The effect of cross-over frequency on binaural hearing performance of adults using electric-acoustic stimulation

References

• Adunka, O. F., Pillsbury, H.C., Adunka, M. C., Buchman, C.A. 2010. Is electric acoustic stimulation better than conventional cochlear implantation for speech perception in quiet? Otology and Neurotology, 31(7): 1049–1054. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181d8d6fe
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akeroyd, M. A. 2006. The psychoacoustics of binaural hearing. International Journal of Audiology, 45, 25–33. doi: 10.1080/14992020600782626
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumann, U., Mocka, M. 2017. Impact of the overlap region between acoustic and electric stimulation. Laryngo-rhino-otologie, 96(6): 361–373. doi:10.1055/s-0042-117639
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brockmeier, S. J., Peterreins, M, Lorens, A., Vermeire, K., Helbig, S., Anderson, I., et al. 2010. Music perception in electric acoustic stimulation users as assessed by the Mu.S.I.C. test. Advances In Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 67: 70–80. doi: 10.1159/000262598
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Büchner, A., Schüssler, M., Battmer, R. D., Stöver, T., Lesinski-Schiedat, A., Lenarz, T. 2009. Impact of low-frequency hearing. Audiology and Neurotology, 14(1): 8–13. doi: 10.1159/000206490
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busby , P.A., Arora, K. 2016. Effects of Threshold Adjustment on Speech Perception in Nucleus Cochlear Implant Recipients. Ear and Hearing, 37: 303–311. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ching, T.Y.C., Dillon, H., Byrne, D. 1998. Speech recognition of hearing-impaired listeners: Predictions from audibility and the limited role of high-frequency amplification. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 103(2): 1128–1140 doi: 10.1121/1.421224
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ching, T.Y.C., Hill, M., & Dillon, H. 2008. Effect of variations in hearing-aid frequency response on real-life functional performance of children with severe or profound hearing loss. International Journal Of Audiology, 47(8): 461–475. doi: 10.1080/14992020802116128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ching, T.Y.C., Incerti, P., Plant, K. 2015. Electric-acoustic stimulation: for whom, in which ear, and how. Cochlear Implant International, 16 (1): 12–15. doi: 10.1179/1467010014Z.000000000225
   Google Scholar
• Ching, T.Y.C., Psarros, C., Hill, M., Dillon, H., Incerti, P. 2001. Should children who use cochlear implants wear hearing aids in the opposite ear?. Ear and Hearing, 22(5): 365–380. doi: 10.1097/00003446-200110000-00002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawes, P., Munro, K. J. 2017. Auditory distraction and acclimatization to hearing aids. Ear and Hearing, 38: 174–183. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, P. W., Hersbach, A. A., Swanson, B. A. 2013. An adaptive Australian sentence test in noise (Austin). Ear and Hearing, 34(5): 592–600. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31828576fb
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhanasingh, A. and Jolly, C. 2017. An overview of cochlear implant electrode array designs. Hearing Research, 356: 93–103. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.10.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon, H 2012. Hearing Aids, 2nd ed. Sydney, New York: Boomerang Press : Thieme.
   Google Scholar
• Dorman, M. F. and Gifford, R. H., Spahr, A. J., McKarns, S. A. 2008. The benefits of combining acoustic and electric stimulation for the recognition of speech, voice and melodies. Audiology and Neurootology, 13(2): 105–112. doi: 10.1159/000111782
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driver, S. and Stark, E. 2010. Real life outcomes for adult EAS patients and adult traditional CI patients. Cochlear Implants International, 11(3): 113–118. doi: 10.1179/146701010X12726366068256
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, C. C., Perreau, A., Gantz, B., Tyler, R.S. 2010. Benefits of localization and speech perception with multiple noise sources in listeners with a short-electrode cochlear implant. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 21: 44–51. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.21.1.6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erixon, E., and, Rask-Andersen, H. 2015. Hearing and patient satisfaction among 19 patients who received implants intended for hybrid hearing: A two-year follow-up. Ear and Hearing, 36(5): 271–278. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000171
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francart, T. and McDermott, H. J. 2013. Psychophysics, fitting, and signal processing for combined hearing aid and cochlear implant stimulation. Ear And Hearing, 34(6): 685–700. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31829d14cb
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraysse, B., MacÃas, Ã. R., Sterkers, O., Burdo, S., Ramsden R, Deguine, O., et al. 2006. Residual hearing conservation and electroacoustic stimulation with the Nucleus 24 Contour Advance cochlear implant. Otology and Neurotology, 27(5): 624–633. doi: 10.1097/01.mao.0000226289.04048.0f
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gantz, B. J., Hansen, M. R., Turner, C. W., Oleson , J. J., Reiss, L. A., Parkinson, A. J. 2009. Hybrid 10 clinical trial: preliminary results. Audiology and Neurotology, 14(1): 32–38. doi: 10.1159/000206493
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gatehouse, S., Noble, W. 2004. The speech, Spatial and Qualities of hearing scale (SSQ). International Journal Of Audiology, 43(2): 85–99. doi: 10.1080/14992020400050014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gfeller, K., C. Turner, Oleson, J., Zhang, Z., Gantz, B., Froman, R., et al. 2007. Accuracy of cochlear implant recipients on pitch perception, melody recognition, and speech reception in noise. Ear and Hearing, 28(3): 412–423. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3180479318
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gifford, R. H., Davis, T.; Sunderhaus, L., Menapace, C.; Buck, B., Crosson, J.; O’Neill, L. 2017. Combined electric and acoustic stimulation With hearing preservation: effect of Cochlear implant Low-frequency Cutoff on speech understanding and perceived listening difficulty. Ear and Hearing, 38(5): 539–553. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000418
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gifford, R. H., Dorman, M. F., Skarzynski, H., Lorens, A., Polak, M., Driscoll, C. L. W., et al. 2013. Cochlear implantation with hearing preservation yields significant benefit for speech recognition in complex listening environments. Ear and Hearing, 34(4): 413–425. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31827e8163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gifford, R. H., Grantham, D. W., Sheffield, S.W., Davis, T.J., Dwyer, R., Dorman, M.F. 2014. Research paper: localization and interaural time difference (ITD) thresholds for cochlear implant recipients with preserved acoustic hearing in the implanted ear. Hearing Research, 312: 28–37. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2014.02.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gstoettner, W. K., Van de Heyning, P., Fitzgerald O'Connor. A, Kiefer, J., Morera, C., Sainz, M., et al. 2011. Assessment of the subjective benefit of electric acoustic stimulation with the Abbreviated Profile of hearing Aid benefit. ORL; Journal for Oto-rhino-laryngology and Its Related Specialties, 73(6): 321–329. doi: 10.1159/000331917
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gstoettner, W. K., Van de Heyning, P., Fitzgerald O'Connor, A., Morera, C., Sainz, M., Vermeire, K., et al. 2008. Electric acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: results of a multi-centre investigation. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 128(9): 968–975. doi: 10.1080/00016480701805471
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helbig, S., Van de Heyning, P., Kiefer, J., Baumann, U., Kleine-Punte, A., Brockmeier, H., et al. 2011. Combined electric acoustic stimulation with the PULSARCI(100) implant system using the FLEX(EAS) electrode array. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 131(6):1–11. doi: 10.3109/00016489.2010.544327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan, C. and Turner, C. 1998. High-frequency audibility: benefits for hearing-impaired listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 104(1): 432–441. doi: 10.1121/1.423247
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Incerti, P. V., Ching, T. Y. C., Cowan, R. 2013. A systematic review of electric-acoustic stimulation: device fitting ranges, outcomes, and clinical fitting practices, Trends in Amplification, 17(1): 3–24. doi: 10.1177/1084713813480857
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Incerti, P. V., Ching, T. Y. C., Cowan, R. 2014. Electric-acoustic stimulation in adults: localization and speech perception. Cochlear Implants International, 15 (1): 17–20. doi: 10.1179/1467010014Z.000000000161
   Google Scholar
• Irving, S., Wise, A. K., Millard, R. E.; Shepherd, R. K., Fallon, J. B. 2014. A partial hearing animal model for chronic electro-acoustic stimulation. Journal of Neural Engineering, 11(4): 046008–. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/11/4/046008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, C. J., Fraysse, B., Deguine, O., Lenarz, T., Mawman, D., Ramos, A., et al. 2006. Combined electroacoustic stimulation in conventional candidates for Cochlear Implantation. Audiology and Neurotology, 11(1): 57–62. doi: 10.1159/000095615
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jurawitz, M.C., Büchner, A., Harpel, T., Schüssler, M., Majdani, O., Lesinski-Schiedat, A., et al.. 2014. Hearing preservation outcomes with different Cochlear implant electrodes: Nucleus® Hybrid™-L24 and Nucleus Freedom™ CI422. Audiology and Neuro-Otology, 19(5): 293–309. doi: 10.1159/000360601
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karsten, S.A., Turner, C.W., Brown, C.J., Joen, E. K., Abbas, J., Gantz, B.J. 2013. Optimising the combination of acoustic and electric hearing in the implanted ear. Ear and Hearing, 34(2): 142–150. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318269ce87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiefer, J., Pok, M., Adunka, O., Stürzebecher, E., Baumgartner, W., Schmidt, M., et al. 2005. Combined electric and acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: results of a clinical study. Audiology and Neuro-Otology, 10(3): 134–144. doi: 10.1159/000084023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenarz, T., James, C., Cuda, D., O'Connor, F., Frachet, B., Frijns, J., et al. 2013. European multi-centre study of the Nucleus Hybrid L24 cochlear implant. International Journal of Audiology, 52(12): 838–848. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2013.802032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loiselle, L. H., Dorman, M. F., Yost, W.A., Cook, S.J., Gifford, R.H. 2016. Using ILD or ITD cues for sound source localization and speech understanding in a complex listening environment by listeners with bilateral and with hearing-preservation cochlear implants. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 59: 810–818. doi: 10.1044/2015_JSLHR-H-14-0355
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorens, A., Polak, M., Piotrowska, P., Skarzynski H. 2008. Outcomes of Treatment of Partial Deafness With Cochlear Implantation: A DUET study. The Laryngoscope, 118(2): 288–294. doi: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e3181598887
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, C., Abbas, P., Robinson, B., Nourski, K., Zhang, F., Jeng, F. 2009. Auditory nerve fiber responses to combined acoustic and electric stimulation. Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 10(3): 425–445. doi: 10.1007/s10162-008-0154-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research 2007 (Updated 2018). The National Health and Medical Research Council, the Australian Research Council and Universities Australia. Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra National Health and Medical Research Council. [cited 2019 Mar 18]. Available from: https://nhmrc.gov.au/aboutus/publications/national-statement-ethical-conduct-human-research-2007-updated-2018
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, S., Cloutier, F., Philippon, D., Côté, M., Bussières, R., Backous, D., 2016. Outcomes review of modern hearing preservation technique in cochlear implant. Auris, Nasus, Larynx, 43(5):485–488. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2016.02.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nourski, K. V., Abbas, P. J., Miller, C. A., Robinson, B.K., Jeng, F. 2007. Acoustic–electric interactions in the Guinea pig auditory nerve: Simultaneous and forward masking of the electrically evoked compound action potential. Hearing Research, 232(1), 87–103. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2007.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plant, K., L. Babic 2016. Utility of bilateral acoustic hearing in combination with electrical stimulation provided by the cochlear implant. International Journal of Audiology, 55:S1–S8. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2016.1178857
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polak, M., Lorens, A., Helbig, S., McDonald, S., McDonald, S., Vermeire, K. 2010. Fitting of the hearing system affects partial deafness cochlear implant performance. Cochlear Implants International, 11(2): 1117–1121.
   Google Scholar
• Roland, J, Gantz, B., Waltzman, S., Parkinson, A., Roland, J. T. 2016. United States multicenter clinical trial of the cochlear nucleus hybrid implant system. The Laryngoscope, 126(1): 175–181. doi: 10.1002/lary.25451
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, A., McDermott, H. J., Dowell, R. C., Sucher, C., Briggs, R. J. S. 2009. Comparison of two frequency-to-electrode maps for acoustic-electric stimulation. International Journal of Audiology, 48(2): 63–73. doi: 10.1080/14992020802452184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skarzynski, H., Lorens, A., Matusiak, M., Porowski, M., Skarzynski, P. H., James, C. 2014. Cochlear implantation with the nucleus slim straight electrode in subjects with residual low-frequency hearing. Ear And Hearing, 2(35): e33–e43. doi:10.1097/01.aud.0000444781.15858.f1
   Google Scholar
• van Hoesel, R.M.Litovsky, R.Y. 2011. Statistical bias in the assessment of binaural benefit relative to the better ear. Journal Of The Acoustical Society Of America, 130(6): 4082–4088. doi: 10.1121/1.3652851
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Hoesel, R., Ramsden, R., O'Driscoll, M. 2002. Sound-direction identification, interaural time delay discrimination, and speech intelligibility advantages in noise for a bilateral cochlear implant user. . Ear and Hearing , 23(2): 137–149. doi: 10.1097/00003446-200204000-00006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermeire, K., Anderson, I., Flynn, M., Van de Heyning, P. 2008. The influence of different speech processor and hearing aid settings on speech perception outcomes in electric acoustic stimulation patients. Ear and Hearing, 29(1): 76–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vollmer, M., Beitel, R.E., Snyder, R.L., Leake, P.A. 2007. Spatial selectivity to intracochlear electrical stimulation in the inferior colliculus is degraded after long-term deafness in cats. Journal of Neurophysiology, 98(5): 2588–2603. doi: 10.1152/jn.00011.2007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J., Schafer, E. C. 2015. Programming cochlear implants. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, T., Dorman, M.F., Spahr, A.J. 2010. Information from the voice fundamental frequency (F0) region accounts for the majority of the benefit when acoustic stimulation is added to electric stimulation. Ear and Hearing, 31(1): 63–69. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181b7190c
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar