Reasons for elective cesarean section on maternal request: a systematic review

References

• Wagner M. Choosing caesarean section. Lancet. 2000;356:1677–1680.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDorman MF, Menacker F, Declercq E. Cesarean birth in the United States: epidemiology, trends, and outcomes. Clin Perinatol. 2008;35:293–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajabi A, Maharlouei N, Rezaianzadeh A, et al. Non-medical factors affecting antenatal preferences for delivery route and actual delivery mode of women in southwestern Iran. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29:3622–3628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patted S. Caesarean section on maternal request (CDMR). Recent Res Sci Technol. 2011;3:100–101.
   Google Scholar
• Hildingsson I, Nilsson C, Karlström A, et al. A longitudinal survey of childbirth-related fear and associated factors. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2011;40:532–543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Størksen HT, Garthus-Niegel S, Adams SS, et al. Fear of childbirth and elective caesarean section: a population-based study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dursun P, Yanik FB, Zeyneloglu HB, et al. Why women request cesarean section without medical indication? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011;24:1133–1137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergholt T, Østberg B, Legarth J, et al. Danish obstetricians’ personal preference and general attitude to elective cesarean section on maternal request: a nation-wide postal survey. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2004;83:262–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale R, Harer W. Elective prophylactic cesarean delivery. ACOG Clin Rev Editorial. 2005;10:1.
   Google Scholar
• Adams SS, Eberhard-Gran M, Sandvik ÅR, et al. Mode of delivery and postpartum emotional distress: a cohort study of 55,814 women. BJOG. 2012;119:298–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sufang G, Padmadas SS, Fengmin Z, et al. Delivery settings and caesarean section rates in China. Bull World Health Organ. 2007;85:755–762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCourt C, Weaver J, Statham H, et al. Elective cesarean section and decision making: a critical review of the literature. Birth. 2007;34:65–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters JPM, Hooft L, Grolman W, et al. Reporting quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of otorhinolaryngologic articles based on the PRISMA statement. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0136540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell D, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses2009; September 15, 2017. Available from: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp (last accessed 2018 Sept).
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins K. Are Brazilian women really choosing to deliver by cesarean? Soc Sci Med. 2000;51:725–740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okonkwo NS, Ojengbede OA, Morhason-Bello IO, et al. Maternal demand for cesarean section: perception and willingness to request by Nigerian antenatal clients. Int J Womens Health. 2012;4:141–148.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shi YH, Jiang Y, Zeng QQ, et al. Influencing factors associated with the mode of birth among childbearing women in Hunan Province: a cross-sectional study in China. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016;16:108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanabe T, Knobel R, Suchard G, et al. Medical students’ personal choice for mode of delivery in Santa Catarina, Brazil: a cross-sectional, quantitative study. BMC Med Educ. 2012;12:1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torloni MR, Betrán AP, Montilla P, et al. Do Italian women prefer cesarean section? Results from a survey on mode of delivery preferences. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013;13:78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bihler J, Tunn R, Reisenauer C, et al. Personal preference of mode of delivery. what do urogynaecologists choose? Preliminary results of the DECISION Study. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2017;77:1182–1188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angeja ACE, Washington AE, Vargas JE, et al. Chilean women’s preferences regarding mode of delivery: which do they prefer and why? BJOG: Int J Ob Gyn. 2006;113:1253–1258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cesar JA, Sauer JP, Carlotto K, et al. Cesarean section on demand: a population-based study in Southern Brazil. Rev Bras Saude Mater Infant. 2017;17:99–105.
   Google Scholar
• Gamble JA, Creedy DK. Women’s preference for a cesarean section: incidence and associated factors. Birth. 2001;28:101–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handelzalts JE, Fisher S, Lurie S, et al. Personality, fear of childbirth and cesarean delivery on demand. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012;91:16–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu KH, Liao PJ, Hwang CJ. Factors affecting Taiwanese women’s choice of cesarean section. Soc Sci Med. 2008;66:201–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuglenes D, Aas E, Botten G, et al. Why do some pregnant women prefer cesarean? The influence of parity, delivery experiences, and fear. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;205:45.e1–45.e9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieminen K, Stephansson O, Ryding EL. Women’s fear of childbirth and preference for cesarean section – a cross-sectional study at various stages of pregnancy in Sweden. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88:807–813.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards GJ, Davies NJ. Elective caesarean section-the patient's choice? J Obstet Gynaecol. 2001;21:128–129.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chong ES, Mongelli M. Attitudes of Singapore women toward cesarean and vaginal deliveries. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2003;80:189–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiklund I, Edman G, Andolf E. Cesarean section on maternal request: reasons for the request, self-estimated health, expectations, experience of birth and signs of depression among first-time mothers. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86:451–456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Béhague DP, Victora CG, Barros FC. Consumer demand for caesarean sections in Brazil: informed decision making, patient choice, or social inequality? A population based birth cohort study linking ethnographic and epidemiological methods. BMJ. 2002;324:942–945.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin HC, Xirasagar S. Maternal age and the likelihood of a maternal request for cesarean delivery: a 5-year population-based study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;192:848–855.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Y, Blustein J, Li H, et al. Maternal obesity, caesarean delivery and caesarean delivery on maternal request: a cohort analysis from China. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2015;29:232–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou YB, Li HT, Ye RW, et al. Gestational weight gain, cesarean delivery, and cesarean delivery on maternal request: a cohort analysis of Chinese nulliparous women. Ann Epidemiol. 2017;27:96–102.e3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Liu Y, Meikle S, et al. Cesarean delivery on maternal request in southeast China. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111:1077–1082.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chigbu CO, Ezeome IV, Iloabachie GC. Cesarean section on request in a developing country. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2007;96:54–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner-Geva L, Glasser S, Levitan G, et al. A case-control study of caesarean delivery on maternal request: who and why? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29:2780–2785.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stützer PP, Berlit S, Lis S, et al. Elective caesarean section on maternal request in Germany: factors affecting decision making concerning mode of delivery. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;295:1151–1156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söderquist J, Wijma B, Thorbert G, et al. Risk factors in pregnancy for post-traumatic stress and depression after childbirth. BJOG. 2009;116:672–680.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torjesen I. Any pregnant woman who wants a caesarean section should not be denied it, says NICE. England: British Medical Journal Publishing Group; 2011.
   Google Scholar