Cognitive hearing science and ease of language understanding

References

• Akeroyd, M. A. 2008. “Are Individual Differences in Speech Reception Related to Individual Differences in Cognitive Ability? A Survey of Twenty Experimental Studies with Normal and Hearing-impaired Adults.” International Journal of Audiology 47 (Suppl 2): S53–S71. doi:10.1080/14992020802301142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amichetti, N. M., A. G. White, and A. Wingfield. 2016. “Multiple Solutions to the Same Problem: Utilization of Plausibility and Syntax in Sentence Comprehension by Older Adults with Impaired Hearing.” Frontiers in Psychology 7: 789. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00789
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, S., T. White-Schwoch, A. Parbery-Clark, and N. Kraus. 2013. “A Dynamic Auditory-cognitive System Supports Speech-in-noise Perception in Older Adults.” Hearing Research 300:18–32. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2013.03.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andin, J., E. Orfanidou, V. Cardin, E. Holmer, C. M. Capek, B. Woll, J. Rönnberg and M. Rudner. 2013. “Similar Digit-Based Working Memory in Deaf Signers and Hearing Non-signers despite Digit Span Differences.” Frontiers in Psychology 4: 942. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00942
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arehart, K. H., P. Souza, R. Baca, and J. M. Kates. 2013. “Working Memory, Age, and Hearing Loss: Susceptibility to Hearing Aid Distortion.” Ear and Hearing 34 (3): 251–260. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e318271aa5e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arehart, K., P. Souza, J. Kates, T. Lunner, and M. S. Pedersen. 2015. “Relationship among Signal Fidelity, Hearing Loss, and Working Memory for Digital Noise Suppression.” Ear and Hearing 36 (5): 505–16. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besser, J., T. Koelewijn, A. A. Zekveld, S. E. Kramer, and J. M. Festen. 2013. “How Linguistic Closure and Verbal Working Memory Relate to Speech Recognition in Noise–A Review.” Trends in Amplification 17 (2): 75–93. doi:10.1177/1084713813495459.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., M. Stevens, P. Mandera, and E. Keuleers. 2016. “The Impact of Word Prevalence on Lexical Decision Times: Evidence from the Dutch Lexicon Project 2.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 42 (3): 441–458. doi:10.1037/xhp0000159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardin, V., E. Orfanidou, L. Kästner, J. Rönnberg, B. Woll, C. M. Capek, and M. Rudner. 2016. “Monitoring Different Phonological Parameters of Sign Language Engages the Same Cortical Language Network but Distinctive Perceptual Ones.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 28 (1): 20–40. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00872.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardin, V., E. Orfanidou, J. Rönnberg, C. M. Capek, M. Rudner, and B. Woll. 2013. “Dissociating Cognitive and Sensory Neural Plasticity in Human Superior Temporal Cortex.” Nature Communications 4: 1473. doi:10.1038/ncomms2463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardin, V., M. Rudner, D. Oliveira, J. Andin, M. Su, L. Beese, B. Woll, J. Rönnberg. 2017. “The Organization of Working Memory Networks Is Shaped by Early Sensory Experience.” Cerebral Cortex 30: 1–15. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhx222.
   Google Scholar
• Caroll, R., A. Warzybok, B. Kollmeier, and E. Ruigendijk. 2016. “Age-Related Differences in Lexical Access Relate to Speech Recognition in Noise.” Frontiers in Psychology 7: 990. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00990
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Classon, E., M. Rudner, and J. Rönnberg. 2013. “Working Memory Compensates for Hearing Related Phonological Processing Deficit.” Journal of Communication Disorders 46 (1): 17–29. doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2012.10.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daneman, M., and P. M. Merikle. 1996. “Working Memory and Language Comprehension: A Meta-Analysis.” Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 3 (4): 422–433. doi:10.3758/BF03214546.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, H., W. Qin, M. Liang, D. Ming, B. Wan, Q. Li, and C. Yu. 2015. “Cross-modal Activation of Auditory Regions during Visuo-Spatial Working Memory in Early Deafness.” Brain 138 (9): 2750–2765. doi:10.1093/brain/awv165.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dolležal, L.-V., A. Brechmann, G. M. Klump, and S. Deike. 2014. “Evaluating Auditory Stream Segregation of SAM Tone Sequences by Subjective and Objective Psychoacoustical Tasks, and Brain Activity.” Frontiers in Neuroscience 8: 119. doi:10.3389/fnins. 2014.00119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, B. 2016. “A Model of Auditory-Cognitive Processing and Relevance to Clinical Applicability.” Ear and Hearing 37 (Suppl 1): 85S–91S. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000308.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Foo, C., M. Rudner, J. Rönnberg, and T. Lunner. 2007. “Recognition of Speech in Noise with New Hearing Instrument Compression Release Settings Requires Explicit Cognitive Storage and Processing Capacity.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 18: 553–566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Füllgrabe, C., and S. Rosen. 2016. “On the (un)importance of Working Memory in Speech-in-noise Processing for Listeners with Normal Hearing Thresholds.” Frontiers in Psychology 7: 1268. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Füllgrabe, C., B.C. Moore, and M. A. Stone. 2015. “Age-group Differences in Speech Identification despite Matched Audiometrically Normal Hearing: Contributions from Auditory Temporal Processing and Cognition.” Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience 6: 347. doi:10.3389/fnagi.2014.00347
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatehouse, S., G. Naylor, and C. Elberling. 2003. “Benefits from Hearing Aids in Relation to the Interaction between the User and the Environment.” International Journal of Audiology 42 (Suppl 1): S77–S85. doi:10.3109/14992020309074627.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gatehouse, S., G. Naylor, and C. Elberling. 2006. “Linear and Nonlinear Hearing Aid Fittings–1: Patterns of Benefit.” International Journal of Audiology 45 (3): 130–152. doi:10.1080/14992020500429518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gennari, S. P., R. Millman, M. Hymers, and S. L. Mattys. 2018. “Anterior Paracingulate and Cingulate Cortex Mediates the Effects of Cognitive Load on Speech Sound Discrimination.” NeuroImage 178: 735–743. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.06.035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goh, W. D., S. Lidia, M. J. Yap, and S. Hui Tan. 2009. “Distributional Analyses in Auditory Lexical Decision: Neighborhood Density and Word-frequency Effects.” Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 16 (5): 882–887. doi:10.3758/PBR.16.5.882.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Good, A., K. A. Gordon, B. C. Papsin, G. Nespoli, T. Hopyan, I. Peretz, and F. A. Russo. 2017. “Benefits of Music Training for Perception of Emotional Speech Prosody in Deaf Children with Cochlear Implants.” Ear and Hearing 38 (4): 455–464. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon-Salant, S., and P. J. Fitzgibbons. 1997. “Selected Cognitive Factors and Speech Recognition Performance among Young and Elderly Listeners.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 40 (2):423–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon-Salant, S., and S. S. Cole. 2016. “Effects of Age and Working Memory Capacity on Speech Recognition Performance in Noise among Listeners with Normal Hearing.” Ear and Hearing 37 (5): 593–602. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grady, C. 2012. “The Cognitive Neuroscience of Ageing.” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 13 (7): 491–505. doi:10.1038/nrn3256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habib, R., L. Nyberg, and E. Tulving. 2003. “Hemispheric Asymmetries of Memory: The HERA Model Revisited.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (6): 241–245. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00110-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadar, B., J. E. Skrzypek, A. Wingfield, and B. M. Ben-David. 2016. “Working Memory Load Affects Processing Time in Spoken Word Recognition: Evidence from Eye-Movements.” Frontiers in Neuroscience 10: 221. doi:10.3389/fnins.2016.00221
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagerman, B. 1982. “Sentences for Testing Speech Intelligibility in Noise.” Scandinavian Audiology 11 (2): 79–78. doi:10.3109/01050398209076203.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagerman, B., and C. Kinnefors. 1995. “Efficient Adaptive Methods for Measuring Speech Reception Threshold in Quiet and in Noise.” International Journal of Audiology 24 (1): 71–77. doi:10.3109/14992029509042213.
   Google Scholar
• Hannon, B., and M. Daneman. 2001. “A New Tool for Measuring and Understanding Individual Differences in the Component Processes of Reading Comprehension.” Journal of Educational Psychology 93 (1): 103–128. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heitz, R. P., J. C. Schrock, T. W. Payne, and R. W. Engle. 2008. “Effects of Incentive on Working Memory Capacity: Behavioral and Pupillometric Data.” Psychophysiology 45 (1): 119–129. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00605.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernvig, L. H., and S. Ø. Olsen. 2005. “Learning Effect When Using the Danish Hagerman Sentences (Dantale II) to Determine Speech Reception Threshold.” International Journal of Audiology 44 (9): 509–512. doi:10.1080/14992020500189997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewitt, D. 2017. “Age-Related Hearing Loss and Cognitive Decline: You Haven't Heard the Half of It.” Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience 9: 112. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2017.00112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulme, C., S. Maughan, and G. D. A. Brown. 1991. “Memory for Familiar and Unfamiliar Words: Evidence for a Long-term Memory Contribution to Short-term Memory Span.” Journal of Memory and Language 30 (6): 685–701. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(91)90032-F.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmer, E., M., Heimann, and M. Rudner. 2016. “Imitation, sign Language Skill and the Developmental Ease of Language Understanding (D-ELU) Model.” Frontiers in Psychology 7: 107. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, C. R., and D. B. Pisoni. 2018. “Extrinsic Cognitive Load Impairs Spoken Word Recognitionin High- and Low-Predictability Sentences.” Ear and Hearing 39 (2): 378–389. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hällgren, M., B. Larsby, and S. Arlinger. 2006. “A Swedish Version of the Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) for Measurement of Speech recognition.” International Journal of Audiology 45 (4): 227–237. doi:10.1080/1499202050042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoover, J. R., H. L. Storkel, and T. P. Hogan (2010). A cross-sectional comparison of the effects of phonotactic probability and neighborhood density on word learning by preschool children. Journal of Memory and Language, 63(1), 100–116. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2010.02.003
   Google Scholar
• Jayakody, D. M. P., P. L. Friedland, R. H. Eikelboom, R. N. Martins, and H. R. Sohrabi. 2018. “A Novel Study on Association between Untreated Hearing Loss and Cognitive Functions of Older Adults: Baseline Non-verbal Cognitive Assessment Results.” Clinical Otolaryngology 43 (1): 182–191. doi:10.1111/coa.12937.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keidser, G., Best, V. Freeston, K. and A. Boyce. 2015. “Cognitive Spare Capacity: evaluation Data and Its Association with Comprehension of Dynamic Conversations.” Frontiers in Psychology 6: 597. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00597
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koelewijn, T., A. A. Zekveld, J. M. Festen, and S. E. Kramer. 2012. “Pupil Dilation Uncovers Extra Listening Effort in the Presence of a Single-talker Masker.” Ear and Hearing 32 (2): 291–300. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182310019.
   Google Scholar
• Koelewijn, T., A. A. Zekveld, J. Rönnberg, J. Festen, and S. E. Kramer. 2012. Processing Load Induced by Informational Masking Is Related to Linguistic Abilities.” International Journal of Otolaryngology 2012: 1–11. doi:10.1155/2012/865731.
   Google Scholar
• Kraus, N., A. Parbery-Clark, D. L. Strait, 2012. “Cognitive Factors Shape Brain Networks for Auditory Skills: spotlight on Auditory Working Memory.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1252 (1): 100–107. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2012.06463.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Luce, P. A., and D. B. Pisoni. 1998. “Recognizing Spoken Words: The Neighborhood Activation Model.” Ear and Hearing 19 (1): 1–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, F. R., L. Ferrucci, Y. An, J. O. Goh, J. Doshi, E. J. Metter, C. Davatzikos, M. A. Kraut, and S. M. Resnick. 2014. “Association of Hearing Impairment with Brain Volume Changes in Older Adults.” Neuroimage 90: 84–92. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.12.059.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, F. R., E. J. Metter, R. J. O'Brien, S. M. Resnick, A. B. Zonderman, and L. Ferrucci. 2011. “Hearing Loss and Incident Dementia.” Archives of Neurology 68 (2): 214–220. doi:10.1001/archneurol.2010.362
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, G., and S. Carlile. 2015. “Costs of Switching Auditory Spatial Attention in following Conversational Turn-Taking.” Frontiers in Neuroscience 9: 124. doi:10.3389/fnins.2015.00124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lunner, T. 2003. “Cognitive Function in Relation to Hearing Aid Use.” International Journal of Audiology 42 (Suppl 1): 49–58. doi:10.3109/14992020309074624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lunner, T., and E. Sundewall-Thorén. 2007. “Interactions between Cognition, compression, and Listening Conditions: effects on Speech-in-noise Performance in a 2-channel Hearing Aid.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 18 (7): 604–617. doi:10.3766/jaaa.18.7.7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lunner, T., M. Rudner, and J. Rönnberg. 2009. “Cognition and Hearing Aids.” Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 50 (5): 395–403. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00742.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, W., C. R. Marshall, K. Mason, and G. Morgan. 2010. “The Acquisition of Sign Language: The Impact of Phonetic Complexity on Phonology.” Language Learning and Development 6 (1): 60–86. doi:10.1080/15475440903245951.
   Google Scholar
• Marslen-Wilson, W. D., and L. K. Tyler. 1980. “The Temporal Structure of Spoken Language Understanding.” Cognition 8 (1): 1–71. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(80)90015-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, J. E., and T. A. Campbell. 2016. “Processing Complex Sounds Passing through the Rostral Brain Stem: The New Early Filter Model.” Frontiers in Neuroscience 10: 136. doi:10.3.89/fnins.2016.00136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, C., A. Jones, T. Denmark, K. Mason, J. Atkinson, and N. Botting. 2015. “Deaf Children's Non-verbal Working Memory Is Impacted by Their Language Experience.” Frontiers in Psychology 6: 527. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00527
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattys, S. L., M. H. Davis, A. R. Bradlow, and S. Scott. 2012. “Speech Recognition in Adverse Conditions: A Review.” Language and Cognitive Processes 27 (7–8): 953–978. doi:10.1080/01690965.2012.705006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGarrigle, R., K. J. Munro, P. Dawes, A. J. Stewart, D. R. Moore, J. G. Barry, and S. Amitay. 2014. “Listening Effort and Fatigue: What Exactly Are we Measuring? A British Society of Audiology Cognition in Hearing Special Interest Group ‘white Paper’.” International Journal of Audiology 53 (7): 433–440. doi:10.3109/14992027.2014.890296.
   Google Scholar
• McMahon, C. M., I. Boisvert, D P. Lissa, L. Granger, R. Ibrahim, and C. Y. Lo. 2016. “Monitoring Alpha Oscillations and Pupil Dilation across a Performance-intensity Function.” Frontiers in Psychology 7: 745. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00745
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meister, H., S. Schreitmüller, M. Ortmann, S. Rählmann, and M. Walger. 2016. “Effects of Hearing Loss and Cognitive Load on Speech Recognition with Competing Talkers.” Frontiers in Psychology 7: 301. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michalek, A. M. P., I. Ash, and K. Schwartz. 2018. “The Independence of Working Memory Capacity and Audiovisual Cues When Listening in Noise.” Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 59 (6): 578–585. doi:10.1111/sjop.12480
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, S., T. Lunner, S. Stenfelt, J. Rönnberg, and M. Rudner. 2013a. “Seeing the Talker’s Face Supports Executive Processing of Speech in Steady State Noise.” Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience 7: 96. doi:10.3389/fnsys.2013.000961
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mishra, S., T. Lunner, S. Stenfelt, J. Rönnberg, and M. Rudner. 2013b. “Visual Information Can Hinder Working Memory Processing of speech.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 56 (4): 1120–1132. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2012/12-0033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, S., S. Stenfelt, T. Lunner, J. Rönnberg, and M. Rudner. 2014. “Cognitive Spare Capacity in Older Adults with Hearing Loss.” Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience 6: 96. doi:10.3389/fnagi.2014.00096
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moradi, S., B. Lidesam, H. Ng. Danielsson, and J. Rönnberg. 2017. Visual cues contribute differentially in audiovisual perception of consonants and vowels in improving recognition and reducing cognitive demands. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60, 2687–2703. doi:10.1044/2016_JSLHR-H-16-0160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molloy, K., T. D. Griffiths, M. Chait, and N. Lavie. 2015. “Inattentional Deafness: Visual Load Leads to Time-specific Suppression of Auditory Evoked Responses.” Journal of Neuroscience 35 (49): 16046–16054. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2931-15.2015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, B. C. J. 2008. “The Role of Temporal Fine Structure Processing in Pitch Perception, masking, and Speech Perception for Normal-hearing and Hearing-impaired People.” Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 9 (4): 399–406. doi:10.1007/s10162-008-0143-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moradi, S., B. Lidestam, H. Danielsson, E. H. N. Ng, and J. Rönnberg. (in press). Audiovisual perceptual doping: A multisensory facilitation effect on auditory speech perception, from phonetic feature extraction to sentence identification in noise in aided hearing-impaired listeners. Ear & Hearing.
   Google Scholar
• Moradi, S., B. Lidestam, and J. Rönnberg. 2013. “Gated Audiovisual Speech Identification in Silence vs. noise: effects on Time and Accuracy.” Frontiers in Psychology 4: 359. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00359
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moradi, S., B. Lidestam, and J. Rönnberg, 2016. “Comparison of Gated Audiovisual Speech Identification in Elderly Hearing Aid Users and Elderly Normal-hearing Individuals: Effects of Adding Visual Cues to Auditory Speech Stimuli.” Trends in Hearing 20: 1–15. doi:10.1177/2331216516653355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moradi, S., B. Lidestam, A. Saremi, and J. Rönnberg. 2014a. “Gated Auditory Speech Perception: effects of Listening Conditions and Cognitive Capacity.” Frontiers in Psychology 5: 532. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00531
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moradi, S., B. Lidestam, M. Hällgren, and J. Rönnberg. 2014b. “Gated Auditory Speech Perception in Elderly Hearing Aid Users and Elderly Normal Hearing Individuals: Effects of Hearing Impairment and Cognitive Capacity.” Trends Hearing 18. doi:10.1177/2331216514545406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moradi, S., A. Whalin, M. Hällgren, J. Rönnberg, and B. Lidestam. 2017. The efficacy of a short-term audiovisual training on speech-in-noise identification in elderly hearing-aid users. Frontiers in Psychology: Auditory Cognitive Neuroscience, 8: 368, doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, E. H. N., E. Classon, B. Larsby, S. Arlinger, T. Lunner, M. Rudner., et al. 2014. “Dynamic Relation between Working Memory Capacity and Speech Recognition in Noise during the First Six Months of Hearing Aid Use.” Trends in Hearing 18. doi:10.1177/2331216514558688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, E. H. N., M. Rudner, T. Lunner, M. S. Pedersen, and J. Rönnberg. 2013. “Effects of Noise and Working Memory Capacity on Memory Processing of Speech for Hearing-aid Users.” International Journal of Audiology 52 (7): 433–441. doi:10.3109/14992027.2013.776181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, E. H. N., M. Rudner, T. Lunner, and J. Rönnberg. 2015. “Noise Reduction Improves Memory for Target Language Speech in Competing Native but Not Foreign Language Speech.” Ear and Hearing 36 (1): 82–91. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000080.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, E. H. N., and J. Rönnberg. 2018. “Hearing Aid Experience and Background Noise Affect the Robust Relationship Between Working Memory and Speech Reception in Noise.” Paper presented at IHCON, Lake Tahoe, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Nyberg, L., M. Lövdén, K. Riklund, U. Lindenberger, and L. Bäckman. 2012. “Memory Aging and Brain Maintenance.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 16 (5): 292–305. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.04.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obleser, J., M. Wöstmann, N. Hellbernd, A. Wilsch, and B. Maess. 2012. “Adverse Listening Conditions and Memory Load Drive a Common α oscillatory Network.” Journal of Neuroscience 32 (36): 12376–12383. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4908-11.2012 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohlenforst, B., A. A. Zekveld, T. Lunner, D. Wendt, G. Naylor, Y. Wang, N. J. Versfeld., et al. 2017. “Impact of Stimulus-related Factors and Hearing Impairment on Listening Effort as Indicated by Pupil Dilation.” Hearing Research 351: 68–79. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2017.05.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peelle, J. E., and A. Wingfield. 2016. “The Neural Consequences of Age-related Hearing Loss.” Trends in Neuroscience 39 (7): 486–497. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2016.05.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen, E. B., M. Wöstmann, J. Obleser, S. Stenfelt, and T. Lunner. 2015. “Hearing Loss Impacts Neural Alpha Oscillations under Adverse Listening Conditions.” Frontiers in Psychology 6: 177. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00177
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pichora-Fuller, M. K., S. E. Kramer, M. A. Eckert, B. Edwards, B. W. Y. Hornsby, L. E. Humes, U. Lemke., et al. 2016. “Hearing Impairment and Cognitive Energy: The Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening (FUEL).” Ear and Hearing 37 (Suppl 1): 5S–27S. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poeppel, D., W. J. Idsardi, and V. van Wassenhove. 2008. “Speech Perception at the Interface of Neurobiology and Linguistics.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 363 (1493): 1071–1086. doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin, M. K., and A. J. Oxenham. 2003. “Effects of Simulated Cochlear-implant Processing on Speech Reception in Fluctuating Maskers.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 114 (1): 446–454. doi:10.1121/1.1579009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reuter-Lorenz, P. A., and K. A. Cappell. 2008. “Neurocognitive Aging and the Compensation Hypothesis.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 17 (3): 177–182. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00570.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rönnberg, J. 2003. “Cognition in the Hearing Impaired and Deaf as a Bridge between Signal and Dialogue: A Framework and a Model.” International Journal of Audiology 42 (Suppl 1): S68–S76. doi:10.3109/14992020309074626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rönnberg, J., H. Danielsson, M. Rudner, S. Arlinger, O. Sternäng, Å. Wahlin, and L-G. Nilsson (2011). Hearing loss is negatively related to episodic and semantic long-term memory but not to short-term memory. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 54, 705–726. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0088.
   Google Scholar
• Rönnberg, J., S. Hygge, G. Keidser, and M. Rudner. 2014. “The Effect of Functional Hearing Loss and Age on Long- and Short-Term Visuospatial Memory: Evidence from the UK Biobank Resource.” Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience 6: 326. doi:10.3389/fnagi.2014.00326
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rönnberg, J., T. Lunner, A. A. Zekveld, P. Sörqvist, H. Danielsson, B. Lyxell., et al. 2013. “The Ease of Language Understanding (ELU) Model: Theoretical, Empirical, and Clinical Advances.” Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience 7: 31. doi:10.3389/fnsys.2013.00031.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rönnberg, J., M. Rudner, and M. Ingvar. 2004. “Neural Correlates of Working Memory for Sign Language.” Cognitive Brain Research 20 (2): 165–182. doi:10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.03.002.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rönnberg, J., M. Rudner, and T. Lunner. 2014. “Commentary on McGarrigle et al. Listening Effort and Fatigue: What Exactly Are we Measuring? A British Society of Audiology Cognition in Hearing Special Interest Group ‘white Paper.” International Journal of Audiology 53 (7): 441–442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rönnberg, J., M. Rudner, C. Foo, and T. Lunner. 2008. “Cognition Counts: A Working Memory System for Ease of Language Understanding (ELU).” International Journal of Audiology 47 (Suppl 2): S99–S105. doi:10.1080/14992020802301167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rönnberg, J., M. Rudner, T. Lunner, and A. A. Zekveld. 2010. “When Cognition Kicks in: Working Memory and Speech Understanding in Noise.” Noise and Health 12 (49): 263–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rönnberg, J., T. Lunner, E. H. N. Ng, B. Lidestam, A. A. Zekveld, P. Sörqvist, B. Lyxell., et al. 2016. “Hearing Impairment, cognition and Speech Understanding: Exploratory Factor Analyses of a Comprehensive Test Battery for a Group of Hearing Aid Users, the n200 Study.” International Journal of Audiology 55 (11): 623–642. doi:10.1080/14992027.2016.1219775.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudner, M. 2016. “Cognitive Spare Capacity as an Index of Listening Effort.” Ear and Hearing 37: 69S–76S. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudner, M. 2018. “Working Memory for Linguistic and Non-linguistic Manual Gestures: Evidence, Theory, and Application.” Frontiers in Psychology 9:679. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00679
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudner, M., J. Andin, and J. Rönnberg. 2009. “Working Memory, deafness and Sign Language.” Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 50 (5): 495–505. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00744.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudner, M., C. Foo, J. Rönnberg, and T. Lunner. 2009. “Cognition and Aided Speech Recognition in Noise: specific Role for Cognitive Factors following Nine-week Experience with Adjusted Compression Settings in Hearing Aids.” Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 50 (5): 405–418. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00745.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudner, M., C. Foo, E. Sundewall Thorén, T. Lunner, and J. Rönnberg. 2008. “Phonological Mismatch and Explicit Cognitive Processing in a Sample of 102 Hearing Aid Users.” International Journal of Audiology 47 (Suppl. 2): S163–S170.
   Google Scholar
• Rudner, M., and E. Holmer. 2016. “Working Memory in Deaf Children Is Explained by the Developmental Ease of Language Understanding (D-ELU) Model.” Frontiers in Psychology 7: 1047. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudner, M., M. Jönsson, S. Szadlo, and E. Holmer. 2016. “Hearing is Believing: Semantic Illusions in the Auditory Modality.” Paper presented at the 2nd Workshop on Psycholinguistic Approaches to Speech Recognition in Adverse Conditions, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, October 31, 2016–November 1, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Rudner, M., S. Mishra, S. Stenfelt, T. Lunner, and J. Rönnberg. 2016. “Seeing the Talker’s Face Improves Free Recall of Speech for Young Adults with Normal Hearing but Not Older Adults with Hearing Loss.” Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research 59 (3): 590–599. doi:10.1044/2015_JSLHR-H-15-0014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudner, M., E. Orfanidou, V. Cardin, C. M. Capek, B. Woll, and J. Rönnberg. 2016. “Pre-existing Semantic Representation Improves Working Memory Performance in the Visuospatial Domain.” Memory and Cognition 44 (4): 608–620. doi:10.3758/s13421-016-0585-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudner, M., P. Fransson, M. Ingvar, L. Nyberg, and J. Rönnberg (2007). Neural representation of binding lexical signs and words in the episodic buffer of working memory. Neuropsychologia, 45(10), 2258–2276. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.02.017.
   Google Scholar
• Rudner, M., and J. Rönnberg. 2008. “The Role of the Episodic Buffer in Working Memory for Language Processing.” Cognitive Processing 9 (1): 19–28. doi:10.1007/s10339-007-0183-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudner, M., J. Rönnberg, and T. Lunner. 2011. “Working Memory Supports Listening in Noise for Persons with Hearing Impairment.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 22 (3): 156–167. doi:10.3766/jaaa.22.3.4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudner, M., T. Lunner, T. Behrens, E. Sundewall-Thorén, and J. Rönnberg. 2012. “Working Memory Capacity May Influence Perceived Effort during Aided Speech Recognition in Noise.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 23 (8): 577–589. doi:10.3766/jaaa.23.7.7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudner, M., M. Seeto, G. Keidser, B. Johnson, and J. Rönnberg. 2018. “Poorer Speech Reception Threshold in Noise is Associated with Reduced Brain Volume in Auditory and Cognitive Processing Regions.”
   Google Scholar
• Rudner, M., E. Toscano, and E. Holmer (2015). Load and distinctness interact in working memory for lexical manual gestures. Frontiers in Psychology 6:1147. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01147.
   Google Scholar
• Rudner M., E. Orfanidou, V. Cardin, C. M., Capek, B. Woll, and J. Rönnberg 2016. Preexisting semantic representation improves working memory performance in the visuospatial domain. Memory & Cognition, 44 (4): 608–620. doi:10.3758/s13421-016-0585-z.
   Google Scholar
• Samuelsson, S., and J. Rönnberg. 1993. “Implicit and Explicit Use of Scripted Constraints in Lipreading.” European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 5 (2): 201–233. doi:10.1080/09541449308520116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidtke, J. 2016. “The Bilingual Disadvantage in Speech Understanding in Noise Is Likely a Frequency Effect Related to Reduced Language Exposure.” Frontiers in Psychology 7: 678. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00678
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheldon, S., M. K. Pichora-Fuller, and B. A. Schneider. 2008. “Priming and Sentence Context Support Listening to Noise-vocoded Speech by Younger and Older Adults.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 123 (1): 489. doi:10.1121/1.2783762
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Signoret, C., I. Johnsrude, E. Classon, and M. Rudner. 2018. “Combined Effects of Form- and Meaning-based Predictability on Perceived Clarity of Speech.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 44 (2): 277–285. doi:10.1037/xhp0000442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Signoret, C., and M. Rudner. 2016. “The Interplay of Phonological and Semantic Knowledge during Perception of Degraded Speech.” Paper presented at the WCA2016: 33rd World Congress of Audiology 2016, September 18–21, Vancouver, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Signoret, C., and M. Rudner. 2018. “Hearing impairment and perceived clarity of predictable speech.” Ear & Hearing. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000689
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S. L., and M. K. Pichora-Fuller. 2015. “Associations between Speech Understanding and Auditory and Visual Tests of Verbal Working Memory: Effects of Linguistic Complexity, task, age, and Hearing Loss.” Frontiers in Psychology 6: 1394. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01394
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza, P., and K. H. Arehart. 2015. “Robust Relationship between Reading Span and Speech Recognition in Noise.” International Journal of Audiology 54 (10): 705–713. doi:10.3109/14992027.2015.1043062.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza, P., K. H. Arehart, J. Shen, M. Anderson, and J. M. Kates. 2015. “Working Memory and Intelligibility of Hearing-aid Processed Speech.” Frontiers in Psychology 6: 526. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00526
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza, P., and L. Sirow. 2014. “Relating Working Memory to Compression Parameters in Clinically Fit Hearing Aids.” American Journal of Audiology 23 (4): 394–401. doi:10.1044/2014_AJA-14-0006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sörqvist, P., S. Stenfelt, and J. Rönnberg. 2012. “Working Memory Capacity and Visual-verbal Cognitive Load Modulate Auditory-sensory Gating in the Brainstem: Toward a Unified View of Attention.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 24 (11): 2147–2154. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sörqvist, P., and J. Rönnberg. 2012. “Episodic Long-term Memory of Spoken Discourse Masked by Speech: What is the Role for Working Memory Capacity?” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 55 (1): 210–218. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0353)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sörqvist, P., Ö. Dahlström, T. Karlsson, and J. Rönnberg. 2016. “Concentration: The Neural Underpinnings of How Cognitive Load Shields against Distraction.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 10: 221. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2016.0022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenfelt, S., and J. Rönnberg. 2009. “The Signal-cognition Interface: interactions between Degraded Auditory Signals and Cognitive Processes.” Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 50 (5): 385–393. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00748.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storkel, H. L., J. Armbrüster, and T. P. Hogan (2006). Differentiating phonotactic probability and neighborhood density in adult word learning. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 1175–1192. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2006/085).
   Google Scholar
• Strait, D. L., and N. Kraus. 2014. “Biological Impact of Auditory Expertise across the Life Span: musicians as a Model of Auditory Learning.” Hearing Research 308: 109–121. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2013.08.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vargha-Khadem, F., D. G. Gadian, K. E. Watkins, A. Connely, W. Van Paesschen, and M. Mishkin. 1997. “Differential Effects of Early Hippocampal Pathology on Episodic and Semantic Memory.” Science 277 (5324): 376–380. doi:10.1126/science.277.5324.376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagener, K. C., T. Brand, and B. Kollmeier. 1999. “Entwicklung Und Evaluation Eines Satztests Für Die Deutsche Sprache Teil III: Evaluation Des Oldenburger Satztests.” Zeitschrift für Audiologie 38 (3): 86–95.
   Google Scholar
• Vercammen, C., Goossens, T. Undurraga, J. A. Wieringen. V, A. and. 2018. “Electrophysiological and Behavioral Evidence of Reduced Binaural Temporal Processing in the Aging and Hearing Impaired Human Auditory System.” Trends in Hearing 22 (3): 1–12. doi:10.1177/2331216518785733
   Google Scholar
• Wild, C. J., A. Yusuf, E. Wilson, J. P. Peelle, M. H. Davis, and I. S. Johnsrude. 2012. “Effortful Listening: The Processing of Degraded Speech Depends Critically on Attention.” Journal of Neuroscience 32 (40): 14010–14021. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1528-12.2012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, R. H., R. McArdle, K. L. Watts, and S. L. Smith. 2012. “The Revised Speech Perception in Noise Test (R-SPIN) in a Multiple Signal-to-noise Ratio Paradigm.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 23 (8): 590–605. doi:10.3766/jaaa.23.7.9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wingfield, A., N. M. Amichetti, and A. Lash. 2015. “Cognitive Aging and Hearing Acuity: modeling Spoken Language Comprehension.” Frontiers in Psychology 6: 684. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.006841
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yonelinas, A. P. 2013. “The Hippocampus Supports High-resolution Binding in the Service of Perception, Working Memory and Long-Term Memory.” Behavioural Brain Research 254: 34–44. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2013.05.030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yumba, W. 2017. “Cognitive Processing Speed, Working Memory, and the Intelligibility of Hearing Aid-Processed Speech in Persons with Hearing Impairment.” Frontiers in Psychology 8: 1308. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zekveld, A. A., S. E. Kramer, and J. M. Festen. 2011. “Cognitive Load during Speech Perception in Noise: The Influence of Age, hearing Loss, and Cognition on the Pupil Response.” Ear and Hearing 32 (4): 498–510. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e31820512bb.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zekveld, A. A., S. E. Kramer, J. Rönnberg, and M. Rudner. 2018. “In a Concurrent Memory and Auditory Perception Task, the Pupil Dilation Response Is More Sensitive to Memory Load than to Auditory Stimulus Characteristics.” Ear and Hearing. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zekveld, A. A., M. Rudner, I. S. Johnsrude, J. M. Festen, J. H. M. van Beek, and J. Rönnberg. 2011. “The Influence of Semantically Related and Unrelated Text Cues on the Intelligibility of Sentences in Noise.” Ear and Hearing 32 (6): e16–e25. doi:0196/0202/11/3206-00e16/0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zekveld, A. A., M. Rudner, I. S. Johnsrude, D. Heslenfeld, and J. Rönnberg. 2012. “Behavioural and fMRI Evidence That Cognitive Ability Modulates the Effect of Semantic Context on Speech Intelligibility.” Brain and Language 122 (2): 103–113. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2012.05.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zekveld, A. A., M. Rudner, I. Johnsrude, and J. Rönnberg. 2013. “The Effects of Working Memory Capacity and Semantic Cues on the Intelligibility of Speech in Noise.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 134 (3):2225–2234. doi:10.1121/1.4817926
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar