Using transposition to improve consonant discrimination and detection for listeners with severe high-frequency hearing loss

References

• Allen J.B. Short term spectral analysis, synthesis and modification by discrete Fourier transform. IEEE Trans Acoust Speech Sig Proc 1977; 25: 235–238
   Google Scholar
• Baer T., Moore B.C.J., Kluk K. Effects of low-pass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in noise for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies. J Acoust Soc Am 2002; 112: 1133–1144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bench J., Bamford J. Speech-Hearing Tests and the Spoken Language of Hearing-Impaired Children. Academic, London 1979
   Google Scholar
• Braida, L.D., Durlach, N.I., Lippmann, R.P., Hicks, M.L., Rabinowitz, W.M. , et al. 1979. Hearing aids: A review of past research on linear amplification, amplitude compression, and frequency lowering. ASHA Monograph No 19, ASLHA, Rockville, Maryland.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne D., Dillon H., Tran K., Arlinger S., Wilbraham K., et al. An international comparison of long-term average speech spectra. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 96: 2108–2120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crouzet, O. & Ainsworth, W.A. 2001. On the various instances of envelope information on the perception of speech in adverse conditions: An analysis of between-channel envelope correlation. Workshop on Consistent and Reliable Cues for Sound Analysis, Aalborg, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Davis A. Hearing in Adults. Whurr, London 1995
   Google Scholar
• Davis, W.E. 2001. Proportional frequency compression in hearing instruments. Hearing Review, February, 34–39.
   Google Scholar
• Dudley H. Remaking speech. J Acoust Soc Am 1939; 11: 169–177
   Google Scholar
• Fant G.C.M. Acoustic Theory of Speech Production. Mouton, The Hague 1970
   Google Scholar
• Faulkner, A., Rosen, S., Smith, M. & Siciliano, C. 2006. Perceptual learning for holes and overlaps in frequency to place representation: Implications for fitting a hearing aid combined with a cochlear implant. An ear to the future: A perspective on directions in hearing research, UCL Ear Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Foust K.O., Gengel R.W. Speech discrimination by sensorineural hearing-impaired persons using a transposer hearing aid. Scand Audiol 1973; 2: 161–170
   Google Scholar
• French N.R., Steinberg J.C. Factors governing the intelligibility of speech sounds. J Acoust Soc Am 1947; 19: 90–119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasberg B.R., Moore B.C.J. Auditory filter shapes in subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear impairments. J Acoust Soc Am 1986; 79: 1020–1033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasberg B.R., Moore B.C.J. Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data. Hear Res 1990; 47: 103–138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan C.A., Turner C.W. High-frequency audibility: Benefits for hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 1998; 104: 432–441
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson B. The use of the transposer for the management of the deaf child. Int Audiol 1966; 5: 362–372
   Google Scholar
• Kluk K., Moore B.C.J. Factors affecting psychophysical tuning curves for hearing-impaired subjects with high-frequency dead regions. Hear Res 2005; 200: 115–131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluk, K. & Moore, B.C.J. 2006. Dead regions and enhancement of frequency discrimination: Effects of audiogram slope, unilateral versus bilateral loss, and hearing-aid use. Hear Res, 222, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Kuk, F., Peeters, H., Keenan, D., Jessen, A. & Andersen, H. 2006. Linear frequency transposition: Extending the audibility of high-frequency information. Hearing Review, 13, 44–46.
   Google Scholar
• Lippmann R.P. Perception of frequency lowered consonants. J Acoust Soc Am 1980; 67: s78
   Google Scholar
• McDermott H.J., Dorkos V.P., Dean M.R., Ching T.Y.C. Improvements in speech perception with use of the AVR TranSonic frequency-transposing hearing aid. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1999; 42: 1323–1335
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott H.J., Knight M.R. Preliminary results with the AVR ImpaCt frequency-transposing hearing aid. J Am Acad Audiol 2001; 12: 121–127
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miller G.A., Nicely P.E. An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. J Acoust Soc Am 1955; 27: 338–352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. Dead regions in the cochlea: Diagnosis, perceptual consequences, and implications for the fitting of hearing aids. Trends Amplif 2001; 5: 1–34
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing, 5th Ed. Academic Press, San Diego 2003
   Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. Dead regions in the cochlea: Conceptual foundations, diagnosis and clinical applications. Ear Hear 2004; 25: 98–116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Alcántara J.I., Dau T. Masking patterns for sinusoidal and narrowband noise maskers. J Acoust Soc Am 1998; 104: 1023–1038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Glasberg B.R. Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting. I. Linear hearing aids. Br J Audiol 1998; 32: 317–335
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Glasberg B.R., Baer T. A model for the prediction of thresholds, loudness and partial loudness. J Audio Eng Soc 1997; 45: 224–240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Glasberg B.R., Stone M.A. New version of the TEN test with calibrations in dB HL. Ear Hear 2004; 25: 478–487
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Huss M., Vickers D.A., Glasberg B.R., Alcántara J.I. A test for the diagnosis of dead regions in the cochlea. Br J Audiol 2000; 34: 205–224
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parent T.C., Chmiel R., Jerger J. Comparison of performance with frequency- transposition hearing aids and conventional hearing aids. J Am Acad Audiol 1997; 8: 355–365
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pick G., Evans E.F., Wilson J.P. Frequency resolution in patients with hearing loss of cochlear origin. Psychophysics and Physiology of Hearing, E.F. Evans, J.P. Wilson. Academic Press, London 1977; 273–281
   Google Scholar
• Posen M.P., Reed C.M., Braida L.D. Intelligibility of frequency-lowered speech produced by a channel vocoder. J Rehab Res Dev 1993; 30: 26–38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rees R., Velmans M. The effect of frequency transposition on the untrained auditory discrimination of congenitally deaf children. Br J Audiol 1993; 27: 53–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, J.D., Baer, T. & Moore, B.C.J. 2005. Using FFT-based frequency transposition to improve consonant identification in listeners with severe high-frequency hearing loss. Experimental Papers Meeting of the British Society of Audiology, Cardiff, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Sakamoto, S., Goto, K., Tateno, M. & Kaga, K. 1997. Development of a digital hearing aid with frequency compression processing based on the PARCOR analysis-synthesis technique. Poster presentation at the second NIH/VA Hearing Aid Research and Development Conference, Bethesda, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Schweitzer C.H. Future trends in amplification. Audiology Treatment, M. Valente, H. Hosford-Dunn, R.J. Roeser. Thieme, New York 2000; 722–724
   Google Scholar
• Sek A., Alcántara J.I., Moore B.C.J., Kluk K., Wicher A. Development of a fast method for determining psychophysical tuning curves. Int J Audiol 2005; 44: 408–420
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner M.W. Speech intelligibility in noise-induced hearing loss: Effects of high-frequency compensation. J Acoust Soc Am 1980; 67: 306–317
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steeneken J.M., Houtgast T. Mutual dependence of the octave-band weights in predicting speech intelligibility. Speech Comm 1999; 28: 109–123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studebaker G. A'rationalized' arcsine transform. J Speech Hear Res 1985; 28: 455–462
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Turner C.W., Hurtig R.R. Proportional frequency compression of speech for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am 1999; 106: 877–886
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velmans M. Speech imitation in simulated deafness, using visual cues and'recoded' auditory information. Lang Speech 1973; 16: 224–236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velmans, M., Marcuson, M., Grant, J., Kwiatkowski, R. & Rees, R. 1988. The use of frequency transposition in the language acquisition of sensori-neural deaf children. Report to the Medical Research Council Grant No G8319832N, 1–115.
   Google Scholar
• Vickers, D.A., Baer, T. & Moore, B.C.J. 2004. Exploring the importance of band independence for speech filtered in multiple bands. Experimental Papers Meeting of the British Society of Audiology, London.
   Google Scholar
• Vickers D.A., Moore B.C.J., Baer T. Effects of lowpass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in quiet for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies. J Acoust Soc Am 2001; 110: 1164–1175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang M.D., Bilger R.C. Consonant confusions in noise: A study of perceptual features. J Acoust Soc Am 1973; 54: 1248–1266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren R.M., Bashford J.A., Lenz P.W. Intelligibilities of 1-octave rectangular bands spanning the speech spectrum when heard separately and paired. J Acoust Soc Am 2005; 118: 3261–3266
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar