References
- Grant A, Elbourne D, Valentin L, et al. Routine formal fetal movement counting and risk of antepartum late death in normally formed singletons. Lancet. 1989;2(8659):345–349.
- O’Sullivan O, Stephen G, Martindale E, et al. Predicting poor perinatal outcome in women who present with decreased fetal movements. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;29(8):705–710.
- Heazell AE, Frøen F. Methods of fetal movement counting and the detection of fetal compromise. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;28(2):147–154.
- Frøen JF, Tveit JV, Saastad E, et al. Management of decreased fetal movements. Semin Perinatol. 2008;32(4):307–311.
- Bishop EH. Pelvic scoring for elective induction. Obstet Gynecol. 1964;24:266–268.
- Xenakis EM, Piper JM, Conway DL, et al. Induction of labor in the nineties: conquering the unfavorable cervix. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;90(2):235–239.
- Chen W, Xue J, Peprah MK, et al. A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the use of Foley catheters, misoprostol, and dinoprostone for cervical ripening in the induction of labour. BJOG. 2016;123(3):346–354.
- Efkarpidis S, Alexopoulos E, Kean L, et al. Case-control study of factors associated with intrauterine fetal deaths. MedGenMed. 2004;6(2):53.
- Sinha D, Sharma A, Nallaswamy V, et al. Obstetric outcome in women complaining of reduced fetal movements. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;27(1):41–43.
- Warland J, O'Brien LM, Heazell AE, et al. An international internet survey of the experiences of 1,714 mothers with a late stillbirth: the STARS cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:172.
- Flenady V, MacPhail J, Gardener G, et al. Detection and management of decreased fetal movements in Australia and New Zealand: a survey of obstetric practice. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;49(4):358–363.
- Norman JE, Heazell AEP, Rodriguez A, et al. Awareness of fetal movements and care package to reduce fetal mortality (AFFIRM): a stepped wedge, cluster-randomised trial. Lancet. 2018;392(10158):1629–1638.
- Bellussi F, Po’ G, Livi A, et al. Fetal movement counting and perinatal mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135(2):453–462.
- Grobman WA, Rice MM, Reddy UM, et al. Labor induction versus expectant management in low-risk nulliparous women. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(6):513–523.
- Saccone G, Della Corte L, Maruotti GM, et al. Induction of labor at full-term in pregnant women with uncomplicated singleton pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019;98(8):958–966.
- Grobman WA, Caughey AB. Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks compared with expectant management: a meta-analysis of cohort studies . Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;221(4):304–310.
- SMFM statement on elective induction of labor in low-risk nulliparous women at term: the ARRIVE trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;221(1):B2–B4.
- Practice Advisory: Clinical guidance for integration of the findings of The ARRIVE Trial: Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women. [cited 2020 June 06]. https://www.acog.org/Clinical-Guidance-and-Publications/Practice-Advisories/Practice-Advisory-Clinical-guidance-for-integration-of-the-findings-of-The-ARRIVE-Trial.
- Boyle A, Reddy UM, Landy HJ, et al. Primary cesarean delivery in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122(1):33–40.
- Tzeng YL, Chao YM, Kuo SY, et al. Childbirth-related fatigue trajectories during labour. J Adv Nurs. 2008;63(3):240–249.
- Lowe NK, Corwin EJ. Proposed biological linkages between obesity, stress, and inefficient uterine contractility during labor in humans. Med Hypotheses. 2011;76(5):755–760.