References
- American National Standards Institute. 1996. Specification for audiometers, ANSI S3.6-1996. New York: American National Standards Institute.
- American National Standards Institute. 1991. Maximum permissible ambient noise levels for audiometric test rooms, ANSI S3.1-1991. New York: American National Standards Institute.
- Cutler A., Mehler J., Norris D., Segui J. Limits on bilingualism. Nature 1989; 340: 229–230
- Gordon-Salant S., Fitzgibbons P. Sources of age-related recognition difficulty for time-compressed speech. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2001; 44: 709–719
- Konkle D.F., Beasley D.S., Bess F.H. Intelligibility of time-altered speech in relation to chronological aging. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1977; 20: 108–115
- Leeper H., Thomas C. Young children's preferences for listening rates. Percept Mot Skills 1978; 47: 891–898
- Nabelek A.K., Letowski T.R., Tucker F.M. Reverberant overlap- and self-masking in consonant identification. J Acoust Soc Am 1989; 86: 1259–1265
- Nabelek A.K., Nabelek I. Room acoustics and speech perception. Handbook of Clinical Audiology, J. Katz. Williams & Williams Publishing Co, Baltimore, MD 1994; 624–637
- Obler L.K., Fein D., Nicholas M., Albert M.L. Auditory comprehension and aging: Decline in syntactic processing. Appl Psycholinguistics 1991; 12: 433–452
- Picheny M.A. & Durlach N.I. 1979. Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing. Paper presented at the 97th meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, Cambridge, MA.
- Picheny M.A., Durlach N.I. & Braida L.D. 1980. Speaking clearly: Intelligibility and acoustic characteristics of nonsense sentences. Paper presented at the 99th meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, Atlanta, GA.
- Picheny M.A., Durlach N.I., Braida L.D. Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing III: An attempt to differentiate the contribution of speaking rate differences in intelligibility between clear and conversational speech. J Speech Hear Res 1989; 32: 600–603
- Riensche L., Lawson G., Beasley D.S., Smith L.L. Age and sex differences on preferred listening rates for speech. J Aud Res 1979; 19: 91–94
- Schmid P.M., Yeni-Komshian G.H. The effects of speaker accent and target predictability on perception of mispronunciations. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1999; 42: 56–64
- Schmitt J. The effects of time compression and time-expansion on passage compression by elderly listeners. J Speech Hear Res 1983; 26: 373–377
- Sutton B., King J., Hux K, Beukelman D. Younger and older adults’ rate performance when listening to synthetic speech. Aug Alt Comm 1995; 11: 147–153
- Tun P.A., Wingfield A. One voice too many: Adult age differences in language processing with different types of distracting sounds. J Gerontol 1999; 54: 317–327
- Uchanski R.M., Choi S.S., Braida L.D., Reed C.M., Durlach N.I. Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing IV: Further studies of the role of speaking rate. J Speech Hear Res 1996; 39: 494–509
- Vaughan N.E., Letwoski T. Effects of age, speech rate, and type of test on temporal auditory processing. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1997; 40: 1192–1201
- Versfeld N.J., Dreschler W.A. The relationship between the intelligibility of time-compressed speech and speech in noise in young and elderly listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 2002; 111: 401–408
- Wingfield A., Ducharme J.L. Effects of age and passage difficulty on listening-rate preferences for time-altered speech. J Geront 1999; 54: 199–202