References
- Action on Hearing Loss. 2011. Hearing matters.
- Brown, C.A., Bacon, S.P. 2009. Achieving electric-acoustic benefit with a modulated tone. Ear and hearing, 30(5): 489–493. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181ab2b87
- Gifford, R.H., Dorman, M. F., Skarzynski, H., Lorens, A., Polak, M., Driscoll, C.L. et al. 2013. Cochlear implantation with hearing preservation yields significant benefit for speech recognition in complex listening environments. Ear and hearing, 34(4): 413–425. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31827e8163
- Helbig, S., Van de Heyning, P., Kiefer, J., Baumann, U., KleinePunte, A., Brockmeier, H. et al. 2011. Combined electric acoustic stimulation with the PULSARCI(100) implant system using the FLEX(EAS) electrode array. Acta oto-laryngologica, 131(6): 585–595. doi: 10.3109/00016489.2010.544327
- Irving, S., Gillespie, L., Richardson, R., Rowe, D., Fallon, J. B., Wise, A. K. 2014. Electroacoustic stimulation: now and into the future. BioMed research international, 2014, p.350504
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Technology Appraisal Guidance. 2009. Cochlear implants for children and adults with severe to profound deafness. NICE technology appraisal guidance [TAG166]. [accessed 29 January 2016]. Available from: http://www.nice.org.uk/ta166.
- Skarzynski, H., van de Heyning, P., Agrawal, S., Arauz, S. L., Atlas, M., Baumgartner, W. et al. 2013. Towards a consensus on a hearing preservation classification system. Acta oto-laryngologica, Supplementum, 133(564): 3–13. doi: 10.3109/00016489.2013.869059
- Talbot, K.N., Hartley, D.E.H. 2008. Combined electro-acoustic stimulation: a beneficial union? Clinical Otolaryngology, 33(6): 536–545. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2008.01822.x