285
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Reformative concept analysis for applied psychology qualitative research

References

  • Adams, G. and H. R. Markus. 2001. Culture as patterns: An alternative approach to the problem of reification. Culture & Psychology 7 (3):283–96. doi:10.1177/1354067X0173002.
  • Agee, J. 2009. Developing qualitative research questions: A reflective process. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 22 (4):431–47. doi:10.1080/09518390902736512.
  • Albert, K., J. S. Brundage, P. Sweet, and F. Vandenberge. 2020. Towards a critical realist epistemology? Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 50 (3):357–72. doi:10.1111/jtsb.12248.
  • Andermann, A. 2016. Taking action on the social determinants of health in clinical practice: A framework for health professionals. Canadian Medical Association Journal 188 (17–18):17–18. doi:10.1503/cmaj.160177.
  • Ardito, R. B., and D. Rabellino. 2011. Therapeutic alliance and outcome of treatment: Historical excursus, measurements and prospects for research. Frontiers in Psychotherapy 2 (270):1–11. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00270.
  • Bandura, A. 1978. The self system in reciprocal determinism. American Psychologist 33 (4):344–58. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.33.4.344.
  • Bandura, A. 1997. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
  • Barbour, R. S. 2001. Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: A case of the tail wagging the dog? British Medical Journal 322 (7294):1115–17. doi:10.1136/bmj.322.7294.1115.
  • Bordin, E. S. 1979. The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice 16 (3):252–60. doi:10.1037/h0085885.
  • Burrows, D. E. 1997. Facilitation: A concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing 25 (2):396–404. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.1997025396.x.
  • Castonguay, L. G., and L. E. Beutler. 2006. Common and unique principles of therapeutic change: What do we know and what do we need to know? In Principles of therapeutic change that work, ed. L. G. Castonguay and L. E. Beutler, 353–70. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Chambliss, D. F., and R. K. Schutt. 2013. Making sense of the Social World: Methods of investigation. 4th ed. London, UK: Sage.
  • Chinn, P. L., and M. K. Kramer. 1994. Theory and nursing: A systematic approach. 3rd ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby Year Book.
  • Cohen, J. A., A. Hassan, K. Wada, and M. Suehn. 2022. The personal and the political: How a feminist standpoint theory epistemology guided an interpretive phenomenological analysis. Qualitative Research in Psychology 19 (4):917–49. doi:10.1080/14780887.2021.1957047.
  • Collier, D., and J. Gerring, Eds. 2009. Concepts and method in social science. Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge.
  • Davis, F.1963. Passage through crisis: Polio victims and their families. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
  • Dudley, R., W. Kuyken, and C. A. Padesky. 2011. Disorder-specific and trans-diagnostic case conceptualisation. Clinical Psychology Review 31 (2):213–24. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2010.07.005.
  • Fauconnier, G., and M. Turner. 1998. Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science 22 (2):133–87. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2202_1.
  • Fletcher, A. J. 2017. Applying critical realism in qualitative research: Methodology meets method. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 20 (2):181–94. doi:10.1080/13645579.2016.1144401.
  • Frank, J. D., and J. B. Frank. 1993. Persuasion and healing: A comparative study. 3rd ed. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Fredericks, M., and S. I. Miller. 1987. The use of conceptual analysis for teaching sociology courses. Teaching Sociology 15 (4):392–98. doi:10.2307/1317995.
  • Fricker, M. 2009. Epistemic injustice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  • Gerring, J. 2012. Social science methodology: A unified framework. 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Goertz, G. 2006. Social science concepts: A User’s Guide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Goertz, G. 2007. Politics, gender and concepts: Theory and methodology. Eds. Mazur, A.G., Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Guest, G., A. Bunce, and L. Johnson. 2006. How many interviews are enough?: An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods 18 (1):59–82. doi:10.1177/1525822X05279903.
  • Habermas, J. 1987. Knowledge and human interests. 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
  • Horvath, A. O. 2018. The psychotherapy relationship: Where does the alliance fit? In Developing the Therapeutic Relationship: Integrating case studies, research and practice, ed. O. Tishby and H. Wiseman. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Hupcey, J. E., and J. Penrod. 2003. Concept advancement: Enhancing inductive validity. Research and Theory for Nursing Practice 17 (1):19–30. doi:10.1891/rtnp.17.1.19.53168.
  • Hupcey, J. E., and J. Penrod. 2005. Concept analysis: Examining the state of the science. Research and Theory for Nursing Practice: An International Journal 19 (2):197–208. doi:10.1891/rtnp.19.2.197.66801.
  • Katz, A. S., B.-J. Hardy, M. Firestone, A. Lofters, and M. E. Morton-Ninomiya. 2019. Vagueness, power and public health: Use of ‘vulnerable’ in public health literature. Critical Public Health 30 (5):601–11. doi:10.1080/09581596.2019.1656800.
  • Knafl, K., B. Breitmayer, A. Gallo, and L. Zoeller. 1987. How families define and manage a child’s chronic illness. NCNR funded research.
  • Knafl, K., B. Breitmayer, A. Gallo, and L. Zoeller. 1996. Family response to childhood chronic illness: Description of management styles. Journal of Pediatric Nursing 11 (5):315–26. doi:10.1016/S0882-5963(05)80065-X.
  • Knafl, K., and J. Deatrick. 1990. Family management style: Concept analysis and development. Journal of Pediatric Nursing 5 (1):4–14. doi:10.5555/uri:pii:088259639090047D.
  • Knafl, K., and J. Deatrick. 2003. Further refinement of the family management style framework. Journal of Family Nursing 9 (3):232–56. doi:10.1177/1074840703255435.
  • Knafl, K., J. A. Deatrick, and A. M. Gallo. 2008. Interplay of concepts, data and methods in the development of the family management style framework. Journal of Family Nursing 14 (4):142–428. doi:10.1177/1074840708327138.
  • Knafl, K., J. Deatrick, A. Gallo, J. Dixon, M. Grey, G. Knafl, and J. O’Malley. 2011. Assessment of the psychometric properties of the family management measure. Journal of Pediatric Psychology 36 (5):494–505. doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsp034.
  • Knafl, K., J. Deatrick, A. M. Gallo, and B. Skelton. 2021. Tracing the use of the family management style framework and measure: A scoping review. Journal of Family Nursing 27 (2):87–106. doi:10.1177/1074840721994331.
  • Kurtz, M. J. (2009). Peasant: clarifying meaning and refining explanation. In Concepts and Method in Social Science: The Tradition of Giovanni Sartori, D. Collier and J. Gerring, 269–88. New York: Routledge.
  • Kvale, S. 2007. Doing interviews. London, UK: Sage.
  • Luborsky, L. 1976. Helping alliances in psychotherapy: The groundwork for a study of their relationship to its outcome. In Successful Psychotherapy. ed. J. L. Cleghorn, 92–116. New York, NY: Brunner/Mazel.
  • Mahon, B. Z. 2015. Missed connections: A connectivity-constrained account of the representation and organisation of object concepts. In The conceptual mind: New directions in the study of concepts, ed. E. Margolis and S. Laurence, 79–115. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Maxwell, J. A. 1992. Understanding and validity in qualitative research. Harvard Educational Review 62 (3):279–300. doi:10.17763/haer.62.3.8323320856251826.
  • McVey, C. 2023. Telenursing: A concept analysis. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing 10–1097. doi:10.1097/CIN.0000000000000973.
  • Milevski, L. 2023. What makes a good strategic concept? Comparative Strategy 42 (5):718–28. doi:10.1080/01495933.2023.2236493.
  • Miller, A. 1990. Banished knowledge: Facing childhood injuries. London, UK: Virago.
  • Morrow, S. L., and M. L. Smith. 2000. Qualitative research for counseling psychology. In Handbook of counseling psychology, ed. S. D. Brown and R. W. Lent, 199–230. 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Morse, J. M. 2000. Denial is not a qualitative concept. Qualitative Health Research 10 (2):147–48. doi:10.1177/104973200129118291.
  • Morse, J. M., J. E. Hupcey, C. Mitcham, and E. Lenz. 1996. Concept analysis in nursing research: A critical appraisal. Scholarly Inquiry for Nursing Practice 10:257–81.
  • Morse, J. M., C. Mitcham, J. E. Hupcey, and M. C. Tasón. 1996. Criteria for concept evaluation. Journal of Advanced Nursing 24 (2):385–90. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.1996.18022.x.
  • Morse, J. M., and J. Penrod. 1999. Linking concepts of enduring, uncertainty, suffering and hope. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 31 (2):145–50. doi:10.1111/j.1547-5069.1999.tb00455.x.
  • Muhammad, I., and A. K. Aboya. 2023. Conceptual analysis of deliberative democracy: A Sartorian perspective. Pakistan Journal of International Affairs 6 (2). doi:10.52337/pjia.v6i2.867.
  • Munari, S. C., A. N. Wilson, N. J. Blow, C. S. E. Homer, and J. E. Ward. 2021. Rethinking the use of ‘vulnerable’. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 45 (3):197–99. doi:10.1111/1753-6405.13098.
  • Olsson, C. A., L. Bond, J. M. Burns, D. A. Vella-Brodrick, and S. M. Sawyer. 2003. Adolescent resilience: A concept analysis. Journal of Adolescence 26 (1):1–11. doi:10.1016/S0140-1971(02)00118-5.
  • O’Reilly, M., and N. Parker. 2012. ‘Unsatisfactory saturation’: A critical exploration of the notion of saturated sample sizes in qualitative research. Qualitative Research Journal 13 (2):1–8. doi:10.1177/1468794112446106.
  • Paley, J. 1996. How not to clarify concepts in nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing 24 (3):572–78. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.1996.22618.x.
  • Paley, J. 2021. Concept analysis in nursing: A new approach. Abingdon, Oxfordshire UK: Routledge.
  • Parse, R. R. 1990. Parse’s research methodology with an illustration of the lived experience of hope. Nursing Science Quarterly 3 (1):9–17. doi:10.1177/089431849000300106.
  • Parse, R. R. 1997. Concept inventing: Unitary creations. Nursing Science Quarterly 10 (2):63–64. doi:10.1177/089431849701000201.
  • Pascual-Leone, A., L. A. Greenberg, and J. Pascual-Leone. 2009. Developments in task analysis: New methods to study change. Psychotherapy Research 19 (4–5):527–42. doi:10.1080/10503300902897797.
  • Pemberton, S. 2015. Harmful societies: Understanding social harm. Briston, UK: Bristol University & Policy Press.
  • Penrod, J., and J. E. Hupcey. 2005. Enhancing methodological clarity: Principle-based concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing 50 (4):403–09. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03405.x.
  • Peters, M. D. J., C. Marnie, A. C. Tricco, D. Pollock, Z. Munn, L. Alexander, P. Mcinerney, C. M. Godfrey, and H. Khalil. 2020. Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews. JBI Evidence Synthesis 18 (10):2119–26. doi:10.11124/JBIES-20-00167.
  • Pilgrim, D. 2016. Diagnosis and formulation in medical contexts. In The handbook of counselling psychology, ed. B. Douglas, R. Woolfe, S. Strawbridge, E. Kasket, and V. Galbraith, 169–84. 4th ed. London, UK: Sage.
  • Pilgrim, D. 2019. Key concepts in mental health. 5th ed. London, UK: Sage.
  • Pinsof, W. M. 1988. The therapist client relationship: An integrative system perspective. Journal of Integrative Eclectic Psychotherapy 7:303–13.
  • Pintrich, P. R., R. W. Marx, and R. A. Boyle. 1993. Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research 63 (2):167–99. doi:10.3102/00346543063002167.
  • Podsakoff, P. M., S. B. MacKenzie, and N. P. Podsakoff. 2016. Recommendations for creating better concept definitions in the organizational, behavioural and social sciences. Organizational Research Methods 19 (2):159–203. doi:10.1177/1094428115624965.
  • Potter, J., and M. Wetherell. 1987. Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London, UK: Sage.
  • PRISMA (2020). Flow diagrams for transparent reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses available at http://prisma-statement.org/prismastatement/flowdiagram.aspx?AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=1
  • Ridner, S. H. 2003. Psychological distress: Concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing 45 (5):536–45. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02938.x.
  • Risjord, M. 2009. Rethinking concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing 65 (3):684–91. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04903.x.
  • Rodgers, B. L. 2000. Concept analysis: An evolutionary view. In Concept development in nursing: Foundations, techniques and applications 2nd, B. L. Rodgers and K. A. Knafl ed. 77–102. Cambridge, MA: Saunders/Elsevier.
  • Rutter, D., J. Francis, E. Coren, and M. Fisher. 2010. SCIE systematic research reviews: Guidelines. London, UK: Social Care Institute for Excellence.
  • SadatHoseini, A., H. Shareinia, S. Pashaeypoor, and M. Mohammadi. 2023. A cross-cultural concept analysis of healing in nursing: A hybrid model. BMC Nursing 22 (1):252. doi:10.1186/s12912-023-01404-8.
  • Sartori, G. 1984. Guidelines for concept analysis. In Social science concepts: A systematic analysis, ed. G. Sartori, 15–88. London, UK: Sage.
  • Sartori, G. 2009. Part 1: Sartori on concepts and method. In Concepts and method in social science: The tradition of Giovanni Sartori, ed. D. Collier and J. Gerring, 11–178. Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge.
  • Schwartz-Barcott, D., and H. S. Kim. 2000. An expansion and elaboration of the hybrid Model of concept development. In Concept Development in Nursing: Foundations, Techniques and Applications 2nd, B. L. Rodgers and K. A. Knafl ed. 129–60. Cambridge, MA: Saunders/Elsevier.
  • Smith, S., and E. Mörelius. 2021. Principle-based concept analysis methodology using a phased approach with quality criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 20:1–12. doi:10.1177/16094069211057995.
  • Thompson, M. 2011. Ontological shift, or ontological drift? Reality claims, epistemological frameworks and theory generation within organisational studies. Academy of Management Review 36 (4):754–73. doi:10.5465/amr.2010.0070.
  • UK Government (2022). Vulnerabilities: Applying all our health. Available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/vulnerabilities-applying-all-our-health/vulnerabilities-applying-all-our-health#:~:text=Being%20vulnerable%20is%20defined%20as,risk%20of%20abuse%20or%20neglect.
  • Vermes, C. (2018). Client factors associated with psychotherapeutic process and outcome: A concept analysis ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Manchester, UK.
  • Walker, L. O., and K. C. Avant. 2010. Strategies for theory construction in nursing. 5th ed. London, UK: Pearson Education.
  • Wampold, B. E., and Z. Imel. 2015. The great psychotherapy debate: The evidence for what makes psychotherapy work. (2nd Ed.), Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge.
  • Wuest, J. 1994. A feminist approach to concept analysis. Western Journal of Nursing Research 16 (5):577–86. doi:10.1177/019394599401600509.