930
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

The association between increased subjective sensation of fetal movements and pregnancy outcome–a prospective cohort and a retrospective comparative analysis

, , , , , , , , & show all
Article: 2184224 | Received 24 Jan 2022, Accepted 18 Feb 2023, Published online: 01 Mar 2023

References

  • De Muylder X. Counting active movements of the fetus: could it be useful? Can Med Assoc J. 1982;127(12):1172–1175, 1194.
  • Heazell AE, Froen JF. Methods of fetal movement counting and the detection of fetal compromise. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;28(2):147–154.
  • Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (UK). Green -top Guidline No. 31: the investigation and management of small-for-gestational -age-fetus; 2013.
  • Froen JF. A kick from with in-fetal movement counting and the cancelled progress in antenatal care. J Perinat Med. 2004;32:13–24.
  • Practice bulletin no.145: antepartum fetal surveillance. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124:182–192.
  • Whitehead CL, Cohen N, Visser GHA, et al. Are increased fetal movements always reassuring? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020;33(21):3713–3718.
  • Linde A, Pettersson K, Radestad I. Women’s experiences of fetal movements before the confirmation of fetal death – contractions misinterpreted as fetal movement. Birth. 2015;42(2):189–194.
  • Warland J, O’Brien LM, Heazell AEP, et al. An international internet survey of the experiences of 1,714 mothers with late stillbirth: the STARS cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Chilbirth. 2015;15:172.
  • Stacey T, Thompson JMD, Mitchell EA, et al. Maternal perception of fetal activity and late stillbirth risk: findings from the Auckland stillbirth study. Birth. 2011;38(4):311–316.
  • Heazell AEP, Warland J, Stacey T, et al. Stillbirth is associated with perceived alternations in fetal activity – findings from an international case control study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17(1):369.
  • Huang C, Han W, Fan Y. Correlation study between increased fetal movement during the third trimester and neonatal outcome. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19(1):467.
  • Sharp I, Adeyeye T, Peacock L, et al. Investigation of the outcome of pregnancies complicated by increased fetal movements and their relationship to underlying causes – A prospective cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020;0:1–10.
  • Dollberg S, Haklai Z, Mimoiuni FB, et al. Birth weight standarts in the live-born population in Israel. Isr Med Assoc J. 2005;5:311–314.
  • Brunton R, Simpson N, Dryer R. Pregnancy-related anxiety, perceived parental self-efficacy and the influence of parity and age. IJERPH. 2020;17(18):6709.
  • Roman H, Goffinet F, Hulsey FT, et al. Maternal body mass index at delivery and risk of cesarean due to dystocia in low risk pregnancies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87(2):163–170.
  • Marrs C, Rosa L, Caughey M, et al. G. Elective induction at 39 weeks of gestation and the implications of a large, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(3):445–450.
  • Grobman WA, Rice MM, Reddy UM, et al. Labor induction versus expectant management in low-risk nulliparous women. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(6):513–523.
  • Monen L, Hasaart TH, Kuppens SM. The aetiology of meconium-stained fluid: pathologic hypoxia or physiologic foetal ripening? Early Hum Dev. 2014;90(7):325–328.
  • Levy M, Kovo M, Izaik Y, et al. Reduced fetal movements at term in singleton low risk pregnancies – is there association with placental histopathological findings? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020;99(7):884–890.
  • Sadovsky E, Polishuk WZ. Fetal movements in utero: nature, assessment, prognostic value, timing of delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 1977;50(1):49–55.