Development of a fast method for determining sensitivity to temporal fine structure

References

• Akeroyd M.A., Moore B.C.J., Moore G.A. Melody recognition using three types of dichotic-pitch stimulus. J Acoust Soc Am 2001; 110: 1498–504
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bracewell R.N. The Fourier Transform and its Applications. Mc-Graw Hill, New York 1986
   Google Scholar
• Buus S., Florentine M. Sensitivity to excitation-level differences within a fixed number of channels as a function of level and frequency. Advances in Hearing Research, G.A. Manley, G.M. Klump, C. Köppl, H. Fastl, H. Oekinghaus. World Scientific, Singapore 1995; 401–12
   Google Scholar
• Cariani P.A., Delgutte B. Neural correlates of the pitch of complex tones. I. Pitch and pitch salience. J Neurophysiol 1996a; 76: 1698–716
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cariani P.A., Delgutte B. Neural correlates of the pitch of complex tones. II. Pitch shift, pitch ambiguity, phase invariance, pitch circularity, rate pitch and the dominance region for pitch. J Neurophysiol 1996b; 76: 1717–34
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Boer E. Pitch of inharmonic signals. Nature 1956; 178: 535–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Cheveigné A., Pressnitzer D. The case of the missing delay lines: Synthetic delays obtained by cross-channel phase interaction. J Acoust Soc Am 2006; 119: 3908–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorman M.F., Gifford R.H., Spahr A.J., McKarns S.A. The benefits of combining acoustic and electric stimulation for the recognition of speech, voice and melodies. Audiol Neurotol 2008; 13: 105–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duquesnoy A.J. Effect of a single interfering noise or speech source on the binaural sentence intelligibility of aged persons. J Acoust Soc Am 1983; 74: 739–43
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festen J.M., Plomp R. Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 1990; 88: 1725–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florentine M., Buus S. An excitation-pattern model for intensity discrimination. J Acoust Soc Am 1981; 70: 1646–54
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert G., Bergeras I., Voillery D., Lorenzi C. Effects of periodic interruptions on the intelligibility of speech based on temporal fine-structure or envelope cues. J Acoust Soc Am 2007; 122: 1336–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glasberg B.R., Moore B.C.J. Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data. Hear Res 1990; 47: 103–38
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gnansia D., Jourdes V., Lorenzi C. Effect of masker modulation depth on speech masking release. Hear Res 2008; 239: 60–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacker M.J., Ratcliff R. A revised table of d' for M-alternative forced choice. Percept Psychophys 1979; 26: 168–70
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins K., Moore B.C.J. Moderate cochlear hearing loss leads to a reduced ability to use temporal fine structure information. J Acoust Soc Am 2007; 122: 1055–68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hopkins, K. & Moore, B.C.J. 2008. The contribution of temporal fine structure to the intelligibility of speech in steady and modulated noise. J Acoust Soc Am, ( in press).
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins K., Moore B.C.J., Stone M.A. Effects of moderate cochlear hearing loss on the ability to benefit from temporal fine structure information in speech. J Acoust Soc Am 2008; 123: 1140–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javel E. Coding of AM tones in the chinchilla auditory nerve: Implications for the pitch of complex tones. J Acoust Soc Am 1980; 68: 133–46
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacher-Fougère S., Demany L. Consequences of cochlear damage for the detection of interaural phase differences. J Acoust Soc Am 2005; 118: 2519–26
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levitt H. Speech discrimination ability in the hearing impaired: Spectrum considerations. The Vanderbilt Hearing-Aid Report, G.A. Studebaker, F.H. Bess. Monographs in Contemporary Audiology, Upper Darby, Pennsylvania 1982; 32–43
   Google Scholar
• Lorenzi C., Gilbert G., Carn C., Garnier S., Moore B.C.J. Speech perception problems of the hearing impaired reflect inability to use temporal fine structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006a; 103: 18866–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzi C., Husson M., Ardoint M., Debruille X. Speech masking release in listeners with flat hearing loss: Effects of masker fluctuation rate on identification scores and phonetic feature reception. Int J Audiol 2006b; 45: 487–95
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzi C., Moore B.C.J. Role of temporal envelope and fine structure cues in speech perception: A review. Auditory Signal Processing in Hearing-impaired Listener, 1st International Symposium on Auditory and Audiological Research (ISAAR 2007), T. Dau, J.M. Buchholz, J.M. Harte, T.U. Christiansen. Centertryk A/S, Denmark 2008; 263–72
   Google Scholar
• Miskolczy-Fodor F. Relation between loudness and duration of tonal pulses. III. Response in cases of abnormal loudness function. J Acoust Soc Am 1960; 32: 486–92
   Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. Frequency difference limens for short-duration tones. J Acoust Soc Am 1973; 54: 610–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. Effects of relative phase of the components on the pitch of three-component complex tones. Psychophysics and Physiology of Hearing, E.F. Evans, J.P. Wilson. Academic Press, London 1977; 349–58
   Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing2nd Ed. Academic Press, London 1982
   Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing5th Ed. Academic Press, San Diego 2003
   Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. Cochlear Hearing Loss: Physiological, Psychological and Technical Issues2nd Ed. Wiley, Chichester 2007
   Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. The choice of compression speed in hearing aids: Theoretical and practical considerations, and the role of individual differences. Trends Amplif 2008a; 12: 102–12
   Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. The role of temporal fine structure in normal and impaired hearing. Auditory Signal Processing in Hearing-impaired Listeners, 1st International Symposium on Auditory and Audiological Research (ISAAR 2007), T. Dau, J.M. Buchholz, J.M. Harte, T.U. Christiansen. Centertryk A/S,in press, Denmark 2008b
   Google Scholar
• Moore, B.C.J. 2008c. The role of temporal fine structure processing in pitch perception, masking, and speech perception for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired people. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol, 9, 399–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Glasberg B.R., Baer T. A model for the prediction of thresholds, loudness, and partial loudness. J Audio Eng Soc 1997; 45: 224–40
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Glasberg B.R., Flanagan H.J., Adams J. Frequency discrimination of complex tones: Assessing the role of component resolvability and temporal fine structure. J Acoust Soc Am 2006a; 119: 480–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Glasberg B.R., Hopkins K. Frequency discrimination of complex tones by hearing-impaired subjects: Evidence for loss of ability to use temporal fine structure information. Hear Res 2006b; 222: 16–27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Glasberg B.R., Low K.-E., Cope T., Cope W. Effects of level and frequency on the audibility of partials in inharmonic complex tones. J Acoust Soc Am 2006c; 120: 934–44
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Glasberg B.R., Shailer M.J. Frequency and intensity difference limens for harmonics within complex tones. J Acoust Soc Am 1984; 75: 550–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, B.C.J., Hopkins, K. & Cuthbertson, S.J. 2008. Discrimination of complex tones with unresolved components using temporal fine structure information. J Acoust Soc Am, ( submitted).
   Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Huss M., Vicker D.A., Glasberg B.R., Alcántara J.I. A test for the diagnosis of dead regions in the cochlea. Br J Audiol 2000; 34: 205–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Moore G.A. Discrimination of the fundamental frequency of complex tones with fixed and shifting spectral envelopes by normally-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects. Hear Res 2003a; 182: 153–63
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Ohgushi K. Audibility of partials in inharmonic complex tones. J Acoust Soc Am 1993; 93: 452–61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Oldfield S.R., Dooley G. Detection and discrimination of spectral peaks and notches at 1 and 8 kHz. J Acoust Soc Am 1989; 85: 820–36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Peters R.W., Stone M.A. Benefits of linear amplification and multi-channel compression for speech comprehension in backgrounds with spectral and temporal dips. J Acoust Soc Am 1999; 105: 400–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J., Sek A. Effects of carrier frequency and background noise on the detection of mixed modulation. J Acoust Soc Am 1994; 96: 741–51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore G.A., Moore B.C.J. Perception of the low pitch of frequency-shifted complexes. J Acoust Soc Am 2003b; 113: 977–85
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer A.R., Russell I.J. Phase-locking in the cochlear nerve of the guinea-pig and its relation to the receptor potential of inner hair-cells. Hear Res 1986; 24: 1–15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson R.D., Allerhand M.H., Giguère C. Time-domain modeling of peripheral auditory processing: A modular architecture and a software platform. J Acoust Soc Am 1995; 98: 1890–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters R.W., Moore B.C.J., Baer T. Speech reception thresholds in noise with and without spectral and temporal dips for hearing-impaired and normally-hearing people. J Acoust Soc Am 1998; 103: 577–87
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plack C.J., Oxenham A.J. The psychophysics of pitch. Pitch Perception, C.J. Plack, A.J. Oxenham, R.R. Fay, A.N. Popper. Springer, New York 2005; 7–55
   Google Scholar
• Plomp R. The ear as a frequency analyser. J Acoust Soc Am 1964; 36: 1628–36
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plomp R., Mimpen A.M. The ear as a frequency analyser II. J Acoust Soc Am 1968; 43: 764–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin M.K., Oxenham A.J. Effects of simulated cochlear-implant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskers. J Acoust Soc Am 2003; 114: 446–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santurette S., Dau T. Binaural pitch perception in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Hear Res 2006; 223: 29–47
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schouten J.F., Ritsma R.J., Cardozo B.L. Pitch of the residue. J Acoust Soc Am 1962; 34: 1418–24
   Google Scholar
• Semal C., Demany L. Individual differences in the sensitivity to pitch direction. J Acoust Soc Am 2006; 120: 3907–15
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shannon R.V., Zeng F.-G., Kamath V., Wygonski J., Ekelid M. Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues. Science 1995; 270: 303–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stickney G.S., Nie K., Zeng F.G. Contribution of frequency modulation to speech recognition in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 2005; 118: 2412–20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone M.A., Moore B.C.J. Effect of the speed of a single-channel dynamic range compressor on intelligibility in a competing speech task. J Acoust Soc Am 2003; 114: 1023–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone M.A., Moore B.C.J. Side effects of fast-acting dynamic range compression that affect intelligibility in a competing speech task. J Acoust Soc Am 2004; 116: 2311–23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone M.A., Moore B.C.J. Quantifying the effects of fast-acting compression on the envelope of speech. J Acoust Soc Am 2007; 121: 1654–64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone M.A., Moore B.C.J. Effects of spectro-temporal modulation changes produced by multi-channel compression on intelligibility in a competing-speech task. J Acoust Soc Am 2008; 123: 1063–76
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Supin A.Y., Popov V.V., Milekhina O.N., Tarakanov M.B. The effect of masking noise on rippled-spectrum resolution. Hear Res 2001; 151: 157–66
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Turner C.W., Gantz B.J., Vidal C., Behrens A., Henry B.A. Speech recognition in noise for cochlear implant listeners: Benefits of residual acoustic hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 2004; 115: 1729–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White L.J., Plack C.J. Factors affecting the duration effect in pitch perception for unresolved complex tones. J Acoust Soc Am 2003; 114: 3309–16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng F.G., Nie K., Stickney G.S., Kong Y.Y., Vongphoe M., et al. Speech recognition with amplitude and frequency modulations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102: 2293–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwislocki J. Acoustic attenuation between the ears. J Acoust Soc Am 1953; 25: 752–9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar