Efficacy of Laser in Hair Removal: A Network Meta-analysis

References

• Surgeons. ASoP. 2019 plastic surgery statistics report. 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Statista. Value of hair removal devices market worldwide in 2017 and 2022 (in billion U.S. dollars). 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Altshuler G, Anderson R, Manstein D, Zenzie H, Smirnov M. Extended theory of selective photothermolysis. Lasers Surg Med. 2001;29(5):416–32. doi: 10.1002/lsm.1136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman MP. Cutaneous laser surgery: the art and science of selective photothermolysis, Vol. 2. Mosby, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen EA. Methods of hair removal. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1999;40(2):143–55. doi: 10.1016/S0190-9622(99)70181-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman L, Blaney DJ, Kindel D, Franke EK. Effect of the laser beam on the skin. J Invest Dermatol. 1963;40(121):2. doi: 10.1038/jid.1963.21
   Google Scholar
• Goldman L, Blaney DJ, Kindel DJ, Richfield D, Franke EK. Pathology of the effect of the laser beam on the skin. Nature. 1963;197(4870):912–14. doi: 10.1038/197912b0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nanni CA, Alster TS. Optimizing treatment parameters for hair removal using a topical carbon-based solution and 1064-nm Q-switched neodymium: yAG laser energy. Arch Dermatol. 1997;133(12):1546–49. doi: 10.1001/archderm.1997.03890480066009
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grossman MC, Dierickx C, Farinelli W, Flotte T, Anderson RR. Damage to hair follicles by normal-mode ruby laser pulses. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1996;35(6):889–94. doi: 10.1016/S0190-9622(96)90111-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dierickx CC, Grossman MC, Farinelli WA, Anderson RR. Permanent hair removal by normal-mode ruby laser. Arch Dermatol. 1998;134(7):837–42. doi: 10.1001/archderm.134.7.837
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Franck P, Henderson PW, Rothaus KO. Basics oF lasers: history, physics, and clinical applications. Clin Plast Surg. 2016;43(3):505–13. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2016.03.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zandi S, Lui H. Long-term removal of unwanted hair using light. Dermatol Clin. 2013;31(1):179–91. doi: 10.1016/j.det.2012.08.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liew SH. Laser Hair Removal. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2002;3(2):107–15. doi: 10.2165/00128071-200203020-00004
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haedersdal M, Gøtzsche PC. Laser and photoepilation for unwanted hair growth. Cochrane Db Syst Rev. 2006;2006(4). doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004684.pub2.
   Google Scholar
• Warner J, Weiner M, Gutowski KA. Laser hair removal. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2006;49(2):389–400. doi: 10.1097/00003081-200606000-00020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulkin JM, Flash S. Laser hair removal. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2010;37(4):477–87. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2010.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. The PG. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000097. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, Cates CJ, Cheng H-Y, Corbett MS, Eldridge SM, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366:l4898.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schünemann H. The GRADE handbook. Cochrane Collaboration; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):557–60. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh CL. Comparative study on a single treatment response to long pulse Nd: yAG lasers and intense pulse light therapy for hair removal on skin type IV to VI–is longer wavelengths lasers preferred over shorter wavelengths lights for assisted hair removal. J Dermatolog Treat. 2003;14(4):243–47. doi: 10.1080/09546630310004171
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ilknur T, Biçak M, Eker P, Ellidokuz H, Özkan S. Effects of the 810-nm diode laser on hair and on the biophysical properties of skin. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2010;12(6):269–75. doi: 10.3109/14764172.2010.538414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ismail SL-PN. YAG laser vs. intense pulsed light for hair removal in dark skin: a randomized controlled trial. Br J Dermatol. 2012;166(2):317–21. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2011.10695.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon H-R, Lee J-H, Lee G, Rhee D-Y, Park G-H, Won CH, Chang S-E, Lee M-W, Choi J-H, Moon K-C, et al. Long-pulsed Alexandrite Laser vs. Intense pulsed light for axillary hair removal in Korean women. Medical Lasers. 2012;1(1):11–15. doi: 10.25289/ML.2012.1.1.11
   Google Scholar
• Nilforoushzadeh MA, Naieni FF, Siadat AH, Rad L. Comparison between sequentional treatment with diode and alexandrite lasers versus alexandrite laser alone in the treatment of hirsutism. J Isfahan Med Sch. 2012;29(173):3065–71.
   Google Scholar
• Shrimal A, Sardar S, Roychoudhury S, Sarkar SL-PN. Long-pulsed Nd: yAG laser and intense pulse light-755 nm for idiopathic facial hirsutism: a comparative study. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2017;10(1):40–44. doi: 10.4103/0974-2077.204582
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Toosi P, Sadighha A, Sharifian A, Razavi GM. A comparison study of the efficacy and side effects of different light sources in hair removal. Lasers Med Sci. 2006;21(1):1–4. doi: 10.1007/s10103-006-0373-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanitphakdeedecha R, Thanomkitti K, Sethabutra P, Eimpunth S, Manuskiatti W. A split axilla comparison study of axillary hair removal with low fluence high repetition rate 810 nm diode laser vs. high fluence low repetition rate 1064 nm Nd: yAG laser. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2012;26(9):1133–36. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2011.04231.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angelovska E, Nikolovska S, Damevska K, Kokaleska-Petrushevska A. Diode laser vs. Intense pulsed light for hair removal: a randomized controlled trial. Lasers Med Sci. 2013;28(6):1431.
   Google Scholar
• Ayatollahi A, Samadi A, Rajabi-Estarabadi A, Yadangi S, Nouri K, Firooz A. Comparison of efficacy and safety of a novel 755-nm diode laser with conventional 755-nm alexandrite laser in reduction of axillary hairs. Lasers Med Sci. 2020;35(2):373–78. doi: 10.1007/s10103-019-02829-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron H, Ibbotson SH, Dawe RS, Ferguson J, Moseley H. Within-patient right-left blinded comparison of diode (810 nm) laser therapy and intense pulsed light therapy for hair removal. Lasers Med Sci. 2008;23(4):393–97. doi: 10.1007/s10103-007-0510-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haak CS, Nymann P, Pedersen AT, et al. Hair removal in hirsute women with normal testosterone levels: a randomized controlled trial of long-pulsed diode laser vs. intense pulsed light. Br J Dermatol. 2010;163(5):1007–13. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.10004.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein A, Steinert S, Baeumler W, Landthaler M, Babilas P. Photoepilation with a diode laser vs. intense pulsed light: a randomized, intrapatient left-to-right trial. Br J Dermatol. 2013;168(6):1287–93. doi: 10.1111/bjd.12182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGill DJ, Hutchison C, McKenzie E, McSherry E, Mackay IR. A randomised, split-face comparison of facial hair removal with the alexandrite laser and intense pulsed light system. Lasers Surg Med. 2007;39(10):767–72. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20584
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sochor M, Curkova AK, Schwarczova Z, Sochorova R, Simaljakova M, Buchvald J. Comparison of hair reduction with three lasers and light sources: prospective, blinded and controlled study. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2011;13(5):210–15. doi: 10.3109/14764172.2011.586422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szima GZ, Janka EA, Kovács A, et al. Comparison of hair removal efficacy and side effect of neodymium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser and intense pulsed light systems (18-month follow-up). J Cosmet Dermatol. 2017;16(2):193–98. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barolet D. Low fluence-high repetition rate diode laser hair removal 12-month evaluation: reducing pain and risks while keeping clinical efficacy. Lasers Surg Med. 2012;44(4):277–81. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davoudi SM, Behnia F, Gorouhi F, Keshavarz S, Nassiri Kashani M, Rashighi Firoozabadi M, Firooz A. Comparison of long-pulsed alexandrite and Nd: yAG lasers, individually and in combination, for leg hair reduction: an assessor-blinded, randomized trial with 18 months of follow-up. Arch Dermatol. 2008;144(10):1323–27. doi: 10.1001/archderm.144.10.1323
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Handrick C, Alster TS. Comparison of long‐pulsed diode and long‐pulsed alexandrite lasers for hair removal: a long‐term clinical and histologic study. Dermatol Surgery. 2001;27(7):622–26. doi: 10.1097/00042728-200107000-00002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain M, Polnikorn N, Goldberg DJ. Laser-assisted hair removal in Asian skin: efficacy, complications, and the effect of single versus multiple treatments. Dermatol Surg. 2003;29(3):249–54. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4725.2003.29059.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ormiga P, Ishida CE, Boechat A, Ramos ESM. Comparison of the effect of diode laser versus intense pulsed light in axillary hair removal. Dermatol Surg. 2014;40(10):1061–69. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bibilash BS, Chittoria RK, Thappa DM, Mohapatra DP, MT F, S D, Pandey S. Are lasers superior to lights in the photoepilation of Fitzpatrick V and VI skin types?–A comparison between Nd: yAG laser and intense pulsed light. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2017;19(5):252–55. doi: 10.1080/14764172.2016.1262956
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rücker G, Schwarzer G. Resolve conflicting rankings of outcomes in network meta‐analysis: partial ordering of treatments. Res Synth Methods. 2017;8(4):526–36. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1270
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg DJ. One-year follow-up results of hair removal using an 810 nm diode laser. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2018;17(5):775–78. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12757
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atta-Motte M, Załęska I. Diode laser 805 hair removal side effects in groups of various ethnicities – cohort study results. J Lasers Med Sci. 2020;11(2):132–37. doi: 10.34172/jlms.2020.23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao J, Prospective GM. Comparative evaluation of three laser systems used individually and in combination for axillary hair removal. Dermatol Surgery. 2005;31(12):1671–77. doi: 10.1097/00042728-200512000-00007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhat YJ, Bashir S, Nabi N, Hassan I. Laser treatment in hirsutism: an update. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2020;10(2):e2020048. doi: 10.5826/dpc.1002a48
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alster TS, Bryan H, Williams CL-PN. YAG laser-assisted hair removal in pigmented skin: a clinical and histological evaluation. Arch Dermatol. 2001;137(7):885–89.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arsiwala SZ, Majid IM. Methods to overcome poor responses and challenges of laser hair removal in dark skin. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2019;85(1):3. doi: 10.4103/ijdvl.IJDVL_1103_16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepselter J, Elman M. Biological and clinical aspects in laser hair removal. J Dermatolog Treat. 2004;15(2):72–83. doi: 10.1080/09546630310023152
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wanner M. Laser hair removal. Derm Atologic Therapy. 2005;18(3):209–16. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8019.2005.05020.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ross EV, Cooke LM, Timko AL, Overstreet KA, Graham BS, Barnette DJ. Treatment of pseudofolliculitis barbae in skin types IV, V, and VI with a long-pulsed neodymium: yttrium aluminum garnet laser. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;47(2):263–70. doi: 10.1067/mjd.2002.124081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogachefsky AS, Becker K, Weiss G, Goldberg DJ. Evaluation of a long‐pulsed Nd: yAG laser at different parameters: an analysis of both fluence and pulse duration. Dermatol Surgery. 2002;28(10):932–36. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4725.2002.02070.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liew S, Grobbelaar A, Gault D, Sanders R, Green C, Linge C. Hair removal using the ruby laser: clinical efficacy in Fitzpatrick skin types IV and histological changes in epidermal melanocytes. Br J Dermatol. 1999;140(6):1105–09. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.1999.02911.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battle EF Jr, Hobbs LM. Laser‐assisted hair removal for darker skin types. Dermatol Ther. 2004;17(2):177–83. doi: 10.1111/j.1396-0296.2004.04018.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chan CS, JS D. Nd: yag laser hair removal in Fitzpatrick skin types IV to VI. J Drugs Dermatol. 2013;12(3):366–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah S, Alster TS. Laser treatment of dark skin. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2010;11(6):389–97. doi: 10.2165/11538940-000000000-00000
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanzi EL, TS A. Long-pulsed 1064-nm Nd: yAG laser-assisted hair removal in all skin types. Dermatol Surg. 2004;30(1):13–17. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2004.30007.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gan SD, EM G. Laser Hair Removal: a Review. Dermatol Surgery. 2013;39(6):823–38. doi: 10.1111/dsu.12116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raulin C, Greve B, Grema H. IPL technology: a review. Lasers Surg Med. 2003;32(2):78–87. doi: 10.1002/lsm.10145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gold MH, Bell MW, Foster TD, Street S. Long‐term epilation using the EpiLight broad band, intense pulsed light hair removal system. Dermatol Surgery. 1997;23(10):909–13. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.1997.tb00746.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raulin C. Falten und Aknenarben In: Raulin C, Greve B (Hrsg) Laser und IPL-Technologie in der Dermatologie und Ästhetischen Medizin. New York: Schattauer, Stuttgart; 2001. pp. 91–95.
   Google Scholar
• Rao K, TK S. Long-pulsed Nd: yAG laser-assisted hair removal in Fitzpatrick skin types IV–VI. Lasers Med Sci. 2011;26(5):623–26. doi: 10.1007/s10103-011-0922-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russe E, Purschke M, Herold M, Sakamoto FH, Wechselberger G, Russe‐Wilflingseder K. Evaluation of safety and efficacy of laser hair removal with the long‐pulsed 755 nm wavelength laser: a two‐center study with 948 patients. Lasers Surg Med. 2020;52(1):77–83. doi: 10.1002/lsm.23160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar