New cochlear implant coding strategy for tonal language speakers

References

• Au D.K.K. Effects of stimulation rates on Cantonese lexical tone perception by cochlear implant users in Hong Kong. Clin Otolaryngol 2003; 28: 533–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry J.G., Blamey P.J., Martin L.F.A., Lee K.Y-S., Tang T., et al. Tone discrimination in Cantonese-speaking children using a cochlear implant. Clin Linguist Phon 2002; 16: 79–99
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baudoin-Chial S. Hemispheric lateralization of modern standard Chinese tone processing. J Neurolinguist 1986; 2: 189–99
   Google Scholar
• Ciocca V., Francis A.L., Aisha R., Wong L. The perception of Cantonese lexical tones by early-deafened cochlear implantees. J Acoust Soc Am 2002; 111: 2250–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen L.T., Richardson L.M., Saunders E., Cowan R.S.C. Spatial spread of neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: Comparison of improved ECAP method and psychophysical forward masking. Hear Res 2003; 179: 72–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fok Chan Y.Y. A Perceptual Study of Tones in Cantonese. Centre of Asian Studies, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 1974
   Google Scholar
• Fryauf-Bertschy H., Tyler R.S., Kelsay D.M., Gantz B.J. Performance over time of congenitally deaf and postlingually deafened children using a multichannel cochlear implant. J Speech Hear Res 1992; 35: 913–20
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gandour J. Perceptual dimensions of tone: Evidence from Cantonese. J Chin Ling 1981; 9: 20–36
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandour J. Tone perception in far eastern-languages. J Phon 1983; 11: 149–75
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geurts L., Wouters J. Coding of the fundamental frequency in continuous interleaved sampling processors for cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 2001; 109: 713–26
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gfeller K., Lansing C.R. Melodic, rhythmic, and timbral perception of adult cochlear implant users. J Speech Hear Res 1991; 34: 916–20
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gfeller K., Christ A., Knutson J.F., Witt S., Murray K.T., et al. Musical backgrounds, listening habits, and aesthetic enjoyment of adult cochlear implant recipients. J Am Acad Audiol 2000; 11: 390–406
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gfeller K., Witt S., Adamek M., Mehr M., Rogers J., et al. Effects of training on timbre recognition and appraisal by postlingually deafened cochlear implant recipients. J Am Acad Audiol 2002; 13: 132–45
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hawthorne G., Hogan A., Giles E., Stewart M., Kethel L., et al. Evaluating the health-related quality of life effects of cochlear implants: A prospective study of an adult cochlear implant program. Int J Audiol 2004; 43: 183–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houtsma A.J.M., Smurzynski J. Pitch identification and discrimination for complex tones with many harmonics. J Acoust Soc Am, 304 1990; 87: 10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leal M.C., Shin Y.J.E., Laborde M-L., Calmels M-N., Verges S., et al. Music perception in adult cochlear implant recipients. Acta Otolaryngol 2003; 123: 826–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee K.Y.S., van Hasselt C.A., Chiu S.N., Cheung D.M.C. Cantonese tone perception ability of cochlear implant children in comparison with normal-hearing children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2002; 63: 137–47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott H.J. Music perception with cochlear implants: A review. Trends Amplif 2004; 8: 49–82
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McDermott H.J., McKay C.M., Vandali A.E. A new portable sound processor for the University of Melbourne/Nucleus Limited multi-electrode cochlear implant. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 91: 3367–71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer T.A., Svirsky M.A., Kirk K.I., Miyamoto R.T. Improvements in speech perception by children with profound prelingual hearing loss: Effects of device, communication mode, and chronological age. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1998; 41: 846–58
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Glasberg B.R., Peters R.W. Relative dominance of individual partials in determining the pitch of complex tones. J Acoust Soc Am 1985; 77: 1853–60
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Rosen S.M. Tune recognition with reduced pitch and interval information. Q J Exp Psychol 1979; 31: 229–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkinson A.J., Arcaroli J., Staller S.J., Arndt P.L., Cosgriff A., et al. The Nucleus 24 Contour cochlear implant system: Adult clinical trial results. Ear Hear 2002; 23: 41s–8s
   Google Scholar
• Parkinson A.J., Parkinson W.S., Tyler R.S., Lowder M.W., Gantz B.J. Speech perception performance in experienced cochlear-implant patients receiving the SPEAK processing strategy in the Nucleus Spectra-22 cochlear implant. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1998; 41: 1073–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelizzone M., Cosendai G., Tinembart J. Within-patient longitudinal speech reception measures with continuous interleaved sampling processors for Ineraid implanted subjects. Ear Hear 1999; 20: 228–37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pijl S. Labeling of musical interval size by cochlear implant patients and normally-hearing subjects. Ear Hear 1997; 18: 364–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plomp R. Pitch of complex tones. J Acoust Soc Am 1967; 41: 1526–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plomp R., Mimpen A.M. The ear as a frequency analyser II. J Acoust Soc Am 1968; 43: 764–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritsma R.J. Frequencies dominant in the perception of the pitch of complex sounds. J Acoust Soc Am 1967; 42: 191–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubinstein J.T. How cochlear implants encode speech. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 12: 444–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tomblin J.B., Spencer L., Flock S., Tyler R., Gantz B. A comparison of language achievement in children with cochlear implants and children using hearing aids. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1999; 42: 497–509
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vance T.J. An experimental investigation of tone and intonation in Cantonese. Phonetica 1976; 33: 368–92
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandali A.E., Sucher C., Tsang D.J., McKay C.M., Chew J.W.D., et al. Pitch ranking ability of cochlear implant recipients: A comparison of sound-processing strategies. J Acoust Soc Am 2005; 117: 3126–38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandali A.E., Whitford L.A., Plant K.L., Clark G.M. Speech perception as a function of electrical stimulation rate: Using the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system. Ear Hear 2000; 21: 608–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vongpaisal T., Trehub S.E., Schellenberg E.G. Song recognition by children and adolescents with cochlear implants. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2006; 49: 1091–103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson B.S., Finley C.C., Lawson D.T., Wolford R.D., Eddington D.K., et al. Better speech recognition with cochlear implants. Nature 1991; 352: 236–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong A.O.C., Wong L.L.N. Tone perception of Cantonese-speaking prelingually hearing-impaired children using cochlear implants. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 130: 751–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong L.L.N., Soli S.D. Development of the Cantonese HINT. Ear Hear 2005; 26: 276–89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar