Monitoring safety and use of old and new treatment options for type 2 diabetic patients: a two-year (2013–2016) analysis

References

• Bustacchini S, Corsonello A, Onder G, et al. Pharmacoeconomics and aging. Drugs Aging. 2009;26(Suppl 1):75–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatè E. Adherence to long-term therapies: evidence for action. Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Sixth Health Search report. 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Italian Barometer Diabetes Report 2013. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Defronzo RA. Banting Lecture. From the triumvirate to the ominous octet: a new paradigm for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes. 2009;58:773–795.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Diabetes A. Standards of medical care in diabetes – 2015. Diabetes Care. 2015;38:S1–S93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inzucchi SE. Oral antihyperglycemic therapy for type 2 diabetes: scientific review. JAMA. 2002;287:360–372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nathan DM, Buse JB, Davidson MB, et al. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a consensus algorithm for the initiation and adjustment of therapy: a consensus statement from the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:1963–1972.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey CJ, Tahrani AA, Barnett AH. Future glucose-lowering drugs for type 2 diabetes. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016;4:350–359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drucker DJ, Nauck MA. The incretin system: glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes. Lancet. 2006;368:1696–1705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdul-Ghani MA, Norton L, DeFronzo RA. Renal sodium-glucose cotransporter inhibition in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2015;309:F889–F900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka T, Higashijima Y, Wada T, et al. The potential for renoprotection with incretin-based drugs. Kidney Int. 2014;86:701–711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nauck MA, Kleine N, Orskov C, et al. Normalization of fasting hyperglycaemia by exogenous glucagon-like peptide 1 (7-36 amide) in type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetic patients. Diabetologia. 1993;36:741–744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalra S. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptors agonists (GLP1 RA). J Pak Med Assoc. 2013;63:1312–1315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumiller JJ, Wood L, Campbell RK. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Pharmacotherapy. 2010;30:463–484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson AM, Trujillo JM. Advances in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: impact of dulaglutide. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2016;9:125–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell S. Incretin-based therapies for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a review of direct comparisons of efficacy, safety and patient satisfaction. Int J Clin Pharm. 2013;35:159–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters A. Incretin-based therapies: review of current clinical trial data. Am J Med. 2010;123:S28–S37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonseca VA. New developments in diabetes management: medications of the 21st century. Clin Ther. 2014;36:477–484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnell K, Klarin I. The relationship between number of drugs and potential drug-drug interactions in the elderly: a study of over 600,000 elderly patients from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register. Drug Saf. 2007;30:911–918.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermeire E, Hearnshaw H, Van Royen P, et al. Patient adherence to treatment: three decades of research. A comprehensive review. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2001;26:331–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gellad WF, Grenard JL, Marcum ZA. A systematic review of barriers to medication adherence in the elderly: looking beyond cost and regimen complexity. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2011;9:11–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haynes RB, Ackloo E, Sahota N, et al. Interventions for enhancing medication adherence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;CD000011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leporini C, De Sarro G, Russo E. Adherence to therapy and adverse drug reactions: is there a link? Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2014;13(Suppl 1):S41–S55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Association WM. Declaration of Helsinki - ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. 2013 [cited 2016 Mar 10]. Available from: http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/
   Google Scholar
• Morisky DE, Ang A, Krousel-Wood M, et al. Predictive validity of a medication adherence measure in an outpatient setting. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2008;10:348–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakthong P, Chabunthom R, Charoenvisuthiwongs R. Psychometric properties of the Thai version of the 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale in patients with type 2 diabetes. Ann Pharmacother. 2009;43:950–957.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Qazaz H, Hassali MA, Shafie AA, et al. The eight-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale MMAS: translation and validation of the Malaysian version. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010;90:216–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tandon S, Chew M, Eklu-Gadegbeku CK, et al. Validation and psychometric properties of the 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8) in Type 2 diabetes patients in sub-Saharan Africa. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2015;110:129–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devellis RF. Scale development: theories and applications. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; Philadelphia:Saunders Elsevier; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Gordis L. Epidemiology. 4th ed. 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Julius RJ, Novitsky MA Jr., Dubin WR. Medication adherence: a review of the literature and implications for clinical practice. J Psychiatr Pract. 2009;15:34–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogedegbe G, Chaplin W, Schoenthaler A, et al. A practice-based trial of motivational interviewing and adherence in hypertensive African Americans. Am J Hypertens. 2008;21:1137–1143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claxton AJ, Cramer J, Pierce C. A systematic review of the associations between dose regimens and medication compliance. Clin Ther. 2001;23:1296–1310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bangalore S, Kamalakkannan G, Parkar S, et al. Fixed-dose combinations improve medication compliance: a meta-analysis. Am J Med. 2007;120:713–719.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palleria C, Leporini C, Chimirri S, et al. Limitations and obstacles of the spontaneous adverse drugs reactions reporting: two “challenging” case reports. J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2013;4:S66–S72.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buse JB, Drucker DJ, Taylor KL, et al. DURATION-1: exenatide once weekly produces sustained glycemic control and weight loss over 52 weeks. Diabetes Care. 2010;33:1255–1261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buse JB, Sesti G, Schmidt WE, et al. Switching to once-daily liraglutide from twice-daily exenatide further improves glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes using oral agents. Diabetes Care. 2010;33:1300–1303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buse JB, Rosenstock J, Sesti G, et al. Liraglutide once a day versus exenatide twice a day for type 2 diabetes: a 26-week randomised, parallel-group, multinational, open-label trial (LEAD-6). Lancet. 2009;374:39–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratley R, Nauck M, Bailey T, et al. One year of liraglutide treatment offers sustained and more effective glycaemic control and weight reduction compared with sitagliptin, both in combination with metformin, in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomised, parallel-group, open-label trial. Int J Clin Pract. 2011;65:397–407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell-Jones D, Cuddihy RM, Hanefeld M, et al. Efficacy and safety of exenatide once weekly versus metformin, pioglitazone, and sitagliptin used as monotherapy in drug-naive patients with type 2 diabetes (DURATION-4): a 26-week double-blind study. Diabetes Care. 2012;35:252–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wysham C, Bergenstal R, Malloy J, et al. DURATION-2: efficacy and safety of switching from maximum daily sitagliptin or pioglitazone to once-weekly exenatide. Diabet Med. 2011;28:705–714.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buse JB, Nauck M, Forst T, et al. Exenatide once weekly versus liraglutide once daily in patients with type 2 diabetes (DURATION-6): a randomised, open-label study. Lancet. 2013;381:117–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratley RE, Nauck M, Bailey T, et al. Liraglutide versus sitagliptin for patients with type 2 diabetes who did not have adequate glycaemic control with metformin: a 26-week, randomised, parallel-group, open-label trial. Lancet. 2010;375:1447–1456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blevins T, Pullman J, Malloy J, et al. DURATION-5: exenatide once weekly resulted in greater improvements in glycemic control compared with exenatide twice daily in patients with type 2 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96:1301–1310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergenstal RM, Wysham C, Macconell L, et al. Efficacy and safety of exenatide once weekly versus sitagliptin or pioglitazone as an adjunct to metformin for treatment of type 2 diabetes (DURATION-2): a randomised trial. Lancet. 2010;376:431–439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheen AJ, Charpentier G, Ostgren CJ, et al. Efficacy and safety of saxagliptin in combination with metformin compared with sitagliptin in combination with metformin in adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2010;26:540–549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallwitz B. Emerging DPP-4 inhibitors: focus on linagliptin for type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2013;6:1–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gupta V, Kalra S. Choosing a gliptin. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2011;15:298–308.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pinkney J, Fox T, Ranganath L. Selecting GLP-1 agonists in the management of type 2 diabetes: differential pharmacology and therapeutic benefits of liraglutide and exenatide. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2010;6:401–411.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azoulay L. Incretin-based drugs and adverse pancreatic events: almost a decade later and uncertainty remains. Diabetes Care. 2015;38:951–953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elashoff M, Matveyenko AV, Gier B, et al. Pancreatitis, pancreatic, and thyroid cancer with glucagon-like peptide-1-based therapies. Gastroenterology. 2011;141:150–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raschi E, Piccinni C, Poluzzi E, et al. The association of pancreatitis with antidiabetic drug use: gaining insight through the FDA pharmacovigilance database. Acta Diabetol. 2013;50:569–577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faillie J-L, Babai S, Crépin S, et al. Pancreatitis associated with the use of GLP-1 analogs and DPP-4 inhibitors: a case/non-case study from the French Pharmacovigilance Database. Acta Diabetol. 2014;51:491–497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatarkiewicz K, Smith PA, Sablan EJ, et al. Exenatide does not evoke pancreatitis and attenuates chemically induced pancreatitis in normal and diabetic rodents. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2010;299:E1076–E1086.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matveyenko AV, Dry S, Cox HI, et al. Beneficial endocrine but adverse exocrine effects of sitagliptin in the human islet amyloid polypeptide transgenic rat model of type 2 diabetes: interactions with metformin. Diabetes. 2009;58:1604–1615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nachnani JS, Bulchandani DG, Nookala A, et al. Biochemical and histological effects of exendin-4 (exenatide) on the rat pancreas. Diabetologia. 2010;53:153–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koehler JA, Baggio LL, Lamont BJ, et al. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor activation modulates pancreatitis-associated gene expression but does not modify the susceptibility to experimental pancreatitis in mice. Diabetes. 2009;58:2148–2161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drucker DJ, Sherman SI, Bergenstal RM, et al. The safety of incretin-based therapies–review of the scientific evidence. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96:2027–2031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dore DD, Seeger JD, Arnold Chan K. Use of a claims-based active drug safety surveillance system to assess the risk of acute pancreatitis with exenatide or sitagliptin compared to metformin or glyburide. Curr Med Res Opin. 2009;25:1019–1027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dore DD, Bloomgren GL, Wenten M, et al. A cohort study of acute pancreatitis in relation to exenatide use. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2011;13:559–566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garg R, Chen W, Pendergrass M. Acute pancreatitis in type 2 diabetes treated with exenatide or sitagliptin: a retrospective observational pharmacy claims analysis. Diabetes Care. 2010;33:2349–2354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romley JA, Goldman DP, Solomon M, et al. Exenatide therapy and the risk of pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer in a privately insured population. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2012;14:904–911.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wenten M, Gaebler JA, Hussein M, et al. Relative risk of acute pancreatitis in initiators of exenatide twice daily compared with other anti-diabetic medication: a follow-up study. Diabet Med. 2012;29:1412–1418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eurich DT, Simpson S, Senthilselvan A, et al. Comparative safety and effectiveness of sitagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes: retrospective population based cohort study. BMJ. 2013;346:f2267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funch D, Gydesen H, Tornøe K, et al. A prospective, claims-based assessment of the risk of pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer with liraglutide compared to other antidiabetic drugs. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014;16:273–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giorda CB, Picariello R, Nada E, et al. Incretin therapies and risk of hospital admission for acute pancreatitis in an unselected population of European patients with type 2 diabetes: a case-control study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014;2:111–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faillie J-L, Azoulay L, Patenaude V, et al. Incretin based drugs and risk of acute pancreatitis in patients with type 2 diabetes: cohort study. BMJ. 2014;348:g2780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou H-C, Chen -W-W, Hsiao F-Y. Acute pancreatitis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors: a population-based nested case-control study. Drug Saf. 2014;37:521–528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karagiannis T, Paschos P, Paletas K, et al. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors for treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the clinical setting: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2012;344:e1369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marguet D, Baggio L, Kobayashi T, et al. Enhanced insulin secretion and improved glucose tolerance in mice lacking CD26. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:6874–6879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hühn J, Ehrlich S, Fleischer B, et al. Molecular analysis of CD26-mediated signal transduction in T cells. Immunol Lett. 2000;72:127–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boonacker EP, Wierenga EA, Smits HH, et al. CD26/DPPIV signal transduction function, but not proteolytic activity, is directly related to its expression level on human Th1 and Th2 cell lines as detected with living cell cytochemistry. J Histochem Cytochem. 2002;50:1169–1177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savarese G, Perrone-Filardi P, D’Amore C, et al. Cardiovascular effects of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in diabetic patients: a meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol. 2015;181:239–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu S, Hopper I, Skiba M, et al. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and cardiovascular outcomes: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials with 55,141 participants. Cardiovasc Ther. 2014;32:147–158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scirica BM, Bhatt DL, Braunwald E, et al. Saxagliptin and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1317–1326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Udell JA, Bhatt DL, Braunwald E, et al. Saxagliptin and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and moderate or severe renal impairment: observations from the SAVOR-TIMI 53 Trial. Diabetes Care. 2015;38:696–705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweizer A, Dejager S, Foley JE, et al. Assessing the cardio-cerebrovascular safety of vildagliptin: meta-analysis of adjudicated events from a large Phase III type 2 diabetes population. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2010;12:485–494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansen OE, Neubacher D, von Eynatten M, et al. Cardiovascular safety with linagliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a pre-specified, prospective, and adjudicated meta-analysis of a phase 3 programme. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2012;11:3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fadini GP, Avogaro A, Degli Esposti L, et al. Risk of hospitalization for heart failure in patients with type 2 diabetes newly treated with DPP-4 inhibitors or other oral glucose-lowering medications: a retrospective registry study on 127,555 patients from the Nationwide OsMed Health-DB Database. Eur Heart J. 2015;36:2454–2462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White WB, Cannon CP, Heller SR, et al. Alogliptin after acute coronary syndrome in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1327–1335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sportiello L, Rafaniello C, Scavone C, et al. The importance of pharmacovigilance for the drug safety: focus on cardiovascular profile of incretin-based therapy. Int J Cardiol. 2016;202:731–735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balkrishnan R, Rajagopalan R, Camacho FT, et al. Predictors of medication adherence and associated health care costs in an older population with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a longitudinal cohort study. Clin Ther. 2003;25:2958–2971.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Diabetes A. Standards of medical care in diabetes–2013. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(Suppl 1):S11–S66.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morisky DE, Green LW, Levine DM. Concurrent and predictive validity of a self-reported measure of medication adherence. Med Care. 1986;24:67–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar