Publication Cover
Cochlear Implants International
An Interdisciplinary Journal for Implantable Hearing Devices
Volume 18, 2017 - Issue 5
254
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original articles

The effects of early auditory-based intervention on adult bilateral cochlear implant outcomes

References

  • AGBell Academy for Listening and Spoken Language. n.d. About the certification. Washington, DC: Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing. Available from: www.listeningandspokenlanguage.org/AcademyDocument.aspx?id=541.
  • Au, K.K., Jin, H., Hui, Y., Wei, L. 2001. [Speech discrimination with bilateral cochlear implants in noisy conditions]. Chung Hua Erh Pi Yen Hou Ko Tsa Chih. Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, 36(6): 433–435.
  • Baumgartner, W.D., Jappel, A., Frei, K., Stach, M., Eckl-Dorna, J., Hamzavi, J. 2004. Bilateral cochlear implantation – 9 year results. International Congress Series, 1273: 459–461. doi: 10.1016/j.ics.2004.08.097
  • Bertoli, S., Probst, R., Bodmer, D. 2011. Late auditory evoked potentials in elderly long-term hearing-aid users with unilateral or bilateral fittings. Hearing Research, 280(1): 58–69. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2011.04.013
  • Brennan-Jones, C.G., White, J., Rush, R.W., Law, J. 2014. Auditory-verbal therapy for promoting spoken language development in children with permanent hearing impairments. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3: 1–23.
  • Coez, A., Zilbovicius, M., Ferrary, E., Bouccara, D., Mosnier, I., Ambert-Dahan, E., et al. 2008. Cochlear implant benefits in deafness rehabilitation: PET study of temporal voice activations. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 49(1): 60–67. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.107.044545
  • Dettman, S., Wall, E., Constantinescu, G., Dowell, R. 2013. Communication outcomes for groups of children using cochlear implants enrolled in auditory-verbal, aural-oral, and bilingual-bicultural early intervention programs. Otology & Neurotology, 34(3): 451–459. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3182839650
  • Dingemanse, J.G., Goedegebure, A. 2015. Application of noise reduction algorithm ClearVoice in cochlear implant processing: effects on noise tolerance and speech intelligibility in noise in relation to spectral resolution. Ear and Hearing, 36(3): 357–367. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000125
  • Dorman, M.F., Dahlstrom, L. 2004. Speech understanding by cochlear-implant patients with different left- and right-ear electrode arrays. Ear and Hearing, 25(2): 191–194. doi: 10.1097/01.AUD.0000120367.70123.9A
  • Dornan, D., Hickson, L., Murdoch, B., Houston, T. 2009. Longitudinal study of speech perception, speech, and language for children with hearing loss in an AVT program. The Volta Review, 109(2–3): 61–85.
  • Eriks-Brophy, A. 2004. Outcomes of auditory-verbal therapy: a review of the evidence and a call for action. The Volta Review, 104(1): 21–36.
  • Estabrooks W. 1994. Auditory-verbal therapy for parents and professionals. Washington, DC: Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing.
  • Etymotic Research Labs. 2005. BKB-SIN™ Speech-in-Noise Test Version 1.03. [CD] Elk Grove Village, IL: Etymotic Research.
  • Freidmann, D.R., Green, J., Fang, Y., Ensor, K., Roland, J.T., Waltzman, S.B. 2015. Sequential bilateral cochlear implantation in the adolescent population. The Laryngoscope, 125(8): 1952–1958. doi: 10.1002/lary.25293
  • Galvin, K.L., Hughes, K.C., Mok, M. 2010. Can adolescents and young adults with prelingual hearing loss benefit from a second, sequential cochlear implant. International Journal of Audiology, 49(5): 368–377. doi: 10.3109/14992020903470767
  • Gil, D., Iorio, M.C.M. 2010. Formal auditory training in adult hearing aid users. Clinics, 65(2): 165–174. doi: 10.1590/S1807-59322010000200008
  • Isaiah, A., Hartley, D.E. 2015. Can training extend current guidelines for cochlear implant candidacy? Neural Regeneration Research, 10(5): 718. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.156964
  • Jeffs, E., Redfern, K., Stanfield, C., Starczewski, H., Stone, S., Twomey, T., Fortnum, H. 2015. A pilot study to explore the experiences of congenitally or early profoundly deafened candidates who receive cochlear implants as adults. Cochlear Implants International, 16(6): 312–320. doi: 10.1179/1754762815Y.0000000011
  • Kaplan, D.M., Shipp, D.B., Chen, J.M., Ng, A.H.C., Nedzelski, J.M. 2003. Early-deafened adult cochlear implant users: assessment of outcomes. The Journal of Otolaryngology, 32(4): 245–249. doi: 10.2310/7070.2003.41601
  • Kühn-Inacker, H., Shehata-Dieler, W., Müller, J., Helms, J. 2004. Bilateral cochlear implants: a way to optimize auditory perception abilities in deaf children? International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 68: 1257–1266. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2004.04.029
  • Moog, J.S. 2000. Auditory-oral education: teaching deaf children to talk. Audiology Online. Available from: http://www.audiologyonline.com/articles/auditory-oral-education-teaching-deaf-1248.
  • Moog, J. 2007. The auditory-oral approach. In: Schwartz S, (ed.) Choices in deafness: a parent's guide to communication options, 3rd ed. Bethedsa, MD: Woodbine House, p. 131–158.
  • Musiek, F., Daniels, S. 2010. Central auditory mechanisms associated with cochlear implantation: an overview of selected studies and comment. Cochlear Implants International, 11(Suppl. 1): 15–28. doi: 10.1179/146701010X12671178390753
  • National Institutes of Health (1995). Cochlear implants in adults and children. NIH Consensus Statement, 13: 1–30.
  • Nishimura, H., Doi, K., Iwaki, T., Hashikawa, K., Oku, N., Teratani, T., et al. 2000. Neural plasticity detected in short-and long-term cochlear implant users using PET. Neuroreport, 11(4): 811–815. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200003200-00031
  • Nopp, P., Schleich, P., D'Haese, P. 2004. Sound localization in bilateral users of MED-EL COMBI 40/40+ cochlear implants. Ear and Hearing, 25(3): 205–214. doi: 10.1097/01.AUD.0000130793.20444.50
  • Oosthuizen, I., Swanepoel, D.W., van Dijk, C. 2012. Speech-perception-in-noise and bilateral spatial abilities in adults with delayed sequential cochlear implantation. South African Journal of Communication Disorders, 59(1): 45–52. doi: 10.4102/sajcd.v59i1.21
  • Pantev, C., Dinnesen, A., Ross, B., Wollbrink, A., Knief, A. 2006. Dynamics of auditory plasticity after cochlear implantation: a longitudinal study. Cerebral Cortex, 16(1): 31–36. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhi081
  • Ramsden, R., Greenham, P., O'Driscoll, M., Mawman, D., Proops, D., Craddock, L., et al. 2005. Evaluation of bilaterally implanted adult subjects with the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system. Otology and Neurotology, 26(5): 988–998. doi: 10.1097/01.mao.0000185075.58199.22
  • Rhoades, E.A. 2006. Research outcomes of auditory-verbal intervention: is the approach justified? Deafness & Education International, 8(3): 125–143. doi: 10.1179/146431506790560157
  • Santarelli, R., De Filippi, R., Genovese, E., Arslan, E. 2008. Cochlear implantation outcome in prelingually deafened young adults: a speech perception study. Audiology & Neurotology, 13(4): 257–265. doi: 10.1159/000115435
  • Santos, R.B.F., Marangoni, A.T., Andrade, A.N.D., Prestes, R., Gil, D. 2014. Effects of auditory training in individuals with high-frequency hearing loss. Clinics, 69(12): 835–840. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2014(12)08
  • Schramm, D., Fitzpatrick, E., Séguin, C. 2002. Cochlear implantation for adolescents and adults with prelinguistic deafness. Otology & Neurotology, 23(5): 698–703. doi: 10.1097/00129492-200209000-00016
  • Sharma, A., Gilley, P.M., Martin, K., Roland, P., Bauer, P., Dorman, M. 2007. Simultaneous versus sequential bilateral implantation in young children: effects on central auditory system development and plasticity. Audiological Medicine, 5: 218–223. doi: 10.1080/16513860701659479
  • Strelnikov, K., Marx, M., Lagleyre, S., Fraysse, B., Deguine, O., Barone, P. 2015. PET-imaging of brain plasticity after cochlear implantation. Hearing Research, 322: 180–187. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2014.10.001
  • Summerfield, A.Q., Barton, G.R., Toner, J., McAnallen, C., Proops, D., Harries, C., et al. 2006. Self-reported benefits from successive bilateral cochlear implantation in post-lingually deafened adults: randomised controlled trial. International Journal of Audiology, 45(Suppl. 1): S99–S107. doi: 10.1080/14992020600783079
  • Teoh, S.W., Pisoni, D.B., Miyamoto, R.T. 2004. Cochlear implantation in adults with prelingual deafness Part II. Underlying constraints that affect audiological outcomes. The Laryngoscope, 114(9): 1714–1719. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200410000-00007
  • Tremblay, K., Kraus, N., McGee, T., Ponton, C., Otis, B. 2001. Central auditory plasticity: changes in the N1-P2 complex after speech-sound training. Ear and Hearing, 22(2): 79–90. doi: 10.1097/00003446-200104000-00001
  • van Hoesel, R.J.M., Tyler, R.S. 2003. Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113(3): 1617–1630. doi: 10.1121/1.1539520
  • Wackym, C.L., Runge-Samuelson, C.L., Firszt, J.B., Alkaf, F.M., Burg, L.S. 2007. More challenging speech-perception tasks demonstrate binaural benefit in bilateral cochlear implant users. Ear and Hearing, 28(2): 80S–85S. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3180315117
  • Wolfe, J., Baker, S., Caraway, T., Kasulis, H., Mears, A., Smith, J., et al. 2007. 1-year postactivation results for sequentially implanted bilateral cochlear implant users. Otology and Neurotology, 28(5): 589–596. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318067bd24
  • Wright, B. 2014, June 29. Improving auditory skills through training. Presented at the Research Symposium at the Alexander Graham Bell Convention in Orlando, FL.
  • Yoon, Y.S., Li, Y., Kang, H.Y., Fu, Q.J. 2011. The relationship between binaural benefit and difference in unilateral speech recognition performance for bilateral cochlear implant users. International Journal of Audiology, 50(8): 554–565. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2011.580785
  • Yoshida, H., Kanda, Y., Miyamoto, I., Fukuda, T., Takahashi, H. 2008. Cochlear implantation on prelingually deafened adults. Auris Nasus Larynx, 35(3): 349–352. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2007.10.003
  • Zhang, M., Hill, M., Boyd, A. 2014. A case series report: prelingually deaf cochlear implant users and factors associated with outcomes. Universal Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2(1): 25–34.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.