Psychometric properties of the Kannada version of the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA)

References

• Anastasi, A. 1976. Psychological Testing (4th ed). New York: Macmillan Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Beaton, D. E., C. Bombardier, F. Guillemin, and M. B. Ferraz. 2000. “Guidelines for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures.” Spine 25 (24): 3186–3191. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brännström, K. Jonas, and Ingegerd Wennerström. 2010. “Hearing Aid Fitting Outcome: Clinical Application and Psychometric Properties of a Swedish Translation of the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA).” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 21 (8): 512–521. doi:https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.21.8.3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bürkner, Paul-Christian, and Matti Vuorre. 2019. “Ordinal Regression Models in Psychology: A Tutorial.” Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science 2 (1): 77–101. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918823199.
   Google Scholar
• Census of India. 2001. Abstract of Speakers’ Strength of Languages and Mother Tongues. Accessed 23 June 2020. http://www.censusindia.gov.in/2011-common/censusda-taonline.html.
   Google Scholar
• Chu, Hosuk, Yang-Sun Cho, Shi-Nae Park, Jae Yong Byun, Jung Eun Shin, Gyu Cheol Han, Byung Chul Cheon, Jun Ho Lee, and Jae Yun Jung. 2012. “Standardization for a Korean Adaptation of the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids: Study of Validity and Reliability.” Korean Journal of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 55 (1): 20–25. doi:https://doi.org/10.3342/kjorl-hns.2012.55.1.20.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, R., and G. C. Alexander. 1995. “The Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit.” Ear and Hearing 16 (2): 176–183. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-199504000-00005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, R. M., and G. C. Alexander. 2002. “The International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA): Psychometric Properties of the English Version.” International Journal of Audiology 41 (1): 30–35. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/14992020209101309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, R. M., and G. C. Alexander. 2001. “Validation of the SADL Questionnaire.” Ear and Hearing 22 (2): 151–160. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-200104000-00008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, R. M., G. C. Alexander, and C. M. Beyer. 2003. “Norms for the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 14 (8): 403–413.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cox, R., M. Hyde, S. Gatehouse, W. Noble, H. Dillon, R. Bentler, D. Stephens, et al. 2000. “Optimal Outcome Measures, Research Priorities, and International Cooperation.” Ear and Hearing 21 (4 Suppl): 106S–115S. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-200008001-00014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, R. M., D. Stephens, and S. E. Kramer. 2002. “Translations of the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA).” International Journal of Audiology 41 (1): 3–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/14992020209101307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon, H., A. James, and J. Ginis. 1997. “Client Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI) and Its Relationship to Several Other Measures of Benefit and Satisfaction Provided by Hearing Aids.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 8 (1): 27–43.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hall, Deborah A., Silvia Zaragoza Domingo, Leila Z. Hamdache, Vinaya Manchaiah, Spoorthi Thammaiah, Chris Evans, and Lena L. N. Wong. 2018. “A Good Practice Guide for Translating and Adapting Hearing-Related Questionnaires for Different Languages and Cultures.” International Journal of Audiology 57 (3): 161–175. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2017.1393565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humes, L. E., and V. Krull. 2012. “Evidence about the Effectiveness of Hearing Aids in Adults.” In: Wong L, Hickson L, (Eds.). Evidence Based Practice in Audiology. San Diego, USA; Plural Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• IBM Corp. Released. 2011. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
   Google Scholar
• International Collegium of Rehabilitative Audiology. 2017. IOI-HA List of Questionnaires. Accessed June 23, 2020 https://icra-audiology.org/Repository/self-report-repository/Survey.
   Google Scholar
• Jespersen, C. T., M. Bille, and J. V. Legarth. 2014. “Psychometric Properties of a Revised Danish Translation of the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA).” International Journal of Audiology 53 (5): 302–308. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2013.874049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo, T. K., and M. Y. Li. 2016. “A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.” Journal of Chiropractic Medicine 15 (2): 155–163. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, S. E., S. T. Goverts, W. A. Dreschler, M. Boymans, and J. M. Festen. 2002. “International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA): Results from The Netherlands.” International Journal of Audiology 41 (1): 36–41. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/14992020209101310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leijon, A., H. Dillon, L. Hickson, M. Kinkel, S. E. Kramer, and P. Nordqvist. 2020. “Analysis of Data from the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA) Using Bayesian Item Response Theory.” International Journal of Audiology 1–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2020.1813338.
   Google Scholar
• Liddell, T. M., and J. K. Kruschke. 2018. “Analyzing Ordinal Data with Metric Models: What Could Possibly Go Wrong?” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 79: 328–348. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.08.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liljequist, D., B. Elfving, and K. Skavberg Roaldsen. 2019. “Intraclass Correlation – A Discussion and Demonstration of Basic Features.” PLoS One 14 (7): e0219854. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219854.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manchaiah, V. K. C., and D. Stephens. 2013. “Perspectives on Defining ‘Hearing Loss’ and Its Consequences.” Hearing, Balance and Communication 11 (1): 6–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/21695717.2012.756624.
   Google Scholar
• Nering, M.L., & Ostini, R. (Eds). 2010. Handbook of Polytomous Item Response Theory Models. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, G. 2010. “Likert Scales, Levels of Measurement and the ‘Laws’ of statistics.” Advances in Health Sciences Education Theory Practice 15 (5): 625–632. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavia, S. M., J. F. Simões, A. M. Paiva, F. J. Sousa, and J. P. Bébéar. 2017. “Translation of the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids into Portuguese from Portugal.” British Medical Journal Open 7 (3): e013784. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013784.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schow, R., and M. Nerbonne. 1982. “Communication Screening Profile: Use with Elderly Clients.” Ear and Hearing 3 (3): 135–147. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-198205000-00007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwee, C. B., S. D. Bot, M. R. de Boer, D. A. van der Windt, D. L. Knol, J. Dekker, L. M. Bouter, and H. C. de Vet. 2007. “Quality Criteria Were Proposed for Measurement Properties of Health Status Questionnaires.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 60 (1): 34–42. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwee, C. B., L. B. Mokkink, D. L. Knol, R. W. Ostelo, L. M. Bouter, and H. C. de Vet. 2012. “Rating the Methodological Quality in Systematic Reviews of Studies on Measurement Properties: A Scoring System for the COSMIN Checklist.” Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation 21 (4): 651–657. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-9960-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thammaiah, S., V. Manchaiah, V. Easwar, and R. Krishna. 2016. “Translation and Adaptation of Five English Language Self-Report Health Measures to South Indian Kannada Language.” Audiology Research 6 (1): 153. http://dx. doi:https://doi.org/10.4081/audiores.2016.153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thammaiah, S., V. Manchaiah, V. Easwar, R. Krishna, and B. McPherson. 2018. “The Participation Scale: Psychometric Properties of a South Indian Translation with Hearing-Impaired Respondents.” Disability and Rehabilitation 40 (22): 2650–2657. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2017.1347208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thammaiah, S., V. Manchaiah, V. Easwar, R. Krishna, and B. McPherson. 2017. “Psychometric Properties of the Hearing Handicap Questionnaire: A Kannada (South-Indian) Translation.” International Journal of Audiology 56 (3): 194–201. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2016.1247500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thammaiah, S., V. Manchaiah, R. Krishna, A. A. Zekveld, and S. E. Kramer. 2019. “Assessment of the Psychometric Properties of the AQoL-4D Questionnaire in Kannada Language for Use with Adults with Hearing Loss.” International Journal of Audiology 58 (6): 326–332. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2019.1587181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uriarte, M., L. Denzin, A. Dunstan, J. Sellars, and L. Hickson. 2005. “Measuring Hearing Aid Outcomes Using the Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life (SADL) Questionnaire: Australian Data.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 16 (6): 383–402. doi:https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.16.6.6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar