Factors influencing speech perception in noise for 5-year-old children using hearing aids or cochlear implants

References

• Akeroyd, M.A. 2006. The psychoacoustics of binaural hearing. Int J Audiol, 45, 25–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American National Standards Institute 1997. Methods for Calculation of the Speech Intelligibility Index, (ANSI S3.5-1997). New York, USA: American National Standards Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Bagatto, M., Moodie, S., Scollie, S., Seewald, R., Pumford, J., et al. 2005. Clinical protocols for hearing instrument fitting in the Desired Sensation Level method. Trends Amplif, 9, 199–226.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barker, B.A. & Newman, R.S. 2004. Listen to your mother! The role of talker familiarity in infant streaming. Cognition, 94, 9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bench, J. & Bamford, J. 1979. Speech-hearing tests and the spoken language of hearing-impaired children, London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bench, J. & Doyle, J. 1979. The BKB/A (Bamford-Kowal-Bench/Australian version) sentence lists for hearing-impaired children, Victoria, Australia: La Trobe University.
   Google Scholar
• Blamey, P. & Sarant, J. 2002. Speech perception and language criteria for paediatric cochlear implant candidature. Audiol Neurootol, 7, 114–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blamey, P.J., Sarant, J.Z., Paatsch, L.E., Barry, J.G., Bow, C.P., et al. 2001. Relationships among speech perception, production, language, hearing loss, and age in children with impaired hearing. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 44, 264–285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, D., Dillon, H., Ching, T.Y.C., Katsch, R. & Keidser, G. 2001. NAL-NL1 procedure for fitting nonlinear hearing aids: Characteristics and comparisons with other procedures. J Am Acad Audiol, 12, 37–51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chadha, N.K., Papsin, B.C., Jiwani, S. & Gordon, K.A. 2011. Speech detection in noise and spatial unmasking in children with simultaneous versus sequential bilateral cochlear implants. Otol Neurotol, 32, 1057–1064.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ching, T.Y.C., Crowe, K., Martin, V., Day, J., Mahler, N., et al. 2010. Language development and everyday functioning of children with hearing loss assessed at 3 years of age. Int J Speech Lang Pathol, 12, 124–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ching, T.Y.C. & Cupples, L. 2015. Phonological awareness at 5 years of age in children who use hearing aids or cochlear implants. Perspect Hear Hear Disord Child, 25, 48–59.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ching, T.Y.C. & Dillon, H. 2003. Prescribing amplification for children: Adult-equivalent hearing loss, real-ear aided gain, and NAL-NL1. Trends Amplif, 7, 1–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ching, T.Y.C., Dillon, H., Hou, S., Zhang, V., Day, J., et al. 2013a. A randomised controlled comparison of NAL and DSL prescriptions for young children: Hearing aid characteristics and performance outcomes at 3 years of age. Int J Audiol, 52, 17S–28S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ching, T.Y.C., Dillon, H., Lockhart, F., van Wanrooy, E. & Flax, M. 2011a. Audibility and speech intelligibility revisited: Implications for amplification. In: Dau, T., Dalsgaard, J. C., Jepsen, M. L. & Poulsen, T. (eds.) International Symposium on Auditory and Audiological Research. Denmark: The Danavox Jubilee Foundation. pp.11–19.
   Google Scholar
• Ching, T.Y.C., Dillon, H., Marnane, V., Hou, S., Day, J., et al. 2013b. Outcomes of early- and late-identified children with hearing loss at 3 years of age: Findings from a prospective population-based study. Ear Hear, 34, 535–552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ching, T.Y.C., Johnson, E.E., Hou, S., Dillon, H., Zhang, V., et al. 2013c. A comparison of NAL and DSL prescriptive methods for paediatric hearing aid fitting: Predicted speech intelligibility and loudness. Int J Audiol, 52, 29S–38S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ching, T.Y.C., van Wanrooy, E., Dillon, H. & Carter, L. 2011b. Spatial release from masking in normal-hearing children and children who use hearing aids. J Acoust Soc Am, 129, 368–375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ching, T.Y.C., Zhang, V.W., Johnson, E.E., Van Buynder, P., Hou S., et al. this issue. Hearing aid fitting and developmental outcomes of children fit according to either the NAL or DSL prescription: fit-to-target, audibility, speech and language abilities (submitted). Int J Audiol.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, L.S., Geers, A.E., Blamey, P.J., Tobey, E.A. & Brenner, C.A. 2011. Factors contributing to speech perception scores in long-term pediatric cochlear implant users. Ear Hear, 32, 19S–26S.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dillon, H. 2012. Binaural and bilateral considerations in hearing aid fitting. In: Dillon, H. (ed.) Hearing Aids. 2nd ed. Sydney, Australia: Boomerang Press. pp.430–468.
   Google Scholar
• Dillon, H., Keidser, G., Ching, T.Y.C., Flax, M. & Brewer, S. 2011. The NAL-NL2 prescription procedure. Phonak Focus, 40, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Dowell, R.C., Dettman, S.J., Blamey, P.J., Barker, E.J. & Clark, G.M. 2002. Speech perception in children using cochlear implants: Prediction of long‐term outcomes. Cochlear Implants Int, 3, 1–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eisenberg, L.S., Shannon, R.V., Martinez, A.S., Wygonski, J. & Boothroyd, A. 2000. Speech recognition with reduced spectral cues as a function of age. J Acoust Soc Am, 107, 2704–2710.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, L. & Katz, D. 1980. Northwestern University Children's Perception of Speech (NU-CHIPS), St. Louis, Auditec.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, L.L. 1979. Performance of children aged 9 to 17 years on a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence material with controlled word predictability. J Acoust Soc Am, 66, 651–653.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fallon, M., Trehub, S.E. & Schneider, B.A. 2000. Children's perception of speech in multitalker babble. J Acoust Soc Am, 108, 3023–3029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festen, J.M. & Plomp, R. 1986. Speech-reception threshold in noise with one and two hearing aids. J Acoust Soc Am, 79, 465–471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallaudet Research Institute 2011. Regional and national summary report of data from the 2009-10 annual survey of deaf and hard of hearing children and youth. Washington, DC: Gallaudet Research Institute, Gallaudet University.
   Google Scholar
• Galvin, K.L., Dowell, R.C., van Hoesel, R.J. & Mok, M. 2017. Speech detection in noise for young bilaterally implanted children: Is there evidence of binaural benefit over the shadowed ear alone? Ear Hear. [Epub ahead of print]. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garadat, S.N. & Litovsky, R.Y. 2007. Speech intelligibility in free field: Spatial unmasking in preschool children. J Acoust Soc Am, 121, 1047–1055.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geers, A.E., Brenner, C. & Davidson, L. 2003. Factors associated with development of speech perception skills in children implanted by age five. Ear Hear, 24, 24–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, K., Henkin, Y. & Kral, A. 2015. Asymmetric hearing during development: The aural preference syndrome and treatment options. Pediatrics, 136, 1098–4275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gravel, J.S., Fausel, N., Liskow, C. & Chobot, J. 1999. Children's speech recognition in noise using omni-directional and dual-microphone hearing aid technology. Ear Hear, 20, 1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks, C.B. & Tharpe, A.M. 2002. Listening effort and fatigue in school-age children with and without hearing loss. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 45, 573–584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillock-Dunn, A., Taylor, C., Buss, E. & Leibold, L.J. 2015. Assessing speech perception in children with hearing loss: What conventional clinical tools may miss. Ear Hear, 36, e57–e60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Incerti, P., Ching, T.Y.C., Hou, S., Van Buynder, P., Flynn, L., et al. this issue. Cochlear implant programming characteristics (submitted). Int J Audiol.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, E.E. & Dillon, H. 2011. A comparison of gain for adults from generic hearing aid prescriptive methods: Impacts on predicted loudness, frequency bandwidth, and speech intelligibility. J Am Acad Audiol, 22, 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnstone, P.M. & Litovsky, R.Y. 2006. Effect of masker type and age on speech intelligibility and spatial release from masking in children and adults. J Acoust Soc Am, 120, 2177–2189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joint Committee on Infant Hearing (JCIH) 2007. Year 2007 position statement: Principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs. Pediatrics, 120, 898–921.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Killan, C.F., Killan, E.C. & Raine, C.H. 2015. Changes in children's speech discrimination and spatial release from masking between 2 and 4 years after sequential cochlear implantation. Cochlear Implants Int, 16, 270–276.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• King, A.M. 2010. The national protocol for paediatric amplification in Australia. Int J Audiol, 49, 64S–69S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhl, P.K. 2000. A new view of language acquisition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 97, 11850–11857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leibold, L.J., Hillock-Dunn, A., Duncan, N., Roush, P.A. & Buss, E. 2013. Influence of hearing loss on children's identification of spondee words in a speech-shaped noise or a two-talker masker. Ear Hear, 34, 575–584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litovsky, R.Y., Johnstone, P.M. & Godar, S.P. 2006. Benefits of bilateral cochlear implants and/or hearing aids in children. Int J Audiol, 45, 78S–91S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackie, K. & Dermody, P. 1986. Use of a monosyllabic adaptive speech test (MAST) with young children. J Speech Hear Res, 29, 275–281.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McCreery, R.W., Bentler, R.A. & Roush, P.A. 2013. Characteristics of hearing aid fittings in infants and young children. Ear Hear, 34, 701–710.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCreery, R.W., Walker, E.A., Spratford, M., Oleson, J., Bentler, R., et al. 2015. Speech recognition and parent ratings from auditory development questionnaires in children who are hard of hearing. Ear Hear, 36, 60S–75S.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Misurelli, S.M. & Litovsky, R.Y. 2012. Spatial release from masking in children with normal hearing and with bilateral cochlear implants: Effect of interferer asymmetry. J Acoust Soc Am, 132, 380–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moeller, M.P. 2011. Language development: New insights and persistent puzzles. Sem Hear, 32, 172–181.
   Google Scholar
• Mok, M., Galvin, K.L., Dowell, R.C. & McKay, C.M. 2007. Spatial unmasking and binaural advantage for children with normal hearing, a cochlear implant and a hearing aid, and bilateral implants. Audiol Neurootol, 12, 295–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, J.K. & Linthicum, F.H. Jr, 2007. The human auditory system: A timeline of development. Int J Audiol, 46, 460–478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nittrouer, S., Caldwell-Tarr, A., Tarr, E., Lowenstein, J.H., Rice, C., et al. 2013. Improving speech-in-noise recognition for children with hearing loss: Potential effects of language abilities, binaural summation, and head shadow. Int J Audiol, 52, 513–525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlovic C.V. 1994. Band importance functions for audiological applications. Ear Hear, 15, 100–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, D.B. 1987. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys, New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Sarant, J.Z., Blamey, P.J., Dowell, R.C., Clark, G.M. & Gibson, W.P.R. 2001. Variation in speech perception scores among children with cochlear implants. Ear Hear, 22, 18–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarant, J.Z., Hughes, K. & Blamey, P.J. 2010. The effect of IQ on spoken language and speech perception development in children with impaired hearing. Cochlear Implants Int, 11, 370–374.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scollie, S.D., Ching, T.Y.C., Seewald, R.C., Dillon, H., Britton, L., et al. 2010. Children's speech perception and loudness ratings when fitted with hearing aids using the DSL v.4.1 and the NAL-NL1 prescriptions. Int J Audiol, 49, 26S–34S.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scollie, S.D., Seewald, R.C., Cornelisse, L.E., Moodie, S., Bagatto, M., et al. 2005. The desired sensation level multistage input/output algorithm. Trends Amplif, 9, 39.
   Google Scholar
• Seewald, R., Cornelisse, L.E. & Ramji, K.V. 1997. DSL v4.1 for Windows: a software implementation of the Desired Sensation Level (DSL[i/o]) method for fitting linear gain and wide-dynamic-range compression hearing instruments. Users' manual. London, Ontario: University of Western Ontario Hearing Health Care Research Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Sininger, Y.S., Grimes, A. & Christensen, E. 2010. Auditory development in early amplified children: Factors influencing auditory-based communication outcomes in children with hearing loss. Ear Hear, 31, 166–185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SPSS Inc. 2007. SPSS for Windows (version 16.0). Chicago, USA: SPSS Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Statsoft Inc. 2011. Statistica Software (version 10.0). Tulsa, OK: USA: Statsoft Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Talarico, M., Abdilla, G., Aliferis, M., Balazic, I., Giaprakis, I., et al. 2006. Effect of age and cognition on childhood speech in noise perception abilities. Audiol Neurootol, 12, 13–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomblin, J.B., Harrison, M., Ambrose, S.E., Walker, E.A., Oleson, J.J., et al. 2015. Language outcomes in young children with mild to severe hearing loss. Ear Hear, 36, 76S–91S.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tomblin, J.B., Oleson, J.J., Ambrose, S.E., Walker, E. & Moeller, M.P. 2014. The influence of hearing aids on the speech and language development of children with hearing loss. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 140, 403–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Deun, L., van Wieringen, A. & Wouters, J. 2010. Spatial speech perception benefits in young children with normal hearing and cochlear implants. Ear Hear, 31, 702–713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vance, M., Rosen, S. & Coleman, M. 2009. Assessing speech perception in young children and relationships with language skills. Int J Audiol, 48, 708–717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. & Naglieri, J.A. 2006. Wechsler Nonverbal Scale of Ability, San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, I., Steiner, V.G. & Pond, R.E. 2002. Preschool Language Scale Fourth edition, San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar