Clinical validation of the Russian Matrix test – effect of hearing loss, age, and noise level

References

• Akeroyd, M. A., S. Arlinger, R. A. Bentler, A. Boothroyd, N. Dillier, W. A. Dreschler, and B. Kollmeier. 2015. “International Collegium of Rehabilitative Audiology (ICRA) Recommendations for the Construction of Multilingual Speech Tests: ICRA Working Group on Multilingual Speech Tests.” International Journal of Audiology 54 (Suppl 2): 17–22. doi:10.3109/14992027.2015.1030513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aleksandrovsky, I. V., J. K. McCullough, and R. H. Wilson. 1998. “Development of Suprathreshold Word Recognition Test for Russian-Speaking Patients.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 9: 417–425.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beck, D. 2017. Paradigm Shifts in Cognition, Audition and Amplification. Podium Presentation at the Ninth Annual House Ear Institute, Research Forum (“Seminars in Hearing”). Los Angeles, CA: California State University of Northridge.
   Google Scholar
• Belov, I. M., E. N. Kuks, and S. K. Poliakova. 1992. “Sootnoshenie Mezhdu Komfortnoj Gromkost'yu i Maksimal'noj Razborchivost'yu Rechi u Detej s Sensonevral'noj Tugouhost'yu [Relation Between Comfortable Loudness and Maximal Speech Intelligibility in Children with Sensorineural Hearing Loss].” Vestnik Otorinolaringologii 3: 6–9.
   Google Scholar
• Berdnikova, I. P., and N. V. Maltceva. 2011. “Razborchivost' Rechi v Usloviyah Pomekhi v Norme i Pri Sensonevral'noj Tugouhosti [Speech Discrimination in the Noise by People with Normal Hearing and Patients with Sensoryneural Hearing Loss].” Russian Otorhinolaryngology 52 (3): 20–23.
   Google Scholar
• Boboshko, M. Yu. 2012. Rechevaya Audiometriya. Uchebnoe Posobie [Speech Audiometry. Handbook for Doctors]. Saint Petersburg, Russia: SpbGMU.
   Google Scholar
• Brand, T., and B. Kollmeier. 2002. “Efficient Adaptive Procedures for Threshold and Concurrent Slope Estimates for Psychophysics and Speech Intelligibility Tests.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 111 (6): 2801–2810. doi:10.1121/1.1479152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronkhorst, A. W., and R. Plomp. 1989. “Binaural Speech Intelligibility in Noise for Hearing-Impaired Listeners.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 86 (4): 1374–1383. doi:10.1121/1.398697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacace, A. T., and A. T. McFarland. 2009. Controversies in Central Auditory Processing Disorder. San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Clinical guidelines. 2016a. Sensonevral'naya Tugouhost' u Vzroslyh [Sensorineural Hearing Loss in Adults]. (ICD 10: H90.3/H90.4/H90.5/H91.1/H91.2/H91.8). ID: KR518.
   Google Scholar
• Clinical guidelines. 2016b. Sensonevral'naya Tugouhost' u Detej [Sensorineural hearing loss in children]. (ICD 10: H90.3/H90.4/H90.5). ID: KR22.
   Google Scholar
• Clinical guidelines. 2016c. Otoskleroz [Otosclerosis]. (ICD 10: H80). ID: KR315.
   Google Scholar
• Dietz, A., M. Buschermöhle, V. Sivonen, T. Willberg, A. A. Aarnisalo, T. Lenarz, and B. Kollmeier. 2015. “Characteristics and International Comparability of the Finnish Matrix Sentence Test in Cochlear Implant Recipients.” International Journal of Audiology 54 (Suppl 2): 80–87. doi:10.3109/14992027.2015.1070309.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dubno, J. R., D. D. Dirks, and D. E. Morgan. 1984. “Effects of Age and Mild Hearing Loss on Speech Recognition in Noise.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 76 (1): 87–96. doi:10.1121/1.391011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubno, J. R., F. S. Lee, L. J. Matthews, and J. H. Mills. 1997. “Age-Related and Gender-Related Changes in Monaural Speech Recognition.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research : JSLHR 40 (2): 444–452. doi:10.1044/jslhr.4002.444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Füllgrabe, C., B. C. Moore, and M. A. Stone. 2015. “Age-Group Differences in Speech Identification Despite Matched Audiometrically Normal Hearing: Contributions from Auditory Temporal Processing and Cognition.” Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience 6: 347. doi:10.3389/fnagi.2014.00347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golovanova, L. E., E. A. Ogorodnikova, and M. Yu Boboshko. 2018. “[The role of mono- and binaural hearing aid in the rehabilitation of the adult patients presenting with hearing impairment].” Vestn. Otorinolaringol 83 (3): 29–32. doi:10.17116/otorino201883329.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• GOST R ISO 8253-3-2014. 2015. Akustika. Metody Audiometricheskih Ispytanij. Chast' 3. Rechevaya Audiometriya [Acoustics. Audiometric Test Methods. Part 3. Speech Audiometry]. Moskow, Russia: Standartinform.
   Google Scholar
• Granberg, S., W. Swanepoel de, U. Englund, C. Möller, and B. Danermark. 2014. “The ICF Core Sets for Hearing Loss Project: International Expert Survey on Functioning and Disability of Adults with Hearing Loss Using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF).” International Journal of Audiology 53 (8): 497–506. doi:10.3109/14992027.2014.900196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant, K. W., and T. C. Walden. 2013. “Understanding Excessive SNR Loss in Hearing-Impaired Listeners.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 24 (4): 258273; quiz 337-8. doi:10.3766/jaaa.24.4.3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, R. W., S. L. Nissen, M. G. Pola, D. L. McPherson, G. A. Tavartkiladze, and D. L. Eggett. 2007. “Psychometrically Equivalent Russian Speech Audiometry Materials by Male and Female talkers.” Int J Audiol 46 (1): 47–66. doi:10.1080/14992020601058117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochmuth, S., T. Brand, M. A. Zokoll, F. Z. Castro, N. Wardenga, and B. Kollmeier. 2012. “A Spanish Matrix Sentence Test for Assessing Speech Reception Thresholds in Noise.” International Journal of Audiology 51 (7): 536–544. doi:10.3109/14992027.2012.670731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, A. E., P. B. Kricos, and R. A. Kessler. 1988. “A Closed- versus Open-Set Measure of Speech Discrimination in Normally Hearing Young and Elderly Adults.” British Journal of Audiology 22 (1): 29–33. doi:10.3109/03005368809077795.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jansen, S. H., H. Luts, K. C. Wagener, B. Kollmeier, M. Del Rio, R. Dauman, C. James, et al. 2012. “Comparison of Three Types of French Speech-in-Noise Tests: A Multi-Center Study.” International Journal of Audiology 51 (3): 164–173. doi:10.3109/14992027.2011.633568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollmeier, B., M. R. Schädler, A. Warzybok, B. T. Meyer, and T. Brand. 2016. “Sentence Recognition Prediction for Hearing-Impaired Listeners in Stationary and Fluctuation Noise with FADE: Empowering the Attenuation and Distortion Concept by Plomp with a Quantitative Processing Model.” Trends in Hearing 20: 233121651665579. doi:10.1177/2331216516655795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollmeier, B., A. Warzybok, S. Hochmuth, M. A. Zokoll, V. Uslar, T. Brand, and K. C. Wagener. 2015. “The Multilingual Matrix Test: Principles, Applications, and Comparison across Languages: A Review.” International Journal of Audiology 54 (Suppl 2): 3–16. doi:10.3109/14992027.2015.1020971.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koroleva, I. V. 2012. Vvedenie v Audiologiyu i Sluhoprotezirovanie [Introduction to Audiology and Hearing Replacement]. Saint Petersburg, Russia: CARO.
   Google Scholar
• Kučera, H., and H. K. Monroe. 1968. A Comparative Quantitative Phonology of Russian, Czech and German. Vol. 4 of Mathematical and Linguistics and Automatic Language Processing. New York, NY: American Elsevier. doi:10.2307/412296.
   Google Scholar
• Kuzovkov, V. E., D. S. Klyachko, S. B. Sugarova, A. S. Lilenko, I. V. Kostevich, and A. A. Nesipbaeva. 2018. “Rol' Etiologicheskogo Faktora v Reabilitacii Pacientov Posle Kohlearnoj Implantacii [The Role of the Etiological Factor in the Rehabilitation of Patients after Cochlear Implantation].” Russian Otorhinolaryngology 94 (3): 60–65. doi:10.18692/1810-4800-2018-3-60-65.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. Y., J. T. Lee, H. J. Heo, C. H. Choi, S. H. Choi, and K. Lee. 2015. “Speech Recognition in Real-Life Background Noise by Young and Middle-Aged Adults with Normal Hearing.” Journal of Audiology & Otology 19 (1): 39–44. doi:10.7874/jao.2015.19.1.39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. J., K. W. Park, L. S. Kim, and H. Kim. 2016. “Effects of Noise Level and Cognitive Function on Speech Perception in Normal Elderly and Elderly with Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment.” Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology : Official Journal of the Society for Behavioral and Cognitive Neurology 29 (2): 68–77. doi:10.1097/WNN.0000000000000092.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, M. P., F. S. Gary, and D. F. Charles, eds. 2013. Ethnologue: Languages of the World. 17th ed. Dallas, TX: SIL International.
   Google Scholar
• Liberman, M. C., M. J. Epstein, S. S. Cleveland, H. Wang, and S. F. Maison. 2016. “Toward a Differential Diagnosis of Hidden Hearing Loss in Humans.” PLoS One 11 (9): e0162726. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0162726.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopotko, A. I. 1999. Sensibilizirovannaya Rechevaya Audiometriya. Posobie Dlya Vrachej [Sensitized Speech Audiometry. Manual for Doctors]. Saint Petersburg, Russia: SpbGMU.
   Google Scholar
• Lopotko, A. I., I. P. Berdnikova, and Korotkov Yu. V. 2002. “Audiometricheskij Rechevoj Ekspress-Test [Audiometric Speech Express Test] Uchenyye Zapiski Sankt-Peterburgskogo Gosudarstvennogo Meditsinskogo Universiteta im. akademika I.” P. Pavlova 9 (1): 6–8.
   Google Scholar
• Mukari, S. Z.-M S., N. H. Abdul Wahat, and R. Mazlan. 2014. “Effects of Ageing and Hearing Thresholds on Speech Perception in Quiet and in Noise Perceived in Different Locations.” Korean Journal of Audiology 18 (3): 112–118. doi:10.7874/kja.2014.18.3.112.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mukari, S. Z. M. S., Y. Yusof, W. S. Ishak, N. Maamor, K. Chellapan, and M. A. Dzulkifli. 2020. “Relative Contributions of Auditory and Cognitive Functions on Speech Recognition in Quiet and in Noise among Older Adults.” Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology 86 (2): 149–156. doi:10.1016/j.bjorl.2018.10.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myles, A. J. 2017. “The Clinical Use of Arthur Boothroyd (AB) Word Lists in Australia: exploring Evidence-Based Practice.” International Journal of Audiology 56 (11): 870–875. doi:10.1080/14992027.2017.1327123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nechaev, D. I., M. V. Goykhburg, A. Ya Supin, V. V. Bakhshinyan, and G. A. Tavartkiladze. 2020. “Razlichenie Signalov s Grebenchatym Spektrom u Prelingval'nyh i Postlingval'nyh Pol'zovatelej Kohlearnyh Implantov [Discrimination of Rippled-Spectrum Signals by Prelingual and Postlingual Cochlear Implant Users].” Human Physiology 46 (2): 119–121. doi:10.31857/S0131164620020113.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, M., S. D. Soli, and J. A. Sullivan. 1994. “Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the Measurement of Speech Reception Thresholds in Quiet and in Noise.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 95 (2): 1085–1099. doi:10.1121/1.408469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozimek, E., A. Warzybok, and D. Kutzner. 2010. “Polish Sentence Matrix Test for Speech Intelligibility Measurement in Noise.” International Journal of Audiology 49 (6): 444–454. doi:10.3109/14992021003681030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plomp, R. 1978. “Auditory Handicap of Hearing Impairment and the Limited Benefit of Hearing Aids.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 63 (2): 533–549. doi:10.1121/1.381753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plomp, R., and A. M. Mimpen. 1979. “Improving the Reliability of Testing the Speech Reception Threshold for Sentences.” Audiology : official Organ of the International Society of Audiology 18 (1): 43–52. doi:10.3109/00206097909072618.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Puglisi, G. E., A. Warzybok, S. Hochmuth, C. Visentin, A. Astolfi, N. Prodi, and B. Kollmeier. 2015. “An Italian Matrix Sentence Test for the Evaluation of Speech Intelligibility in Noise.” International Journal of Audiology 54 (Suppl 2): 44–50. doi:10.3109/14992027.2015.1061709.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rembaud, F., C. Füllgrabe, and L. Fontan. 2017. “L’audiométrie Vocale en France: état Des Lieux [Speech Audiometry in France: state of Affairs].” Cahiers de L'Audition 30 (6): 22–25.
   Google Scholar
• Riekhakaynen, E. I. 2016. Vospriyatie Russkoj Ustnoj Rechi: kontekst + Chastotnost' [the Perception of Russian Oral Speech: context + Frequency]. Saint Petersburg, Russia: SPbGU.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, G. P., N. J. DiSarno, and C. J. Hardiman. 1990. “Central Auditory Processing in Normal-Hearing Elderly Adults.” Audiology : Official Organ of the International Society of Audiology 29 (2): 85–92. 89. doi:10.3109/00206099009081649.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sharoff, S. 2002. “Meaning as Use: Exploitation of Aligned Corpora for the Contrastive Study of Lexical Semantics.” Proceedings of Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC02), Las Palmas, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Smoorenburg, G. F. 1992. “Speech Reception in Quiet and in Noisy Conditions by Individuals with Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in Relation to Their Tone Audiogram.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 91 (1): 421–437. doi:10.1121/1.402729.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokolova, S. M., K. A. Belicheva, U. S. Kibalova, and N. V. Moroz. 2013. “Ocenka Rechevoj Razborchivosti u Detej s Glubokimi Formami Tugouhosti [Evaluation of Speech Perception in Children with Profound Hearing Loss Forms].” Russian Otorhinolaryngology 1: 193–197.
   Google Scholar
• Souza, P. E., K. T. Boike, K. Witherell, and K. Tremblay. 2007. “Prediction of Speech Recognition from Audibility in Older Listeners with Hearing Loss: Effects of Age, Amplification, and Background Noise.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 18 (1): 54–65. doi:10.3766/jaaa.18.1.5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens, S. D. G. 1976. “The Input for a Damaged Cochlea: A Brief Review.” British Journal of Audiology 10 (4): 97–101. doi:10.3109/03005367609078817.
   Google Scholar
• Strom, K. E. 2006. “The Hearing Review 2006 Dispenser Survey.” Hearing Review 13: 16–39.
   Google Scholar
• Studebaker, G. A., R. L. Sherbecoe, D. M. McDaniel, and C. A. Gwaltney. 1999. “Monosyllabic Word Recognition at Higher-than-Normal Speech and Noise Levels.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 105 (4): 2431–2443. doi:10.1121/1.426848.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svistushkin, V. M., I. T. Mukhamedov, A. V. Pashkov, O. Yu. Karpova, E. G. Varosyan, S. V. Gadaleva, and E. O. Rozmanov. 2018. “Kohlearnaya implantaciya u bol'noj s otosklerozom i dvustoronnej gluhotoj. Sluchaj iz praktiki [Cochlear Implantation with Cochlear Otosclerosis with Bilateral Deafness. Case from Practice].” Vestnik Otorinolaringologii 83 (6): 61–63. doi:10.17116/otorino20188306161.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tambovtsev, Y. 2001. Kompendium Osnovnyh Statisticheskih Harakteristik Funktsionirovanija Soglasnyh Fonem v Zvukovoj Tsepochke Anglijskogo, Nemetskogo, Frantsuzskogo i Drugih Indoevropejskih Jazykov [Compendium of the Basic Characteristics of Functioning of Consonants in the Speech Chain of English, German, French and Other Indo-European Languages]. Novosibirsk, Russia: Novosibirskij Klassicheskij Institut.
   Google Scholar
• Tavartkiladze, G. A. 2013. Rukovodstvo po Klinicheskoj Audiologii [Handbook on Clinical Audiology]. Moscow: Meditsina.
   Google Scholar
• van Rooij, J. C., and R. Plomp. 1990. “Auditive and Cognitive Factors in Speech Perception by Elderly Listeners.” Acta Oto-Laryngologica. Supplementum 476: 177–181. doi:10.1121/1.402628.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wagener, K., T. Brand, and B. Kollmeier. 1999a. “Entwicklung Und Evaluation Eines Satztests in Deutscher Sprache Teil II: Optimierung Des Oldenburger Satztests [Development and Evaluation of a German Sentence Test, Part II: Optimization of the Oldenburg Sentence Tests].” Zeitschrift Für Audiologie 38: 44–56.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wagener, K., T. Brand, and B. Kollmeier. 1999b. “Entwicklung Und Evaluation Eines Satztests Für Die Deutsche Sprache Teil III: Evaluation Des Oldenburger Satztests [Development and Evaluation of a German Sentence Test].” Zeitschrift Für Audiologie 38: 86–95. – Part III: Evaluation of the Oldenburg sentence test).
   Google Scholar
• Wagener, K., V. Kühnel, and B. Kollmeier. 1999c. “Entwicklung Und Evaluation Eines Satztests in Deutscher Sprache I: Design Des Oldenburger Satztests [Development and Evaluation of a German Sentence Test– Part I: Design of the Oldenburg sentence test].” Zeitschrift Für Audiologie 38: 4–15.
   Google Scholar
• Wagener, K. 2004. “Factors Influencing Sentence Intelligibility in Noise.” PhD diss., University of Oldenburg, BIS-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Wardenga, N., C. Batsoulis, K. C. Wagener, T. Brand, T. Lenarz, and H. Maier. 2015. “Do You Hear the Noise? The German Matrix Sentence Test with a Fixed Noise Level in Subjects with Normal Hearing and Hearing Impairment.” International Journal of Audiology 54 (Suppl 2): 71–79. doi:10.3109/14992027.2015.1079929.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Warzybok, A., M. Z. Zokoll, and B. Kollmeier. 2016. “Development and Evaluation of the Russian Digit Triplet Test.” Acta Acustica United with Acustica 102 (4): 714–724. doi:10.3813/AAA.918988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warzybok, A., M. Zokoll, N. Wardenga, E. Ozimek, M. Boboshko, and B. Kollmeier. 2015. “Development of the Russian Matrix Sentence Test.” International Journal of Audiology 54 (Suppl 2): 35–43. doi:10.3109/14992027.2015.1020969.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wiley, T. L., K. J. Cruickshanks, D. M. Nondahl, T. S. Tweed, R. Klein, and B. E. K. Klein. 1998. “Aging and Word Recognition in Competing Message.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 9 (3): 191–198. doi:10.3766/jaaa.16.3.7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilson, R. H., and R. L. McArdle. 2005. “Speech Signals Used to Evaluate Functional Status of the Auditory System.” The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 42 (4s): 79–94. doi:10.1682/JRRD.2005.06.0096.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilson, R. H., and R. McArdle. 2007. “Intra- and Inter-Session Test, Retest Reliability of the Words-in-Noise (WIN) Test.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 18 (10): 813–825. doi:10.3766/jaaa.18.10.2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO). 2001. International Classification of Functioning. Geneva, Switzerland: Disability and Health (ICF). https://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO). 2019. “Prevention of Blindness and Deafness.” Grades of Hearing Impairment. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO. https://www.who.int/pbd/deafness/hearing_impairment_grades/en/
   Google Scholar
• Zanto, T. P., B. Toy, and A. Gazzaley. 2010. “Delays in Neural Processing During Working Memory Encoding in Normal Aging.” Neuropsychologia 48 (1): 13–25. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.08.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zokoll, M. A., S. Hochmuth, A. Warzybok, K. С. Wagener, M. Buschermöhle, and B. Kollmeier. 2013. “Speech-in-Noise Tests for Multilingual Hearing Screening and Diagnostics.” American Journal of Audiology 22 (1): 175–178. doi:10.1044/1059-0889(2013/12-0061).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar