Ten(HL)-test results and psychophysical tuning curves for subjects with auditory neuropathy

References

• ANSI. ANSI S3.6-2004 Specification for audiometers. American National Standards Institute, New York 2004
   Google Scholar
• Berlin C.I., Hood L., Morlet T., Rose K., Brashears S. Auditory neuropathy/dys-synchrony: Diagnosis and management. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev 2003; 9: 225–231
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berlin C.I., Hood L.J., Morlet T., Wilensky D., St John P., et al. Absent or elevated middle ear muscle reflexes in the presence of normal otoacoustic emissions: A universal finding in 136 cases of auditory neuropathy/dys-synchrony. J Am Acad Audiol 2005; 16: 546–553
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chistovich L.A. Frequency characteristics of masking effect. Biofizika 1957; 2: 743–755
   Google Scholar
• Egan J.P., Hake H.W. On the masking pattern of a simple auditory stimulus. J Acoust Soc Am 1950; 22: 622–630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florentine M., Houtsma A.J.M. Tuning curves and pitch matches in a listener with a unilateral, low-frequency hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am 1983; 73: 961–965
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasberg B.R., Moore B.C.J. Auditory filter shapes in subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear impairments. J Acoust Soc Am 1986; 79: 1020–1033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasberg B.R., Moore B.C.J. Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data. Hear Res 1990; 47: 103–138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huss M., Moore B.C.J. Tone decay for hearing-impaired listeners with and without dead regions in the cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 2003; 114: 3283–3294
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluk K., Moore B.C.J. Factors affecting psychophysical tuning curves for normally hearing subjects. Hear Res 2004; 194: 118–134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluk K., Moore B.C.J. Factors affecting psychophysical tuning curves for hearing-impaired subjects. Hear Res 2005; 200: 115–131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluk K. & Moore B.C.J. 2006. Detecting dead regions using psychophysical tuning curves: A comparison of simultaneous and forward masking. Int J Audiol, (in press).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langenbeck B. Textbook of Practical Audiometry. Edward Arnold, London 1965
   Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. Mechanisms of masking. J Acoust Soc Am 1975; 57: 391–399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. Dead regions in the cochlea: Diagnosis, perceptual consequences, and implications for the fitting of hearing aids. Trends Amplif 2001; 5: 1–34
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing, 5th Ed. Academic Press, San Diego 2003
   Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. Dead regions in the cochlea: Conceptual foundations, diagnosis and clinical applications. Ear Hear 2004; 25: 98–116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Alcántara J.I. The use of psychophysical tuning curves to explore dead regions in the cochlea. Ear Hear 2001; 22: 268–278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Glasberg B.R., Roberts B. Refining the measurement of psychophysical tuning curves. J Acoust Soc Am 1984; 76: 1057–1066
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Glasberg B.R., Stone M.A. New version of the TEN test with calibrations in dB HL. Ear Hear 2004; 25: 478–487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Huss M., Vickers D.A., Glasberg B.R., Alcántara J.I. A test for the diagnosis of dead regions in the cochlea. Br J Audiol 2000; 34: 205–224
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Killen T., Munro K.J. Application of the TEN test to hearing-impaired teenagers with severe to profound hearing loss. Int J Audiol 2003; 42: 465–474
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson R.D., Moore B.C.J. Auditory filters and excitation patterns as representations of frequency resolution. Frequency Selectivity in Hearing, B.C.J. Moore. Academic, London 1986; 123–177
   Google Scholar
• Rance G. Auditory neuropathy/dys-synchrony and its perceptual consequences. Trends Amplif 2005; 9: 1–43
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schuknecht H.F. Pathology of the Ear, 2nd Ed. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia 1993
   Google Scholar
• Sek A., Alcántara J.I., Moore B.C.J., Kluk K., Wicher A. Development of a fast method for determining psychophysical tuning curves. Int J Audiol 2005; 44: 408–420
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Small A.M. Pure-tone masking. J Acoust Soc Am 1959; 31: 1619–1625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starr A., McPherson D., Patterson J., Don M., Luxford W., et al. Absence of both auditory evoked potentials and auditory percepts dependent on timing cues. Brain 1991; 114: 1157–1180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starr A., Picton T.W., Sininger Y., Hood L.J., Berlin C.I. Auditory neuropathy. Brain 1996; 119 (Pt3): 741–753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summers V., Molis M.R., Musch H., Walden B.E., Surr R.K., et al. Identifying dead regions in the cochlea: Psychophysical tuning curves and tone detection in threshold-equalizing noise. Ear Hear 2003; 24: 133–142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton A.R., Abbas P.J. Low-frequency hearing loss: Perception of filtered speech, psychophysical tuning curves, and masking. J Acoust Soc Am 1980; 67: 638–643
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner C.W., Burns E.M., Nelson D.A. Pure tone pitch perception and low-frequency hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am 1983; 73: 966–975
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler R.S. Frequency resolution in hearing-impaired listeners. Frequency Selectivity in Hearing, B.C.J. Moore. Academic Press, London 1986; 309–371
   Google Scholar
• Zeng F.G., Kong Y.Y., Michalewski H.J., Starr A. Perceptual consequences of disrupted auditory nerve activity. J Neurophysiol 2005; 93: 3050–3063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng F.G., Oba S., Starr A. Suprathreshold processing deficits due to desynchronous neural activities in auditory neuropathy. Physiological and Psychophysical Bases of Auditory Function, D.J. Breebaart, A.J.M. Houtsma, A. Kohlrausch, V.F. Prijs, R. Schoonhoven. Shaker, Maastricht 2001; 365–372
   Google Scholar