Reference thresholds for the TEN(HL) test for people with normal hearing

References

• Baer, T., Moore, B.C.J. & Kluk, K. 2002. Effects of lowpass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in noise for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies. J Acoust Soc Am, 112, 1133–1144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, R.J., Rosen, S. & Darling, A.M. 1998. An efficient characterisation of human auditory filtering across level and frequency that is also physiologically reasonable. In: Palmer, A.R., Rees, A., Summerfield, A.Q. & Meddis, R. (eds.) Psychophysical and Physiological Advances in Hearing, London: Whurr, pp. 81–87.
   Google Scholar
• Cairns, S., Frith, R., Munro, K.J. & Moore, B.C.J. 2007. Repeatability of the TEN(HL) test for detecting cochlear dead regions. Int J Audiol, 46, 575–584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carhart, R. & Jerger, J.F. 1959. Preferred method for clinical determination of pure-tone thresholds. J Speech Hear Disord, 24, 330–345.
   Google Scholar
• Chistovich, L.A. 1957. Frequency characteristics of masking effect. Biofizika, 2, 743–755.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, R.M., Johnson, J.A. & Alexander, G.C. 2012. Implications of high-frequency cochlear dead regions for fitting hearing aids to adults with mild to moderately severe hearing loss. Ear Hear, 33, 573–587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florentine, M. & Houtsma, A.J.M. 1983. Tuning curves and pitch matches in a listener with a unilateral, low-frequency hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am, 73, 961–965.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Füllgrabe, C., Moore, B.C.J. & Stone, M.A. 2015. Age-group differences in speech identification despite matched audiometrically normal hearing: Contributions from auditory temporal processing and cognition. Front Aging Neurosci, 6, Article 347, 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasberg, B.R. & Moore, B.C.J. 1986. Auditory filter shapes in subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear impairments. J Acoust Soc Am, 79, 1020–1033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasberg, B.R. & Moore, B.C.J. 1990. Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data. Hear Res, 47, 103–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasberg, B.R. & Moore, B.C.J. 2000. Frequency selectivity as a function of level and frequency measured with uniformly exciting notched noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 108, 2318–2328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO 389-8 2004. Acoustics – Reference Zero for the Calibration of Audiometric Equipment – Part 8: Reference Equivalent Threshold Sound Pressure Levels for Pure Tones and Circumaural Earphones. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• Kluk, K. & Moore, B.C.J. 2005. Factors affecting psychophysical tuning curves for hearing-impaired subjects. Hear Res, 200, 115–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluk, K. & Moore, B.C.J. 2006. Detecting dead regions using psychophysical tuning curves: A comparison of simultaneous and forward masking. Int J Audiol, 45, 463–476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malicka, A.N., Munro, K.J., Baer, T., Baker, R.J. & Moore, B.C.J. 2013. The effect of low-pass filtering on identification of nonsense syllables in quiet by school-age children with and without cochlear dead regions. Ear Hear, 34, 458–469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, B.C.J. 1978. Psychophysical tuning curves measured in simultaneous and forward masking. J Acoust Soc Am, 63, 524–532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, B.C.J. 2001. Dead regions in the cochlea: Diagnosis, perceptual consequences, and implications for the fitting of hearing aids. Trends Amplif, 5, 1–34.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore, B.C.J. 2004. Dead regions in the cochlea: Conceptual foundations, diagnosis, and clinical applications. Ear Hear, 25, 98–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, B.C.J. & Alcántara, J.I. 2001. The use of psychophysical tuning curves to explore dead regions in the cochlea. Ear Hear, 22, 268–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, B.C.J. & Glasberg, B.R. 1987. Formulae describing frequency selectivity as a function of frequency and level and their use in calculating excitation patterns. Hear Res, 28, 209–225.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, B.C.J., Glasberg, B.R. & Schlueter, A. 2010. Detection of dead regions in the cochlea: Relevance for combined electric and acoustic stimulation. In: van de Heyning, P. & Kleine Punte, A. (eds.) Cochlear Implants and Hearing Preservation Advances in ORL, 67, Basel: Karger, 67, pp. 43–50.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, B.C.J., Glasberg, B.R. & Stone, M.A. 2004. New version of the TEN test with calibrations in dB HL. Ear Hear, 25, 478–487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, B.C.J., Huss, M., Vickers, D.A., Glasberg, B.R. & Alcántara, J.I. 2000. A test for the diagnosis of dead regions in the cochlea. Br J Audiol, 34, 205–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, B.C.J. & Malicka, A.N. 2013. Cochlear dead regions in adults and children: Diagnosis and clinical implications. Sem Hear, 34, 37–50.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, R.D., Nimmo-Smith, I., Weber, D.L. & Milroy, R. 1982. The deterioration of hearing with age: Frequency selectivity, the critical ratio, the audiogram, and speech threshold. J Acoust Soc Am, 72, 1788–1803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pepler, A., Munro, K.J., Lewis, K. & Kluk, K. 2014. Repeatability, agreement, and feasibility of using the threshold equalizing noise test and fast psychophysical tuning curves in a clinical setting. Int J Audiol, 53, 745–752.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pick, G., Evans, E.F. & Wilson, J.P. 1977. Frequency resolution in patients with hearing loss of cochlear origin. In: Evans, E.F. & Wilson, J.P. (eds.) Psychophysics and Physiology of Hearing, London: Academic Press, pp. 273–281.
   Google Scholar
• Sek, A., Alcántara, J.I., Moore, B.C.J., Kluk, K. & Wicher, A. 2005. Development of a fast method for determining psychophysical tuning curves. Int J Audiol, 44, 408–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sek, A. & Moore, B.C.J. 2011. Implementation of a fast method for measuring psychophysical tuning curves. Int J Audiol, 50, 237–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unoki, M., Irino, T., Glasberg, B.R., Moore, B.C.J. & Patterson, R.D. 2006. Comparison of the roex and gammachirp filters as representations of the auditory filter. J Acoust Soc Am, 120, 1474–1492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vickers, D.A., Moore, B.C.J. & Baer, T. 2001. Effects of lowpass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in quiet for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies. J Acoust Soc Am, 110, 1164–1175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinay Baer, T. & Moore, B.C.J. 2007. Speech recognition as a function of highpass filter cutoff frequency for people with and without low-frequency cochlear dead regions. J Acoust Soc Am, 122, 542–553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinay Baer, T. & Moore, B.C.J. 2008. Speech recognition in noise as a function of highpass-filter cutoff frequency for people with and without low-frequency cochlear dead regions. J Acoust Soc Am, 123, 606–609.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, T., Dorman, M.F., Gifford, R. & Moore, B.C.J. 2014. Cochlear dead regions constrain the benefit of combining acoustic stimulation with electric stimulation. Ear Hear, 35, 410–417.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar