Donor-linking provisions in New Zealand: counselling roles, concerns and needs

References

• Adams, D., & Lorbach, C. (2012). Accessing donor conception information in Australia: A call for retrospective access. Journal of Law and Medicine, 19(4), 707–721.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Advisory Committee on Assisted Reproductive Technology (ACART). (2021). ACART advice and guidelines for gamete and embryo donation and surrogacy. Advisory Committee on Assisted Reproductive Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Allan, S. (2017). Donor conception and the search for information. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Australian and New Zealand Infertility Counsellors Association (ANZICA). (2012). ANZICA Guidelines for professional standards of practice: Donor linking counselling. https://www.fertilitysociety.com.au/memberzone/
   Google Scholar
• Blyth, E., Crawshaw, M., Frith, L., & Jones, C. (2020). Donor conceived people’s views and experiences of their genetic origins: A critical analysis of the research evidence. In K. Beier, C. Brügge, P. Thorn, & C. Wiesemann, (Eds.), Assistierte Reproduktion mit Hilfe Dritter [Third Party Assisted Reproduction] (pp. 361–368). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-60298-0_24
   Google Scholar
• Blyth, E., Crawshaw, M., Frith, L., & van den Akker, O. (2017). Gamete donors’ reasons for, and expectations and experiences of, registration with a voluntary donor linking register. Human Fertility, 20(4), 268–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2017.1292005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bracewell-Milnes, T., Saso, S., Bora, S., Ismail, A., Al-Memar, M., Hamed, A., Abdalla, H., & Thum, M. (2016). Investigating psychosocial attitudes, motivations and experiences of oocyte donors, recipients and egg sharers: A systematic review. Human Reproduction Update, 22(4), 450–465. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmw006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Crawshaw, M., Daniels, K., Adams, D., Bourne, K., van Hooff, J. A. P., Kramer, W., Pasch, L., & Thorn, P. (2015). Emerging models for facilitating contact between people genetically related through donor conception: A preliminary analysis and discussion. Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online, 1(2), 71–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbms.2015.10.001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crawshaw, M., Frith, L., van den Akker, O., & Blyth, E. (2016). Voluntary DNA-based information exchange and contact services following donor conception: An analysis of service users’ needs. New Genetics and Society, 35(4), 372–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/14636778.2016.1253462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawshaw, M., & Marshall, L. (2008). Practice experiences of running UK DonorLink, a voluntary information exchange register for adults related through donor conception. Human Fertility, 11(4), 231–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/14647270801908228
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, K. (2020). The perspective of adult donor conceived persons. In K. Beier, C. Brügge, P. Thorn, & C. Wiesemann, (Eds.), Assistierte Reproduktion mit Hilfe Dritter [Third Party Assisted Reproduction] (pp. 443–459). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-60298-0_29
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, K., Kramer, W., & Perez-y-Perez, M. (2012). Semen donors who are open to contact with their offspring: Issues and implications for them and their families. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 25(7), 670–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.09.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darroch, F., & Smith, I. (2021). Establishing identity: How direct-to-consumer genetic testing challenges the assumption of donor anonymity. Family Court Review, 59(1), 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fertility Associates. (2022). Pathway to a child. Retrieved from: https://www.fertilityassociates.co.nz/pathway-to-a-child-booklet/
   Google Scholar
• Gilman, L., Redhead, C., Hudson, N., Fox, M., Nordqvist, P., MacCallum, F., Kirkman-Brown, J., & Frith, L. (2024). Direct-to-consumer genetic testing and the changing landscape of gamete donor conception: Key issues for practitioners and stakeholders. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 48(1), 103421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.103421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goedeke, S., Daniels, K., & Thorpe, M. (2016). Embryo donation and counselling for the welfare of donors, recipients, their families and children. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 31(2), 412–418. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dev304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goedeke, S., Gamble, H., & Thurlow, R. (2023). Extended families? Contact expectations and experiences of egg donors donating to previously unknown recipients. Human Fertility, 26(6), 1519–1529. https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2023.2292592
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grethel, M., Lewis, J., Freeman, R., & Stone, C. (2023). Discovery of unexpected paternity after direct-to-consumer DNA testing and its impact on identity. Family Relations, 72(4), 2022–2038. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, R., Fanning-Randall, M., Bloxham, O., Turner, S., Chan, E., Howe, K., Wilson, S., & Robinson, P. (2021). Gaping holes in law covering info for donor-conceived people. Stuff. https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/opinion/125225832/gaping-holes-in-law-covering-info-for-donorconceived-people
   Google Scholar
• Hertz, R., Nelson, M., & Kramer, W. (2015). Sperm donors describe the experience of contact with their donor-conceived offspring. Facts, Views & Vision – Issues in Obstetrics. Facts, Views & Vision in ObGyn, 7(2), 91–100.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Human Assisted Reproductive Technology (HART) Act 2004. (2004). https://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/2004/009
   Google Scholar
• Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA). (2023). Support and intermediary service. https://www.hfea.gov.uk/donation/finding-out-about-your-donor/support-and-intermediary-service/
   Google Scholar
• Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA). (2024). Minutes of the Authority meeting on 24 January 2024. https://www.hfea.gov.uk/media/gr4pkbtr/2024-01-24-minutes-of-authority-meeting.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Indekeu, A., Bolt, S., & Maas, A. (2022). Meeting multiple same-donor offspring: psychosocial challenges. Human Fertility, 25(4), 677–687. https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2021.1872804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indekeu, A., Maas, A., McCormick, E., Benward, J., & Scheib, J. (2021). Factors associated with searching for people related through donor conception among donor-conceived people, parents, and donors: A systematic review. F&S Reviews, 2(2), 93–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xfnr.2021.01.003
   Google Scholar
• Indekeu, A., Prinsen, C., & Maas, A. (2023). Lessons from 10 years’ experience running the Fiom KID-DNA database, a voluntary DNA-linking register for donor-conceived people and donors in The Netherlands. Human Fertility, 26(5), 1164–1172. https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2022.2144772
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jadva, V., Freeman, T., Kramer, W., & Golombok, S. (2011). Sperm and oocyte donors’ experiences of anonymous donation and subsequent contact with their donor offspring. Human Reproduction, 26(3), 638–645. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deq364
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, F., Dempsey, D., & Frew, C. (2019). The donor-linking practices of Australian fertility clinics. Journal of Law and Medicine, 27(2), 355–368.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kirkman-Brown, J., Calhaz-Jorge, C., Dancet, E. A. F., Lundin, K., Martins, M., Tilleman, K., Thorn, P., Vermeulen, N., & Frith, L, ESHRE Working Group on Reproductive Donation. (2022). Good practice recommendations for information provision for those involved in reproductive donation†. Human Reproduction Open, 2022(1), hoac001. https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoac001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pasch, L. (2018). New realities for the practice of egg donation: a family-building perspective. Fertility and Sterility, 110(7), 1194–1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.08.055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodino, I., Chester, H., Harris, M., & Maslin-Prothero, S. (2015). A qualitative study exploring counselling for release of information to participants of a donor-assisted conception programme. Human Fertility, 18(2), 134–140. https://doi.org/10.3109/14647273.2014.992982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Te Kāwanatanga o Aotearoa/New Zealand Government. (2022). Find a sperm or egg donor or a donor-conceived child. https://www.govt.nz/browse/family-and-whanau/fertility-issues-and-assisted-reproduction/finding-a-child-or-parent-on-the-sperm-and-egg-donor-list/
   Google Scholar
• Te Tari Taiwhenua/Department of Internal Affairs Press Release. 3000th donor-conceived child’s record added to HART register. Te Tari Taiwhenua/Department of Internal Affairs. https://www.dia.govt.nz/press.nsf/d77da9b523f12931cc256ac5000d19b6/2b6c23ce05d212c5cc2587f10010cde9!OpenDocument
   Google Scholar
• Trail, R., & Goedeke, S. (2022). The experience of single mothers by choice (choice mothers) making early contact with open-identity or private sperm donors in New Zealand. In R. Shaw (Ed.), Reproductive Citizenship: Health, Technology and Society (pp. 179–201). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-9451-6_8
   Google Scholar
• Victorian Assisted Reproductive Treatment Authority (VARTA). (2023). 2023 annual report. https://www.varta.org.au/resources/annual-reports
   Google Scholar