Comparison of three procedures for initial fitting of compression hearing aids. III. Inexperienced versus experienced users

References

• Alcántara J. I., Moore B. C.J., Marriage J. E. Comparison of three procedures for initial fitting of compression hearing aids. II. Experienced users, fitted unilaterally. Int J Audiol 2004; 43: 3–14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American National Standards Institute. Methods for the Calculation of the Speech Intelligibility Index. ANSI, New York 1997, ANSI S3.5-1997
   Google Scholar
• Arlinger S., Lyregaard P. E., Billermark E., Oberg M. Fitting hearing aids to first-time users. Scand Audiol 2000; 29: 150–158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bladon R. A., Lindblom B. Modeling the judgment of vowel quality differences. J Acoust Soc Am 1981; 69: 1414–1422
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne D., Dillon H. The National Acoustic Laboratories' (NAL) new procedure for selecting the gain and frequency response of a hearing aid. Ear Hear 1986; 7: 257–265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne D., Dillon H., Tran K., Arlinger S., Wilbraham K., et al. An international comparison of long-term average speech spectra. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 96: 2108–2120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornelisse L. E., Seewald R. C., Jamieson D. G. The input/ output formula: a theoretical approach to the fitting of personal amplification devices. J Acoust Soc Am 1995; 97: 1854–1864
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox R. M. Using loudness data for hearing aid selection. The IHAFF approach. Hear J 1995; 48(10)39–44
   Google Scholar
• Cox R. M., Alexander G. C. The abbreviated profile of hearing aid benefit. Ear Hear 1995; 16: 176–186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasberg B. R., Moore B. C.J. Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data. Hear Res 1990; 47: 103–138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hohmann V. Dynamikkompression für Hörgeräte-Psychoakustische Grundlagen und Algorithmen. VDI-Verlag, Düsseldorf 1993
   Google Scholar
• Horwitz A. R., Turner C. W. The time course of hearing aid benefit. Ear Hear 1997; 18: 1–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humes L. E., Wilson D. L., Barlow N. N., Garner C. Changes in hearing-aid benefit following 1 or 2 years of hearing-aid use by older adults. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2002; 45: 772–782
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiessling J. Scaling methods for the selection, fitting and evaluation of hearing aids. Psychoacoustics, Speech and Hearing Aids, B. Kollmeier. World Scientific, Singapore 1997; 297–306
   Google Scholar
• Killion M. C., Fikret-Pasa S. Three types of sensorineural hearing loss: loudness and intelligibility considerations. Hear J 1993; 46: 31–36
   Google Scholar
• Kollmeier B., Hohmann V. Loudness estimation and compensation employing a categorical scale. Advances in Hearing Research, G. A. Manley, G. M. Klump, C. Köppl, H. Fastl., H. Oeckinghaus. World Scientific, Singapore 1995; 441–451
   Google Scholar
• Kuk F. K., Lau C. C. Effect of hearing aid experience on preferred insertion gain selection. J Am Acad Audiol 1996; 7: 274–281
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Libby E. R. Achieving a transparent, smooth, wideband hearing aid response. Hear Inst 1981; 32: 9–12
   Google Scholar
• MacLeod A., Summerfield Q. A procedure for measuring auditory and audio-visual speech-reception thresholds for sentences in noise: rationale, evaluation, and recommendations for use. Br J Audiol 1990; 24: 29–43
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore B. C.J. Parallels between frequency selectivity measured psychophysically and in cochlear mechanics. Scand Audiol Suppl 1986; 25: 139–152
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore B. C.J. Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting. IV. Fitting hearing aids with multi-channel compression so as to restore ‘normal’ loudness for speech at different levels. Br J Audiol 2000; 34: 165–177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B. C.J. An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing, 5th edn. Academic, San Diego 2003
   Google Scholar
• Moore B. C.J., Alcántara J. I., Marriage J. E. Comparison of three procedures for initial fitting of compression hearing aids. I. Experienced users, fitted bilaterally. Br J Audiol 2001; 35: 339–353
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B. C.J., Glasberg B. R. A model of loudness perception applied to cochlear hearing loss. Auditory Neurosci 1997; 3: 289–311
   Google Scholar
• Moore B. C.J., Glasberg B. R. Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting. I. Linear hearing aids. Br J Audiol 1998; 32: 317–335
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B. C.J., Glasberg B. R., Stone M. A. Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting. III. A general method for deriving initial fittings for hearing aids with multi-channel compression. Br J Audiol 1999a.; 33: 241–258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B. C.J., Peters R. W., Stone M. A. Benefits of linear amplification and multi-channel compression for speech comprehension in backgrounds with spectral and temporal dips. J Acoust Soc Am 1999b.; 105: 400–411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B. C.J., Huss M., Vickers D. A., Glasberg B. R., Alcántara J. I. A test for the diagnosis of dead regions in the cochlea. Br J Audiol 2000; 34: 205–224
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen S. O., Rasmussen A. N., Nielsen L. H., Borgkvist B. V. Loudness perception is influenced by long-term hearing aid use. Audiology 1999; 38: 202–205
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters R. W., Moore B. C.J., Baer T. Speech reception thresholds in noise with and without spectral and temporal dips for hearing-impaired and normally hearing people. J Acoust Soc Am 1998; 103: 577–587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pluvinage V. Clinical measurement of loudness growth. Hear Inst 1989; 39: 28–29, 32
   Google Scholar
• Steinberg J. C., Gardner M. B. The dependency of hearing impairment on sound intensity. J Acoust Soc Am 1937; 9: 11–23
   Google Scholar
• Vickers D. A., Moore B. C.J., Baer T. Effects of lowpass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in quiet for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies. J Acoust Soc Am 2001; 110: 1164–1175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villchur E. Signal processing to improve speech intelligibility in perceptive deafness. J Acoust Soc Am 1973; 53: 1646–1657
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar