DSL prescriptive targets for bone conduction devices: adaptation and comparison to clinical fittings

References

• Ambrose, S.E., Walker, E.A., Unflat-Berry, L.M., Oleson, J.J. & Moeller, M.P. 2015. Quantity and quality of caregivers’ linguistic input to 18-month and 3-year-old children who are hard of hearing. Ear Hear, 36, 48S–59S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Academy of Audiology (AAA). 2006. American Academy of Audiology guidelines for the audiologic management of adult hearing impairment. Retrieved from http://www.audiology.org/resources/documentlibrary/Documents/haguidelines.pdf
   Google Scholar
• American Academy of Audiology (AAA). 2013. American Academy of Audiology Pediatric Amplification Guidelines. Retrieved from http://www.audiology.org/resources/documentlibrary/Documents/PediatricAmplificationGuidelines.pdf
   Google Scholar
• American National Standards Institute (ANSI). 1997. Method for the Calculation of the Speech Intelligibility Index (ANSI 53.79–1997). New York: ANSI.
   Google Scholar
• American National Standards Institute (ANSI). 2010. Specification for Audiometers. ANSI S3.6-2010. New York: Acoustical Society of America.
   Google Scholar
• American National Standards Institute (ANSI). 2012. Methods for calculation of the Speech Intelligibility Index, ANSI S3.5-2012. New York: Acoustical Society of America.
   Google Scholar
• American National Standards Institute (ANSI). 2013. Methods of Measurement of Real-Ear Performance Characteristics of Hearing Aids. ANSI S3.46-2013. New York: Acoustical Society of America.
   Google Scholar
• Bagatto, M., Moodie, S., Scollie, S., Seewald, R., Moodie, S., et al. 2005. Clinical protocols for hearing instrument fitting in the desired sensation level method. Trends Amplif, 9, 199–226.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bagatto, M.P., Moodie, S.T., Malandrino, A.C., Richert, F.M., Clench, D.A., et al. 2011. The University of Western Ontario Pediatric Audiological Monitoring Protocol. Trends Amplif, 15, 57–76.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boymans, M. & Dreschler, W. 2011. Audiologist-driven versus patient-driven fine tuning of hearing instruments. Trends Amplif, 16, 49–58.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carlsson, P. & Håkansson, B. 1997. The bone-anchored hearing aid: Reference quantities and functional gain. Ear Hear, 18, 34–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornelisse, L.E., Seewald, R.C. & Jamieson, D.G. 1995. The input/output formula: A theoretical approach to the fitting of personal amplification devices. J Acoust Soc Am, 97, 1854–1864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crukley, J. & Scollie, S. 2012. Children’s speech recognition and loudness perception with the desired sensation level v5 quiet and noise prescriptions. Am J Audiol, 21, 149–162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon, H. 2012. Hearing Aids. New York (NY): Thieme.
   Google Scholar
• Glista, D., Scollie, S., Moodie, S., & Easwar, V. 2014. The Ling 6 (HL) test: Typical pediatric performance data and clinical use evaluation. J Am Acad Audiol, 25, 1008–1021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Håkansson, B.O., Tjellström, A. & Carlsson, P. 1990. Percutaneous vs. transcutaneous transducers for hearing by direct bone conduction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 102, 339–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Håkansson, B., Tjellström, A. & Rosenhall, U. 1984. Hearing thresholds with direct bone conduction versus conventional bone conduction. Scand Audiol, 13, 3–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Håkannson, B., Tjellström, A. & Rosenhall, U. 1985. Acceleration levels at hearing threshold with direct bone conduction versus conventional bone conduction. Acta Otolaryngol, 100, 240–252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, D.B. 2004. Limitations and uses of the aided audiogram. Semin Hear, 25, 51–62.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgetts, W.E., Hagler, P., Hakansson, B.E.V. & Soli, S.D. 2010. A comparison of three approaches to verifying aided Baha output. Int J Audiol, 49, 286–295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgetts, W.E., Hagler, P., Hakansson, B.E.V. & Soli, S.D. 2011. Technology-limited and patient-derived versus audibility-derived fittings in bone-anchored hearing aid users: A validation study. Ear Hear, 32, 31–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenstad, L.M., Seewald, R.C., Cornelisse, L.E. & Shantz, J. 1999. Comparison of linear gain and wide dynamic range compression hearing aid circuits: Aided speech perception measures. Ear Hear, 20, 117–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenstad, L.M., Pumford, J., Seewald, R.C. & Cornelisse, L.E. 2000. Comparison of linear gain and wide dynamic range compression hearing aid circuits II: Aided loudness measures. Ear Hear, 21, 32–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenstad, L.M., Bagatto, M.P., Seewald, R.C., Scollie, S.D., Cornelisse, L.E., et al. 2007. Evaluation of the desired sensation level [input/output] algorithm for adults with hearing loss: The acceptable range for amplified conversational speech. Ear Hear, 28, 793–811.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keidser, G., Dillon, H., Flax, M., Ching, T. & Brewer, S. 2011. The NAL-NL2 prescription procedure. Audiol Res, 1, e24–e90.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCreery, R., Walker, E., Spratford, M., Kirby, B., Oleson, J. & Brennan, M. 2016. Stability of audiometric thresholds for children with hearing aids applying the American Academy of Audiology Pediatric Amplification Guideline: Implications for safety. J Am Acad Audiol, 27, 252–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keidser, G., Dillon, H., Carter, L. & O’Brien, A. 2012. NAL-NL2 empirical adjustments. Trends Hear, 16, 211–223.
   Google Scholar
• McCreery, R. 2013. The trouble with functional gain in verifying pediatric hearing aids. Hear J, 66, 14–16.
   Google Scholar
• McCreery R., Bentler R. & Roush P. 2013. The characteristics of hearing aid fittings in infants and young children. Ear Hear, 34, 701–710.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moodie, S., Pietrobon, J., Rall, E., Lindley, G., Eiten, L., et al. 2016. Using the real-ear-to-coupler difference within the american academy of audiology pediatric amplification guideline: Protocols for applying and predicting earmold RECDs. J Am Acad Audiol, 27, 264–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, B.C.J., Glasberg, B.R. & Stone, M.A. 2010. Development of a new method for deriving initial fittings for hearing aids with multi-channel compression: CAMEQ2-HF. Int J Audiol, 49, 216–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mylanus, E.A.M., Snik, A.F.M. & Cremers, C.W.R.J. 1994. Influence of the thickness of the skin and subcutaneous tissue covering the mastoid on bone-conduction thresholds obtained transcutaneously versus percutaneously. Scand Audiol, 23, 201–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, W.O. 1998. Average speech levels and spectra in various speaking/listening conditions: A summary of the Pearson, Bennett, & Fidell (1977) report. Am J Audiol, 7, 21–25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Polonenko, M., Scollie, S., Moodie, S., Seewald, R., Laurnagaray, D., et al. 2010. Fit to targets, preferred listening levels, and self reported outcomes for the DSL v5.0a hearing aid prescription for adults. Int J Audiol, 49, 550–560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quar, T.K., Ching, T.Y.C., Newall, P. & Sharma, M. 2013. Evaluation of real-world preferences and performance of hearing aids fitted according to the NAL-NL1 and DSL v5 procedures in children with moderately severe to profound hearing loss. Int J Audiol, 52, 322–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scollie, S.D., Seewald, R.C., Cornelisse, L.E. & Jenstad, L.M. 1998. Validity and repeatability of level-independent HL to SPL transforms. Ear Hear, 19, 407–413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scollie, S.D., Seewald, R., Cornelisse, L., Moodie, S., Bagatto, M., et al. 2005. The desired sensation level multistage input/output algorithm. Trends Amplif, 9, 159–197.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scollie, S.D. 2008. Children’s speech recognition scores: The Speech Intelligibility Index and proficiency factors for age and hearing level. Ear Hear, 29, 543–556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scollie, S.D., Ching, T.Y.C., Seewald, R., Dillon, H., Britton, L., et al. 2010a. Evaluation of the NAL-NL1 and DSL v4.1 prescriptions for children: Preference in real world use. Int J Audiol, 49 Suppl 1, S49–S63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scollie, S.D., Ching, T.Y.C., Seewald, R.C., Dillon, H., Britton, L., et al. 2010b. Children's speech perception and loudness ratings when fitted with hearing aids using the DSL v.4.1 and the NAL-NL1 prescriptions. Int J Audiol, 49 Suppl 1, S26–S34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scollie, S., Glista, D., Tenhaaf Le Quelenec, J., Dunn, A., Malandrino, A., et al. 2012. Ling 6 Stimuli and normative data for detection of Ling-6 sounds in hearing level. Am J Audiol, 21, 232–241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seewald, R., Moodie, S., Scollie, S. & Bagatto, M. 2005. The DSL method for pediatric hearing instrument fitting: Historical perspective and current issues. Trends Amplification, 9, 145–157.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sininger, Y.S., Grimes, A. & Christensen, E. 2010. Auditory development in early amplified children: factors influencing auditory-based communication outcomes in children with hearing loss. Ear Hear, 31, 166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snik, F.M., Mylanus, A.M. & Cremers, W.R.J. 2001. The bone-anchored hearing aid: A solution for previously unresolved otologic problems. Otolaryngol Clin North Am, 34, 365–372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snik, F.M., Mylanus, E.A., Proops, D.W., Wolfaardt, J.F., Hodgetts, W.E., et al. 2005. Consensus statements on the BAHA system: Where do we stand at present? Ann Otol RhinolLaryngol, 114(12_suppl), 2–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiles, D., Bentler, R. & McGregor, K. 2012. The speech intelligibility index and pure-tone average as predictors of lexical ability in children fit with hearing aids. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 55, 764–778.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenfelt, S. & Håkansson, B. 2002. Air versus bone conduction: an equal loudness investigation. Hear Res, 167, 1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenfelt, S. & Goode, R. 2005. Transmission properties of bone conducted sound: measurements in cadaver heads. J Acoust Soc Am, 118, 2373–2391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenfelt, S. & Zeitooni, M. 2013. Loudness functions with air and bone conduction stimulation in normal-hearing subjects using a categorical loudness scaling procedure. Hear Res, 301, 85–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, E.A., Holte, L., McCreery, R., Spratford, M., Page, T., et al. 2015. The influence of hearing aid use on outcomes of children with mild hearing loss. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 58, 1611–1625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wazen, J.J., Babu, S., Daugherty, J. & Metrailer, A. 2016. Three-week loading of the 4.5 mm wide titanium implant in bone anchored hearing systems. Am J Otolaryngol, 37, 132–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar