362
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL RESEARCH REPORT

Safety and efficacy of low fluence, high repetition rate versus high fluence, low repetition rate 810-nm diode laser for axillary hair removal in Chinese women

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 393-396 | Received 05 Apr 2016, Accepted 30 May 2016, Published online: 19 Jul 2016

References

  • Sadighha A, Mohaghegh Zahed G. Meta-analysis of hair removal laser trials. Lasers Med Sci. 2009;24:21–25.
  • Haedersdal M, Gøtzsche PC. Laser and photoepilation for unwanted hair growth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;18(4):CD004684.
  • Baugh WP, Trafeli JP, Barnette DJ Jr, Ross EV. Hair reduction using a scanning 800 nm diode laser. Dermatol Surg. 2001;27:358–364.
  • Goldberg DJ, Silapunt S. Histologic evaluation of a millisecond Nd: YAG laser for hair removal. Lasers Surg Med. 2001;28:159–161.
  • Lin TY, Manuskiatti W, Dierickx CC, Farinelli WA, Fisher ME, Flotte T, et al. Hair growth cycle affects hair follicle destruction by ruby laser pulses. J Invest Dermatol. 1998;111:107–113.
  • Grossman MC, Dierickx C, Farinelli W, Flotte T, Anderson RR. Damage to hair follicles by normal-mode ruby laser pulses. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1996;35:889–894.
  • Patil UA, Dhami LD. Overview of lasers. Indian J Plast Surg. 2008; 41:101–113.
  • Braun M. Permanent laser hair removal with low fluence high repetition rate versus high fluence low repetition rate 810 nm diode laser — A split leg comparison study. J Drugs Dermatol. 2009; 8:14–17.
  • Royo J, Urdiales F, Moreno J, Al-Zarouni M, Cornejo P, Trelles MA. Six-month follow-up multicenter prospective study of 368 patients, phototypes III to V, on epilation efficacy using an 810-nm diode laser at low fluence. Lasers Med Sci. 2011;26(2):247–255.
  • Trelles MA, Urdiales F, Al-Zarouni M. Hair structures are effectively altered during 810 nm diode laser hair epilation at low fluences. J Dermatolog Treat. 2010;21(2):97–100.
  • Zhou ZC, Guo LF, Gold MH. Hair removal utilizing the LightSheer Duet HS hand piece and the LightSheer ET: a comparative study of two diode laser systems in Chinese women. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2011;13(6):283–290.
  • Chen J, Liu XJ, Huo MH. Split-leg comparison of low fluence diode laser and high fluence intense pulsed light in permanent hair reduction in skin types III to IV. Australas J Dermatol. 2012;53(3):186–189.
  • Pai GS, Bhat PS, Mallya H, Gold M. Safety and efficacy of low-fluence, high-repetition rate versus high-fluence, low-repetition rate 810-nm diode laser for permanent hair removal–a split-face comparison study. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2011;13(4):134–137.
  • Braun M. Comparison of high-fluence, single-pass diode laser to low-fluence, multiple-pass diode laser for laser hair reduction with 18 months of follow up. J Drugs Dermatol. 2011;10(1):62–65.
  • Rogachefsky AS, Silapunt S, Goldberg DJ. Evaluation of a new super-long-pulsed 810 nm diode laser for the removal of unwanted hair: the concept of thermal damage time. Dermatol Surg. 2002;28: 410–414.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.