References
- American National Standards Institute. 1996. American national standard specification for audiometers. ANSI S3.6-1996. New York: ANSI.
- Anderson K. The problem of classroom acoustics: The typical classroom soundspace is a barrier to learning. Hearing Seminar 2004; 25(2)117–130
- Berg F.S. Facilitating classroom listening: a handbook for teachers of normal and hard of hearing students. College-Hill Press, San Diego, CA 1987
- Berg F.S. Acoustic and Sound Systems in School. Singular Publishing, San Diego, CA 1993
- Berger K.W., DePompei R.A., Droder J.L. The effect of distance on speechreading. Ohio Journal of Speech and Hearing 1970; 5: 115–122
- Boothroyd A. Auditory perception of speech contrasts by subjects with sensorineureal hearing loss. J Speech Hear Res 1984; 27: 134–144
- Crandell C., Smaldino J. Room acoustics for listeners with normal-hearing and hearing impairment. Audiology Treatment, M. Valente, H. Hosford-Dunn, R.J. Roeser. Thieme, New York, NY 2000; 601–627
- Crandell C., Smaldino J., Flexer C. Sound Field FM amplification: Theory and practical applications. Singular Press, San Diego, CA 1995
- Erber N.P. Effects of distance on the visual reception of speech. J Speech Hear Res 1971; 14: 848–857
- Erber N.P. Auditory, visual and auditory-visual recognition of consonants by children with normal and impaired hearing. J Speech Hear Res 1972; 15: 413–422
- Erber N.P. The effects of angle, distance, and illumination on visual reception of speech by profoundly deaf children. J Speech Hear Res 1974; 17: 99–112
- Erber N.P. Optimizing speech communication in the classroom. Parent-infant intervention: Communication Disorders, A. Simmons-Martin, D.R. Calvert. Grune and Stratton, New York, NY 1979; 307–319
- Finitzo-Hieber T., Tillman T. Room acoustics effects on monosyllabic word discrimination ability for normal and hearing-impaired children. J Speech Hear Res 1978; 21: 440–458
- Flexer C. Classroom amplification systems. Auditory Disorders in School Children3rd ed., R. Roeser, M. Downs. Thieme-Stratton, New York, NY 1995; 235–260
- Gagné J.-P. Audiovisual-FM system is found more beneficial in classroom than auditory-only. The Hearing Journal 2001; 54(1)48–51
- Gagné J.-P., Laplante-Lévesque A., Labelle M., Doucet K. An audiovisual-FM system (AudiSee) designed for use in classroom settings: An evaluation of the effects of visual distractions on speechreading performance. Seminars in Hearing 2002a; 23(1)43–55
- Gagné J.-P., Rochette A.-J., Charest M. Auditory, visual and audiovisual clear speech. Speech Communication 2002b; 37: 213–230
- Lewis D. Assistive devices for classroom listening. Am J Audiol 1994; 3(1)58–69
- Macleod A., Summerfield Q. A procedure for measuring auditory and audio-visual speech-reception thresholds for sentences in noise: rationale, evaluation, and recommendations for use. British Journal of Audiology 1990; 24: 24–43
- Picard M., Bradley J.S. Revisiting speech interference in classrooms. Audiology 2001; 40: 221–244
- Pimentel R.G. Classroom amplification systems for the partially hearing student. Auditory Disorders in School Children2nd ed., R. Roeser, M. Downs. Thieme, New York, NY 1988; 234–245
- Ross M. Auditory training systems: Characteristics, Selection and Use. Park Press, Timonium, MD 1992
- Seewald R.C., Ross M., Giolas T.G., Yonovitz A. Primary modality for speech perception in children with normal and impaired hearing. J Speech Hear Res 1985; 28: 36–46
- Strouse-Watt, W. 2004. How visual acuity is measured. http://www.mdsupport.org/ library/acuity.html.
- Studebaker G.A. A ‘rationalized arcsine transform’. J Speech Hear Res 1985; 28: 455–462
- Walden B.E., Prosek R.A., Worthington D.W. Auditory and audiovisual feature transmission in hearing-impaired adults. J Speech Hear Res 1975; 18: 272–280
- Yacullo W.S., Hawkins D.B. Speech recognition in noise and reverberation by school age children. Audiology 1987; 26: 235–246