Evaluation of NRT and behavioral measures for MAPping elderly cochlear implant users

References

• Abbas P., Brown C.J., Shallop J.K., First J.B., Hughes M.L., et al. Summary of results using the Nucleus CI24M implant to record the electrically evoked compound action potential. Ear Hear 1999; 20: 45–59
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics. 1998. Population Projections 1997 to 2051, ABS Catalogue No. 3222.0, Canberra.
   Google Scholar
• Boothroyd, A., Hanin, L. & Hnath, T. 1985. A sentence test of speech perception: Reliability, set equivalence, and short term learning. In: City University of NY Internal Report #RCI10: Rehabilitation of cochlear implantees. New York: City University of New York.
   Google Scholar
• Brown C.J., Abbas P.J., Borland J. Electrically evoked whole nerve action potentials in Ineraid cochlear implant users: Responses to different stimulating electrode configurations and comparison to psychophysical responses. J Speech Hear Res 1996; 39: 453–467
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown C.J., Abbas P.J., Gantz B.J. Preliminary experience with neural response telemetry in the Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant. Am J Otol 1998; 19: 320–327
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown C.J., Hughes M.L., Luk B., Abbas P., Wolaver A., et al. The relationship between EAP and EABR thresholds and levels used to program the Nucleus 24 speech processor: Data from adults. Ear Hear 2000; 21: 151–163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchman C.A., Fucci M.J., Luxford W.M. Cochlear implants in the geriatric population: Benefits outweigh risks. Ear Nose Throat J 1999; 78: 489–494
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cafarelli Dees D., Dillier N., Lai W.K., von Wallenberg E., van Dijk B., et al. Normative findings of electrically evoked compound action potential measurements. Using the neural response telemetry of the Nucleus CI24M Cochlear Implant System. Audiol Neurotol 2005; 10: 105–116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craddock L., Cooper H., van De Heyning P., Vermeire K., Davies M., et al. Comparison between NRT-based MAPs and behaviourally measured MAPs at different stimulation rates: A multicentre investigation. Cochlear Implants International 2003; 44: 161–170
   Google Scholar
• Facer G.W., Peterson A.M., Brey R.H. Cochlear implantation in the senior citizen age group using the Nucleus 22-channel device. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 1995; 166: 187–190
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Francis H.W., Chee N., Yeagle J., Cheng A., Niparko J.K. Impact of cochlear implants on the functional health status of older adults. Laryngoscope 2002; 112: 1482–1488
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franck K.H., Norton S.J. Estimation of psychophysical levels using the electrically evoked compound action potential measured with neural response telemetry capabilities of Cochlear Corporation's CI24M device. Ear Hear 2001; 22: 289–299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooker, K. & Shifren, K. 1995. Psychological aspects of aging. In: Communication in Later Life. R.A. Huntley & Helfer, K.S., Boston, Buterworth-Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Horn K.L., McMahon N.B., McMahon D.C., Lewis J.S., Barker M., et al. Functional use of the Nucleus 22-channel cochlear implant in the elderly. Laryngoscope 1991; 101: 284–288
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes M.L., Brown C.J., Abbas P.J., Wolaver A.A., Gervais J.P. Comparison of EAP thresholds with MAP levels in the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant: Data from children. Ear Hear 2000; 21: 164–174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Incerti, P. (September, 2002) , Psarros, C., Abrahams, Y., Brew, J., Haddon, A., , et al. 2002. The role of objective measures for setting initial maps in children: ‘Is it time to get rid of the audiologist?’ Paper presented at 7th International Cochlear Implant Conference. Manchester, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Jerger J., Jerger S., Oliver T., Pirozzolo F. Speech understanding in the elderly. Ear Hear 1989; 10: 79–89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelsall D.C., Shallop J.K., Burnelli T. Cochlear implantation in the elderly. Am J Otol 1995; 16: 609–15
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Labadie R.F., Carrasco V.N., Gilmer C.H., Pillsbury H.C., 3rd. Cochlear implant performance in senior citizens. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000; 123: 419–424
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orabi, A.A. & Al-Zoubi, F. 2003. Cochlear implants international, 4, 55–56.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson G., Lehiste I. Revised CNC lists for auditory tests. J Speech Hear Disord 1962; 27: 62–70
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pedley, K., Tari, S. & Drinkwater, T. 2003. Cochlear implantation in older adults. Cochlear Limited Sydney, N30037. ISSI.
   Google Scholar
• Pichora-Fuller M.K. Cognitive aging and auditory information processing. Int J Audiol 2003; 42(Suppl 2)S26–32
   Google Scholar
• Plant K., Law M., Whitford L., Knight M., Tari S., et al. Evaluation of streamlined programming procedures for the Nucleus cochlear implant with the Contour electrode array. Ear Hear 2005; 26: 651–668
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Psarros C.E., Plant K.L., Lee K., Decker J.A., Whitford L.A., et al. Conversion from the SPEAK to the ACE Strategy in children using the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: Speech perception and speech production outcomes. Ear Hear 2002; 23: 18S–27S
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabbitt P., Diggle P., Smith D., Holland F., McInnes L. Identifying and separating the effects of practice and of cognitive aging during a large longitudinal study of elderly community residents. Neuropsychologia 2001; 39: 532–543
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seyle K., Brown C.J. Speech perception using maps based on neural response telemetry measures. Ear Hear 2002; 23: 72S–79S
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waltzman S.B., Cohen N.L., Shapiro W.H. The benefits of cochlear implantation in the geriatric population. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1993; 108: 329–333
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, S.D. (September, 2002) , Comer, L.K., Reilley, D., Backous, D.D. 2002. Cochlear implants in patients greater than 80 years of age. Poster presented at 7th International Cochlear Implant Conference. Manchester, UK.
   Google Scholar