283
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

‘Beneficiary-Ownership’? Redemptive Knowledge and Policy-Making on Migration in West Africa

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Adamson, F. B., and G. Tsourapas. 2019. Migration diplomacy in world politics. International Studies Perspectives 20 (2):113–28. doi:10.1093/isp/eky015.
  • Adler-Nissen, R., and A. Drieschova. 2019. Track-change diplomacy: Technology, affordances, and the practice of international negotiations. International Studies Quarterly 63 (3):531–45. doi:10.1093/isq/sqz030.
  • Aguillon, M.-D. 2020. La fabrique de la politique migratoire sénégalaise: concevoir, négocier, contester. Anthropologie et Développement 51 (Décembre):51–67. doi:10.4000/anthropodev.957.
  • Altai Consulting/IOM Nigeria. October 2016. Identification mission to support the development of migration profiles in West Africa. Report shared in person after interview (on file with corresponding author).
  • Ashutosh, I., and A. Mountz. 2011. Migration management for the benefit of whom? Interrogating the work of the International Organization for migration. Citizenship Studies 15 (1):21–38. doi:10.1080/13621025.2011.534914.
  • Bakewell, O. 2008. Research beyond the categories: The importance of policy irrelevant research into forced migration. Journal of Refugee Studies 21 (4):432–53. doi:10.1093/jrs/fen042.
  • Barnett, M. N., and M. Finnemore. 1999. The politics, power, and pathologies of international organizations. International Organization 53 (4):699–732. doi:10.1162/002081899551048.
  • Bartels, I. 2022. The International Organization for Migration in North Africa: Making International Migration management. London: Routledge.
  • Bisong, A. 2019. Trans-regional institutional cooperation as multilevel governance: ECOWAS migration policy and the EU. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 45 (8):1294–309. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2018.1441607.
  • Bradley, M. 2020. The International Organization for Migration: Challenges, commitments, complexities. global institutions. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
  • Bradley, M. 2022. Colonial continuities and colonial unknowing in international migration management: The international Organization for migration reconsidered. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 49 (1):22–42. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2022.2127407.
  • Bradley, M., C. Costello, and A. Sherwood. 2023. IOM unbound? Obligations and accountability of the International Organization for Migration in an era of expansion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Constantinou, C. M. 2013. Between statecraft and humanism: Diplomacy and its forms of knowledge. International Studies Review 15 (2):141–62. doi:10.1111/misr.12037.
  • Constantinou, C. M., P. Kerr, and P. Sharp. 2016. The sage handbook of diplomacy. London: Sage.
  • Constantinou, C. M., and F. McConnell. 2023. On the right to diplomacy: Historicizing and theorizing delegation and exclusion at the United Nations. International Theory 15 (1):53–78. doi:10.1017/S1752971922000045.
  • Czaika, M., H. de Haas, and M. Villares‐Varela. 2018. The global evolution of travel visa regimes. Population & Development Review 44 (3):589–622. doi:10.1111/padr.12166.
  • Dini, S. 2018. Migration management, capacity building and the sovereignty of an African state: International Organization for migration in Djibouti. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 44 (10):1691–705. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2017.1354058.
  • Duffield, M. 2007. Development, territories, and people: Consolidating the external sovereign frontier. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 32 (2):225–46. doi:10.1177/030437540703200204.
  • Finnemore, M., and M. N. Barnett. 2004. Rules for the world: International organizations in global politics. New York: Cornell University Press.
  • Frowd, P. M. 2018. Developmental borderwork and the International Organization for Migration. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 44 (10):1656–72. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2017.1354046.
  • Geiger, M., and A. Pecoud, eds. 2020. The International Organization for Migration: The new ‘UN Migration Agency’ in critical perspective. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Green, B., and A. Pécoud 2022. How does the UN talk about human mobility? A textual analysis of narratives by IOM and UNHCR on migrants and refugees. Toronto Met University Working paper 22/7https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Antoine-Pecoud/publication/363367146_How_does_the_UN_talk_about_human_mobility_A_textual_analysis_of_narratives_by_IOM_and_UNHCR_on_migrants_and_refugees/links/6319c3a7071ea12e361a4ee6/How-does-the-UN-talk-about-human-mobility-A-textual-analysis-of-narratives-by-IOM-and-UNHCR-on-migrants-and-refugees.pdf [ accessed 22 Sept 2022]
  • Guild, E., and S. Grant 2017. Migration governance in the UN: What is the global compact and what does it mean? Queen Mary School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No 252/2017 https://ssrn.com/abstract=2895636 [accessed July 2022]
  • Guild, E., G. Stefanie, and G. Kees. 2020. Unfinished business: The IOM and migrants’ human rights. The international organization for migration: the new ‘un migration agency’ in critical perspective. In The International Organization for Migration, International political economy series, ed. M. Geiger and A. Pecoud, pp. 29–51. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Hammar, T, G. Brochmann, K. Tamas, and T. Faist, eds. 2021. International migration, immobility and development: Multidisciplinary perspectives. London: Routledge.
  • Hesse, B. 2004. Im/plausible deniability: racism’s conceptual double bind. Social Identities 10 (1):9–29. doi:10.1080/1350463042000190976.
  • Howarth, D. 2000. Discourse. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  • IOM (December 2019) Strategic Vision: Setting a Course for IOM (C/110/INF/1). accessed July 2022 https://publications.iom.int/books/strategic-vision-setting-course-iom
  • IOM. Geneva, 3 March 2022. IOM and AU Sign New 3-Year Agreement to Strengthen Migration Policies and Frameworks in Africa. Accessed September 22 2022. https://www.iom.int/news/iom-and-au-sign-new-3-year-agreement-strengthen-migration-policies-and-frameworks-africa
  • Kabbanji, L. 2013. Towards a global agenda on migration and development? Evidence from Senegal: Migration and development in Senegal. Population, Space and Place 19 (4):415–29. doi:10.1002/psp.1782.
  • Kamau, M., P. Chasek, and D. O’Connor. 2018. Transforming Multilateral Diplomacy. London: Routledge.
  • Kamwengo, C. 2020. Beneficiary country ownership and the politics of partnership in trilateral development cooperation: A case study of Zambia. Doctoral dissertation, Durham University.
  • Laclau, E. 2014. The rhetorical foundations of society. London: Verso.
  • Marchart, O. 2014. Institution and dislocation: Philosophical roots of Laclau’s discourse theory of space and antagonism. Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory 15 (3):271–82. doi:10.1080/1600910X.2014.966272.
  • Mbembe, A. 2021. Out of the dark night: Essays on decolonizatio.N. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Mbembe, A., and L. Chauvet. 2020. Afropolitanism. Nka: Journal of Contemporary African Art 46 (May):56–61. doi:10.1215/10757163-8308174.
  • Merlingen, M. 2003. Governmentality: Towards a Foucauldian framework for the study of IGOs. Cooperation and Conflict 38 (4):361–84. doi:10.1177/0010836703384002.
  • OECD. 2012. The busan partnership for effective development cooperation. Accessed March 11 2023.https://www.oecd.org/dac/effectiveness/Busan%20partnership.pdf.
  • Oelgemöller, C. 2011. ‘Transit’ and ‘suspension’: Migration management or the metamorphosis of asylum-seekers into ‘illegal’immigrants. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 37 (3):407–24. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2011.526782.
  • Opondo, S. O. 2010. Decolonizing diplomacy: Reflections on African Estrangement and exclusion. In Sustainable Diplomacies, C. M. Constantinou and J. DerDerian, eds pp. 109–27. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Panafrican News Agency. Dakar, 19 October 2000. Africa: OAU, IOM to Co-Operate on International Migration. Accessed September 22 2022. https://allafrica.com/stories/200010190345.html
  • Pécoud, A. 2017. De la ‘gestion’ au contrôle des migrations? Discours et pratiques de l’Organization Internationale pour les migrations. Critique internationale 76 (3):81–99. doi:10.3917/crii.076.0081.
  • Pécoud, A. 2018. What do we know about the International Organization for Migration? Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 44 (10):1621–38. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2017.1354028.
  • Pécoud, A. 2020. Introduction: The international organization for migration as the new ‘UN migration agency. In The International Organization for Migration, International political economy series, ed. M. Geiger and A. Pécoud, pp. 1–27. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Perrin, D. 2020. Dynamiques juridiques et politiques autour des mobilités en Afrique méditerranéenne et sahélienne: inspirations, ambitions et contraintes. Migrations Société 1 (179):75–89. doi:10.3917/migra.179.0075.
  • Pratt, M. L. 2008. Imperial eyes: Travel writing and transculturation. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.
  • Robinson, C. 2018. Making migration knowable and governable: Benchmarking practices as technologies of global migration governance. International Political Sociology 12 (4):418–37. doi:10.1093/ips/oly020.
  • Roos, C., F. Trauner, I. Adam, and Florian Trauner. and Ilke Adam. 2023. Bureaucratic migration politics in West Africa: Opportunities and dependencies created by EU funding. International Migration Review 58 (1):296–318. doi:10.1177/01979183221142775.
  • Rother, S. 2019. The global forum on migration and development as a venue of state socialisation: A stepping stone for multi-level migration governance? Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 45 (8):1258–74. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2018.1441605.
  • Şahin, M. Z. 2021. Governing practices and strategic narratives for Syrian refugee returns. Journal of Refugee Studies 34 (3):2804–26. doi:10.1093/jrs/feaa121.
  • Schriever, S. June 2022. Translating discursive frames into normative practices: The case of UNHCR and IOM’s role in climate migration governance. Conference Paper, Paris
  • Serban, I. D. 2021. The European Union: From a complex adaptive system to a policy interpreter. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 59 (2):388–403. doi:10.1111/jcms.13095.
  • Singler, S. 2021. Biometric statehood, transnational solutionism and security devices: The performative dimensions of the IOM’s MIDAS. Theoretical Criminology 25 (3):454–73. doi:10.1177/13624806211031245.
  • Soukouna, S. 2020. L’État Malien entre négociations et résistances dans la formulation de politiques sure les migrations. Anthropologie et Développement 51 (Décembre):69–84. doi:10.4000/anthropodev.966.
  • Stengel, F. A., and D. Nabers. 2019. Symposium: The contribution of Laclau’s discourse theory to international relations and international political economy introduction. New Political Science 41 (2):248–62. doi:10.1080/07393148.2019.1596683.
  • UN. Charter of the United Nations. Accessed September 22 2022. https://www.un.org/en/about-us/un-charter
  • UN. Department of Economic and Social Affairs (Sustainable Development) Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development ( A/RES/70/1). Accessed September 22 2022.https://undocs.org/en/A/RES/70/1.
  • UNGA. 2018. New York declaration (A/RES/71/1) and global compact for safe, Orderly and regular migration (A/RES/73/195). Accessed September 22 2022. https://refugeesmigrants.un.org/migration-compact.
  • Ziegelmayer, U. 2020. Les migrations au Sénégal : besoin d’une vision sociétale et d’humaniser la question plutôt que d’une criminalisation et d’une rhétorique de la peur Perspectives. Dakar: Heinrich Boell Stiftung. Accessed September 22 2022. https://sn.boell.org/fr/2020/12/14/les-migrations-au-senegal-besoin-dune-vision-societale-et-dhumaniser-la-question-plutot.