Evaluation of the NAL Dynamic Conversations Test in older listeners with hearing loss

References

• Akeroyd, M. A. 2008. “Are Individual Differences in Speech Reception Related to Individual Differences in Cognitive Ability? A Survey of Twenty Experimental Studies with Normal and Hearing-impaired Adults.” International Journal of Audiology 47: S53–S71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayasse, N. D., A. Lash, and A. Wingfield. 2017. “Effort Not Speed Characterizes Comprehension of Spoken Sentences by Older Adults with Mild Hearing Impairment.” Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience 8: 329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besser, J., T. Koelewijn, A. A. Zekveld, S. E. Kramer, and J. M. Festen. 2013. How Linguistic Closure and Verbal Working Memory Relate to Speech Recognition in Noise – A Review.” Trends in Amplification 17: 75–93.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Best, V., G. Keidser, K. Freeston, and J. M Buchholz. 2016. “A Dynamic Speech Comprehension Test for Assessing Real-world Listening Ability.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 27: 515–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, V., M. McLelland, and H. Dillon. 2014. The BEST (Beautifully Efficient Speech Test) for Evaluating Speech Intelligibility in Noise World Congress of Audiology. Brisbane, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Best, V., J. Mejia, K. Freeston, R. J. van Hoesel, and H. Dillon. 2015. “An Evaluation of the Performance of Two Binaural Beamformers in Complex and Dynamic Multitalker Environments.” International Journal of Audiology 54: 727–735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, V., E. J. Ozmeral, N. Kopčo, and B. G. Shinn-Cunningham. 2008. “Object Continuity Enhances Selective Auditory Attention.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 105: 13173–13177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daneman, M., and P. Carpenter. 1980. “Individual Differences in Working Memory and Reading.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 19: 450–466.
   Google Scholar
• Feuerstein, J. 1992. “Monaural versus Binaural Hearing: Ease of Listening, Word Recognition, and Attentional Effort.” Ear and Hearing 13: 80–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, S., J. P. Gagné, M. Alepins, and P. Dubois. 2010. “Evaluating the Effort Expended to Understand Speech in Noise using a Dual-task Paradigm: The Effects of Providing Visual Speech Cues.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 53: 18–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagné, J. P., J. Besser, and U. Lemke. 2017. “Behavioral Assessment of Listening Effort using a Dual-task Paradigm: A Review.” Trends in Hearing 21. doi:10.1177/2331216516687287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon-Salant, S., and S. S. Cole. 2016. “Effects of Age and Working Memory Capacity on Speech Recognition Performance in Noise Among Listeners with Normal Hearing.” Ear and Hearing 37: 593–602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hällgren, M., B. Larsby, B. Lyxell, and S. Arlinger. 2001. “Evaluation of a Cognitive Test Battery in Young and Elderly Normal-hearing and Hearing-impaired Persons.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 12: 357–370.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Humes, L. E. 1999. “Dimensions of Hearing Aid Outcome.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 10: 26–39.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jensen, N. S., R. B. Johannesson, S. Laugesen, and R. K. Hietkamp. 2012. “Measuring Speech-in-speech Intelligibility with Target Location Uncertainty.” In Speech perception and auditory disorders. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Audiological and Auditory Research (ISAAR), edited by Dau, T., Jepsen, M.L., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., and Poulsen, T., 135–142. Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J., J. Xu, R. Cox, and P. A. Pendergraft. 2015. “A Comparison of Two Methods for Measuring Listening Effort as Part of An Audiologic Test Battery.” American Journal of Audiology 24: 419–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsen, B., and E. F. Gardener. 1984. Stanford Diagnostic Reading Test. NY, USA: Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Keidser, G., H. Dillon, J. Mejia, and C. V. Nguyen. 2013. “An Algorithm that Administers Adaptive Speech-in-noise Testing to a Specified Reliability at Selectable Points on the Psychometric Function.” International Journal of Audiology 52: 795–800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiessling, J., M. K. Pichora-Fuller, S. Gatehouse, D. Stephens, S. Arlinger, et al. 2003. “Candidature for and Delivery of Audiological Services: Special Needs of Older People.” International Journal of Audiology 42: 92–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, D. E., D. L. Valente, and J. L. Spalding. 2015. “Effect of Minimal/Mild Hearing Loss on Children's Speech Understanding in a Simulated Classroom.” Ear and Hearing 36: 136–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luts, H., K. Eneman, J. Wouters, M. Schulte, M. Vormann, et al. 2010. “Multicenter Evaluation of Signal Enhancement Algorithms for Hearing Aids.” Journal of Acoustical Society of America 127: 1491–1505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGarrigle, R., K. J. Munro, P. Dawes, A. J. Stewart, D. R. Moore, et al. 2014. “Listening Effort and Fatigue: What Exactly are We Measuring? A British Society of Audiology Cognition in Hearing Special Interest Group ‘white paper'.” International Journal of Audiology 53: 433–445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, D. R., M. Daneman, and B. A. Schneider. 2006. “Why do older adults have difficulty following conversations?” Psychology Aging 21: 49–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naylor, G. 2016. “Theoretical Issues of Validity in the Measurement of Aided Speech Reception Threshold in Noise for Comparing Nonlinear Hearing Aid Systems.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 27: 504–514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naylor, G., and R. B. Johannesson. 2009. “Long-term Signal-to-noise Ratio at the Input and Output of Amplitude-compression Systems.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 20: 161–171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rönnberg, J., S. Arlinger, B. Lyxell, and C. Kinnefors. 1989. “Visual Evoked Potentials: Relation to Adult Speechreading and Cognitive Function.” Journal of Speech Hearing and Research 32: 725–735.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rudner, M., T. Lunner, T. Behrens, E. S. Thorén, and J. Rönnberg. 2012. “Working Memory Capacity may Influence Perceived Effort During Aided Speech Recognition in Noise.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 23: 577–589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza, P. and K. Arehart. 2015. “Robust Relationship Between Reading Span and Speech Recognition in Noise.” International Journal of Audiology 54: 705–713.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valente, D. L., H. M. Plevinsky, J. M. Franco, E. C. Heinrichs-Graham, and D. E. Lewis. 2012. “Experimental Investigation of the Effects of the Acoustical Conditions in a Simulated Classroom on Speech Recognition and Learning in Children.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 131: 232–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Tillaart-Haverkate, M., I. de Ronde-Brons, W. A. Dreschler, and R. Houben. 2017. “The Influence of Noise Reduction on Speech Intelligibility, Response Times to Speech, and Perceived Listening Effort in Normal-hearing Listeners.” Trends in Hearing 21. doi:10.1177/2331216517716844.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar