References
- Ouzounian JG, Elkayam U. Physiologic changes during normal pregnancy and delivery. Cardiol Clin. 2012;30(3):317–329.
- Paauw ND, Lely AT. Cardiovascular sequels during and after preeclampsia. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018; 1065:455–470.
- Ghossein-Doha C, Khalil A, Lees CC. Maternal hemodynamics: a 2017 update. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;49(1):10–14.
- Vinayagam D, Patey O, Thilaganathan B, et al. Cardiac output assessment in pregnancy: comparison of two automated monitors with echocardiography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;49(1):32–38.
- Vinayagam D, Thilaganathan B, Stirrup O, et al. Maternal hemodynamics in normal pregnancy: reference ranges and role of maternal characteristics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;51(5):665–671.
- McLaughlin K, Wright SP, Kingdom JCP, et al. Clinical validation of non-invasive cardiac output monitoring in healthy pregnant women. J Obstet GynaecolCan. 2017; 39(11):1008–1014.
- Monteith C, McSweeney L, Breatnach CR, et al. Non-invasive cardiac output monitoring (NICOM®) can predict the evolution of uteroplacental disease-results of the prospective HANDLE study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017;216:116–124.
- Stott D, Papastefanou I, Paraschiv D, et al. Longitudinal maternal hemodynamics in pregnancies affected by fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;49(6):761–768.
- Luchi C, Natali I, Caputo M, et al. Maternal heart examination in pregnancy affected by low PAPP-A MoM in the first trimester. pcard. 2020;2020(1):41–49.
- Sanghavi M, Rutherford JD. Cardiovascular physiology of pregnancy. Circulation. 2014;130(12):1003–1008.
- Valensise H, Tiralongo GM, Pisani I, et al. Maternal hemodynamics early in labor: a possible link with obstetric risk? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;51(4):509–513.
- Kalafat E, Barratt I, Nawaz A, et al. Maternal cardiovascular function and risk of intrapartum fetal compromise in women undergoing induction of labor: pilot study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020;56(2):233–239.
- Burton RF. Estimating body surface area from mass and height: theory and the formula of Du Bois and Du Bois. Ann Hum Biol. 2008;35(2):170–184.
- Ayres-de-Campos D, Spong CY, Chandraharan E, FIGO Intrapartum Fetal Monitoring Expert Consensus Panel. FIGO consensus guidelines on intrapartum fetal monitoring: cardiotocography. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;131(1):13–24.
- DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL.Comparing the Areas under Two or More Correlated Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves: A Nonparametric Approach. Biometrics. 1988;44(3):837–845.
- Rizzo G, Aiello E, Bosi C, et al. Fetal head circumference and subpubic angle are independent risk factors for unplanned cesarean and operative delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017;96(8):1006–1011.
- Khalil AA, Morales-Rosello J, Morlando M, et al. Is fetal cerebroplacental ratio an independent predictor of intrapartum fetal compromise and neonatal unit admission? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(54):e1–e10.
- Rizzo G, Pietrolucci ME, Mappa I, et al. Modeling gestational age centiles for fetal umbilicocerebral ratio by quantile regression analysis: a secondary analysis of a prospective cross-sectional study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;23:1–5.
- Di Mascio D, Rizzo G, Buca D, et al. Comparison between cerebroplacental ratio and umbilicocerebral ratio in predicting adverse perinatal outcome at term. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020;252:439–443.
- Prior T, Mullins E, Bennett P, et al. Prediction of intrapartum fetal compromise using the cerebroumbelical ratio: a prospective observational study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208:e1–e6.
- Dall'Asta A, Ghi T, Rizzo G, et al. Cerebroplacental ratio assessment in early labor in uncomplicated term pregnancy and prediction of adverse perinatal outcome: prospective multicenter study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;53(4):481–487.
- Antonio F, Rizzo G, Gustapane S, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of Doppler ultrasound in predicting perinatal outcome in pregnancies at term: a prospective longitudinal study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020;99(1):42–47.