‘I finally understand my mistakes’ – the benefits of screencast feedback

References

• Allen, D., & Fraser, B. J. (2007). Parent and student perceptions of classroom learning environment and its association with student outcomes. Learning Environments Research, 10(1), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-007-9018-z
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, R. K. (2002). Optimizing learning from examples using animated pedagogical agents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 416. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakx, A., Koopman, M., de Kruijf, J., & den Brok, P. (2015). Primary school pupils’ views of characteristics of good primary school teachers: An exploratory, open approach for investigating pupils’ perceptions. Teachers & Teaching, 21(5), 543–564. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2014.995477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102
   Google Scholar
• Borup, J., West, R. E., & Thomas, R. (2015). The impact of text versus video communication on instructor feedback in blended courses. Educational Technology Research & Development, 63(2), 161–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9367-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Brick, B., & Holmes, J. (2008). Using screen capture software for student feedback. In D. Klinshuk, G. Sampson, J. M. Spector, P. Isaias, & D. Ifenthaler (Eds.), Cognition and Exploratory Leaning in Digital Age: Proceedings of the IADIS CELDA 2008 conference, ‘IADIS CELDA 2008‘ (pp. 339–342). IADIS. http://www.iadis.org
   Google Scholar
• Cornelius-White, J. (2007). Learner-centered teacher-student relationships are effective: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 113–143. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crooks, T. J. (1988). The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students. Review of Educational Research, 58(4), 438–481. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543058004438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denton, D. W. (2014). Using screen capture feedback to improve academic performance. TechTrends, 58(6), 51–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-014-0803-0
   Google Scholar
• DiMartino, P., & Zan, R. (2010). ‘Me and maths’: Towards a definition of attitude grounded on students’ narratives. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(1), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-009-9134-z
   Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1040. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256–273. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, K., Dujardin, A. F., & Williams, N. (2012). Screencast feedback for essays on a distance learning MA in professional communication. Journal of Academic Writing, 2(1), 95–126. https://doi.org/10.18552/joaw.v2i1.62
   Google Scholar
• Fauth, B., Decristan, J., Rieser, S., Klieme, E., & Büttner, G. (2014). Student ratings of teaching quality in primary school: Dimensions and prediction of student outcomes. Learning and Instruction, 29, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frymier, A. B., & Houser, M. L. (2009). The teacher‐student relationship as an interpersonal relationship. Communication Education, 49(3), 207–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520009379209
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2015). The applicability of visible learning to higher education. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 1(1), 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000021
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Clarke, S. (2019). Visible learning: Feedback (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429485480-1
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haxton, K. J., & McGarvey, D. J. (2011). Screencasting as a means of providing timely, general feedback on assessment. New Directions in the Teaching of Physical Sciences, 7(7), 18–21. https://doi.org/10.29311/ndtps.v0i7.462
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, M., & Phillips, M. (2015). Video-based feedback on student assessment: Scarily personal. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(1). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hounsell, D. (2003). Student feedback, learning and development higher education and the lifecourse. In M. Slowey & D. Watson (Eds.), Higher education and the lifecourse (pp. 67–78). The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, F. (1998). The impact of teacher written feedback on individual writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7(3), 255–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(98)90017-0
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, F., & Hyland, K. (2001). Sugaring the pill: Praise and criticism in written feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(3), 185–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00038-8
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Interpersonal aspects of response: Constructing and interpreting teacher written feedback. In K. Hyland & F. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues (pp. 206–224). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Karat, C.-M., Halverson, C., Horn, D., & Karat, J. (1999). Patterns of entry and correction in large vocabulary continuous speech recognition systems. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’99). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 568–575. https://doi.org/10.1145/302979.303160
   Google Scholar
• Killingback, C., Ahmed, O., & Williams, J. (2019). ‘It was all in your voice’: Tertiary student perceptions of alternative feedback modes (audio, video, podcast, and screencast): A qualitative literature review. Nurse Education Today, 72, 32–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.10.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Killingback, C., Drury, D., Mahato, P., & Williams, J. (2020). Student feedback delivery modes: A qualitative study of student and lecturer views. Nurse Education Today, 84, 104237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2019.104237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinchin, I. M. (2003). Effective teacher ↔ student dialogue: A model from biological education. Journal of Biological Education, 37(3), 110–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2003.9655864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, R. T. (1996). Contribution of human hippocampal region to novelty detection. Nature, 383(6597), 256–259. https://doi.org/10.1038/383256a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krebs, R. M., Schott, B. H., Schütze, H., & Düzel, E. (2009). The novelty exploration bonus and its attentional modulation. Neuropsychologia, 47(11), 2272–2281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.01.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamey, A. (2015). Video feedback in philosophy. Metaphilosophy, 46(4–5), 691–702. https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lisman, J. E., & Grace, A. A. (2005). The hippocampal-VTA loop: Controlling the entry of information into long-term memory. Neuron, 46(5), 703–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2005.05.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loch, B., Jordan, C. R., Lowe, T. W., & Mestel, B. D. (2014). Do screencasts help to revise prerequisite mathematics? An investigation of student performance and perception. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 45(2), 256–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2013.822581
   Google Scholar
• Lowenthal, P. R. (2020). Video feedback: Is it worth the effort? A response to Borup et al. Educational Technology Research & Development. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09872-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowenthal, P. R., & Dunlap, J. C. (2018). Investigating students’ perceptions of instructional strategies to establish social presence. Distance Education, 39(3), 281–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1476844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney, P., Macfarlane, S., & Ajjawi, R. (2019). A qualitative synthesis of video feedback in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 24(2), 157–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2018.1471457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton, F., & Morris, P. J. T. F. (2002). What matters? Discovering critical conditions of classroom learning. Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
   Google Scholar
• Marton, F., Tsui, A. B., Chik, P. P., Ko, P. Y., & Lo, M. L. (2004). Classroom discourse and the space of learning. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mathisen, P. (2012). Video feedback in higher education – A contribution to improving the quality of written feedback. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 7(2), 97–116. https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1891-943X-2012-02-02
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E. (2003). Elements of a science of e-learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 29(3), 297–313. https://doi.org/10.2190/YJLG-09F9-XKAX-753D
   Google Scholar
• Mayes, E., Black, R., & Finneran, R. (2020). The possibilities and problematics of student voice for teacher professional learning: Lessons from an evaluation study. Cambridge Journal of Education, 51(2), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2020.1806988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mensink, P. J., & King, K. (2020). Student access of online feedback is modified by the availability of assessment marks, gender and academic performance. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(1), 10–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesulam, M. M. (1998). From sensation to cognition. Brain: A Journal of Neurology, 121(6), 1013–1052. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/121.6.1013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullamphy, D. F., Higgins, P. J., Belward, S. R., & Ward, L. M. (2010). To screencast or not to screencast. Anziam Journal, 51, C446–C460. https://doi.org/10.21914/anziamj.v51i0.2657
   Google Scholar
• Nathan, M. J., & Sawyer, K. (2016). The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (Sawyer, R. K., Ed.). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Malley, P. J. (2011). Combining screencasting and a tablet PC to deliver personalised student feedback. New Directions in the Teaching of Physical Sciences, 7(7), 27–30. https://doi.org/10.29311/ndtps.v0i7.464
   Google Scholar
• Parton, B. S., Crain-Dorough, M., & Hancock, R. (2010). Using flip camcorders to create video feedback: Is it realistic for professors and beneficial to students? International Journal of Instructional Technology & Distance Learning, 7(1), 15–21. http://www.itdl.org/Journal/Jan_10/Jan_10.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Paterson, K., & McColl, J. H. (2009). Giving useful feedback to students in statistics courses. In CETL-MSOR Conference 2009, Milton Keynes, UK (pp. 52). CETL-MSOR-Proceedings2009.pdf (sigma-network.ac.uk)
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, O. C. (2013). Sampling in interview-based qualitative research: A theoretical and practical guide. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 11(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2013.801543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, M., Loch, B., & Croft, T. (2015). Student perceptions of screencast feedback on mathematics assessment. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 1(3), 363–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-015-0018-6
   Google Scholar
• Rojo Robas, V., Madariaga, J. M., & Villarroel, J. D. (2020). Secondary education students’ beliefs about mathematics and their repercussions on motivation. Mathematics, 8(3), 368. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8030368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roorda, D. L., Koomen, H. M. Y., Spilt, J. L., & Oort, F. J. (2011). The influence of affective teacher–student relationships on students’ school engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic approach. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 493–529. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311421793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, T., Henderson, M., & Phillips, M. (2019). Feedback modes matter: Comparing student perceptions of digital and non‐digital feedback modes in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3), 1507–1523. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18(2), 119–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00117714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawyer, R. K. (Ed.). (2016). The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shuell, T. J. (1993). Toward an integrated theory of teaching and learning. Educational Psychologist, 28(4), 291–311. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2804_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skidmore, D. (2006). Pedagogy and dialogue. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36(4), 503–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640601048407
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, R. A., West, R. E., & Borup, J. (2017). An analysis of Instructor social presence in online text and asynchronous video feedback comments. The Internet and Higher Education, 33, 61–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Udir. (2020). Gi Gode Faglige Tilbakemeldinger [Give Good Professional Feedback]. Retrieved November 30, 2020, from https://www.udir.no/laring-og-trivsel/vurdering/underveisvurdering/tilbakemeldinger/
   Google Scholar
• West, J., & Turner, W. (2016). Enhancing the assessment experience: Improving student perceptions, engagement and understanding using online video feedback. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 53(4), 400–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2014.1003954
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D. (2011). What is assessment for learning? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 37(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.001
   Google Scholar
• Zhai, S., Sue, A., & Accot, J. (2002). Movement model, hits distribution and learning in virtual keyboarding. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’02), 4(1), 17–24. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/503376.503381
   Google Scholar