Construction and evaluation of the Mandarin Chinese matrix (CMNmatrix) sentence test for the assessment of speech recognition in noise

References

• Akeroyd, M. A., S. Arlinger, R. A. Bentler, A. Boothroyd, N. Dillier, W. A. Dreschler, J.-P. Gagné, et al. 2015. “International Collegium of Rehabilitative Audiology (ICRA) Recommendations for the Construction of Multilingual Speech Tests.” International Journal of Audiology 54 (sup2): 17–22. doi:10.3109/14992027.2015.1030513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bao, Z. W. 1985. “Mandarin Articulation Index Test Method for Telecommunication (in Chinese).” Audio Engineering, 1985, 9(2): 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Bo Nielsen, J., T. Dau, and T. Neher. 2014. “A Danish Open-Set Speech Corpus for Competing-Speech Studies.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 135 (1): 407–420. doi:10.1121/1.4835935.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma, P., and D. Weenink. 2013. Praat: doing phonetics by computer. Version 6.0.10, retrieved 1 January 2016 from http://www.praat.org/
   Google Scholar
• Bolia, R. S., W. T. Nelson, M. A. Ericson, and B. D. Simpson. 2000. “A Speech Corpus for Multitalker Communications Research.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 107 (2): 1065–1066. doi:10.1121/1.428288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boothroyd, A., and S. Nittrouer. 1988. “Mathematical Treatment of Context Effects in Phoneme and Word Recognition.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 84 (1): 101–114. doi:10.1121/1.396976.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand, T., and B. Kollmeier. 2002. “Efficient Adaptive Procedures for Threshold and Concurrent Slope Estimates for Psychophysics and Speech Intelligibility Tests.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 111 (6): 2801–2810. doi:10.1121/1.1479152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, X. Y. 1963. “Speech Audiometry (in Chinese).” Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology 9: 8–10.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, F., L. L. N. Wong, and Y. Hu. 2014. “Effects of Lexical Tone Contour on Mandarin Sentence Intelligibility.” Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research 57 (1): 338–345. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2013/12-0324).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, J. Y., W. Y. He, and X. Y. Xu. 1966. “Compilation of Mandarin Word Lists for Speech Audiometry (in Chinese).” Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology 12: 106–11.
   Google Scholar
• Dietz, A., M. Buschermöhle, A. A. Aarnisalo, A. Vanhanen, T. Hyyrynen, O. Aaltonen, H. Löppönen, M. A. Zokoll, and B. Kollmeier. 2014. “The Development and Evaluation of the Finnish Matrix Sentence Test for Speech Intelligibility Assessment.” Acta Oto-Laryngologica 134 (7): 728–737. doi:10.3109/00016489.2014.898185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, J., C. Schaefer, G. Dacakis, and L. L. N. Wong. 2002. “Hearing Levels and Hearing Handicap in Cantonese-Speaking Australians.” Asia Pacific Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing 7 (2): 92–100. doi:10.1179/136132802805576454.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, J., and L. L. Wong. 1996. “Mismatch between Aspects of Hearing Impairment and Hearing Disability/Handicap in Adult/Elderly Cantonese Speakers: Some Hypotheses concerning Cultural and Linguistic Influences.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 7 (6): 442–446.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fu, Q.-J., M. Zhu, and X. Wang. 2011. “Development and Validation of the Mandarin Speech Perception Test.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 129 (6): EL267–273. doi:10.1121/1.3590739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu, R., and B. Fu. 1988. “Diagnostic Significance of the Staggered Spondaic Word Test and 40-Hz Auditory Event-Related Potentials.” International Journal of Audiology 27 (1): 8–16.
   Google Scholar
• Gu, R., X. Q. Li, and G. F. Chen. 1988. “Staggered Spondaic Word Test and Competing Sentence Test in Chinese Potentials.” Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology 23: 97–99.
   Google Scholar
• Hagerman, B. 1982. “Sentences for Testing Speech Intelligibility in Noise.” Scandinavian Audiology 11 (2): 79–87. doi:10.3109/01050398209076203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsh, I. J., H. Davis, S. R. Silverman, E. G. Reynolds, E. Eldert, and R. W. Benson. 1952. “Development of Materials for Speech Audiometry.” The Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 17 (3): 321–337. doi:10.1044/jshd.1703.321.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hochmuth, S., T. Brand, M. A. Zokoll, F. Z. Castro, N. Wardenga, and B. Kollmeier. 2012. “A Spanish Matrix Sentence Test for Assessing Speech Reception Thresholds in Noise.” International Journal of Audiology 51 (7): 536–544. doi:10.3109/14992027.2012.670731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochmuth, S., T. Jürgens, T. Brand, and B. Kollmeier. 2015. “Talker- and Language-Specific Effects on Speech Intelligibility in Noise Assessed with Bilingual Talkers: Which Language Is More Robust against Noise and Reverberation?.” International Journal of Audiology 54 (sup2): 23–34. doi:10.3109/14992027.2015.1088174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houben, R., J. Koopman, H. Luts, K. C. Wagener, A. van Wieringen, H. Verschuure, and W. A. Dreschler. 2014. “Development of a Dutch Matrix Sentence Test to Assess Speech Intelligibility in Noise.” International Journal of Audiology 53 (10): 760–763. doi:10.3109/14992027.2014.920111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. 2004. ISO389-8 Acoustics – Reference zero for the calibration of audiometric equipment – Part 8: Reference equivalent threshold sound pressure levels for pure tones and circumaural earphones: International Organization for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• Jansen, S., H. Luts, K. C. Wagener, B. Kollmeier, M. Del Rio, R. Dauman, C. James, et al. 2012. “Comparison of Three Types of French Speech-in-Noise Tests: A Multi-Center Study.” International Journal of Audiology 51 (3): 164–173. doi:10.3109/14992027.2011.633568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji, F., X. Xi, A-T Chen, J. Ying, Q-J Wang, and S.-M. Yang. 2011a. “Development of a Mandarin Monosyllable Test Material with Homogenous Items (I): Homogeneity Selection.” Acta Oto-Laryngologica 131 (9): 962–969. doi:10.3109/00016489.2011.574646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji, F., X. Xi, A-T Chen, W-L Zhao, X. Zhang, Y-F Ni, S.-M. Yang, and Q. Wang. 2011b. “Development of a Mandarin Monosyllable Test Material with Homogenous Items (II): Lists Equivalence Evaluation.” Acta Oto-Laryngologica 131 (10): 1051–1060. doi:10.3109/00016489.2011.583267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, H., G. Lin, N. Sankaran, J. Xia, S. Kalluri, and S. Carlile. 2017. “Development and Evaluation of a Mixed Gender, Multi-Talker Matrix Sentence Test in Australian English.” International Journal of Audiology 56 (2): 85–91. doi:10.1080/14992027.2016.1236415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollmeier, B. 1990. Messmethodik, Modellierung und Verbesserung der Verständlichkeit von Sprache [methodology, modeling, and improvement of speech intelligibility measurements]. Göttingen: Universität of Göttingen.
   Google Scholar
• Kollmeier, B., A. Warzybok, S. Hochmuth, M. A. Zokoll, V. Uslar, T. Brand, and K. C. Wagener. 2015. “The Multilingual Matrix Test: Principles, Applications, and Comparison across Languages: A Review.” International Journal of Audiology 54 (sup2): 3–16. doi:10.3109/14992027.2015.1020971.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollmeier, B., and M. Wesselkamp. 1997. “Development and Evaluation of a German Sentence Test for Objective and Subjective Speech Intelligibility Assessment.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 102 (4): 2412–2421. doi:10.1121/1.419624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, Z. A. 1999. Neural Mechanism of Auditory Perception and Discrimination. Shanghai, China: Shanghai Science, Technology & Education Publishers
   Google Scholar
• Luts, H., E. Boon, J. Wable, and J. Wouters. 2008. “FIST: A French Sentence Test for Speech Intelligibility in Noise.” International Journal of Audiology 47 (6): 373–374. doi:10.1080/14992020801887786.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, D. Y., and H. Shen. 2004. Handbook of acoustics (revised edition). Beijing: Science Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, X., B. McPherson, and L. Ma. 2013. “Chinese Speech Audiometry Material: Past, Present, Future.” Hearing, Balance and Communication 11 (2): 52–63. doi:10.3109/21695717.2013.794592.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, G. A., G. A. Heise, and W. Lichten. 1951. “The Intelligibility of Speech as a Function of the Context of the Test Materials.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 41 (5): 329–35. doi:10.1037/h0062491.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nielsen, J. B., and T. Dau. 2011. “The Danish Hearing in Noise Test.” International Journal of Audiology 50 (3): 202–208. doi:10.3109/14992027.2010.524254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, M., S. D. Soli, and J. A. Sullivan. 1994. “Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the Measurement of Speech Reception Thresholds in Quiet and in Noise.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 95 (2): 1085–1099. doi:10.1121/1.408469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nissen, S. L., R. W. Harris, L.-J. Jennings, D. L. Eggett, and H. Buck. 2005a. “Psychometrically Equivalent Mandarin Bisyllabic Speech Discrimination Materials Spoken by Male and Female Talkers.” International Journal of Audiology 44 (7): 379–390. doi:10.1080/14992020500147615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nissen, S. L., R. W. Harris, L.-J. Jennings, D. L. Eggett, and H. Buck. 2005b. “Psychometrically Equivalent Trisyllabic Words for Speech Reception Threshold Testing in Mandarin.” International Journal of Audiology 44 (7): 391–399. doi:10.1080/14992020500147672.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozimek, E., D. Kutzner, A. Sek, and A. Wicher. 2009. “Polish Sentence Tests for Measuring the Intelligibility of Speech in Interfering Noise.” International Journal of Audiology 48 (7): 433–443. doi:10.1080/14992020902725521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozimek, E., A. Warzybok, and D. Kutzner. 2010. “Polish Sentence Matrix Test for Speech Intelligibility Measurement in Noise.” International Journal of Audiology 49 (6): 444–454. doi:10.3109/14992021003681030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plomp, R., and A. M. Mimpen. 1979. “Improving the Reliability of Testing the Speech Reception Threshold for Sentences.” Audiology: Official Organ of the International Society of Audiology 18 (1): 43–52. doi:10.3109/00206097909072618.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Primadita, F. 2017. Development and Clinical Validation of the Indonesian Matrix Sentence Test Mathematics and Science. Oldenburg: University of Oldenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Puglisi, G. E., A. Warzybok, S. Hochmuth, C. Visentin, A. Astolfi, N. Prodi, and B. Kollmeier. 2015. “An Italian Matrix Sentence Test for the Evaluation of Speech Intelligibility in Noise.” International Journal of Audiology 54 (sup2): 44–50. doi:10.3109/14992027.2015.1061709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, Y., and S. X. Wang. 1983. “Constitution of a Set of Speech Assessment Material (in Chinese).” Acta Psychologica Sinica 15 (3): 316–328.
   Google Scholar
• Smits, C., T. S. Kapteyn, and T. Houtgast. 2004. “Development and Validation of an Automatic Speech-in-Noise Screening Test by Telephone.” International Journal of Audiology 43 (1): 15–28. doi:10.1080/14992020400050004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soli, S. D., and L. L. N. Wong. 2008. “Assessment of Speech Intelligibility in Noise with the Hearing in Noise Test.” International Journal of Audiology 47 (6): 356–361. doi:10.1080/14992020801895136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao, D.-D., Q.-J. Fu, J. J. Galvin, and Y.-F. Yu. 2017. “The Development and Validation of the Closed-Set Mandarin Sentence (CMS) Test.” Speech Communication 92: 125–131. doi:10.1016/j.specom.2017.06.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tillman, T. W., and R. Carhart. 1966. “An Expanded Test for Speech Discrimination Utilizing CNC Monosyllabic Words. Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6.” SAM-TR-66-55. Tech Rep SAM-TR 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, K. S., L. H. Tseng, C. J. Wu, and S. T. Young. 2009. “Development of a Mandarin Monosyllable Recognition Test.” Ear and Hearing 30 (1): 90–99. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e31818f28a6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Wieringen, A., and J. Wouters. 2008. “LIST and LINT: Sentences and Numbers for Quantifying Speech Understanding in Severely Impaired Listeners for Flanders and The Netherlands.” International Journal of Audiology 47 (6): 348–355. doi:10.1080/14992020801895144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Versfeld, N. J., L. Daalder, J. M. Festen, and T. Houtgast. 2000. “Method for the Selection of Sentence Materials for Efficient Measurement of the Speech Reception Threshold.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 107 (3): 1671–1684. doi:10.1121/1.428451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagener, K., J. L. Josvassen, and R. Ardenkjaer. 2003. “Design, Optimization and Evaluation of a Danish Sentence Test in Noise: Diseño, Optimización y Evaluación De La Prueba Danesa De Frases En Ruido.” International Journal of Audiology 42 (1): 10–17. doi:10.3109/14992020309056080.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagener, K., and B. Kollmeier. 2005. “Evaluation Des Oldenburger Satztests Mit Kindern Und Oldenburger Kinder-Satztest [Evaluation of the Oldenburg Sentence Test with Children and the Oldenburg Children's Sentence Test].” Zeitschrift für Audiologie 44: 134–143.
   Google Scholar
• Wagener, K. C. 2004. Factors Influencing Sentence Intelligibility in Noise. BIS-Verlag: University of Oldenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Wagener, K. C., T. Brand, and B. Kollmeier. 1999a. “Entwicklung Und Evaluation Eines Satztests Für Die Deutsche Sprache Teil III: Evaluation Des Oldenburger Satztests [Development and Evaluation of a German Sentence Test – Part III: Evaluation of the Oldenburg Sentence Test].” Zeitschrift für Audiologie 38: 86–95.
   Google Scholar
• Wagener, K. C., T. Brand, and B. Kollmeier. 1999b. “Entwicklung Und Evaluation Eines Satztests in Deutscher Sprache - Teil II: Optimierung Des Oldenburger Satztests [Development and Evaluation of a German Sentence Test - Part II: Optimization of the Oldenburg Sentence Tests].” Zeitschrift für Audiologie 38: 44– 56.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wagener, K. C., T. Brand, and B. Kollmeier. 1999c. “Entwicklung Und Evaluation Eines Satztests in Deutscher Sprache I: Design Des Oldenburger Satztests [Development and Evaluation of a German Sentence Test – Part I: Design of the Oldenburg Sentence Test].” Zeitschrift für Audiologie 38: 4–15.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, S., R. Mannell, P. Newall, H. Zhang, and D. Han. 2007. “Development and Evaluation of Mandarin Disyllabic Materials for Speech Audiometry in China.” International Journal of Audiology 46 (12): 719–731. doi:10.1080/14992020701558511.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y. 1955. “Vocabulary of Speech for Hearing Assessment.” Clinical Otorhinolaryngology 3: 40–45.
   Google Scholar
• Warzybok, A., M. Zokoll, N. Wardenga, E. Ozimek, M. Boboshko, and B. Kollmeier. 2015. “Development of the Russian Matrix Sentence Test.” International Journal of Audiology 54 (sup2): 35–43. doi:10.3109/14992027.2015.1020969.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wesker, T., B. Meyer, K. Wagener, J. Anemueller, and A. Mertins. 2005. “Oldenburg Logatome Speech Corpus (OLLO) for Speech Recognition Experiments with Humans and Machines.” Proceedings of Interspeech 2:1273–1276.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, L. L., and S. D. Soli. 2005. “Development of the Cantonese Hearing in Noise Test (CHINT).” Ear and Hearing 26 (3): 276–89. doi:10.1097/00003446-200506000-00004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, L. L. N., S. D. Soli, S. Liu, N. Han, and M.-W. Huang. 2007. “Development of the Mandarin Hearing in Noise Test (MHINT).” Ear and Hearing 28 (2 Suppl): 70S–74S. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e31803154d0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xi, X.,. T. Y. C. Ching, F. Ji, Y. Zhao, J.-N. Li, J. Seymour, M.-D. Hong, A.-T. Chen, and H. Dillon. 2012. “Development of a Corpus of Mandarin Sentences in Babble with Homogeneity Optimized via Psychometric Evaluation.” International Journal of Audiology 51 (5): 399–404. doi:10.3109/14992027.2011.642011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xi, X., and F. Ji. 2009. Mandarin monosyllable recognition test (CD). Beijing: PLA Sanitation Audio and Video Publishing House.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., S. Wang, L. Wang, J. Chen, and P.-P. Yue. 2006. “Digital Recording and Equivalent Evaluation of Mandarin Speech Test Materials.” Clinical Otorhinolaryngology. 20: 1011–1015. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1781.2006.22.002.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, J. L. 1995. Acoustics – Speech articulation testing method (Chinese National Standard GB/T 15508-1995).
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y. 1935. The Researches on the Modern Wu language. Beijing: Tsinghua University Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Zokoll, M. A., D. Fidan, D. Türkyılmaz, S. Hochmuth, İ. Ergenç, G. Sennaroğlu, and B. Kollmeier. 2015. “Development and Evaluation of the Turkish Matrix Sentence Test.” International Journal of Audiology 54 (Suppl 2): 51–61. doi:10.3109/14992027.2015.1074735.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zokoll, M. A., S. Hochmuth, A. Warzybok, K. C. Wagener, M. Buschermöhle, and B. Kollmeier. 2013. “Speech-in-Noise Tests for Multilingual Hearing Screening and Diagnostics1.” American Journal of Audiology 22 (1): 175–8. doi:10.1044/1059-0889(2013/12-0061).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zokoll, M. A., K. C. Wagener, T. Brand, M. Buschermöhle, and B. Kollmeier. 2012. “Internationally Comparable Screening Tests for Listening in Noise in Several European Languages: The German Digit Triplet Test as an Optimization Prototype.” International Journal of Audiology 51 (9): 697–707. doi:10.3109/14992027.2012.690078.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar