Students’ appropriation of collaboration script in a networked class: an exploratory study

References

• Aditomo, A., & Reimann, P. (2007). Learning from virtual interaction: A review of research on online synchronous groups. In C. Chinn, G. Erkens, & S. Puntambekar (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (pp. 56–65). International Society of the Learning Sciences, New Brunswick, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Betbeder, M. L., & Tchounikine, P. (2003). Symba: A framework to support collective activities in an educational context. In K. Lee & K. Mitchell (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference on Computers in Education 2003 (pp. 188–196). AACE digital library.
   Google Scholar
• Böttcher, F., & Meisert, A. (2011). Argumentation in science education: A model-based framework. Science & Education, 20(2), 103–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-010-9304-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69909-7_3470-2
   Google Scholar
• Bulgren, J. A., Ellis, J. D., & Marquis, J. G. (2014). The use and effectiveness of an argumentation and evaluation intervention in science classes. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(1), 82–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9452-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, W., Looi, C.-K., & Wen, Y. (2011). A scaffolded software tool for L2 vocabulary learning: GroupScribbles with graphic organizers. In H. Spada, G. Stahl, N. Miyake, & N. Law (Eds.), Proceedings of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) 2011 (Part 1, pp. 414–421). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, W., Pi, Z., Tan, S. H. J., & Lyu, Q. (2022). Preparing pre-service teachers for instructional innovation with ICT via co-design practice. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(5), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, W., Tan, J. S. H., Zhang, S., Pi, Z., & Lyu, Q. (2023). AppleTree system for effective computer-supported collaborative argumentation: An exploratory study. Educational Technology Research & Development. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10258-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. (2009). Active-constructive-interactive: A conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities. Topics in Cognitive Science, 1(1), 73–105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01005.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi, M. T. H., & Wylie, R. (2014). The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 49(4), 219–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.965823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. University of Rochester Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dillenbourg, P., & Hong, F. (2008). The mechanics of CSCL macro scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(1), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-007-9033-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillenbourg, P., Prieto, L. P., & Olsen, J. K. (2018). Classroom Orchestration. In F. Fischer, C. E. Hmelo-Silver, S. R. Goldman, & P. Reimann (Eds.), International Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 180–190). International handbook of the learning sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Dillenbourg, P., & Tchounikine, P. (2007). Flexibility in macro‐scripts for computer‐supported collaborative learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00191.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J., & Stewart, I. (2012). An evaluation of argument mapping as a method of enhancing critical thinking performance in e-learning environments. Metacognition and Learning, 7(3), 219–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-012-9092-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häkkinen, P., & Mäkitalo-Siegl, K. (2007). Educational perspectives on scripting CSCL. In F. Fischer, I. Kollar, H. Mandl, & J. M. Haake (Eds.) Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning. Computer-supported collaborative learning (Vol. 6, pp. 263–271). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-36949-5_15
   Google Scholar
• Heimbuch, S., Ollesch, L., & Bodemer, D. (2018). Comparing effects of two collaboration scripts on learning activities for wiki-based environments. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 13(3), 331–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-018-9283-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heng, L. L., Surif, J., & Seng, C. H. (2015). Malaysian students’ scientific argumentation: Do groups perform better than individuals? International Journal of Science Education, 37(3), 505–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.995147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2020). Applying collaborative cognitive load theory to computer-supported collaborative learning: Towards a research agenda. Educational Technology Research & Development, 68(2), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09729-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P. A., & Erkens, G. (2013). Toward a framework for CSCL research. Educational Psychologist, 48(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.750227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobbe, L., Weinberger, A., Dillenbourg, P., Harrer, A., Hämäläinen, R., Häkkinen, P., & Fischer, F. (2007). Specifying computer-supported collaboration scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(2–3), 211–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-007-9014-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Hesse, F. W. (2006). Collaboration scripts – A conceptual analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 18(2), 159–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9007-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopp, B., & Mandl, H. (2011). Fostering argument justification using collaboration scripts and content scripts. Learning and Instruction, 21(5), 636–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarou, D., Sutherland, R., & Erduran, S. (2016). Argumentation in science education as a systemic activity: An activity-theoretical perspective. International Journal of Educational Research, 79, 150–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y.-H. (2015). Facilitating critical thinking using the C-QRAC collaboration script: Enhancing science reading literacy in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment. Computers & Education, 88, 182–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Y.-R., & Hung, J.-F. (2016). The analysis and reconciliation of students’ rebuttals in argumentation activities. International Journal of Science Education, 38(1), 130–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1134848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, J., & Law, N. (2012). Online peer assessment: Effects of cognitive and affective feedback. Instructional Science, 40(2), 257–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9177-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maor, D. (2007). The cognitive and social processes of university students' online learning. In Proceedings of ASCILITE–Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education Annual Conference 2007 (pp. 611–623). Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education. Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. (2007). Middle school students’ use of appropriate and inappropriate evidence in writing scientific explanations. In M. C. Lovett & P. Shah (Eds.), Thinking with data: The proceedings of the 33rd Carnegie symposium on cognition (pp. 233–265). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Mody, C. (2015). Scientific practice and science education. Science Education, 99(6), 1026–1032. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Näykki, P., Isohätälä, J., Järvelä, S., Pöysä-Tarhonen, J., & Häkkinen, P. (2017). Facilitating socio-cognitive and socio-emotional monitoring in collaborative learning with a regulation macro script – An exploratory study. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 12(3), 251–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-017-9259-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noroozi, O., Weingerger, A., Biemans, H. J. A., Mulder, M., & Chizari, M. (2013). Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction through a transactive discussion script in CSCL. Computers & Education, 61, 59–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.08.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onrubia, J., & Engel, A. (2012). The role of teacher assistance on the effects of a macro-script in collaborative writing tasks. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 7(1), 161–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-011-9125-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radkowitsch, A., Vogel, F., & Fischer, F. (2020). Good for learning, bad for motivation? A meta-analysis on the effects of computer-supported collaboration scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 15(1), 5–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-020-09316-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rau, M. A., Bowman, H. E., & Moore, J. W. (2017). An adaptive collaboration script for learning with multiple visual representations in chemistry. Computers & Education, 109, 38–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheuer, O., McLaren, B. M., Weinberger, A., & Sabine, N. (2014). Promoting critical, elaborative discussions through a collaboration script and argument diagrams. Instructional Science, 42(2), 127–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-013-9274-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, B. B., & Glassner, A. (2007). The role of floor control and of ontology in argumentative activities with discussion-based tools. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(4), 449–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-007-9024-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl, G. (2010). Guiding group cognition in CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(3), 255–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-010-9091-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stegmann, K., Kollar, I., Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2016). Appropriation from a script theory of guidance perspective: A response to Pierre Tchounikine. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 11(3), 371–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-016-9241-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stegmann, K., Wecker, C., Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2012). Collaborative argumentation and cognitive elaboration in a computer-supported collaborative learning environment. Instructional Science, 40(2), 297–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9174-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stegmann, K., Weinberger, A., & Fischer, F. (2007). Facilitating argumentative knowledge construction with computer-supported collaboration scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(4), 421–447. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-007-9028-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, S. H. J., & Chen, W. (2022). Peer feedback to support collaborative knowledge improvement: What kind of feedback feed-forward? Computers & Education, 187, 104467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tchounikine, P. (2008). Operationalizing macro-scripts in CSCL technological settings. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(2), 193–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-008-9039-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tchounikine, P. (2016). Contribution to a theory of CSCL scripts: Taking into account the appropriation of scripts by learners. Internal Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 11(3), 349–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-016-9240-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, F., Wecker, C., Kollar, I., & Fischer, F. (2016). Socio-cognitive scaffolding with collaboration scripts: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 29(3), 477–511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-016-9361-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., Kollar, I., & Stegmann, K. (2017). Adaptable scripting to foster regulation processes and skills in computer-supported collaborative learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 12(2), 153–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-017-9254-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinberger, A., Ertl, B., Fischer, F., & Mandl, H. (2005). Epistemic and social scripts in computer-supported collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 33(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-004-2322-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yun, S. M., & Kim, H. B. (2015). Changes in students’ participation and small group norms in scientific argumentation. Research in Science Education, 45(3), 465–484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9432-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar