Critical Appraisal in the Context of Integrations of Qualitative Evidence in Applied Psychology: The Introduction of a New Appraisal Tool for Interview Studies

References

• Berg, J, Kaltiala-Heino, R, Löyttyniemi, V & Välimäki, M 2013, ‘Staff’s perception of adolescent aggressive behaviour in four European forensic units: a qualitative interview study’, Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 67, pp. 124–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, C & Hayward, M 2011, ‘What can qualitative research tell us about service user perspectives of CBT for psychosis? A synthesis of current evidence’, Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, vol. 39, pp. 487–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradbury, KJ, Bishop, FL, Yardley, L & Lewith, G 2013, ‘Patients’ appraisals of public and private healthcare: a qualitative study of physiotherapy and osteopathy’, Journal of Health Psychology, vol. 18, pp. 1307–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V & Clarke, V 2006. ‘Using thematic analysis in psychology’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 3, pp. 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Carrero, V, Peiro, JM & Salanova, M 2000, ‘Studying radical organizational innovation through grounded theory’, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, vol. 9, pp. 489–514.
   Google Scholar
• Chenail, RJ, St. George, S, Wulff, D, Duffy, M, Scott, K & Tomm, K 2012, ‘Clients’ relational conceptions of conjoint couple and family therapy quality: a grounded formal theory’, Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, vol. 38, pp. 241–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, JW 2007, Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions, 2nd edn, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon-Woods, M, Shaw, RL, Agarwal, S & Smith, J 2006, ‘The problem of appraising qualitative research’, Quality and Safety in Health Care, vol. 13, pp. 223–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, R 2010, ‘Psychotherapy change process research: realizing the promise’, Psychotherapy Research, vol. 20, pp. 123–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, R, Fischer, CT & Rennie, DL 1999, ‘Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields’, British Journal of Clinical Psychology, vol. 38, pp. 215–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, R & James, E 1989, ‘Varieties of client experience in psychotherapy: an analysis of the literature’, Clinical Psychology Review, vol. 9, pp. 443–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, CT 2009, ‘Bracketing in qualitative research: conceptual and practical matters’, Psychotherapy Research, vol. 19, pp. 583–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, J & Patterson, JA 2013, ‘Research response to Tracy’s under the ‘‘Big Tent’’: establishing universal criteria for evaluating qualitative research’, Qualitative Inquiry, vol. 19, pp. 689–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg, L, Elliott, R & Lietar, G 1994, ‘Research on humanistic and experiential psychotherapies’, in AE Bergin & SL Garfield (eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behaviour change, 4th edn, Wiley, New York, pp. 509–39.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh, T & Taylor, R 1997, ‘How to read a paper: papers that go beyond numbers (qualitative research)’, BMJ: British Medical Journal, vol. 315, pp. 740–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hannes, K 2011, ‘Critical appraisal of qualitative research’, in J Noyes, A Booth, K Hannes, A Harden, J Harris, S Lewin & C Lockwood (eds.), Supplementary guidance for inclusion of qualitative research in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions [Online]. Cochrane Collaboration Qualitative Methods Group, viewed 12 October 2014, <http://cqrmg.cochrane.org/suppl.lemental-handbook-guidance>
   Google Scholar
• Harper, D 2008, ‘Clinical psychology’, in C Willig &W Stainton-Rogers (eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology, The Open University, London, pp. 430–54.
   Google Scholar
• Howley, M, Preece, D & Arnold, T 2001, ‘Multidisciplinary use of “structured teaching” to promote consistency of approach for children with autistic spectrum disorder’, Educational and Child Psychology, vol. 18, pp. 41–52.
   Google Scholar
• Knox, S & Burkard, AW 2009, ‘Qualitative research interviews’, Psychotherapy Research, vol. 19, pp. 566–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonidaki, V 2012, Helpful and unhelpful aspects of individual psychological therapy: A qualitative systematic literature review, Qualitative Methods in Psychology Section Annual Conference, London, 18–20 April. viewed 12 October 2014, <http://abstracts.bps.org.uk/index.cfm?&ResultsType=Abstracts&ResultSet_ID=8051&FormDisplayMode=view&frmShowSelected=true&localAction=details>
   Google Scholar
• Madill, A 2007, ‘Survey of British Psychological Society qualitative methods in psychology section members 2006’, British Psychological Society Qualitative Methods in Psychology Section Newsletter, vol. 3, pp. 9–14.
   Google Scholar
• Madill, A & Gough, B 2008, ‘Qualitative research and its place in psychological science’, Psychological Methods, vol. 13, pp. 254–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Major, CH & Savin-Baden, M 2011, ‘Integration of qualitative evidence: towards construction of academic knowledge in social science and professional fields’, Qualitative Research, vol. 11, pp. 645–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mee Kwan, SS, Tuckey, MR & Dollard, MF 2014, ‘The role of the psychosocial safety climate in coping with workplace bullying: a grounded theory and sequential tree analysis’, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, Epub ahead of print, 1 December 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Midgley, N, Target, M & Smith, J 2006, ‘The outcome of child psychoanalysis from the patient’s point of view: a qualitative analysis of a long-term follow-up study’, Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, vol. 79, pp. 257–69.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, A, Lathlean, J, Bressington, D, Forrester, A, Van Veenhuyze, W & Gray, R 2011, ‘Prisoners’ experiences of antipsychotic medication: influences on adherence’, The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, vol. 22, pp. 110–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrow, SL 2005, ‘Quality and trustworthiness in qualitative research in counselling psychology,’ Journal of Counseling Psychology, vol. 52, pp. 250–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, LK, Skavenski, S, Michalopoulos, LM, Bolton, PA, Bass, JK, Familiar, I, Imasiku, M & Cohen, J 2014, ‘Counselor and client perspectives of trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy for children in Zambia: a qualitative study’, Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, Epub ahead of print, 14 October 2014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Northcote, MT 2012, Selecting criteria to evaluate qualitative research, viewed 14 October 2014, <http://research.avondale.edu.au/edu_papers/38>
   Google Scholar
• Noyes, J, Popay, J, Pearson, A, Hannes, K & Booth, A 2011, ‘Qualitative research and Cochrane reviews’, in JPT Higgins & S Green (eds.), Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011], The Cochrane Collaboration, viewed 14 October 2014, <www.cochrane-handbook.org>
   Google Scholar
• Parker, I 2004 ‘Criteria for qualitative research in psychology’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 1, pp. 95–106.
   Google Scholar
• Pauley, G & McPherson, S 2010, ‘The experience and meaning of compassion and self-compassion for individuals with depression or anxiety’, Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, vol. 83, pp. 129–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popay, J, Rogers, A & Williams, G 1998, ‘Rationale and standards for the systematic review of qualitative literature in health services research’, Qualitative Health Research, vol. 8, pp. 341–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, J & Hepburn, A 2005 ‘Qualitative interviews in psychology: problems and possibilities’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 2, pp. 281–307.
   Google Scholar
• Public Health Resource Unit 2006, Critical appraisal skills programme (CASP), viewed 14 October 2014, <http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/report4.htm>
   Google Scholar
• Reicher, S 2000, ‘Against methodolatry: some comments on Elliott, Fischer, and Rennie’, British Journal of Clinical Psychology, vol. 39, pp. 1–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saini, M & Shlonsky, A 2012, Systematic synthesis of qualitative research, Oxford University Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Sandelowski, M & Barroso, J 2007, Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research, Springer, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J 2011a, ‘Evaluating the contribution of interpretative phenomenological analysis’, Health Psychology Review, vol. 5, pp. 9–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, J, 2011b, ‘Evaluating the contribution of interpretative phenomenological analysis: a reply to the commentaries and further development of criteria’, Health Psychology Review, vol. 5, pp. 55–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, JA, Flowers, P & Larkin, M 2009, Interpretative phenomenological analysis, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• Snelgrove, S, Edwards, S & Liossi, C 2013, ‘A longitudinal study of patients’ experiences of chronic low back pain using interpretative phenomenological analysis: changes and consistencies’, Psychology and Health, vol. 28, pp. 121–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer, L, Ritchie, J, Lewis, J & Dillon, L 2003, Quality in qualitative evaluation: a framework for assessing research evidence, National Centre for Social Research, Government Chief Social Researcher’s Office, London.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A & Corbin, J 1990, Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques, Sage, London.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, SJ, 2010, ‘Qualitative quality: eight ‘‘big-tent’’ criteria for excellent qualitative research’, Qualitative Inquiry, vol. 16, pp. 837–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Grieken, RA, Kirkenier, AC, Koeter, MW, Nabitz, UW & Schene, AH 2013, ‘Patients’ perspective on self-management in the recovery from depression’, Health Expectations: An International Journal of Public Participation in Health Care and Health Policy, Epub ahead of print, 14 October 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Watts, S 2014, ‘User skills for qualitative analysis: perspective, interpretation and the delivery of impact’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 11, pp. 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willig, C 2013, Introducing qualitative research in psychology: adventures in theory and method, 3rd edn, Open University Press, Berkshire.
   Google Scholar
• Yardley, L 2008, ‘Demonstrating validity in qualitative psychology’, in JA Smith (ed.), Qualitative psychology: a practical guide to research methods, 2nd edn, Sage, London, pp. 235–68.
   Google Scholar