Extended bandwidth real-ear measurement accuracy and repeatability to 10 kHz

References

• American National Standards Institute. (2013). Methods of Measurement of Real-Ear Performance Characteristics of Hearing Aids. ANSI S3.46-2013. New York: Acoustical Society of America.
   Google Scholar
• American Academy of Audiology (2006). Guidelines for the Audiologic Management of Adult Hearing Impairment. Retrieved from http://audiology-web.s3.amazonaws.com/migrated/haguidelines.pdf_53994876e92e42.70908344.pdf
   Google Scholar
• American Academy of Audiology (2013). American Academy of Audiology Clinical Practice Guidelines Pediatric Amplification. Retrieved from http://galster.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/AAA-2013-Pediatric-Amp-Guidelines.pdf
   Google Scholar
• British Society of Audiology & British Academy of Audiology (2007). Guidance on the use of real ear measurement to verify the fitting of digital signal processing hearing aids. Retrieved from http://www.thebsa.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/REM.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Audioscan. (2015). Audioscan Verifit® User’s Guide 3.10 ©. Dorchester: Etymonic Design Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell M., Souza P.E. & Tremblay K.L. 2006. Effect of probe tube insertion depth on spectral measures of speech. Trends Amplif, 10, 145–154.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chan J.C. & Geisler C.D. 1990. Estimation of eardrum acoustic pressure and of ear canal length from remote points in the canal. J Acoust Soc Am, 87, 1237–1247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuglholt M.L., Roslyng-Jensen M., Pogash R.R. & Lindley G. 2010. Applying extended bandwidth and binaural broadband technology in paediatric fittings. Oticon Clinical Update, Retrieved from http://www.oticonkorea.com/∼asset/cache.ashx?id=10849&type=14&format=web
   Google Scholar
• Füllgrabe C., Baer T., Stone M.A. & Moore B.C.J. 2010. Preliminary evaluation of a method for fitting hearing aids with extended bandwidth. Int J Audiol, 49, 741–753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilman S. & Dirks D. 1986. Acoustics of ear canal measurement of eardrum SPL in simulators. J Acoust Soc Am, 80, 783–793.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray C.D. & Kinnear P.R. (1999). SPSS for Windows Made Simple. Hove: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kimlinger C., McCreery R. & Lewis D. 2015. High-frequency audibility: The effects of audiometric configuration, stimulus type, and device. J Am Acad Audiol, 26, 128–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis J.D., McCreery R.W., Neely S.T. & Stelmachowicz P.G. 2009. Comparison of in-situ calibration methods for quantifying input to the middle ear. J Acoust Soc Am, 126, 3114–3124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mardia K.V. 1971. The effect of non-normality on some multivariate tests and robustness to non-normality in the linear model. Biometrika, 58, 105–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCreery R.W., Pittman A., Lewis J., Neely S.T. & Stelmachowicz P.G. 2009. Use of forward pressure level to minimize the influence of acoustic standing waves during probe-microphone hearing-aid verification. J Acoust Soc Am, 126, 15–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore B.C.J. & Sęk A. 2012. Comparison of the CAM2 and NAL-NL2 hearing aid fitting methods. Ear Hear, 34, 83–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller H.G. 2001. Probe microphone measurements: 20 years of progress. Trends Amplif, 5, 35–68.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Munro K.J. & Davis J. 2003. Deriving the real-ear SPL of audiometric data using the “coupler to dial and the real ear to coupler difference”. Ear Hear, 24, 100–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro K.J. & Howlin E.M. 2005. Comparison of real-ear to coupler difference values in the right and left ear of hearing aid users. Ear Hear, 31, 146–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien A., Keidser G., Yeend I., Hartley L. & Dillon H. 2010. Validity and reliability of in-situ air conduction thresholds measured through hearing aids coupled to closed and open instant-fit tips. Int J Audiol, 49, 868–876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richmond S.A., Kopun J.G., Neely S.T., Tan H. & Gorga M.P. 2011. Distribution of standing-wave errors in real-ear sound-level measurements. J Acoust Soc Am, 129, 3134–3140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheperle R.A., Goodman S.S. & Neely S.T. 2011. Further assessment of forward pressure level for in situ calibration. J Acoust Soc Am, 130, 3882–3892.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scollie S. & Seewald R. 1998. Validity and repeatability of level-independent HL to SPL transforms. Ear Hear, 19, 407–413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinclair S.T., Beauchaine K.L., Moodie S.K., Feigin J.A., Seewald R.C. et al. 1996. Repeatability of a real-ear-to-coupler difference measurement as a function of age. Am J Audiol, 5, 52–56.
   Google Scholar
• Souza N.N., Dhar S., Neely S.T. & Siegel J.H. 2014. Comparison of nine methods to estimate ear-canal stimulus levels. J Acoust Soc Am, 136, 1768–1787.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stinson M.R. & Lawton B.W. 1989. Specification of the geometry of the human ear canal for the prediction of sound-pressure level distribution. J Acoust Soc Am, 85, 2492–2503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stinson M.R., Shaw E.A.G. & Lawton B.W. 1982. Estimation of acoustical energy reflectance at the eardrum from measurements of pressure distribution in the human ear canal. J Acoust Soc Am, 72, 766–773.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storey L. & Dillon H. 2001. Estimating the location of probe microphones relative to the tympanic membrane. J Am Acad Audiol, 12, 150–154.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tabachnik B.G. & Fidell L.S. (1996). Multivariate Normality. In Woods (ed.), Using Multivariate Statistics: Third Edition. Northbridge: HarperCollins College Publisher; 381.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor B. & Mueller H.G. (2011). Fitting and Dispensing Hearing Aids: First Edition. San Diego: Plural Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Valente M., Meister M., Smith P. & Goebel J. 1990. Intratester test-retest reliability of insertion gain measures. Ear Hear, 11, 181–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valente M., Valente M. & Goebel J. 1991. Reliability and intersubject variability of the real ear unaided response. Ear Hear, 12, 216–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zemplenyi J., Gilman S. & Dirks D. 1985. Optical method for measurement of ear canal length. J Acoust Soc Am, 78, 2146–2148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar