References
- Braude, P., Pickering, S., Flinter, F., & Ogilvie, C. M. (2002).Preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Nature Reviews Genetics, 3, 941–953.
- Edwards, J. (2000). Born and bred: idioms of kinship and new reproductive technologies in England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Edwards, J., Franklin, S., Price, F., Hirsch, E., & Strathern, M. (1993). Technologies of procreation: kinship in the age of assisted conception. Manchester: University of Manchester Press.
- Edwards, J., Franklin, S., Price, F., Hirsch, E., & Strathern, M. (1999). Technologies of procreation: kinship in the age of assisted conception. (2nd edn). London and New York: Routledge.
- Finkler, K. (2000). Experiencing the new genetics: family and kinship on the medical frontier. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
- Franklin, S., & Roberts, C. (forthcoming) Born and Made: An ethnography of preimplantation genetic diagnosis, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Franklin, S., & Roberts, C. (2002). Definitions of Genetic Knowledge in the Context of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis: An ethnographic study. End of Award Report, ESRC Project L218252036.
- Franklin, S. (1994). Embodied Progress: a cultural account of assisted conception. London and New York: Routledge.
- Handyside, A. H., Kontogianni, E. H., Hardy, K., & Winston, R.M.L. (1990). Pregnancies from biopsied human preimplantation embryos sexed by Y-specific DNA amplification. Nature (London), 344, 768–770.
- Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority/Advisory Committee on Genetic Testing (1999). Consultation Document on Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis, Http://www.hfea.gov.uk/pgd/ pgdpaper.pdf.
- Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority/Human Genetics Commission (2002). Outcome of the Public Consultation on Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis, www.hfea.gov.uk.
- Marcus, G. E. (1995). Ethnography in/of the world system: the emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 95– 117.
- Novas, C., & Rose, N. (2000). Genetic risk and the birth of the somatic individual. Economy and Society, 29(4),485–513. Rabinow, P. (1992). Artificiality and enlightenment: from sociobiology to biosociality. In J. Crary, & S. Kwinter (Eds.), Incorporations (pp. 234–252). New York: Zone Books.
- Rapp, R. (1999). Testing women, testing the fetus: the social impact of amniocentesis in America. New York: Routledge.
- Rapp, R., Heath, D., & Taussig, K. (2001). Genealogical disease: where hereditary abnormality, biomedical explanation, and family responsibility meet. In S. Franklin, & S. McKinnon (Eds.), Relative values: reconfiguring kinship studies (pp. 384– 412). Durham: Duke University Press.
- Strathern, M. (1991). The representation of kinship in the context of the new reproductive technologies. End of Award Report, ESRC Project R00023537.
- Thompson, G. (2001). Strategic naturalizing: kinship in an infertility clinic. In S. Franklin, & S. McKinnon (Eds.), Relative values: reconfiguring kinship studies (pp. 175–202). Durham: Duke University Press.