Analysis of data from the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA) using Bayesian Item Response Theory

References

• Boeschen-Hospers, J. M., N. Smits, C. Smits, M. Stam, C. B. Terwee, and S. E. Kramer. 2016. “Reevaluation of the Amsterdam Inventory for Auditory Disability and Handicap Using Item Response Theory.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research: JSLHR 59 (2): 373–383. doi:10.1044/2015_JSLHR-H-15-0156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, R. A., and M. E. Terry. 1952. “Rank Analysis of Incomplete Block Designs. I. The Method of Paired Comparisons.” Biometrika 39 (3/4): 324–345. doi:10.2307/2334029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brännström, K. J., and I. Wennerström. 2010. “Hearing Aid Fitting Outcome: Clinical Application and Psychometric Properties of a Swedish Translation of the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA).” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 21 (8): 512–521. doi:10.3766/jaaa.21.8.3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bürkner, P.-C., and M. Vuorre. 2019. “Ordinal Regression Models in Psychology: A Tutorial.” Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science 2 (1): 77–101. doi:10.1177/2515245918823199.
   Google Scholar
• Chenault, M., M. Berger, B. Kremer, and L. Anteunis. 2013. “Quantification of Experienced Hearing Problems with Item Response Theory.” American Journal of Audiology 22 (2): 252–262. doi:10.1044/1059-0889(2013/12-0038).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, R., H. Hyde, S. Gatehouse, W. Noble, H. Dillon, R. Bentler, D. Stephens, et al. 2000. “Optimal Outcome Measures, Research Priorities, and International Cooperation.” Ear and Hearing 21 (4 Suppl): 106S–115S. doi:10.1097/00003446-200008001-00014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, R. M., and G. C. Alexander. 2002. “The International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA): Psychometric Properties of the English Version.” International Journal of Audiology 41 (1): 30–35. doi:10.3109/14992020209101309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demorest, M. E., D. J. Wark, and S. A. Erdman. 2011. “Development of the Screening Test for Hearing Problems.” American Journal of Audiology 20 (2): 100–110. doi:10.1044/1059-0889(2011/10-0048).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon, H. 2006. “Hearing Loss: The Silent Epidemic. Who, Why, Impact and What Can we Do about It. Libby Harricks Oration.” In Self-Help for the Hard of Hearing, Perth, Australia. 17th National Conference of the Audiological Society of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Durlach, N., and L. Braida. 1969. “Intensity Perception. I. Preliminary Theory of Intensity Resolution.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 46 (2): 372–383. doi:10.1121/1.1911699.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fox, J.-P. 2010. “Bayesian Item Response Modeling: Theory and Applications."New York, NY: Springer.doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-0742-4
   Google Scholar
• Gasparin, M., I. H. Menegotto, and C. S. Cunha. 2010. “Psychometric Properties of the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids.” Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology 76 (1): 85–90. doi:10.1590/S1808-86942010000100014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heffernan, E., D. W. Maidment, J. G. Barry, and M. A. Ferguson. 2019. “Refinement and Validation of the Social Participation Restrictions Questionnaire: An Application of Rasch Analysis and Traditional Psychometric Analysis Techniques.” Ear and Hearing 40 (2): 328–339. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000618.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heuermann, H., M. Kinkel, and J. R. Tchorz. 2005. “Comparison of Psychometric Properties of the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA) in Various Studies.” International Journal of Audiology 44 (2): 102–109. doi:10.1080/14992020500031223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickson, L., S. Clutterbuck, and A. Khan. 2010. “Factors Associated with Hearing Aid Fitting Outcomes on the IOI-HA.” International Journal of Audiology 49 (8): 586–595. doi:10.3109/14992021003777259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jespersen, C. T., M. Bille, and J. V. Legarth. 2014. “Psychometric Properties of a Revised Danish Translation of the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA).” International Journal of Audiology 53 (5): 302–308. doi:10.3109/14992027.2013.874049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, S. E., S. T. Goverts, W. A. Dreschler, M. Boymans, and J. M. Festen. 2002. “International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA): Results from The Netherlands.” International Journal of Audiology 41 (1): 36–41. doi:10.3109/14992020209101310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leijon, A., G. E. Henter, and M. Dahlquist. 2016. “Bayesian Analysis of Phoneme Confusion Matrices.” IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing 24 (3): 469–482. doi:10.1109/TASLP.2015.2512039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liddell, T., and J. K. Kruschke. 2018. “Analyzing Ordinal Data with Metric Models: What Could Possibly Go Wrong?” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 79: 328–348. doi:10.1109/TASLP.2015.2512039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H., H. Zhang, S. Liu, X. Chen, D. Han, and L. Zhang. 2011. “International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA): Results from the Chinese Version.” International Journal of Audiology 50 (10): 673–678. doi:10.3109/14992027.2011.588966.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez-Poveda, E. A., P. T. Johannesen, P. Pérez-Gonzalez, J. L. Blanco, S. Kalluri, and B. Edwards. 2017. “Predictors of Hearing-Aid Outcomes.” Trends in Hearing 21: 1–28. doi:10.1177/2331216517730526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luce, R. D. 1959. Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Masters, G. N. 1982. “A Rasch Model for Partial Credit Scoring.” Psychometrika 47 (2): 149–174. doi:10.1007/BF02296272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink, L. B., D. L. Knol, R. M. A. van Nispen, and S. E. Kramer. 2010. “Improving the Quality and Applicability of the Dutch Scales of the Communication Profile for the Hearing Impaired Using IRT.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research: JSLHR 53 (3): 556–571. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0035).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nering, M. L., and R. Ostini. 2010. Handbook of Polytomous Item Response Theory Models. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nordqvist, P. 2018. “Hearing Aid Fitting and Big Data – What Factors Make a Difference for the End User.” In World Congress of Audiology, Cape Town: International Society of Audiology.
   Google Scholar
• Paiva, S. M. M., J. F. C. P. M. Simões, A. M. Diogo Paiva, F. J. F. Castro e Sousa, and J.-P. Bébéar. 2017. “Translation of the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids into Portuguese from Portugal.” BMJ Open 7 (3): e013784. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013784.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serbetcioglu, B., B. Mutlu, G. Kirkim, and S. Uzunoglu. 2009. “Results of Factorial Validity and Reliability of the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids in Turkish.” International Advances in Otology 5 (1): 80–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel, S., and N. J. J. Castellan. 1988. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Teixeira, C. F., L. G. da Silva Augusto, and S. da Silva Caldas Neto. 2008. “Prótese Auditiva: satisfação Do Usuário Com Sua Prótese e Com Seu Meio Ambiente (Hearing Aid: user Satisfaction with Their Hearing Aid and with Their Environment).” Revista CEFAC 10 (2): 245–253. doi:10.1590/S1516-18462008000200015.
   Google Scholar
• Thurstone, L. L. 1927. “A Law of Comparative Judgment.” Psychological Review 34 (4): 273–286. doi:10.1037/h0070288.
   Google Scholar