In vitro comparison of contemporary radiographic imaging techniques for the measurement of inter-radicular width

References

• Barr JH, Grøn P. Palate contour as a limiting factor in intraoral x-ray technique. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1959; 12: 459–472. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(59)90057-X
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baumgaertel SJ, Palomo M, Hans MG. Reliability and accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography dental measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2009; 136: 19–25. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.09.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkfellner WP, Solar A, Gahleitner K, Huber F, Kainberger J, Kettenbach P, et al. In vitro assessment of a registration protocol for image guided implant dentistry. Clin Oral Implan Res 2001; 12: 69–78. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012001069.x
   Google Scholar
• Brezniak NS, Goren R, Zoizner T, Shochat A, Dinbar A, Wasserstein M, et al. The accuracy of the cementoenamel junction identification on periapical films. Angle Orthod 2004; 74: 496–500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks SL. CBCT dosimetry: orthodontic considerations. Semin Orthod 2009; 8: 45–51.
   Google Scholar
• De Vos WJ, Casselman G, Swennen L. Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillof Surg 2009; 38: 609–625. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2009.02.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Waard OF, Rangel A, Fudalej P, Bronkhorst EM, Kuijpers-Jagtman J, Breuning KH. Reproducibility and accuracy of linear measurements on dental models derived from cone-beam computed tomography compared with digital dental casts. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2014; 146: 328–336. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.05.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Figueroa MA, Raboud DW, Lam EW, Heo F, Major P. Effect of buccolingual root angulation on the mesiodistal angulation shown on panoramic radiographs. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2008; 134: 93–99. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.07.034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gher ME, Richardson A. The accuracy of dental radiographic techniques used for evaluation of implant fixture placement. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1995; 15: 268–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haring JM, Jansen L. Dental Radiology: Principles and Techniques. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders. 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Jin JY, Ren L, Liu Q, Kim J, Wen N, Guan H, et al. Combining scatter reduction and correction to improve image quality in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Med Phys 2010; 37: 5634–5644. doi: 10.1118/1.3497272
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund H, Gröndahl K. Cone beam computed tomography for assessment of root length and marginal bone level during orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 2010; 80: 466–473. doi: 10.2319/072909-427.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund T, Manson-Hing L. Relations between tooth positions and focal troughs of panoramic machines. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1975a; 40: 285–293. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(75)90162-0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lund T, Manson-Hing L. A study of the focal troughs of three panoramic dental x-ray machines: Part I. The area of sharpness. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1975b; 39: 318–328. doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(75)90235-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mah J, Danforth KA, Bumann A, Hatcher D. Radiation absorbed in maxillofacial imaging with a new dental computed tomography device. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontol 2003; 96: 508–513. doi: 10.1016/S1079-2104(03)00350-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray D, Whyte A. Dental panoramic tomography: what the general radiologist needs to know. Clin Radiol 2002; 57: 1–7. doi: 10.1053/crad.2001.0826
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens AM, Johal A. Near-end of treatment panoramic radiograph in the assessment of mesiodistal root angulation. Angle Orthod 2008; 78: 475–481. doi: 10.2319/040107-161.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peretz B, Gotler M, Kaffe I. Common errors in digital panoramic radiographs of patients with mixed dentition and patients with permanent dentition. Int J Dent 2012; 6: 45–51.
   Google Scholar
• Periago DR, Scarfe WC, Moshiri M, Scheetz JP, Silveira AM, Farman F. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program. Angle Orthod 2008; 78: 387–395. doi: 10.2319/122106-52.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham DG, Jonasson S, Kiliaridis S. Assessment of trabecular pattern on periapical and panoramic radiographs: a pilot study. Acta Odontol Scand 2010; 68: 91–97. doi: 10.3109/00016350903468235
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rejebian GP. A statistical correlation of individual tooth size distortions on the orthopantomographic radiograph. Am J Orthod 1979; 75: 525–534. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(79)90071-X
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sameshima GT, Asgarifar KR. Assessment of root resorption and root shape: periapical vs panoramic films. Angle Orthod 2001; 71: 185–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarfe WC, Farman AF. What is cone-beam CT and how does it work? Dent Clin N Am 2008; 52: 707–730. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2008.05.005
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schiff TJ, D'Ambrosio BJ, Glass R, Langlais P, McDavid WD. Common positioning and technical errors in panoramic radiography. J Am Dent Assoc 1986; 113: 422–426. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1986.0212
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SedentexCT. Radiation radiation protection:cone beam CT for dental and maxillofacial radiology: evidence based guidelines, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Sherrard JF, Rossouw PE, Benson BW, Carrillo R, Buschang P. Accuracy and reliability of tooth and root lengths measured on cone-beam computed tomographs. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2010; 137: S100–S108. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.03.040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stramotas SJ, Geenty P, Darendeliler M, Byloff F, Berger J, Petocz P. The reliability of crown–root ratio, linear and angular measurements on panoramic radiographs. Clin Orthod Res 2010; 3: 182–191. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0544.2000.030404.x
   Google Scholar
• Stramotas SJ, Geenty P, Petocz A, Darendeliler M. Accuracy of linear and angular measurements on panoramic radiographs taken at various positions in vitro. Eur J Orthod 2000; 24: 43–52. doi: 10.1093/ejo/24.1.43
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarazona-Álvarez PJ, Romero-Millán D, Peñarrocha-Oltra M, Fuster-Torres B. Comparative study of mandibular linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography and digital calipers. J Clin Exp Dent 2010; 6: e271–278.
   Google Scholar
• White S, Pharoah MJ. The evolution and application of dental maxillofacial imaging modalities. Dent Clin North Am 2008; 52: 689–705. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2008.05.006
   PubMedGoogle Scholar