Development and evaluation of a mixed gender, multi-talker matrix sentence test in Australian English

References

• Akeroyd M.A., Arlinger S., Bentler R.A., Boothroyd A., Dillier N., et al. 2015. International Collegium of Rehabilitative Audiology (ICRA) recommendations for the construction of multilingual speech tests. Int J Audiol, 54, 17–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Athalye S. 2010. Factors Affecting Speech Recognition in Noise and Hearing Loss in Adults with a Wide Variety of Auditory Capabilities. Southampton, UK: PhD Thesis, Faculty of Engineering and the Environment: Institute of Sound and Vibration Research, University of Southampton.
   Google Scholar
• Bench J., Kowal A. & Bamford J. 1979. The BKB (Bamford-Kowal-Bench) sentence lists for partially-hearing children. British Journal of Audiology, 13, 108–112.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bolia R.S., Nelson W.T., Ericson M.A. & Simpson B.D. 2000. A speech corpus for multitalker communcations research. J Acoust Soc Am, 107, 1065–1066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brungart D.S., Simpson B.D., Ericson M.A. & Scott K.R. 2001. Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of multiple simultaneous talkers. J Acoust Soc Am, 110, 2527–2538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz A., Buschermöhle M., Aarnisalo A.A., Vanhanen A., Hyyrynen T., et al. 2014. The development and evaluation of the Finnish matrix sentence test for speech intelligibility assessment. Acta Otolaryngol, 134, 728–737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fry D. 1947. The frequency of occurrence of speech sounds in Southern English. Arch Neérl Phon Exp, 20, 103–106.
   Google Scholar
• Glasberg B.R. & Moore B.C.J. 2002. A model of loudness applicable to time-varying sounds. J Audio Eng Soc, 50, 331–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagerman B. 1982. Sentences for testing speech intelligibility in noise. Scand Audiol, 11, 79–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall S. 2006. The Development of a New English Sentence in Noise Test and an English Number Recognition Test. Southampton, UK: MSc Thesis, Faculty of Engineering and the Environment: Institute of Sound and Vibration Research, University of Southampton.
   Google Scholar
• Hewitt D.R. 2008. Evaluation of an English Speech-in-Noise Audiometry Test. Southampton, UK: MSc Thesis, Faculty of Engineering, Science and Mathematics, University of Southampton.
   Google Scholar
• Hochmuth S., Brand T., Zokoll M.A., Castro F.Z., Wardenga N., et al. 2012. A Spanish matrix sentence test for assessing speech reception thresholds in noise. Int J Audiol, 51, 536–544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochmuth S., Kollmeier B., Brand T. & Jürgens T. 2015. Influence of noise type on speech reception thresholds across four languages measured with matrix sentence tests. Int J Audiol, 54, 62–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houben R., Koopman J., Luts H., Wagener K.C., van Wieringen A., et al. 2014. Development of a Dutch matrix sentence test to assess speech intelligibility in noise. Int J Audiol, 53, 760–763.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen S., Luts H., Wagener K.C., Kollmeier B., Del Rio M., et al. 2012. Comparison of three types of French speech-in-noise tests: A multi-center study. Int J Audiol, 51, 164–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollmeier B., Warzybok A., Hochmuth S., Zokoll M., Uslar V., et al. 2015. The multilingual matrix test: Principles, applications and comparisons across languages: A review. Int J Audiol, 54, 3–16. Retrieved: http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2015.1020971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin G. & Carlile S. 2015. Costs of switching auditory spatial attention in following conversational turn-taking. Front Neurosci, 9, 124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson M., Soli S.D. & Sullivan J.A. 1994. Development of the hearing in noise test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95, 1085–1099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozimek E., Warzybok A. & Kutzner D. 2010. Polish sentence matrix test for speech intelligibility measurement in noise. Int J Audiol, 49, 444–454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plomp R. & Mimpen A.M. 1979. Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences. Audiology, 18, 43–52.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Puglisi G.E., Astolfi A., Prodi N., Visentin C., Warzybok A., et al. 2014. Construction and first evaluation of the Italian Matrix Sentence Test for the assessment of speech intelligibility in noise. Presented at Forum Acusticum, Krakow.
   Google Scholar
• Van Esch T.E.M., Kollmeier B., Vormann M., Lyzenga J., Houtgast T., et al. 2013. Evaluation of the preliminary auditory profile test battery in an international multi-centre study. Int J Audiol, 52, 305–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlaming M.S.M.G., Kollmeier B., Dreschler W.A., Martin R., Wouters J., et al. 2011. HearCom: Hearing in the communication society. Acta Acust United C, 97, 175–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagener K., Brand T. & Kollmeier B. 1999a. Development and evaluation of a German sentence test I: Design of the Oldenburg sentence test (in German). Z Audiol, 38, 4–15.
   Google Scholar
• Wagener K., Brand T. & Kollmeier B. 1999b. Development and evaluation of a German sentence test II: Optimization of the Oldenburg sentence test (in German). Z Audiol, 38, 44–56.
   Google Scholar
• Wagener K., Brand T. & Kollmeier B. 1999c. Development and evaluation of a German sentence test III: Evaluation of the Oldenburg sentence test (in German). Z Audiol, 38, 86–95.
   Google Scholar
• Wagener K., Josvassen J.L. & Ardenkjœr R. 2003. Design, optimization and evaluation of a Danish sentence test in noise. Int J Audiol, 42, 10–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warzybok A., Brand T., Wagener K.C. & Kollmeier B. 2015a. How much does language proficiency by non-native listeners influence speech audiometric tests in noise? Int J Audiol, 54, 88–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warzybok A., Zokoll M., Wardenga N., Ozimek E., Boboshko M., et al. 2015b. Development of the Russian matrix sentence test. Int J Audiol, 54, 35–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods W.S., Kalluri S., Pentony S. & Nooraei N. 2013. Predicting the effect of hearing loss and audibility on amplified speech reception in a multi-talker listening scenario. J Acoust Soc Am, 133, 4268–4278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zokoll M., Berg D., Wagener K., Jansen S., Lyzenga J., et al. 2009. D-1-9: Report on an optimized inventory of Speech-based auditory screening & impairment tests for six languages. Final report for EU Project FP6-004171 HEARCOM: Hearing in the Communication Society.
   Google Scholar
• Zokoll M., Wagener K.C., Warzybok A., Hochmuth S. & Kollmeier B. 2012. International vergleichbare und multilingual einsetzbare Sprachtests im Störgeräusch: Erweiterung um einen Amerikanisch Englischen Test. In: 43. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Medizinische Physik. Jena, Germany, pp. 153–156.
   Google Scholar
• Zokoll M., Hochmuth S., Warzybok A., Wagener K.C., Buschermöhle M., et al. 2013. Speech-in-noise tests for multilingual hearing screening and diagnostics. Am J Audiol, 22, 175–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar