Effect of video styles on learner engagement in MOOCs

References

• Alario-Hoyos, C., Muñoz-Merino, P. J., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Delgado Kloos, C., & Parada, G. A. H. (2016). Who are the top contributors in a MOOC? Relating participants’ performance and contributions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32(3), 232–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alemayehu, L., & Chen, H.-L. (2021). Learner and instructor-related challenges for learners’ engagement in MOOCs: A review of 2014–2020 publications in selected SSCI indexed journals. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(5), 3172–3194. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1920430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alemdag, E. (2022). Effects of instructor-present videos on learning, cognitive load, motivation, and social presence: A meta-analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 27(9), 12713–12742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11154-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., Kim, D., & Reschly, A. L. (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the student engagement instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44(5), 427–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, R., Xu, D., Park, J., Yu, R., Li, Q., Cung, B., Fischer, C., Rodriguez, F., Warschauer, M., & Smyth, P. (2020). The benefits and caveats of using clickstream data to understand student self-regulatory behaviors: Opening the black box of learning processes. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00187-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmichael, M., Reid, A.-K., & Karpicke, J. (2018). Assessing the impact of educational video on student engagement, critical thinking and learning: The current state of play. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., Gao, Q., Yuan, Q., & Tang, Y. (2019). Facilitating students’ interaction in MOOCs through timeline-anchored discussion. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(19), 1781–1799. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1574056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, H.-T. M., & Thomas, M. (2020). Effects of lecture video styles on engagement and learning. Educational Technology Research & Development, 68(5), 2147–2164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09757-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C. J., Wong, V. S., Teh, C. S., & Chuah, K. M. (2017). MOOC videos-derived emotions. Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering, 9(2–9), 137–140. https://jtec.utem.edu.my/jtec/article/view/2688
   Google Scholar
• Chorianopoulos, K. (2018). A taxonomy of asynchronous instructional video styles. International Review of Research in Open & Distributed Learning, 19(1), 295–311. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i1.2920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobos, R., & Ruiz-Garcia, J. C. (2021). Improving learner engagement in MOOCs using a learning intervention system: A research study in engineering education. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 29(4), 733–749. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Comer, D. K., Baker, R., & Wang, Y. (2015). Negativity in massive online open courses: Impacts on learning and teaching and how instructional teams may be able to address it. InSight: A Journal of Scholarly Teaching, 10, 92–113. https://doi.org/10.46504/10201508co
   Google Scholar
• Costley, J., & Lange, C. H. (2017). Video lectures in e-learning. Interactive Technology & Smart Education, 14(1), 14–30. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-08-2016-0025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels, L. M., Adams, C., & McCaffrey, A. (2016). Emotional and social engagement in a massive open online course: An examination of Dino 101. In M. P. McCreery (Ed.), Emotions, technology, and learning (pp. 25–41). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dart, S. (2020, December 6–9). Khan-style video engagement in undergraduate engineering: Influence of video duration, content type and course. Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education, Sydney, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Dart, S., & Gregg, A. (2021, December). Know your stuff, show enthusiasm, keep it on message: Factors influencing video engagement in two mechanical engineering courses. Proceedings of the Research in Engineering Education Symposium and Australasian Association for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Deng, R., & Benckendorff, P. (2021). What are the key themes associated with the positive learning experience in MOOCs? An empirical investigation of learners’ ratings and reviews. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00244-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, R., Benckendorff, P., & Gannaway, D. (2019). Progress and new directions for teaching and learning in MOOCs. Computers & Education, 129, 48–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, R., Benckendorff, P., & Gannaway, D. (2020). Learner engagement in MOOCs: Scale development and validation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(1), 245–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, R., & Gao, Y. (2023a). Effects of embedded questions in pre-class videos on learner perceptions, video engagement, and learning performance in flipped classrooms. Active Learning in Higher Education, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/14697874231167098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, R., & Gao, Y. (2023b). A review of eye tracking research on video-based learning. Education and Information Technologies, 28(6), 7671–7702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11486-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, R., & Gao, Y. (2023c). Using learner reviews to inform instructional video design in MOOCs. Behavioral Sciences, 13(4), 330. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13040330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endres, T., Weyreter, S., Renkl, A., & Eitel, A. (2020). When and why does emotional design foster learning? Evidence for situational interest as a mediator of increased persistence. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(4), 514–525. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallego-Romero, J. M., Alario-Hoyos, C., Estévez-Ayres, I., & Delgado Kloos, C. (2020). Analyzing learners’ engagement and behavior in MOOCs on programming with the Codeboard IDE. Educational Technology Research & Development, 68(5), 2505–2528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09773-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, J. A., Oswald, C. A., & Pomerantz, J. (2015). Predictors of retention and achievement in a massive open online course. American Educational Research Journal, 52(5), 925–955. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831215584621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, P. J., Kim, J., & Rubin, R. (2014, March). How video production affects student engagement: An empirical study of MOOC videos. The first ACM conference on learning at scale, Atlanta, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Guzmán-Valenzuela, C., Gómez-González, C., Rojas-Murphy Tagle, A., & Lorca-Vyhmeister, A. (2021). Learning analytics in higher education: A preponderance of analytics but very little learning? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00258-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haensel, J. X., Smith, T. J., & Senju, A. (2022). Cultural differences in mutual gaze during face-to-face interactions: A dual head-mounted eye-tracking study. Visual Cognition, 30(1–2), 100–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2021.1928354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis: Pearson new international edition. Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Hansch, A., McConachie, K., Schmidt, P., Hillers, L., Newman, C., & Schildhauer, T. (2015). The role of video in online learning: Findings from the field and critical reflections. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2577882
   Google Scholar
• Hoi, V. N., & Le Hang, H. (2021). The structure of student engagement in online learning: A bi-factor exploratory structural equation modelling approach. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(4), 1141–1153. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, J., Pi, Z., & Yang, J. (2018). Learning declarative and procedural knowledge via video lectures: Cognitive load and learning effectiveness. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55(1), 74–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2016.1237371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, C., Costley, J., & Lange, C. (2019). The effects of multimedia video lectures on extraneous load. Distance Education, 40(1), 54–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1553559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, H., Zhang, G., Gao, W., & Wang, M. (2020). Big data analytics for MOOC video watching behavior based on Spark. Neural Computing and Applications, 32(11), 6481–6489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-018-03983-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, Y., & Peng, J.-E. (2023). Exploring the relationships between learners’ engagement, autonomy, and academic performance in an English language MOOC. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–26. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2164777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, E., Kim, D., Yoon, M., Park, S., & Oakley, B. (2019). The influence of instructional design on learner control, sense of achievement, and perceived effectiveness in a supersize MOOC course. Computers & Education, 128, 377–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung, Y., & Lee, J. (2018). Learning engagement and persistence in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCS). Computers & Education, 122, 9–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay, R. H. (2012). Exploring the use of video podcasts in education: A comprehensive review of the literature. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 820–831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, G., Coffrin, C., de Barba, P., & Corrin, L. (2015, March). Predicting success: How learners’ prior knowledge, skills and activities predict MOOC performance. 5th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J., Kwon, Y., & Cho, D. (2011). Investigating factors that influence social presence and learning outcomes in distance higher education. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1512–1520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo, T. M., Tsai, C.-C., & Wang, J.-C. (2021). Linking web-based learning self-efficacy and learning engagement in MOOCs: The role of online academic hardiness. The Internet and Higher Education, 51, 100819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100819
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lackmann, S., Léger, P.-M., Charland, P., Aubé, C., & Talbot, J. (2021). The influence of video format on engagement and performance in online learning. Brain Sciences, 11(2), 128. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11020128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lallé, S., & and Conati, C. (2020). A data-driven student model to provide adaptive support during video watching across MOOCs. In I. I. Bittencourt, M. Cukurova, K. Muldner, R. Luckin, & E. Millán, Artificial intelligence in education (pp. 282–295). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52237-7_23
   Google Scholar
• Lange, C., & Costley, J. (2020). Improving online video lectures: Learning challenges created by media. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00190-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lan, M., & Hew, K. F. (2020). Examining learning engagement in MOOCs: A self-determination theoretical perspective using mixed method. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-0179-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. (2018). Effect of uninterrupted time-on-task on students’ success in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). Computers in Human Behavior, 86, 174–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemay, D. J., & Doleck, T. (2022). Predicting completion of Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) assignments from video viewing behavior. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(10), 1782–1793. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1746673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, K. (2019). MOOC learners’ demographics, self-regulated learning strategy, perceived learning and satisfaction: A structural equation modeling approach. Computers & Education, 132, 16–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Q., & Baker, R. (2018). The different relationships between engagement and outcomes across participant subgroups in Massive Open Online Courses. Computers & Education, 127, 41–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majid, S., Khine, W. K. K., Oo, M. Z. C., & Lwin, Z. M. (2012 , November). An analysis of YouTube videos for teaching information literacy skills. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computers and Advanced Technology in Education (ICCAT 2001). Beijing, China.
   Google Scholar
• Manuel, F., Maur, A., Weiser, C., & Winkel, K. (2021). Pre-class video watching fosters achievement and knowledge retention in a flipped classroom. Computers & Education, 179, 104399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maroco, J., Maroco, A. L., Campos, J. A. D. B., & Fredricks, J. A. (2016). University student’s engagement: Development of the University Student Engagement Inventory (USEI). Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 29(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-016-0042-8
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2002). Animation as an aid to multimedia learning. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013184611077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noetel, M., Griffith, S., Delaney, O., Sanders, T., Parker, P., Del Pozo Cruz, B., & Lonsdale, C. (2021). Video improves learning in higher education: A systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 91(2), 204–236. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654321990713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perna, L. W., Ruby, A., Boruch, R. F., Wang, N., Scull, J., Ahmad, S., & Evans, C. (2014). Moving through MOOCs: Understanding the progression of users in massive open online courses. Educational Researcher, 43(9), 421–432. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x14562423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pi, Z., Chen, M., Zhu, F., Yang, J., & Hu, W. (2022). Modulation of instructor’s eye gaze by facial expression in video lectures. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 59(1), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2020.1788410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pi, Z., Xu, K., Liu, C., & Yang, J. (2020). Instructor presence in video lectures: Eye gaze matters, but not body orientation. Computers & Education, 144, 103713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plass, J. L., & Kaplan, U. (2016). Emotional design in digital media for learning. In S. Tettegah & M. Gartmeier (Eds.), Emotions, technology, design, and learning (pp. 131–162). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pursel, B. K., Zhang, L., Jablokow, K. W., Choi, G. W., & Velegol, D. (2016). Understanding MOOC students: Motivations and behaviours indicative of MOOC completion. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32, 202–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero-Rodríguez, L. M., Ramírez-Montoya, M. S., & González, J. R. V. (2019). Gamification in MOOCs: Engagement application test in energy sustainability courses. IEEE Access, 7, 32093–32101. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2019.2903230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruipérez-Valiente, J. A., Staubitz, T., Jenner, M., Halawa, S., Zhang, J., Despujol, I., Maldonado-Mahauad, J., Montoro, G., Peffer, M., Rohloff, T., Lane, J., Turro, C., Li, X., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., & Reich, J. (2022). Large scale analytics of global and regional MOOC providers: Differences in learners’ demographics, preferences, and perceptions. Computers & Education, 180, 104426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104426
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos Espino, J. M., Afonso Suárez, M. D., & González-Henríquez, J. J. (2020). Video for teaching: Classroom use, instructor self-production and teachers’ preferences in presentation format. Technology, Pedagogy & Education, 29(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939x.2020.1726805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos Espino, J. M., Afonso Suárez, M. D., & Guerra Artal, C. (2016). Speakers and boards: A survey of instructional video styles in MOOCs. Technical Communication, 63(2), 101–115. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/stc/tc/2016/00000063/00000002/art00004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanz-Martínez, L., Er, E., Martínez-Monés, A., Dimitriadis, Y., & Bote-Lorenzo, M. L. (2019). Creating collaborative groups in a MOOC: A homogeneous engagement grouping approach. Behaviour & Information Technology, 38(11), 1107–1121. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929x.2019.1571109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semenova, T. (2022). The role of learners’ motivation in MOOC completion. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance & E-Learning, 37(3), 273–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2020.1766434
   Google Scholar
• Seo, K., Dodson, S., Harandi, N. M., Roberson, N., Fels, S., & Roll, I. (2021). Active learning with online video: The impact of learning context on engagement. Computers & Education, 165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, D. (2022). By the numbers: MOOCs in 2021. https://www.classcentral.com/report/mooc-stats-2021/
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K. B. (2002). Typologies, taxonomies, and the benefits of policy classification. Policy Studies Journal, 30(3), 379–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2002.tb02153.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stöhr, C., Stathakarou, N., Mueller, F., Nifakos, S., & McGrath, C. (2019). Videos as learning objects in MOOCs: A study of specialist and non-specialist participants' video activity in MOOCs. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 166–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, Y., Guo, Y., & Zhao, Y. (2020). Understanding the determinants of learner engagement in MOOCs: An adaptive structuration perspective. Computers & Education, 157, 103963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tawfik, A. A., Reeves, T. D., Stich, A. E., Gill, A., Hong, C., McDade, J., Pillutla, V. S., Zhou, X., & Giabbanelli, P. J. (2017). The nature and level of learner–learner interaction in a chemistry Massive Open Online Course (MOOC). Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29(3), 411–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-017-9135-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornhill, S., Asensio, M., & Young, C. (2002). Video streaming: A guide for educational development. JISC Click and Go Video Project.
   Google Scholar
• van Wermeskerken, M., Ravensbergen, S., & van Gog, T. (2018). Effects of instructor presence in video modeling examples on attention and learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 430–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walji, S., Deacon, A., Small, J., & Czerniewicz, L. (2016). Learning through engagement: MOOCs as an emergent form of provision. Distance Education, 37(2), 208–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2016.1184400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J., Antonenko, P., & Dawson, K. (2020). Does visual attention to the instructor in online video affect learning and learner perceptions? An eye-tracking analysis. Computers & Education, 146, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, W., Guo, L., He, L., & Wu, Y. J. (2019). Effects of social-interactive engagement on the dropout ratio in online learning: Insights from MOOC. Behaviour & Information Technology, 38(6), 621–636. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929x.2018.1549595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, W. R., Kim, W., & Watson, S. L. (2016). Learning outcomes of a MOOC designed for attitudinal change: A case study of an Animal Behavior and Welfare MOOC. Computers & Education, 96, 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, X., Saab, N., & Admiraal, W. (2021). Assessment of cognitive, behavioral, and affective learning outcomes in massive open online courses: A systematic literature review. Computers & Education, 163, 104097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, K. E., Martinez, M., Mills, C., D’Mello, S., Smilek, D., & Risko, E. F. (2018). Instructor presence effect: Liking does not always lead to learning. Computers & Education, 122, 205–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, X., Zhu, X., & Chan, F. M. (2023). System design of Pintrich’s SRL in a supervised-PLE platform: A pilot test in higher education. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(2), 683–700. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1802296
   Google Scholar