Timing of delivery in women with prior uterine rupture: a decision analysis

References

• Leung AS, Leung EK, Paul RH. Uterine rupture after previous cesarean delivery: maternal and fetal consequences. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;169:945–950.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yap OW, Kim ES, Laros RK, Jr. Maternal and neonatal outcomes after uterine rupture in labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001;184:1576–1581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chauhan SP, Martin JN, Jr., Henrichs CE. Maternal and perinatal complications with uterine rupture in 142,075 patients who attempted vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a review of the literature. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189:408–417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronel D, Wiznitzer A, Sergienko R, et al. Trends, risk factors and pregnancy outcome in women with uterine rupture. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012;285:317–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Qahtani N. Fertility after complete uterine rupture. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2013;25:214–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim AC, Kwee A, Bruinse HW. Pregnancy after uterine rupture: a report of 5 cases and a review of the literature. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2005;60:613–617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eshkoli T, Weintraub AY, Baron J, et al. The significance of a uterine rupture in subsequent births. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015;292:799–803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usta IM, Hamdi MA, Musa AA, et al. Pregnancy outcome in patients with previous uterine rupture. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86:172–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank ZC, Caughey AB. Pregnancy in women with a history of uterine rupture. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2018;73:703–708.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chibber R, El-Saleh E, Al Fadhli R, et al. Uterine rupture and subsequent pregnancy outcome – how safe is it? A 25-year study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010;23:421–424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okafor II, Nwogu-Ikojo EE, Obi SN. Pregnancy after rupture of the pregnant uterus. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;31:371–374.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. Practice bulletin No. 184: vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130:e217–e233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stotland NE, Lipschitz LS, Caughey AB. Delivery strategies for women with a previous classic cesarean delivery: a decision analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187:1203–1208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilliod RA, Cheng YW, Snowden JM, et al. The risk of intrauterine fetal death in the small-for-gestational-age fetus. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207:318.e1–318.e6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith GC, Pell JP, Bobbie R. Caesarean section and risk of unexplained stillbirth in subsequent pregnancy. Lancet. 2003;362:1779–1784.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phibbs CS, Schmitt SK. Estimates of the cost and length of stay changes that can be attributed to one-week increases in gestational age for premature infants. Early Hum Dev. 2006;82:85–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheth SS. Results of treatment of rupture of the uterus by suturing. BJOG. 1968;75:55–58.
   Google Scholar
• Reyes-Ceja L, Cabrera R, Insfran E. Pregnancy following previous uterine rupture. Study of 19 patients. Obstet Gynecol. 1969;34:387–389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onyemeh AU, Twomey D. The consecutive management of uterine rupture. Trop J Obstet Gynaecol. 1988;1:80–81.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Soltan MH, Khashoggi T, Adelusi B. Pregnancy following rupture of the pregnant uterus. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1996;52:37–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney M, Moldenhauer J, Treadwell M. Subsequent pregnancy outcome with prior uterine rupture. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193:S127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Qahtani NH, Al Hajeri F. Pregnancy outcome and fertility after complete uterine rupture: a report of 20 pregnancies and a review of literature. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2011;284:1123–1126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox NS, Gerber RS, Mourad M, et al. Pregnancy outcomes in patients with prior uterine rupture or dehiscence. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123:785–789.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark SL, Belfort MA, Dildy GA, et al. Maternal death in the 21st century: causes, prevention, and relationship to cesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199:36.e1–36.e5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guise JM, Eden K, Emeis C, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights. Evid Rep Technol Assess. 2010;191:1–397.
   Google Scholar
• Wen SW, Huang L, Liston R, et al. Severe maternal morbidity in Canada, 1991–2001. CMAJ Can Med Assoc J. 2005;173:759–764.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caughey AB, Shipp TD, Repke JT, et al. Rate of uterine rupture during a trial of labor in women with one or two prior cesarean deliveries. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;181:872–876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Zirqi I, Stray-Pedersen B, Forsén L, et al. Uterine rupture after previous caesarean section. BJOG. 2010;117:809–820.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surman G, Newdick H, King A, et al. 4 Child: four countries database of cerebral palsy, vision loss and hearing loss in children. Annual report 2009, including data for births 1984 to 2003. Oxford: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Perez A, Ritter S, Brotschi B, et al. Long-term neurodevelopmental outcome with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. J Pediatr. 2013;163:454–459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung A, Macario A, El-Sayed YY, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a trial of labor after previous cesarean. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;97:932–941.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuppermann M, Nease RF, Learman LA, et al. Procedure-related miscarriages and Down syndrome-affected births: implications for prenatal testing based on women's preferences. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96:511–516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grobman WA, Dooley SL, Welshman EE, et al. Preference assessment of prenatal diagnosis for Down syndrome: is 35 years a rational cutoff? Prenat Diagn. 2002;22:1195–1200.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll AE, Downs SM. Improving decision analyses: parent preferences (utility values) for pediatric health outcomes. J Pediatr. 2009;155:21–25,25.e1–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arias E. United States life tables, 2010. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2014;63:1–63.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blair E, Watson L, Badawi N, et al. Life expectancy among people with cerebral palsy in Western Australia. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2001;43:508–515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar