Bioengineering and regeneration of gastrointestinal tissue: where are we now and what comes next?

References

• Sanders KM, Koh SD, Ro S, et al. Regulation of gastrointestinal motility—insights from smooth muscle biology. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;9(11):633.
   Google Scholar
• Kiela PR, Ghishan FK. Physiology of intestinal absorption and secretion. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2016;30(2):145–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Flier LG, Clevers H. Stem cells, self-renewal, and differentiation in the intestinal epithelium. Annu Rev Physiol. 2009;71:241–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goto Y, Kiyono H. Epithelial barrier: an interface for the cross‐communication between gut flora and immune system. Immunol Rev. 2012;245(1):147–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander J, Ganta VC, Jordan P, et al. Gastrointestinal lymphatics in health and disease. Pathophysiology. 2010;17(4):315–335.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nakatsu H, Ueno T, Oga A, et al. Influence of mesenchymal stem cells on stomach tissue engineering using small intestinal submucosa. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2015;9(3):296–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin HH, Dunn JC. Small intestinal submucosa seeded with intestinal smooth muscle cells in a rodent jejunal interposition model. J Surg Res. 2011;171(1):e21–e26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walthers CM, Lee M, Wu BM, et al. Smooth muscle strips for intestinal tissue engineering. PloS one. 2014;9(12):e114850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghavan S, Bitar KN. The influence of extracellular matrix composition on the differentiation of neuronal subtypes in tissue engineered innervated intestinal smooth muscle sheets. Biomaterials. 2014;35(26):7429–7440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hao MM, Young HM. Development of enteric neuron diversity. J Cell Mol Med. 2009;13(7):1193–1210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders KM, Koh SD, Ward SM. Interstitial cells of Cajal as pacemakers in the gastrointestinal tract. Annu Rev Physiol. 2006;68:307–343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Micci MA, Kahrig KM, Simmons RS, et al. Neural stem cell transplantation in the stomach rescues gastric function in neuronal nitric oxide synthase–deficient mice. Gastroenterology. 2005;129(6):1817–1824.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hotta R, Stamp LA, Foong JP, et al. Transplanted progenitors generate functional enteric neurons in the postnatal colon. J Clin Invest. 2013;123(3):1182–1191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu W, Wu R, Dong Y, et al. Neuroepithelial stem cells differentiate into neuronal phenotypes and improve intestinal motility recovery after transplantation in the aganglionic colon of the rat. Neurogastroenterol Motility. 2007;19(12):1001–1009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger M, Caldwell C, Barlow AJ, et al. Enteric nervous system stem cells derived from human gut mucosa for the treatment of aganglionic gut disorders. Gastroenterology. 2009;136(7):2214–2225. e3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger M, Bareiss PM, Danker T, et al. Expansion and differentiation of neural progenitors derived from the human adult enteric nervous system. Gastroenterology. 2009;137(6):2063–2073.e4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anitha M, Joseph I, Ding X, et al. Characterization of fetal and postnatal enteric neuronal cell lines with improvement in intestinal neural function. Gastroenterology. 2008;134(5):1424–1435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almond S, Lindley RM, Kenny SE, et al. Characterisation and transplantation of enteric nervous system progenitor cells. Gut. 2007;56(4):489–496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghavan S, Gilmont RR, Bitar KN. Neuroglial differentiation of adult enteric neuronal progenitor cells as a function of extracellular matrix composition. Biomaterials. 2013;34(28):6649–6658.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakhem E, Rego SL, Raghavan S, et al. The appendix as a viable source of neural progenitor cells to functionally innervate bioengineered gastrointestinal smooth muscle tissues. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2015;4(6):548–554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rego SL, Raghavan S, Zakhem E, et al. Enteric neural differentiation in innervated, physiologically functional, smooth muscle constructs is modulated by bone morphogenic protein 2 secreted by sphincteric smooth muscle cells. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2017;11(4):1251–1261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrana NE, Lavalle P, Dokmeci MR, et al. Engineering functional epithelium for regenerative medicine and in vitro organ models: a review. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2013;19(6):529–543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paz AC, Soleas J, Poon JC, et al. Challenges and opportunities for tissue-engineering polarized epithelium. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2013;20(1):56–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohki T, Yamato M, Murakami D, et al. Treatment of oesophageal ulcerations using endoscopic transplantation of tissue-engineered autologous oral mucosal epithelial cell sheets in a canine model. Gut. 2006;55(12):1704–1710.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macheiner T, Kuess A, Dye J, et al. A novel method for isolation of epithelial cells from ovine esophagus for tissue engineering. Biomed Mater Eng. 2014;24(2):1457–1468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shabafrooz V, Mozafari M, Köhler GA, et al. The effect of hyaluronic acid on biofunctionality of gelatin–collagen intestine tissue engineering scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2014;102(9):3130–3139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costello CM, Hongpeng J, Shaffiey S, et al. Synthetic small intestinal scaffolds for improved studies of intestinal differentiation. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2014;111(6):1222–1232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu J, Peng S, Luo D, et al. In vitro 3D human small intestinal villous model for drug permeability determination. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2012;109(9):2173–2178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Gunasekara DB, Reed MI, et al. A microengineered collagen scaffold for generating a polarized crypt-villus architecture of human small intestinal epithelium. Biomaterials. 2017;128:44–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi B, Shim KY, Ha SK, et al. Three-dimensional in vitro gut model on a villi-shaped collagen scaffold. BioChip J. 2017;11(3):219–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walthers CM, Nazemi AK, Patel SL, et al. The effect of scaffold macroporosity on angiogenesis and cell survival in tissue-engineered smooth muscle. Biomaterials. 2014;35(19):5129–5137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somara S, Gilmont RR, Dennis RG, et al. Bioengineered internal anal sphincter derived from isolated human internal anal sphincter smooth muscle cells. Gastroenterology. 2009;137(1):53–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecker L, Baar K, Dennis RG, et al. Development of a three-dimensional physiological model of the internal anal sphincter bioengineered in vitro from isolated smooth muscle cells. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2005;289(2):G188–G196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gwyther TA, Hu JZ, Billiar KL, et al. Directed cellular self-assembly to fabricate cell-derived tissue rings for biomechanical analysis and tissue engineering. J vis exp. 2011 57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raghavan S, Lam MT, Foster LL, et al. Bioengineered three-dimensional physiological model of colonic longitudinal smooth muscle in vitro. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2010;16(5):999–1009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi H, Shimizu T, Nakayama M, et al. The use of anisotropic cell sheets to control orientation during the self-organization of 3D muscle tissue. Biomaterials. 2013;34(30):7372–7380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakase Y, Hagiwara A, Nakamura T, et al. Tissue engineering of small intestinal tissue using collagen sponge scaffolds seeded with smooth muscle cells. Tissue Eng. 2006;12(2):403–412.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Franck D, Chung YG, Coburn J, et al. In vitro evaluation of bi-layer silk fibroin scaffolds for gastrointestinal tissue engineering. J Tissue Eng. 2014;5:2041731414556849.
   Google Scholar
• Sjöqvist S, Jungebluth P, Lim ML, et al. Experimental orthotopic transplantation of a tissue-engineered oesophagus in rats. Nat Commun. 2014;5:4562.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakhem E, Raghavan S, Gilmont RR, et al. Chitosan-based scaffolds for the support of smooth muscle constructs in intestinal tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2012;33(19):4810–4817.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakhem E, Raghavan S, Bitar KN. Neo-innervation of a bioengineered intestinal smooth muscle construct around chitosan scaffold. Biomaterials. 2014;35(6):1882–1889.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakhem E, Bitar KN. Development of chitosan scaffolds with enhanced mechanical properties for intestinal tissue engineering applications. J Funct Biomater. 2015;6(4):999–1011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakhem E, Elbahrawy M, Orlando G, et al. Successful implantation of an engineered tubular neuromuscular tissue composed of human cells and chitosan scaffold. Surgery. 2015;158(6):1598–1608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakhem E, El Bahrawy M, Orlando G, et al. Biomechanical properties of an implanted engineered tubular gut‐sphincter complex. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2017;11(12):3398–3407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakhem E, Tamburrini R, Orlando G, et al. Transplantation of a human tissue-engineered bowel in an athymic rat model. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2017;23(11):652–660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ju YM, San Choi J, Atala A, et al. Bilayered scaffold for engineering cellularized blood vessels. Biomaterials. 2010;31(15):4313–4321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown BN, Badylak SF. Extracellular matrix as an inductive scaffold for functional tissue reconstruction. Transl Res. 2014;163(4):268–285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crapo PM, Gilbert TW, Badylak SF. An overview of tissue and whole organ decellularization processes. Biomaterials. 2011;32(12):3233–3243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badylak SF, Taylor D, Uygun K. Whole-organ tissue engineering: decellularization and recellularization of three-dimensional matrix scaffolds. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2011;13:27–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert TW, Sellaro TL, Badylak SF. Decellularization of tissues and organs. Biomaterials. 2006;27(19):3675–3683.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown BN, Valentin JE, Stewart-Akers AM, et al. Macrophage phenotype and remodeling outcomes in response to biologic scaffolds with and without a cellular component. Biomaterials. 2009;30(8):1482–1491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badylak S, Meurling S, Chen M, et al. Resorbable bioscaffold for esophageal repair in a dog model. J Pediatr Surg. 2000;35(7):1097–1103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doede T, Bondartschuk M, Joerck C, et al. Unsuccessful alloplastic esophageal replacement with porcine small intestinal submucosa. Artif Organs. 2009;33(4):328–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang ZQ, Watanabe Y, Toki A. Experimental assessment of small intestinal submucosa as a small bowel graft in a rat model. J Pediatr Surg. 2003;38(11):1596–1601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badylak SF, Hoppo T, Nieponice A, et al. Esophageal preservation in five male patients after endoscopic inner-layer circumferential resection in the setting of superficial cancer: a regenerative medicine approach with a biologic scaffold. Tissue Eng Part A. 2011;17(11–12):1643–1650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieponice A, Ciotola FF, Nachman F, et al. Patch esophagoplasty: esophageal reconstruction using biologic scaffolds. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;97(1):283–288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badylak SF, Valentin JE, Ravindra AK, et al. Macrophage phenotype as a determinant of biologic scaffold remodeling. Tissue Eng Part A. 2008;14(11):1835–1842.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieponice A, Gilbert TW, Johnson SA, et al. Bone marrow–derived cells participate in the long-term remodeling in a mouse model of esophageal reconstruction. J Surg Res. 2013;182(1):e1–e7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diemer P, Markoew S, Le DQS, et al. Poly-ε-caprolactone mesh as a scaffold for in vivo tissue engineering in rabbit esophagus. Dis Esophagus. 2015;28(3):240–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyazawa M, Aikawa M, Watanabe Y, et al. Extensive regeneration of the stomach using bioabsorbable polymer sheets. Surgery. 2015;158(5):1283–1290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araki M, Tao H, Sato T, et al. Development of a new tissue‐engineered sheet for reconstruction of the stomach. Artif Organs. 2009;33(10):818–826.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng Q, Lee BLP, Komvopoulos K, et al. Plasma surface chemical treatment of electrospun poly (L-lactide) microfibrous scaffolds for enhanced cell adhesion, growth, and infiltration. Tissue Eng Part A. 2013;19(9–10):1188–1198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravichandran R, Venugopal JR, Sundarrajan S, et al. Composite poly-L-lactic acid/poly-(α, β)-DL-aspartic acid/collagen nanofibrous scaffolds for dermal tissue regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C. 2012;32(6):1443–1451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang K, Lee JS, Kim J, et al. Polydopamine-mediated surface modification of scaffold materials for human neural stem cell engineering. Biomaterials. 2012;33(29):6952–6964.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hori Y, Nakamura T, Kimura D, et al. Functional analysis of the tissue‐engineered stomach wall. Artif Organs. 2002;26(10):868–872.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denost Q, Adam JP, Pontallier A, et al. Colorectal tissue engineering: a comparative study between porcine small intestinal submucosa (SIS) and chitosan hydrogel patches. Surgery. 2015;158(6):1714–1723.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fatehullah A, Tan SH, Barker N. Organoids as an in vitro model of human development and disease. Nat Cell Biol. 2016;18(3):246–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Rijn JM, Schneeberger K, Wiegerinck CL, et al. Novel approaches: tissue engineering and stem cells–in vitro modelling of the gut. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2016;30(2):281–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi R. Preliminary studies of tissue-engineered intestine using isolated epithelial organoid units on tubular synthetic biodegradable scaffolds. Transplant Proc. 1997;29:848–851.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huch M, Dorrell C, Boj SF, et al. In vitro expansion of single Lgr5+ liver stem cells induced by Wnt-driven regeneration. Nature. 2013;494(7436):247–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spence JR, Mayhew CN, Rankin SA, et al. Directed differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells into intestinal tissue in vitro. Nature. 2011;470(7332):105–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato T, Vries RG, Snippert HJ, et al. Single Lgr5 stem cells build crypt-villus structures in vitro without a mesenchymal niche. Nature. 2009;459(7244):262–265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ootani A, Li X, Sangiorgi E, et al. Sustained in vitro intestinal epithelial culture within a Wnt-dependent stem cell niche. Nat Med. 2009;15(6):701–706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jabaji Z, Brinkley GJ, Khalil HA, et al. Type I collagen as an extracellular matrix for the in vitro growth of human small intestinal epithelium. PloS one. 2014;9(9):e107814.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buske P, Przybilla J, Loeffler M, et al. On the biomechanics of stem cell niche formation in the gut–modelling growing organoids. FEBS J. 2012;279(18):3475–3487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gjorevski N, Sachs N, Manfrin A, et al. Designer matrices for intestinal stem cell and organoid culture. Nature. 2016;539(7630):560–564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grikscheit TC, Ogilvie JB, Ochoa ER, et al. Tissue-engineered colon exhibits function in vivo. Surgery. 2002;132(2):200–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grikscheit TC, Ochoa ER, Ramsanahie A, et al. Tissue-engineered large intestine resembles native colon with appropriate in vitro physiology and architecture. Ann Surg. 2003;238(1):35–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yip HYK, Tan CW, Hirokawa Y, et al. Colon organoid formation and cryptogenesis are stimulated by growth factors secreted from myofibroblasts. PloS one. 2018;13(6):e0199412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grikscheit TC, Siddique A, Ochoa ER, et al. Tissue-engineered small intestine improves recovery after massive small bowel resection. Ann Surg. 2004;240(5):748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sala FG, Kunisaki SM, Ochoa ER, et al. Tissue-engineered small intestine and stomach form from autologous tissue in a preclinical large animal model. J Surg Res. 2009;156(2):205–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grikscheit T, Srinivasan A, Vacanti JP. Tissue-engineered stomach: a preliminary report of a versatile in vivo model with therapeutic potential. J Pediatr Surg. 2003;38(9):1305–1309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grikscheit T, Ochoa ER, Srinivasan A, et al. Tissue-engineered esophagus: experimental substitution by onlay patch or interposition. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;126(2):537–544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spurrier RG, Speer AL, Hou X, et al. Murine and human tissue-engineered esophagus form from sufficient stem/progenitor cells and do not require microdesigned biomaterials. Tissue Eng Part A. 2014;21(5–6):906–915.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maemura T, Ogawa K, Shin M, et al. Assessment of tissue-engineered stomach derived from isolated epithelium organoid units. Transplant Proc. 2004;36:1595–1599. Elsevier.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maemura T, Kinoshita M, Shin M, et al. Assessment of a tissue‐engineered gastric wall patch in a rat model. Artif Organs. 2012;36(4):409–417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin DE, Barthel ER, Speer AL, et al. Human tissue-engineered small intestine forms from postnatal progenitor cells. J Pediatr Surg. 2013;48(1):129–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant CN, Mojica SG, Sala FG, et al. Human and mouse tissue-engineered small intestine both demonstrate digestive and absorptive function. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2015;308(8):G664–G677.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMarco RL, Su J, Yan KS, et al. Engineering of three-dimensional microenvironments to promote contractile behavior in primary intestinal organoids. Integr Biol (Camb). 2014;6(2):127–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Zhou W, Roh T, et al. In vitro enteroid-derived three-dimensional tissue model of human small intestinal epithelium with innate immune responses. PloS one. 2017;12(11):e0187880.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Workman MJ, Mahe MM, Trisno S, et al. Engineered human pluripotent-stem-cell-derived intestinal tissues with a functional enteric nervous system. Nat Med. 2017;23(1):49–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bein A, Shin W, Jalili-Firoozinezhad S, et al. Microfluidic organ-on-a-chip models of human intestine. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;5(4):659–668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatia SN, Ingber DE. Microfluidic organs-on-chips. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32(8):760–772.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huh D, Kim HJ, Fraser JP, et al. Microfabrication of human organs-on-chips. Nat Protoc. 2013;8(11):2135–2157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefebvre DE, Venema K, Gombau L, et al. Utility of models of the gastrointestinal tract for assessment of the digestion and absorption of engineered nanomaterials released from food matrices. Nanotoxicology. 2015;9(4):523–542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim HJ, Ingber DE. Gut-on-a-chip microenvironment induces human intestinal cells to undergo villus differentiation. Integr Biol (Camb). 2013;5(9):1130–1140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasendra M, Tovaglieri A, Sontheimer-Phelps A, et al. Development of a primary human small intestine-on-a-chip using biopsy-derived organoids. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):2871.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang Y, Ahmad AA, Sims CE, et al. In vitro generation of colonic epithelium from primary cells guided by microstructures. Lab Chip. 2014;14(9):1622–1631.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huh D, Torisawa Y-S, Hamilton GA, et al. Microengineered physiological biomimicry: organs-on-chips. Lab Chip. 2012;12(12):2156–2164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim HJ, Huh D, Hamilton G, et al. Human gut-on-a-chip inhabited by microbial flora that experiences intestinal peristalsis-like motions and flow. Lab Chip. 2012;12(12):2165–2174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosberg A, Nesmith AP, Goss JA, et al. Muscle on a chip: in vitro contractility assays for smooth and striated muscle. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods. 2012;65(3):126–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang B, Montgomery M, Chamberlain MD, et al. Biodegradable scaffold with built-in vasculature for organ-on-a-chip engineering and direct surgical anastomosis. Nat Mater. 2016;15(6):669–678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Rodriguez R, Munoz-Berbel X, Demming S, et al. Cell-based microfluidic device for screening anti-proliferative activity of drugs in vascular smooth muscle cells. Biomed Microdevices. 2012;14(6):1129–1140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim HJ, Li H, Collins JJ, et al. Contributions of microbiome and mechanical deformation to intestinal bacterial overgrowth and inflammation in a human gut-on-a-chip. Proc Nat Acad Sci. 2016;113(1):E7–E15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artursson P, Karlsson J. Correlation between oral drug absorption in humans and apparent drug permeability coefficients in human intestinal epithelial (Caco-2) cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1991;175(3):880–885.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Artursson P. Epithelial transport of drugs in cell culture. I: a model for studying the passive diffusion of drugs over intestinal absorbtive (Caco‐2) cells. J Pharm Sci. 1990;79(6):476–482.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidalgo IJ, Raub TJ, Borchardt RT. Characterization of the human colon carcinoma cell line (Caco-2) as a model system for intestinal epithelial permeability. Gastroenterology. 1989;96(3):736–749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim HJ, Lee J, Choi JH, et al. Co-culture of living microbiome with microengineered human intestinal villi in a gut-on-a-chip microfluidic device. J vis exp. 2016 114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao D, Liu H, Lin JM, et al. Characterization of drug permeability in Caco-2 monolayers by mass spectrometry on a membrane-based microfluidic device. Lab Chip. 2013;13(5):978–985.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imura Y, Asano Y, Sato K, et al. A microfluidic system to evaluate intestinal absorption. Anal Sci. 2009;25(12):1403–1407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ávan der Meer AD, JungáKim H, Ávan der Helm MW, et al. Measuring direct current trans-epithelial electrical resistance in organ-on-a-chip microsystems. Lab Chip. 2015;15(3):745–752.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar