Semantic context improves speech intelligibility and reduces listening effort for listeners with hearing impairment

References

• Bentler, R., Y. H. Wu, J. Kettel, and R. Hurtig. 2008. “Digital Noise Reduction: Outcomes from Laboratory and Field Studies.” International Journal of Audiology 47 (8): 447–460. doi:10.1080/14992020802033091.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brons, I., R. Houben, and W. A. Dreschler. 2013. “Perceptual Effects of Noise Reduction with Respect to Personal Preference, Speech Intelligibility, and Listening Effort.” Ear and Hearing 34 (1): 29–41. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e31825f299f.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, R. M., G. C. Alexander, and C. Gilmore. 1987. “Development of the Connected Speech Test (CST).” Ear and Hearing 8 (5): 119S–126S. doi:10.1097/00003446-198710001-00010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, M. H., M. A. Ford, F. Kherif, and I. S. Johnsrude. 2011. “Does Semantic Context Benefit Speech Understanding through “Top–Down” Processes? Evidence from Time-Resolved Sparse fMRI.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23 (12): 3914–3932. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00084.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desjardins, J. L. 2016. “The Effects of Hearing Aid Directional Microphone and Noise Reduction Processing on Listening Effort in Older Adults with Hearing Loss.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 27 (1): 29–41. doi:10.3766/jaaa.15030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desjardins, J. L., and K. A. Doherty. 2014. “The Effect of Hearing Aid Noise Reduction on Listening Effort in Hearing-Impaired Adults.” Ear and Hearing 35 (6): 600–610. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubno, J. R., J. B. Ahlstrom, and A. R. Horwitz. 2000. “Use of Context by Young and Aged Adults with Normal Hearing.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 107 (1): 538–546. doi:10.1121/1.428322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., E. Erdfelder, A. G. Lang, and A. Buchner. 2007. “G*Power 3: A Flexible Statistical Power Analysis Program for the Social, Behavioral, and Biomedical Sciences.” Behavior Research Methods 39 (2): 175–191. doi:10.3758/BF03193146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, S., J. P. Gagné, M. Alepins, and P. Dubois. 2010. “Evaluating the Effort Expended to Understand Speech in Noise Using a Dual-Task Paradigm: The Effects of Providing Visual Speech Cues.” Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research 53 (1): 18–33. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0140).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatehouse, S., and M. A. Akeroyd. 2006. “Two-Eared Listening in Dynamic Situations.” International Journal of Audiology 45 (1): 120–124. doi:10.1080/14992020600783103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatehouse, S., and W. Noble. 2004. “The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ).” International Journal of Audiology 43 (2): 85–99. doi:10.1080/14992020400050014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holube, I., K. Haeder, C. Imbery, and R. Weber. 2016. “Subjective Listening Effort and Electrodermal Activity in Listening Situations with Reverberation and Noise.” Trends in Hearing 20. doi:10.1177/2331216516667734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornsby, B. W. Y. 2013. “The Effects of Hearing Aid Use on Listening Effort and Mental Fatigue Associated with Sustained Speech Processing Demands.” Ear and Hearing 34 (5): 523–534. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e31828003d8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnsrude, I. S., A. Mackey, H. Hakyemez, E. Alexander, H. P. Trang, and R. P. Carlyon. 2013. “Swinging at a Cocktail Party: Voice Familiarity Aids Speech Perception in the Presence of a Competing Voice.” Psychological Science 24 (10): 1995–2004. doi:10.1177/0956797613482467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnsrude, I. S., and J. M. Rodd. 2016. “Factors that Increase Processing Demands When Listening to Speech.” In Neurobiology of Language, edited by G. Hickok and S. L. Small, 491–502. London: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Koelewijn, T., H. de Kluiver, B. G. Shinn-Cunningham, A. A. Zekveld, and S. E. Kramer. 2015. “The Pupil Response Reveals Increased Listening Effort when it is Difficult to Focus Attention.” Hearing Research 323: 81–90. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2015.02.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, S. E., T. S. Kapteyn, and T. Houtgast. 2006. “Occupational Performance: Comparing Normally-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Employees Using the Amsterdam Checklist for Hearing and Work.” International Journal of Audiology 45 (9): 503–512. doi:10.1080/14992020600754583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, M., M. Schulte, T. Brand, and I. Holube. 2017. “Development of an Adaptive Scaling Method for Subjective Listening Effort.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 141 (6): 4680–4693. doi:10.1121/1.4986938.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luts, H., K. Eneman, J. Wouters, M. Schulte, M. Vormann, M. Buechler, N. Dillier, et al. 2010. “Multicenter Evaluation of Signal Enhancement Algorithms for Hearing Aids.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 127 (3): 1491–1505. doi:10.1121/1.3299168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackersie, C. L., and H. Cones. 2011. “Subjective and Psychophysiological Indexes of Listening Effort in a Competing-Talker Task.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 22 (2): 113–122. doi:10.3766/jaaa.22.2.6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marrone, N., C. R. Mason, and G. Kidd. 2008. “The Effects of Hearing Loss and Age on the Benefit of Spatial Separation between Multiple Talkers in Reverberant Rooms.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 124 (5): 3064–3075. doi:10.1121/1.2980441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattys, S. L., M. H. Davis, A. R. Bradlow, and S. K. Scott. 2012. “Speech Recognition in Adverse Conditions: A Review.” Language and Cognitive Processes 27 (7–8): 953–978. doi:10.1080/01690965.2012.705006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGarrigle, R., K. J. Munro, P. Dawes, A. J. Stewart, D. R. Moore, J. G. Barry, and S. Amitay. 2014. “Listening Effort and Fatigue: What Exactly are we Measuring? A British Society of Audiology Cognition in Hearing Special Interest Group ‘White Paper’.” International Journal of Audiology 53 (7): 433–445. doi:10.3109/14992027.2014.890296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neher, T., G. Grimm, and V. Hohmann. 2014. “Perceptual Consequences of Different Signal Changes Due to Binaural Noise Reduction: Do Hearing Loss and Working Memory Capacity Play a Role?” Ear and Hearing 35 (5): e213–e227. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble, W., and S. Gatehouse. 2006. “Effects of Bilateral versus Unilateral Hearing Aid Fitting on Abilities Measured by the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ).” International Journal of Audiology 45 (3): 172–181. doi:10.1080/14992020500376933.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obleser, J., and S. A. Kotz. 2010. “Expectancy Constraints in Degraded Speech Modulate the Language Comprehension Network.” Cerebral Cortex 20 (3): 633–640. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pichora-Fuller, M. K., S. E. Kramer, M. A. Eckert, B. Edwards, B. W. Y. Hornsby, L. E. Humes, and U. Lemke. 2016. “Hearing Impairment and Cognitive Energy: The Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening (FUEL).” Ear and Hearing 37: 1S–27S. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pichora-Fuller, M. K., B. A. Schneider, and M. Daneman. 1995. “How Young and Old Adults Listen to and Remember Speech in Noise.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97 (1): 593–608. doi:10.1121/1.412282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Picou, E. M., T. A. Ricketts, and B. W. Y. Hornsby. 2011. “Visual Cues and Listening Effort: Individual Variability.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 54 (5): 1416–1430. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0154).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudner, M., T. Lunner, T. Behrens, E. S. Thorén, and J. Rönnberg. 2012. “Working Memory Capacity May Influence Perceived Effort during Aided Speech Recognition in Noise.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 23 (8): 577–589. doi:10.3766/jaaa.23.7.7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studebaker, G. A. 1985. “A “Rationalized” Arcsine Transform.” Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 28 (3): 455–462. doi:10.1044/jshr.2803.455.
   Google Scholar
• Sumby, W., and I. Pollack. 1954. “Visual Contribution to Speech Intelligibility in Noise.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 26: 212–215. doi:10.1121/1.1907309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tun, P. A., S. Mccoy, and A. Wingfield. 2009. “Aging, Hearing Acuity, and the Attentional Costs of Effortful Listening.” Psychology and Aging 24 (3): 761–766. doi:10.1037/a0014802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winn, M. 2016. “Rapid Release from Listening Effort Resulting from Semantic Context, and Effects of Spectral Degradation and Cochlear Implants.” Trends in Hearing 20. doi:10.1177/2331216516669723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winn, M. B., A. E. Rhone, M. Chatterjee, and W. J. Idsardi. 2013. “The Use of Auditory and Visual Context in Speech Perception by Listeners with Normal Hearing and Listeners with Cochlear Implants.” Frontiers in Psychology 4: 1–13. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00824.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wisniewski, M. G., E. R. Thompson, N. Iyer, J. R. Estepp, M. N. Goder-Reiser, and S. C. Sullivan. 2015. “Frontal Midline θ Power as an Index of Listening Effort.” Neuroreport 26 (2): 94–99. doi:10.1097/WNR.0000000000000306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Y. H., N. Aksan, M. Rizzo, E. Stangl, X. Zhang, and R. Bentler. 2014. “Measuring Listening Effort: Driving Simulator versus Simple Dual-Task Paradigm.” Ear and Hearing 35 (6): 623–632. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000079.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar