The long-term learning effect related to the repeated use of the Finnish matrix sentence test and the Finnish digit triplet test

References

• Akeroyd, M. A., S. Arlinger, R. A. Bentler, A. Boothroyd, N. Dillier, W. A. Dreschler, J.-P. Gagne, et al. 2015. “International Collegium of Rehabilitative Audiology (ICRA) Recommendations for the Construction of Multilingual Speech Tests.” International Journal of Audiology 54 (sup2): 17–22. doi:10.3109/14992027.2015.1030513
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand, T., and B. Kollmeier. 2002. “Efficient Adaptive Procedures for Threshold and Concurrent Slope Estimates for Psychophysics and Speech Intelligibility Tests.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 111 (6): 2801–2810. doi:10.1121/1.1479152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bugannim, Y., D. A. Roth, D. Zechoval, and L. Kishon-Rabin. 2019. “Training of Speech Perception in Noise in Pre-Lingual Hearing Impaired Adults with Cochlear Implants Compared with Normal Hearing Adults.” Otology & Neurotology 40 (3): e316–e325. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000002128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, O. M., and R. Rajan. 2008. “Learning in a Task of Complex Auditory Streaming and Identification.” Neurobiology of Learning and Memory 89 (4): 448–461. doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2007.08.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cainer, K. E., C. James, and R. Rajan. 2008. “Learning Speech-in-Noise Discrimination in Adult Humans.” Hearing Research 238 (1–2): 155–164. doi:10.1016/j.heares.2007.10.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullington, H. E., and A. Agyemang-Prempeh. 2017. “Person-Centred Cochlear Implant Care: Assessing the Need for Clinic Intervention in Adults with Cochlear Implants Using a Dual Approach of an Online Speech Recognition Test and a Questionnaire.” Cochlear Implants International 18 (2): 76–88. doi:10.1080/14670100.2017.1279728.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cullington, H. E., and T. Aidi. 2017. “Is the Digit Triplet Test an Effective and Acceptable Way to Assess Speech Recognition in Adults Using Cochlear Implants in a Home Environment?” Cochlear Implants International 18 (2): 97–105. doi:10.1080/14670100.2016.1273435.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Denys, S., M. Hofmann, H. Luts, C. Guérin, A. Keymeulen, K. Van Hoeck, A. van Wieringen, K. Hoppenbrouwers, and J. Wouters. 2018. “School-Age Hearing Screening Based on Speech-in-Noise Perception Using the Digit Triplet Test.” Ear and Hearing 39 (6): 1104–1115. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz, A., M. Buschermöhle, A. A. Aarnisalo, A. Vanhanen, T. Hyyrynen, O. Aaltonen, H. Löppönen, M. A. Zokoll, and B. Kollmeier. 2014. “The Development and Evaluation of the Finnish Matrix Sentence Test for Speech Intelligibility Assessment.” Acta Oto-Laryngologica 134 (7): 728–737. doi:10.3109/00016489.2014.898185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz, A., M. Buschermöhle, V. Sivonen, T. Willberg, A. A. Aarnisalo, T. Lenarz, and B. Kollmeier. 2015. “Characteristics and International Comparability of the Finnish Matrix Sentence Test in Cochlear Implant Recipients.” International Journal of Audiology 54 (sup2): 80–87. doi:10.3109/14992027.2015.1070309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, J. R., and M. P. Haggard. 1987. “The Four Alternative Auditory Feature Test (FAAF)-Linguistic and Psychometric Properties of the Material with Normative Data in Noise.” British Journal of Audiology 21 (3): 165–174. doi:10.3109/03005368709076402.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gantz, B. J., C. C. Dunn, J. Oleson, and M. R. Hansen. 2018. “Acoustic plus Electric Speech Processing: Long-Term Results.” The Laryngoscope 128 (2): 473–481. doi:10.1002/lary.26669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagerman, B. 1982. “Sentences for Testing Speech Intelligibility in Noise.” Scandinavian Audiology 11 (2): 79–87. doi:10.3109/01050398209076203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernvig, L. H., and S. Ø. Olsen. 2005. “Learning Effect When Using the Danish Hagerman Sentences (Dantale II) to Determine Speech Reception Threshold.” International Journal of Audiology 44 (9): 509–512. doi:10.1080/14992020500189997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hey, M., T. Hocke, J. Hedderich, and J. Müller-Deile. 2014. “Investigation of a Matrix Sentence Test in Noise: Reproducibility and Discrimination Function in Cochlear Implant Patients.” International Journal of Audiology 53 (12): 895–902. doi:10.3109/14992027.2014.938368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochmuth, S., T. Brand, M. A. Zokoll, F. Z. Castro, N. Wardenga, and B. Kollmeier. 2012. “A Spanish Matrix Sentence Test for Assessing Speech Perception Thresholds in Noise.” International Journal of Audiology 51 (7): 536–544. doi:10.3109/14992027.2012.670731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houben, R., J. Koopman, H. Luts, K. C. Wagener, A. van Wieringen, H. Verschuure, and W. A. Dreschler. 2014. “Development of a Dutch Matrix Sentence Test to Assess Speech Intelligibility in Noise.” International Journal of Audiology 53 (10): 760–763. doi:10.3109/14992027.2014.920111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen, S., H. Luts, K. C. Wagener, B. Frachet, and J. Wouters. 2010. “The French Digit Triplet Test: A Hearing Screening Tool for Speech Intelligibility in Noise.” International Journal of Audiology 49 (5): 378–387. doi:10.3109/14992020903431272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen, S., H. Luts, K. C. Wagener, B. Kollmeier, M. Del Rio, R. Dauman, C. James, et al. 2012. “Comparison of Three Types of French Speech-in-Noise Tests: A Multi-Center Study.” International Journal of Audiology 51 (3): 164–173. doi:10.3109/14992027.2011.633568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Killion, M. C., P. A. Niquette, G. I. Gudmundsen, L. J. Revit, and S. Banerjee. 2004. “Development of a Quick Speech-in-Noise Test for Measuring Signal-to-Noise Ratio Loss in Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 116 (4): 2395–2405. doi:10.1121/1.1784440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollmeier, B., A. Warzybok, S. Hochmuth, M. A. ZokolL, V. Uslar, T. Brand, and K. C. Wagener. 2015. “The Multilingual Matrix Test: Principles, Applications, and Comparison Across Languages: A Review.” International Journal of Audiology 54 (sup2): 3–16. doi:10.3109/14992027.2015.1020971.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, G. A., G. A. Heise, and W. Lichten. 1951. “The Intelligibility of Speech as a Function of the Context of the Test Materials.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 41 (5): 329–335. doi:10.1037/h0062491.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore, D. R., M. Edmondson-Jones, P. Dawes, H. Fortnum, A. McCormack, R. H. Pierzycki, and K. J. Munro. 2014. “Relation between Speech-in-Noise Threshold, Hearing Loss and Cognition from 40–69 Years of Age.” PLoS One 9 (9): e107720. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0107720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro, K. J., and M. E. Lutman. 2005. “The Influence of Visual Feedback on Closed-Set Word Test Performance over Time.” International Journal of Audiology 44 (12): 701–705. doi:10.1080/14992020500271795.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. B., and T. Dau. 2011. “The Danish Hearing in Noise Test.” International Journal of Audiology 50 (3): 202–208. doi:10.3109/14992027.2010.524254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, M., S. D. Soli, and J. A. Sullivan. 1994. “Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the Measurement of Speech Reception Thresholds in Quiet and in Noise.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 95 (2): 1085–1099. doi:10.1121/1.408469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozimek, E., A. Warzybok, and D. Kutzner. 2010. “Polish Sentence Matrix Test for Speech Intelligibility Measurement in Noise.” International Journal of Audiology 49 (6): 444–454. doi:10.3109/14992021003681030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pillsbury, Harold C., Margaret T. Dillon, Craig A. Buchman, Hinrich Staecker, Sandra M. Prentiss, Michael J. Ruckenstein, Douglas C. Bigelow, et al. 2018. “Multicenter US Clinical Trial with an Electric-Acoustic Stimulation (EAS) System in Adults: Final Outcomes.” Otology & Neurotology 39 (3): 299–305. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000001691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plomp, R., and A. M. Mimpen. 1979. “Improving the Reliability of Testing the Speech Reception Threshold for Sentences.” International Journal of Audiology 18 (1): 43–52. doi:10.3109/00206097909072618.
   Google Scholar
• Puglisi, G. E., A. Warzybok, S. Hochmuth, C. Visentin, A. Astolfi, N. Prodi, and B. Kollmeier. 2015. “An Italian Matrix Sentence Test for the Evaluation of Speech Intelligibility in Noise.” International Journal of Audiology 54 (sup2): 44–50. doi:10.3109/14992027.2015.1061709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlüter A., I. Holube, and U. Lemke. 2012. “Trainingseffekte bei normaler und schneller Sprache”, 15. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Audiologie (DGA), Erlangen, Germany. 
   Google Scholar
• Simonsen, L. B. 2016. “Did You Get a HINT? an Investigation of the Changes in Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) Performance Due to Repeated Exposures.” Master thesis, University of Copenhagen.
   Google Scholar
• Smits, C., T. S. Kapteyn, and T. Houtgast. 2004. “Development and Validation of an Automatic Speech-in-Noise Screening Test by Telephone.” International Journal of Audiology 43 (1): 15–28. doi:10.1080/14992020400050004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits, C., S. T. Goverts, and J. M. Festen. 2013. “The Digits-in-Noise Test: Assessing Auditory Speech Recognition Abilities in Noise.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 133 (3): 1693–1706. doi:10.1121/1.4789933.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soli, S. D., and L. L. N. Wong. 2008. “Assessment of Speech Intelligibility in Noise with the Hearing in Noise Test.” International Journal of Audiology 47 (6): 356–361. doi:10.1080/14992020801895136
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stam, M., J. H. Smit, J. W. R. Twisk, U. Lemke, C. Smits, J. M. Festen, and S. E. Kramer. 2016. “Change in Psychosocial Health Status over 5 Years in Relation to Adults' Hearing Ability in Noise.” Ear and Hearing 37 (6): 680–689. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theodoridis, G. C., and Z. G. Schoeny. 1990. “Procedure Learning Effects in Speech Perception Tests.” International Journal of Audiology 29 (4): 228–239. doi:10.3109/00206099009072854.
   Google Scholar
• Wagener, K., T. Brand, and B. Kollmeier. 1999a. “Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Satztests für die deutsche Sprache II: Optimierung des Oldenburger Satztests.” Zeitschrift für Audiologie 38: 44–56.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wagener, K., T. Brand, and B. Kollmeier. 1999b. “Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Satztests für die deutsche Sprache III: Evaluation des Oldenburger Satztests.” Zeitschrift für Audiologie 38: 86–95.
   Google Scholar
• Wagener, K., V. Kühnel, and B. Kollmeier. 1999. “Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Satztests für die deutsche Sprache I: Design des Oldenburger Satztests.” Zeitschrift für Audiologie 38: 4–15.
   Google Scholar
• Wagener, K. C., J. L. Josvassen, and R. Ardenkjaer. 2003. “Design, Optimization and Evaluation of a Danish Sentence Test in Noise.” International Journal of Audiology 42 (1): 10–17. doi:10.3109/14992020309056080.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagener, K. C., and T. Brand. 2005. “Sentence Intelligibility in Noise for Listeners with Normal Hearing and Hearing Impairment: Influence of Measurement Procedure and Masking Parameters.” International Journal of Audiology 44 (3): 144–156. doi:10.1080/14992020500057517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warzybok, A., M. Zokoll, N. Wardenga, E. Ozimek, M. Boboshko, and B. Kollmeier. 2015. “Development of the Russian Matrix Sentence Test.” International Journal of Audiology 54 (sup2): 35–43. doi:10.3109/14992027.2015.1020969.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willberg, T., M. Buschermöhle, V. Sivonen, A. A. Aarnisalo, H. Löppönen, B. Kollmeier, and A. Dietz. 2016. “The Development and Evaluation of the Finnish Digit Triplet Test.” Acta Oto-Laryngologica 136 (10): 1035–1040. doi:10.1080/00016489.2016.1175662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yund, E. W., and D. L. Woods. 2010. “Content and Procedural Learning in Repeated Sentence Tests of Speech Perception.” Ear and Hearing 31 (6): 769–778. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181e68e4a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zokoll, M. A., K. C. Wagener, T. Brand, M. Buschermöhle, and B. Kollmeier. 2012. “Internationally Comparable Screening Tests for Listening in Noise in Several European Languages: The German Digit Triplet Test as an Optimization Prototype.” International Journal of Audiology 51 (9): 697–707. doi:10.3109/14992027.2012.690078.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zokoll, M. A., D. Fidan, D. Türkyilmaz, S. Hochmuth, İ. Ergenç, G. Sennaroğlu, and B. Kollmeier. 2015. “Development and Evaluation of the Turkish Matrix Sentence Test.” International Journal of Audiology 54 (sup2): 51–61. doi:10.3109/14992027.2015.1074735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar