Effect of signal processing strategy and stimulation type on speech and auditory perception in adult cochlear implant users

References

• Advanced Bionics. 2008. “HiRes with Fidelity 120: Speech Recognition and Strategy Preference Multicenter Study (1) in North America” Auditory Research Bulletin: 2007 Biennial Edition, p 36–37.
   Google Scholar
• Amoodi, H. A., P. T. Mick, D. B. Shipp, L. M. Friesen, J. M. Nedzelski, J. M. Chen, and V. Y. Lin. 2012. “Results with Cochlear Implantation in Adults with Speech Recognition Scores Exceeding Current Criteria.” Otology & Neurotology 33 (1): 6–12. doi:10.1097/MAO.0b013e318239e5a1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnolder, C., and V. Y. Lin. 2013. “Expanded Selection Criteria in Adult Cochlear Implantation.” Cochlear Implants International 14 (S4): 10–13. doi:10.1179/1467010013Z.000000000123.
   Google Scholar
• Bonham, B. H., and L. M. Litvak. 2008. “Current Focusing and Steering: Modeling, Physiology, and Psychophysics.” Hearing Research 242 (1–2): 141–153. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2008.03.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, P. J., A. Büchner, M. A. Stone, T. Lenarz, and B. C. Moore. 2009. “Comparison of Dual-Time-Constant and Fast-acting Automatic Gain Control (AGC) systems in Cochlear Implants.” International Journal of Audiology 48 (4): 211–221. doi:10.1080/14992020802581982.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, P. J., and B. C. Moore. 2015. “Balancing Cochlear Implant AGC and Near-Instantaneous Compression to Improve Perception of Soft Speech.” Cochlear Implants International 16 (supp1): S9–S11. doi:10.1179/1467010014Z.000000000224.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brendel, M., A. Buechner, B. Krueger, C. Frohne-Buechner, and T. Lenarz. 2008. “Evaluation of the Harmony Sound Processor in Combination with the Speech Coding Strategy HiRes 120.” Otology & Neurotology 29 (2): 199–202. doi:10.1097/mao.0b013e31816335c6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buechner, A., C. Frohne-Buechner, T. Stoever, L. Gaertner, R.-D. Battmer, and T. Lenarz. 2005. “Comparison of a Paired or Sequential Stimulation Paradigm with Advanced Bionics' High-Resolution Mode.” Otology & Neurotology 26 (5): 941–947. doi:10.1097/01.mao.0000185069.27705.f0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buechner, A., M. Brendel, B. Krüeger, C. Frohne-Büchner, W. Nogueira, B. Edler, and T. Lenarz. 2008. “Current Steering and Results from Novel Speech Coding Strategies.” Otology & Neurotology 29 (2): 203–207. doi:10.1097/mao.0b013e318163746.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buechner, A., K. H. Dyballa, P. Hehrmann, S. Fredelake, and T. Lenarz. 2014. “Advanced Beamformers for Cochlear Implant Users: Acute Measurement of Speech Perception in Challenging Listening Conditions.” PLoS One 9 (4): e95542. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0095542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson, G. S., H. A. Kreft, and L. Litvak. 2005. “Place-Pitch Discrimination of Single-versus Dual-Electrode Stimuli by Cochlear Implant Users.” Acoustical Society of America 118 (2): 623–626. doi:10.1121/1.1937362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donaldson, G. S., P. K. Dawson, and L. Z. Borden. 2011. “Within-Subjects Comparison of the HiRes and Fidelity-120 Speech Processing Strategies: Speech Perception and Its Relation to Place-pitch Sensitivity.” Ear and Hearing 32 (2): 238–250. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181fb8390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drennan, W. R., J. H. Won, K. Nie, E. Jameyson, and J. T. Rubinstein. 2010. “Sensitivity of Psychophysical Measures to Signal Processor Modifications in Cochlear Implant Users.” Hearing Research 262 (1–2): 1–8. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2010.02.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drennan, W. R., J. J. Oleson, K. Gfeller, J. Crosson, V. D. Driscoll, J. H. Won, E. S. Anderson, and J. T. Rubinstein. 2015. “Clinical Evaluation of Music Perception, Appraisal and Experience in Cochlear Implant Users.” International Journal of Audiology 54 (2): 114–123. doi:10.3109/14992027.2014.948219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, C. C., R. S. Tyler, S. A. Witt, and B. J. Gantz. 2006. “Effects of Converting Bilateral Implant Subjects to a Strategy with Increased Rate and Number of Channels.” Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology 115 (6): 425–432. doi:10.1177/000348940611500605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firszt, J., D. Koch, M. Downing, and L. Litvak. 2007. “Current Steering Creates Additional Pitch Percepts in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients.” Otology and Neurotology 28 (5): 629–636. doi:10.1097/01.mao.0000281803.36574.bc.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firszt, J. B., L. K. Holden, R. M. Reeder, and M. W. Skinner. 2009. “Speech Recognition in Cochlear Implant Recipients: Comparison of Standard and HiRes 120 Sound Processing.” Otology & Neurotology 30 (2): 146–152. doi:10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181924ff8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishman, K. E., R. V. Shannon, and W. H. Slattery. 1997. “Speech Recognition as a Function of the Number of Electrodes Used in the SPEAK Cochlear Implant Speech Processor.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 40 (5): 1201–1215. doi:10.1044/jslhr.4005.1201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friesen, L. M., R. V. Shannon, D. Baskent, and X. Wang. 2001. “Speech Recognition in Noise as a Function of the Number of Spectral Channels: Comparison of Acoustic Hearing and Cochlear Implants.” Acoustical Society of America 110 (2): 1150–1163. doi:10.1121/1.1381538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friesen, L. M., R. V. Shannon, and R. J. Cruz. 2005. “Effects of Stimulation Rate on Speech Recognition with Cochlear Implants.” Audiology and Neurotology 10 (3): 169–184. doi:10.1159/000084027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frijns, J. H. M., W. M. C. Klop, R. M. Bonnet, and J. J. Briaire. 2003. “Optimizing the Number of Electrodes with High-rate Stimulation of the Clarion CII Cochlear implant.” Acta Otolaryngol 123 (2): 138–142. doi:10.1080/0036554021000028126
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujita, S., and J. Ito. 1999. “Ability of Nucleus Cochlear Implantees to Recognize Music.” Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology 108 (7): 634–640. doi:10.1177/000348949910800702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvin, J. J., 3rd, and Q. J. Fu. 2009. “Influence of Stimulation Rate and Loudness Growth on Modulation Detection and Intensity Discrimination in Cochlear Implant Users.” Hearing Research 250 (1–2): 46–54. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2009.01.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gfeller, K., and C. Lansing. 1991. “Melodic, rhythmic, and Timbral Perception of Adult Cochlear Implant Users.” Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 34 (4): 916–920. doi:10.1044/jshr.3404.916
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gfeller, K., and C. Lansing. 1992. “Musical Perception of Cochlear Implant Users as Measured by the Primary Measure of Music Audiation: An Item Analysis.” Journal of Music Therapy 29 (1): 18–39. doi:10.1093/jmt/29.1.18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gfeller, K., G. Woodworth, D. Robin, S. Witt, and J. F. Knutson. 1997. “Perception of Rhythmic and Sequential Pitch Patterns by Normally Hearing Adults and Adult Cochlear Implant Users.” Ear and Hearing 18 (3): 252–260. doi:10.1097/00003446-199706000-00008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geißler, G., I. Arweiler, P. Hehrmann, T. Lenarz, V. Hamacher, and A. Büchner. 2015. “Speech Reception Threshold Benefits in Cochlear Implant Users with an Adaptive Beamformer in Real Life Situations.” Cochlear Implants International 16 (2): 69–76. doi:10.1179/1754762814Y.0000000088.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gifford, R. H., M. F. Dorman, J. K. Shallop, and S. A. Sydlowski. 2010. “Evidence for the Expansion of Adult Cochlear Implant Candidacy.” Ear and Hearing 31 (2): 186–194. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181c6b831.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsworthy, R. L., L. A. Delhorne, J. G. Desloge, and L. D. Braida. 2014. “Two-microphone Spatial Filtering Provides Speech Reception Benefits for Cochlear Implant Users in Difficult Acoustic Environments.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 136 (2): 867–876. doi:10.1121/1.4887453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, T., A. Faulkner, and S. Rosen. 2004. “Enhancing Temporal Cues to Voice Pitch in Continuous Interleaved Sampling Cochlear Implants.” Journal of Acoustical Society of America 116 (4): 2298–2310. doi:10.1121/1.1785611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden, L. K., M. W. Skinner, T. A. Holden, and M. E. Demorest. 2002. “Effects of Stimulation Rate with the Nucleus 24 ACE Speech Coding Strategy.” Ear and Hearing 23 (5): 463–476. doi:10.1097/01.AUD.0000034718.53595.99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holder, J. T., L. M. Levin, and R. H. Gifford. 2018. “Speech Recognition in Noise for Adults with Normal Hearing: Age-Normative Performance for AzBio, BKB-SIN, and QuickSIN.” Otology Neurotology. 39 (10): e972–e978. PMID: 30247429 doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000002003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsiao, F., and K. Gfeller. 2012. “Music Perception of Cochlear Implant Recipients with Implications for Music Instruction.” A Review of Literature. Update (Music Educators National Conference (U.S.)) 30 (2): 5–10. doi:10.1177/8755123312437050.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Iverson, J. R., and A. D. Patel. 2008. The Beat Alignment Test (BAT): Surveying Beat Proc essing Abilities in the General Population. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Music Perception & Cognition (ICMPC10), August 2008, Sapporo, Japan, edited by K. Miyazaki. Adelaide: Causal Productions. 465–468.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, R., G. L. Nimmons, W. Drennan, J. Longnion, C. Ruffin, K. Nie, J. H. Won, T. Worman, B. Yueh, J. Rubinstein. 2009. “Development and Validation of the University of Washington Clinical Assessment of Music Perception Test.” Ear and Hearing 30 (4): 411–418. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181a61bc0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khing, P. P., B. A. Swanson, and E. Ambikairajah. 2013. “The Effect of Automatic Gain Control Structure and Release Time on Cochlear Implant Speech Intelligibility.” PLoS One 8 (11): e82263. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0082263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiefer, J., C. von Ilberg, J. Hubner-Egner, V. Rupprecht, and R. Knecht. 2000. “Optimized Speech Understanding with the Continuous Interleaved Sampling Speech Coding Strategy in Patients with Cochlear Implants: Effect of Variations in Stimulation Rate and Number of Channels.” Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology 109 (11): 1009–1020. doi:10.1177/000348940010901105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kileny, P., S. Zimmerman-Phillips, T. Zwolan, and J. Kemink. 1992. “Effects of Channel Number and Place of Stimulation on Performance with the Cochlear Corporation Multichannel Implant.” The American Journal of Otology 13: 117–123.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koch, D. B., M. Downing, M. J. Osberger, and L. Litvak. 2007. “Using Current Steering to Increase Spectral Resolution in CII and HiRes 90K Users.” Ear and Hearing 28 (Supplement): 38S–41S. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e31803150de.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koch, D. B., A. Quick, M. J. Osberger, A. Saoji, and L. Litvak. 2014. “Enhanced Hearing in Noise for Cochlear Implant Recipients: Clinical Trial Results for a Commercially Available Speech-Enhancement Strategy.” Otology & Neurotology 35 (5): 803–809. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000000301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitt, H. 1971. “Transformed Up-Down Methods in Psychoacoustics.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 49 (2B): 467–477. doi:10.1121/1.1912375.
   Google Scholar
• Loizou, P. C., O. Poroy, and M. Dorman. 2000. “The Effect of Parametric Variations of Cochlear Implant Processors on Speech Understanding.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 108 (2): 790–802. doi:10.1121/1.429612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middlebrooks, J. C. 2008. “Cochlear-implant High Pulse Rate and Narrow Electrode Configuration Impair Transmission of Temporal Information to the Auditory Cortex.” Journal of Neurophysiology 100 (1): 92–107. doi:10.1152/jn.01114.2007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mlynski, R., M. Ziese, T. Rahne, and J. M. Deile. 2016. “Speech Perception and Subjective Preference with Fine Structure Coding Strategies.” Otolaryngology 6 (4): 254. doi:10.4172/2161-119X.1000254.
   Google Scholar
• Minimum Speech Test Battery (MSTB). 2011. The new minimum speech test battery (MSTB). 304 http://auditorypotential.com/MSTBfiles/MSTBManual2011-06-20%20.pdf. Accessed 26 Febr 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, D. A., G. S. Donaldson, and H. Kreft. 2008. “Forward-masked Spatial Tuning Curves in Cochlear Implant Users.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 123 (3): 1522–1543. doi:10.1121/1.2836786.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nie, K., A. Barco, and F. Zeng. 2006. “Spectral and Temporal Cues in Cochlear Implant Speech Perception.” Ear and Hearing 27 (2): 208–217. doi:10.1097/01.aud.0000202312.31837.25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, G. E., and I. Lehiste. 1962. “Revised CNC Lists for Auditory Tests.” The Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 27: 62–70. doi:10.1044/jshd.2701.62
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Riss, D., J. Hamzavi, M. Blineder, C. Honeder, I. Ehrenreich, A. Kaider, W. Baumgartner, W. Gstoettner, and C. Arnoldner. 2014. “FS4, FS4-p and FSP: A 4-Month Crossover Study of 3 Fine Structure Sound-coding Strategies.” Ear and Hearing 35 (6): e272–e281. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubenstein, J. T., and R. Hong. 2003. “Signal Coding in Cochlear Implants: Exploiting the Stochastic Effects of Electrical Stimulation.” Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology 191: 14–19. doi:10.1177/00034894031120S904.
   Google Scholar
• Saoji, A. A., L. M. Litvak, and M. L. Hughes. 2009. “Excitation Patterns of Simultaneous and Sequential Dual-electrode Stimulation in Cochlear Implant Recipients.” Ear and Hearing 30 (5): 559–567. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181ab2b6f.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shannon, R. V., R. J. Cruz, and J. J. Galvin. 2011. “Effect of Stimulation Rate on Cochlear Implant Users' Phoneme, Word, and Sentence Recognition in Quiet and in Noise.” Audiology and Neurotology 16 (2): 113–123. doi:10.1159/000315115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, M. W., G. M. Clark, L. A. Whitford, P. M. Seligman, S. J. Staller, D. B. Shipp, J. K. Shallop, C. Everingham, C. M. Menapace, and P. L. Arndt. 1994. “Evaluation of a New Spectral Peak Coding Strategy for the Nucleus 22 Channel Cochlear Implant System.” American Journal of Otology 15 (Suppl 2): 15–27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spahr, A. J., M. F. Dorman, L. M. Litvak, S. Van Wie, R. H. Gifford, P. C. Loizou, L. M. Loiselle, T. Oakes, S. Cook. 2012. “Development and Validation of the AzBio Sentence Lists.” Ear and Hearing 33 (1): 112–117. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e31822c2549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stickney, G. S., P. C. Loizou, L. N. Mishra, P. F. Assmann, R. V. Shannon, and J. M. Opie. 2006. “Effects of Electrode Design and Configuration on Channel Interactions.” Hearing Research 211 (1–2): 33–45. doi:10.1016/jhearres.2005.08.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, A. R., and M. J. M. Raffin. 1978. “Speech-discrimination Scores Modeled as a Binomial Variable.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 21 (3): 507–518. doi: doi:10.1044/jshr.2103.507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townshend, B., N. Cotter, D. Van Compernolle, and R. L. White. 1987. “Pitch Perception by Cochlear Implant Subjects.” Acoustical Society of America 82 (1): 106–115. doi:10.1121/1.395554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Ilberg, C. A., U. Baumann, J. Kiefer, J. Tillein, and O. F. Adunka. 2011. “Electric-acoustic Stimulation of the Auditory System: A Review of the First Decade.” Audiology and Neurotology 16 (s2): 1–30. doi:10.1159/000327765.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilson, B. S., C. C. Finley, D. T. Lawson, R. D. Wolford, D. K. Eddington, and W. M. Rabinowitz. 1991. “Better Speech Recognition with Cochlear Implants.” Nature 352 (6332): 236–238. doi:10.1038/352236a0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, B. S., D. T. Lawson, and M. Zerbi., et al. 1995. “New Processing Strategies in Cochlear Implantation.” American Journal of Otology 16: 669–675.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilson, B. S., C. C. Finley, D. T. Lawson, and M. Zerbi. 1997. “Temporal Representations with Cochlear Implants.” American Journal of Otology 18 (6sup): S30–S34.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wolfe, J., S. Neumann, M. Marsh, E. Schafer, L. Lianos, J. Gilden, L. O’Neill., et al. 2015. “Benefits of Adaptive Signal Processing in a Commercially Available Cochlear Implant Sound Processor.” Otology and Neurotology 36 (7): 1181–1190. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000000781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, J., M. Morais, E. Schafer, S. Agrawal, and D. Koch. 2015. “Evaluation of Speech Recognition of Cochlear Implant Recipients Using Adaptive, Digital Remote Microphone Technology and a Speech Enhancement Sound Processing Algorithm.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 26 (5): 502–508. doi:10.3766/jaaa.14099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zirn, S., D. Polterauer, S. Keller, and W. Hemmert. 2016. “The Effect of Fluctuating Maskers on Speech Understanding of High-performing Cochlear Implant Users.” International Journal of Audiology 5 (55): 295–304. doi:10.3109/14992027.2015.1128124.
   Google Scholar