Beliefs and attitudes among Swedish workers regarding the risk of hearing loss

References

• Barrenas, M.L., Hellstrom, P.-A. & Starck, J. 1998. Hearing conserva-tion. In: D. Prasher, L. Luxon & I. Pyykko I (eds.) Advances in Noise Research, Vol. II, Protection Against Noise. London: Whurr, pp. 211–218.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, E.H. 1980a. EARLog #3-the effects of hearing protectors on auditory communications. J Sound Vib, 14(1),16–17.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, E.H. 1980b. EARLog #5-hearing protector performance: how they work and what goes wrong in the real world. J Sound Vib, 14(10),14–17.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, E.H. 2000a. Hearing conservation: why do it In: E.H. Berger, L.H. Royster, J.D. Royster, D.P. Driscoll & M. Layne (eds.) The Noise Manual. Fairfax, VA: American Industrial Hygiene Association, pp. 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, E.H. 2000b. Hearing protector devices. In:E.H. Berger, L.H. Royster, J.D. Royster, D.P. Driscoll & M. Layne. The Noise Manual. Fairfax, VA: American Industrial Hygiene Association, pp. 379–454.
   Google Scholar
• Bolinder, E., Magnusson, E. & Nyren, L. 1969. Members of the Swedish Trade Union Confederation Personal Opinion on Health Hazards at their Workplaces. Results from a Questionnaire Survey. Solna: Pogo Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carmen. R. & Uram, S. 2002. Hearing loss and anxiety in adults. Hear J. 55(4). 48–54.
   Google Scholar
• Casali, J.G. & Park, M.Y. 1990. Attenuation performance of four hearing protectors under dynamic movement and different user fitting conditions. Hum Factors. 32(1),9–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Joy, D.M. 1994. Tactics against workplace hearing loss motivate employees to wear protection. Occup Health Safety, 63(3),50–54.
   Google Scholar
• Dias, O. & Andrea, M. 1997. Role of education in protection against noise. In: Protection against Noise, Conference Programme & Abstracts, 2nd European Conference. London: pp. 16–19.
   Google Scholar
• Franks, J.R., Stephenson, M.R. & Merry, C.J. 1996. Preventing Occupational Hearing Loss-a Practical Guide. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 96-110. Cincinnati, OH: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
   Google Scholar
• Gasaway, D.C. 1985. Hearing Conservation: A practical Manual and Guide. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Hallberg, L.R.-M. 1998. Lack of awareness of the risks of noise exposure in men and women. In: D. Prasher, L. Luxon & I. Pyykko (eds.) Advances in Noise Research, Vol. II, Protection Against Noise. London: Whurr, pp. 247–252.
   Google Scholar
• Helmkamp, J.S. 1986. Why workers do not use hearing protection? Occup Health Safety, 55(10), 52.
   Google Scholar
• Herberg, K.-W. & Schroeter, J. 1984. Investigation of the motives for wearing or not wearing hearing protectors (in German). Die BG, 3, 174–177.
   Google Scholar
• Hetu, R., Getty, L., Beaudry, J. & Philibert, L. 1994. Attitudes towards co-workers affected by occupational hearing loss I: questionnaire development and inquiry. Br J Audiol, 28(6),299–311.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickson, L., Phua, S. & McPherson, B. 1995. Use of hearing protection by factory workers: if not, why not? J Occup Health Aust NZ, 11(3),265–270.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, M. & Arlinger, S. 2001. The development of noise-induced hearing loss in the Swedish County of Ostergotland in the 1980s and 1990s. Noise & Health, 3(10),15–28.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lusk, S.L. 1997. Noise exposure effects on hearing and prevention of noise induced hearing loss. AAOHN, 45(8),397–408.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lusk, S.L. & Kelemen, M.J. 1993. Predicting use of hearing protection: a preliminary study. Health Nursing, 10(3),189–196.
   Google Scholar
• Lusk, S.L., Kerr, M.J. & Kauffman, S.A. 1998. Use of hearing protec-tion and perceptions of noise exposure and hearing loss among construction workers. AIHAJ, 59, 446–470.
   Google Scholar
• Lusk, S.L., Kerr, M.J., Ronis, D.L. & Eakin, B.L. 1999. Applying the health promotion model to development of a worksite intervention. AJHP, 13(4),219–227.
   Google Scholar
• McCullagh, M., Lusk, S.L. & Ronis, D.L. 2002. Factors influencing use of hearing protection among farmers. Nursing Res, 51(1),33–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morata. T.C. Fiorini, A.C. Fischer. F.M., Krieg. E.F. Gozzoli. L. et al. 2001. Factors affecting the use of hearing protectors in a population of printing workers. Noise & Health, 4(13),25–32.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morata. T.C., Johnson, A.-C. Nylen, P. Svensson, E.B., Cheng, J., et al. 2002. Audiometric findings in workers exposed to low levels of styrene and noise. J Occup Environ Med, 44. S06-814.
   Google Scholar
• National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. 1998. Criteria for a Recommended Standard. Occupational Exposure to Noise. Revised Criteria. DHHS, (NIOSH) Publication No. 98-126. Cincinnati, OH: Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.
   Google Scholar
• Purdy, S. & Williams, W. 2002. Development of the noise at work questionnaire to assess perceptions of noise in the workplace. J Occup Health Safety Aust NZ, 18(1),77–83.
   Google Scholar
• Royster, J.D. & Royster, L.H. 1990. Hearing Conservation Programs: Practical Guidelines for Success. Chelsea, MI: Lewis Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Stephenson, M.R. & Merry, C.J. 1999. A comparison and contrast of workers' vs. health and safety professionals' attitudes and beliefs about preventing occupational hearing loss. NIOSH poster pre-sented at the National Hearing Conservation Association Annual Conference, 25-27 February, 1999, Atlanta GA. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/noise/nhca99f.ppt (accessed 13 February 2000).
   Google Scholar
• Suter, A. 1986. Hearing conservation In: E.H. Berger, W.D. Ward, J.C. Morrill & L.H. Royster (eds.) Noise and Hearing Conservation Manual, 4th edn. Akron, OH: American Industrial Hygiene Association, pp. 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish National Board of Occupational Safety and Health, AFS. 1992. Ordinance of the Swedish National Board of Occupational Safety and Health Containing Provisions on Noise, No 10. Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish National Board of Occupational Safety and Health. 2001. Occupational Diseases and Occupational Accidents 1999. Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Toppila, E” Starck, J” Philstrom, A. & Pyykko, I. 1998. The evaluation for hearing conservation programs. In: D. Prasher, L. Luxon & I. Pyykko (eds.) Advances in Noise Research, Vol. II, Protection Against Noise. London: Whurr, pp. 167–176.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, W, Purdy, S.C., Murray, N, Dillon, H., LePage, E., et al. 2004. Does the presentation of audiometric test data have a positive effect on the perceptions of workplace noise and noise exposure avoidance? Noise & Health, 6(24),75–84.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zohar, D., Cohen, A. & Azar, N. 1980. Promoting increased use of ear protectors in noise through information feedback. Hum Factors, 22(1),69–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar