Development of the Social Participation Restrictions Questionnaire (SPaRQ) through consultation with adults with hearing loss, researchers, and clinicians: a content evaluation study

References

• Alwin, D. F. 1997. “Feeling Thermometers versus 7-Point Scales: Which Are Better?” Sociological Methods & Research 25(3): 318–340. doi:10.1177/0049124197025003003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, L. G., M. Groenvold, T. Jørgensen, and M. Aadahl. 2010. “Construct Validity of a Revised Physical Activity Scale and Testing by Cognitive Interviewing.” Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 38(7): 707–714. doi:10.1177/1403494810380099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aronson, J. K., and R. E. Ferner. 2005. “Clarification of Terminology in Drug Safety.” Drug Safety 28(10): 851–870. doi:10.2165/00002018-200528100-00003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, A. B., P. Leighton, and M. A. Ferguson. 2017. “Coping Together with Hearing Loss: A Qualitative Meta-Synthesis of the Psychosocial Experiences of People with Hearing Loss and Their Communication Partners.” International Journal of Audiology 56(5): 297–305. doi:10.1080/14992027.2017.1286695.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beatty, P. C., and G. B. Willis. 2007. “Research Synthesis: The Practice of Cognitive Interviewing.” Public Opinion Quarterly 71(2): 287–311. doi:10.1093/poq/nfm006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boothroyd, A. 2007. “Adult Aural Rehabilitation: What Is It and Does It Work?” Trends in Amplification 11(2): 63–71. doi:10.1177/1084713807301073.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boynton, P. M., G. W. Wood, T. Greenhalgh, and Q. Clinic. 2004. “Hands-on Guide to Questionnaire Research: Reaching beyond the White Middle Classes.” British Medical Journal 328(7453): 1433–1436. doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7453.1433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3(2): 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Brod, M., L. E. Tesler, and T. L. Christensen. 2009. “Qualitative Research and Content Validity: Developing Best Practices Based on Science and Experience.” Quality of Life Research 18(9): 1263–1278. doi:10.1007/s11136-009-9540-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, M., R. Wilcox, C.-P. Chou, M. Chang, F. Yang, J. Blanchard, A. Marterella, A. Kuo, and F. Clark. 2011. “Psychometric Properties of Reverse-Scored Items on the CES-D in a Sample of Ethnically Diverse Older Adults.” Psychological Assessment 23(2): 558–562. doi:10.1037/a0022484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, L. A., and D. Watson. 1995. “Constructing Validity: Basic Issues in Objective Scale Development.” Psychological Assessment 7(3): 309–319. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, D. 2003. “Pretesting Survey Instruments: An Overview of Cognitive Methods.” Quality of Life Research 12(3): 229–238. doi:10.1023/A:1023254226592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conrad, F., and J. Blair. 1996. “From Impressions to Data: Increasing the Objectivity of Cognitive Interviews.” In Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods, Annual Meetings of the American Statistical Association, Alexandria, VA, USA: American Statistical Association; 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Cummins, R. A., and E. Gullone. 2000. “Why We Should Not Use 5-Point Likert Scales: The Case for Subjective Quality of Life Measurement.” In Proceedings, Second International Conference on Quality of Life in Cities, Kent Ridge, Singapore: National University of Singapore; 74–93.
   Google Scholar
• Danermark, B., S. Granberg, S. E. Kramer, M. Selb, and C. Möller. 2013. “The Creation of a Comprehensive and a Brief Core Set for Hearing Loss Using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health.” American Journal of Audiology 22(2): 323–328. doi:10.1044/1059-0889(2013/12-0052).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, A., P. Smith, M. Ferguson, D. Stephens, and I. Gianopoulos. 2007. “Acceptability, Benefit and Costs of Early Screening for Hearing Disability: A Study of Potential Screening Tests and Models.” Health Technology Assessment 11(42): 1–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkers, M. 2010. “Issues in the Conceptualization and Measurement of Participation: An Overview.” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 91(9 Suppl): S5–S16. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2009.10.036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drennan, J. 2003. “Cognitive Interviewing: Verbal Data in the Design and Pretesting of Questionnaires.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 42(1): 57–63. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02579.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyssen, I. C., M. P. Steultjens, J. Dekker, and C. B. Terwee. 2011. “A Systematic Review of Instruments Assessing Participation: Challenges in Defining Participation.” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 92(6): 983–997. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2011.01.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, M., Kitterick, A. P. T. Chong, L. Y. Edmondson-Jones, M. Barker, F. Hoare. D., and J. 2017. “Hearing Aids for Mild to Moderate Hearing Loss in Adults.” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (9), Art. no. CD012023. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD012023.pub2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, M. A., H. Henshaw, D. Maidment, and E. Heffernan. In press. “Evidence-Based Interventions for Adult Aural Rehabilitation: That Was Then, This Is Now.” Seminars in Hearing
   Google Scholar
• Granberg, S., J. Dahlström, C. Möller, K. Kähäri, and B. Danermark. 2014. “The ICF Core Sets for Hearing Loss – Researcher Perspective. Part I: Systematic Review of Outcome Measures Identified in Audiological Research.” International Journal of Audiology 53(2): 65–76. doi:10.3109/14992027.2013.851799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, J. S., and L. L. Davis. 1997. “Selection and Use of Content Experts for Instrument Development.” Research in Nursing & Health 20(3): 269–274 doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199706)20:3<269::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-G.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haynes, S. N., D. Richard, and E. S. Kubany. 1995. “Content Validity in Psychological Assessment: A Functional Approach to Concepts and Methods.” Psychology Assessment 7(3): 238–247. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heffernan, E., N. S. Coulson, H. Henshaw, J. G. Barry, and M. A. Ferguson. 2016. “Understanding the Psychosocial Experiences of Adults with Mild-Moderate Hearing Loss: An Application of Leventhal’s Self-Regulatory Model.” International Journal of Audiology 55(Suppl 3): S3–S12. doi:10.3109/14992027.2015.1117663.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heinemann, A. W., D. Tulsky, M. Dijkers, M. Brown, S. Magasi, W. Gordon, and H. Demark. 2010. “Issues in Participation Measurement in Research and Clinical Applications.” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 91(9 Suppl): S72–S76. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2009.11.031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leidy, N. K., and M. Vernon. 2008. “Perspectives on Patient-Reported Outcomes: Content Validity and Qualitative Research in a Changing Clinical Trial Environment.” PharmacoEconomics 26(5): 363–370. doi:10.2165/00019053-200826050-00002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung, S.-O. 2011. “A Comparison of Psychometric Properties and Normality in 4-, 5-, 6-, and 11-Point Likert Scales.” Journal of Social Service Research 37(4): 412–421. doi:10.1080/01488376.2011.580697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink, L. B., C. B. Terwee, D. L. Patrick, J. Alonso, P. W. Stratford, D. L. Knol, L. M. Bouter., & H. C. De Vet. 2012. The COSMIN Checklist Manual. Amsterdam: VU University Medical Center.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. 1990. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods. New York: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, J., M. Hammond, E. Heffernan, and T. Turner. 2012. “Careers and Talents Not to Be Wasted: Skilled Immigrants’ Journeys through Psychological States En Route to Satisfying Employment.” Journal of Management Development 31(2): 102–115. doi:10.1108/02621711211199458.
   Google Scholar
• Rattray, J., and M. C. Jones. 2007. “Essential Elements of Questionnaire Design and Development.” Journal of Clinical Nursing 16(2): 234–243. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01573.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeve, B. B., K. W. Wyrwich, A. W. Wu, G. Velikova, C. B. Terwee, C. F. Snyder, C. Schwartz, et al. 2013. “ISOQOL Recommends Minimum Standards for Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Used in Patient-Centered Outcomes and Comparative Effectiveness Research.” Quality of Life Research 22(8): 1889–1905. doi:10.1007/s11136-012-0344-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubio, D. M., M. Berg-Weger, S. S. Tebb, E. S. Lee, and S. Rauch. 2003. “Objectifying Content Validity: Conducting a Content Validity Study in Social Work Research.” Social Work Research 27(2): 94–104. doi:10.1093/swr/27.2.94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salter, K., J. W. Jutai, R. Teasell, N. C. Foley, J. Bitensky, and M. Bayley. 2005. “Issues for Selection of Outcome Measures in Stroke Rehabilitation: ICF Participation.” Disability and Rehabilitation 27(6): 315–528. doi:10.1080/09638280400008545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seekins, T., W. Shunkamolah, M. Bertsche, C. Cowart, J. A. Summers, A. Reichard, and G. White. 2012. “A Systematic Scoping Review of Measures of Participation in Disability and Rehabilitation Research: A Preliminary Report of Findings.” Disability and Health Journal 5(4): 224–232. doi:10.1016/j.dhjo.2012.05.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheer, V. C. 2014. “A Meta-Synthesis of Health-Related Self-Efficacy Instrumentation: Problems and Suggestions.” Journal of Nursing Measurement 22(1): 77–93. doi:10.1891/1061-3749.22.1.77.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith, S. L., K. M. Pichora-Fuller, K. L. Watts, and C. La More. 2011. “Development of the Listening Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (LSEQ).” International Journal of Audiology 50(6): 417–25. doi:10.3109/14992027.2011.553205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwee, C. B., S. D. Bot, M. R. De Boer, D. A. Van Der Windt, D. L. Knol, J. Dekker, L. M. Bouter, and H. C. De Vet. 2007. “Quality Criteria Were Proposed for Measurement Properties of Health Status Questionnaires.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 60(1): 34–42. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Sonderen, E., R. Sanderman, and J. C. Coyne. 2013. “Ineffectiveness of Reverse Wording of Questionnaire Items: Let’s Learn from Cows in the Rain.” PLoS One 8(7): 9e68967 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0068967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vas, V.,. M. A. Akeroyd, and D. A. Hall. 2017. “A Data-Driven Synthesis of Research Evidence for Domains of Hearing Loss, as Reported by Adults with Hearing Loss and Their Communication Partners.” Trends in Hearing 21: 1–25. DOI: 10.1177/2331216517734088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weng, L.-J. 2004. “Impact of the Number of Response Categories and Anchor Labels on Coefficient Alpha and Test–Retest Reliability.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 64(6): 956–972. doi:10.1177/0013164404268674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteneck, G., and M. P. Dijkers. 2009. “Difficult to Measure Constructs: Conceptual and Methodological Issues Concerning Participation and Environmental Factors.” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 90(11): S22–S35. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2009.06.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization 2001. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. Geneva: World Health Organization.
   Google Scholar
• Willis, G. B. 2004. Cognitive Interviewing: A Tool for Improving Questionnaire Design: A Tool for Improving Questionnaire Design. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, C. M. 2006. “Careless Responding to Reverse-Worded Items: Implications for Confirmatory Factor Analysis.” Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment 28(3): 186–194. doi:10.1007/s10862-005-9004-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yardley, L. 2008. Demonstrating Validity in Qualitative Psychology. In Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods, edited by J. A. Smith. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar