References
- Alhanbali, S., P. Dawes, R. E. Millman, and K. J. Munro. 2019. “Measures of Listening Effort Are Multidimensional.” Ear and Hearing 40 (5): 1084–1097. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000697.
- Anderson Gosselin, P., and J.-P. Gagné. 2010. “Use of a Dual-Task Paradigm to Measure Listening Effort.” Revue canadienne d’orthophonie et d’audiologie 34 (1): 43–51.
- Aston-Jones, G., and J. D. Cohen. 2005. “An Integrative Theory of Locus Coeruleus-Norepinephrine Function: Adaptive Gain and Optimal Performance.” Annual Review of Neuroscience 28: 403–450. doi:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.28.061604.135709.
- Bakdash, J. Z., and L. R. Marusich. 2017. “Repeated Measures Correlation.” Frontiers in Psychology 8: 456. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00456.
- Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker, and Steve Walker. 2015. “Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4.” Journal of Statistical Software 67 (1): 1–48. doi:https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01.
- Best, V., E. J. Ozmeral, and B. G. Shinn-Cunningham. 2007. “Visually-Guided Attention Enhances Target Identification in a Complex Auditory Scene.” Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology: JARO 8 (2): 294–304. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-007-0073-z.
- Boersma, P., and D. Weenink. 2019. Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer [Computer program]. Version 6.0.33, retrieved May 2018 from http://www.praat.org/
- Choi, S., A. Lotto, D. Lewis, B. Hoover, and P. Stelmachowicz. 2008. “Attentional Modulation of Word Recognition by Children in a Dual-Task Paradigm.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 51 (4): 1042–1054. doi:https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2008/076).
- Christensen, R. H. B. 2019. Ordinal-Regression Models for Ordinal Data. R package version 2019.4-25, from http://www.cran.r-project.org/package=ordinal/
- Driver, J. 2001. “A Selective Review of Selective Attention Research from the past Century.” British Journal of Psychology 92 (1): 53–78. doi:https://doi.org/10.1348/000712601162103.
- Gagné, J.-P., J. Besser, and U. Lemke. 2017. “Behavioral Assessment of Listening Effort Using a Dual-Task Paradigm.” Trends in Hearing 21: 2331216516687287. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216516687287.
- Gatehouse, S., and J. Gordon. 1990. “Response Times to Speech Stimuli as Measures of Benefit from Amplification.” British Journal of Audiology 24 (1): 63–68. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/03005369009077843.
- Gustafson, S., R. McCreery, B. Hoover, J. G. Kopun, and P. Stelmachowicz. 2014. “Listening Effort and Perceived Clarity for Normal-Hearing Children with the Use of Digital Noise Reduction.” Ear and Hearing 35 (2): 183–194. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aud.0000440715.85844.b8.
- Herrmann, B., and I. S. Johnsrude. 2020. “A Model of Listening Engagement (MoLE).” Hearing Research 397: 108016. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2020.108016.
- Hornsby, B. W. 2013. “The Effects of Hearing Aid Use on Listening Effort and Mental Fatigue Associated with Sustained Speech Processing Demands.” Ear and Hearing 34 (5): 523–534. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0b013e31828003d8.
- Hothorn, T., F. Bretz, and P. Westfall. 2008. “Simultaneous Inference in General Parametric Models.” Biometrical Journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift 50 (3): 346–363. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.200810425.
- Houben, R., M. van Doorn-Bierman, and W. A. Dreschler. 2013. “Using Response Time to Speech as a Measure for Listening Effort.” International Journal of Audiology 52 (11): 753–761. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2013.832415.
- Hupé, J. M., C. Lamirel, and J. Lorenceau. 2009. “Pupil Dynamics During Bistable Motion Perception.” Journal of Vision 9 (7): 10–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1167/9.7.10.
- Jaeger, T. F. 2008. “Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (Transformation or Not) and Towards Logit Mixed Models.” Journal of Memory and Language 59 (4): 434–446. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007.
- Kahneman, D. 1973. Attention and Effort. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
- Koelewijn, T., H. de Kluiver, B. G. Shinn-Cunningham, A. A. Zekveld, and S. E. Kramer. 2015. “The Pupil Response Reveals Increased Listening Effort When It is Difficult to Focus Attention.” Hearing Research 323: 81–90. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2015.02.004.
- Koelewijn, T., B. G. Shinn-Cunningham, A. A. Zekveld, and S. E. Kramer. 2014. “The Pupil Response is Sensitive to Divided Attention During Speech Processing.” Hearing Research 312: 114–120. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2014.03.010.
- Koelewijn, T., A. A. Zekveld, J. M. Festen, J. Rönnberg, and S. E. Kramer. 2012. “Processing Load Induced by Informational Masking is Related to Linguistic Abilities.” International Journal of Otolaryngology 2012: 865731. doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/865731.
- Koelewijn, T., A. A. Zekveld, T. Lunner, and S. E. Kramer. 2018. “The Effect of Reward on Listening Effort as Reflected by the Pupil Dilation Response.” Hearing Research 367: 106–112. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2018.07.011.
- Kollmeier, B., A. Warzybok, S. Hochmuth, M. A. Zokoll, V. Uslar, T. Brand, and K. C. Wagener. 2015. “The Multilingual Matrix Test: Principles, Applications, and Comparison Across Languages: A Review.” International Journal of Audiology 54 (sup2): 3–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2015.1020971.
- Lau, M. K., C. Hicks, T. Kroll, and S. Zupancic. 2019. “Effect of Auditory Task Type on Physiological and Subjective Measures of Listening Effort in Individuals with Normal Hearing.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research : JSLHR 62 (5): 1549–1560. doi:https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_JSLHR-H-17-0473.
- Lemke, U., and J. Besser. 2016. “Cognitive Load and Listening Effort: Concepts and Age-Related Considerations.” Ear & Hearing 37 (1): 77S–84S. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000304.
- Lenth, L. 2019. emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means. R package version 1.3.4. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans
- Lewis, D., K. Schmid, S. O’Leary, J. Spalding, E. Heinrichs-Graham, and R. High. 2016. “Effects of Noise on Speech Recognition and Listening Effort in Children with Normal Hearing and Children with Mild Bilateral or Unilateral Hearing Loss.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research : JSLHR 59 (5): 1218–1232. doi:https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_JSLHR-H-15-0207.
- Lidestam, B., J. Holgersson, and S. Moradi. 2014. “Comparison of Informational vs. Energetic Masking Effects on Speechreading Performance.” Frontiers in Psychology 5: 639. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00639.
- Mattys, S. L., M. H. Davis, A. R. Bradlow, and S. K. Scott. 2012. “Speech Recognition in Adverse Conditions: A Review.” Language and Cognitive Processes 27 (7-8): 953–978. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2012.705006.
- McCloy, D. R., E. D. Larson, B. Lau, and A. K. Lee. 2016. “Temporal Alignment of Pupillary Response with Stimulus Events via Deconvolution.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 139 (3): EL57–EL62. doi:https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4943787.
- McCloy, D. R., B. K. Lau, E. Larson, K. A. Pratt, and A. K. Lee. 2017. “Pupillometry Shows the Effort of Auditory Attention Switching.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 141 (4): 2440–2451. doi:https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4979340.
- McGarrigle, R., P. Dawes, A. J. Stewart, S. E. Kuchinsky, and K. J. Munro. 2017a. “Measuring Listening-Related Effort and Fatigue in School-Aged Children Using Pupillometry.” Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 161: 95–112. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.04.006.
- McGarrigle, R., P. Dawes, A. J. Stewart, S. E. Kuchinsky, and K. J. Munro. 2017b. “Pupillometry Reveals Changes in Physiological Arousal During a Sustained Listening Task.” Psychophysiology 54 (2): 193–203. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12772.
- McGarrigle, R., S. J. Gustafson, B. W. Hornsby, and F. H. Bess. 2019. “Behavioral Measures of Listening Effort in School-Age Children: Examining the Effects of Signal-to-Noise Ratio, Hearing Loss, and Amplification.” Ear and Hearing 40 (2): 381–392. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000623.
- McGarrigle, R., K. J. Munro, P. Dawes, A. J. Stewart, D. R. Moore, J. G. Barry, and S. Amitay. 2014. “Listening Effort and Fatigue: what Exactly Are We Measuring? A British Society of Audiology Cognition in Hearing Special Interest Group ‘white paper’.” International Journal of Audiology 53 (7): 433–440. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2014.890296.
- McGarrigle, R., L. Rakusen, and S. Mattys. 2021. “Effortful Listening Under the Microscope: Examining Relations Between Pupillometric and Subjective Markers of Effort and Tiredness from Listening.” Psychophysiology 58 (1): e13703. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13703.
- Mealings, K. T., K. Demuth, J. M. Buchholz, and H. Dillon. 2015. “The Effect of Different Open Plan and Enclosed Classroom Acoustic Conditions on Speech Perception in Kindergarten Children .” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 138 (4): 2458–2469. doi:https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4931903.
- Meister, H., S. Rählmann, U. Lemke, and J. Besser. 2018. “Verbal Response Times as a Potential Indicator of Cognitive Load during Conventional Speech Audiometry with Matrix Sentences.” Trends in Hearing 22: 2331216518793255. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216518793255.
- Mirman, D. 2014. Growth Curve Analysis and Visualization Using R. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
- Ohlenforst, B., D. Wendt, S. E. Kramer, G. Naylor, A. A. Zekveld, and T. Lunner. 2018. “Impact of SNR, Masker Type and Noise Reduction Processing on Sentence Recognition Performance and Listening Effort as Indicated by the Pupil Dilation Response.” Hearing Research 365: 90–99. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2018.05.003.
- Pals, C., A. Sarampalis, H. van Rijn, and D. Başkent. 2015. “Validation of a Simple Response-Time Measure of Listening Effort.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 138 (3): EL187–EL192. doi:https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4929614.
- Peelle, J. E. 2018. “Listening Effort: How the Cognitive Consequences of Acoustic Challenge Are Reflected in Brain and Behavior.” Ear and Hearing 39 (2): 204–214. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000494.
- Pichora-Fuller, M. Kathleen, Sophia E. Kramer, Mark A. Eckert, Brent Edwards, Benjamin W. Y. Hornsby, Larry E. Humes, Ulrike Lemke, et al. 2016. “Hearing Impairment and Cognitive Energy: The Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening (FUEL).” Ear & Hearing 37 (1): 5S–27S. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000312.
- Picou, E. M., and T. A. Ricketts. 2014. “The Effect of Changing the Secondary Task in Dual-Task Paradigms for Measuring Listening Effort.” Ear and Hearing 35 (6): 611–622. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000055.
- Picou, E. M., and T. A. Ricketts. 2018. “The Relationship Between Speech Recognition, Behavioural Listening Effort, and Subjective Ratings.” International Journal of Audiology 57 (6): 457–467. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2018.1431696.
- Piquado, T., D. Isaacowitz, and A. Wingfield. 2010. “Pupillometry as a Measure of Cognitive Effort in Younger and Older Adults.” Psychophysiology 47 (3): 560–569. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00947.x.
- Pollack, I. 1975. “Auditory Informational Masking.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 57 (S1): S5–S5. doi:https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1995329.
- Prodi, N., and C. Visentin. 2019. “Impact of Background Noise Fluctuation and Reverberation on Response Time in a Speech Reception Task.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research : JSLHR 62 (11): 4179–4195. doi:https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_JSLHR-H-19-0180.
- Prodi, N., C. Visentin, E. Borella, I. C. Mammarella, and A. Di Domenico. 2019a. “Noise, Age and Gender Effects on Speech Intelligibility and Sentence Comprehension for 11- to 13-Year-Old Children in Real Classrooms.” Frontiers in Psychology 10: 2166. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02166.
- Prodi, N., C. Visentin, A. Peretti, J. Griguolo, and G. B. Bartolucci. 2019b. “Investigating Listening Effort in Classrooms for 5- to 7-Year-Old Children.” Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools 50 (2): 196–210. doi:https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_LSHSS-18-0039.
- Puglisi, G. E., A. Warzybok, S. Hochmuth, C. Visentin, A. Astolfi, N. Prodi, and B. Kollmeier. 2015. “An Italian Matrix Sentence Test for the Evaluation of Speech Intelligibility in Noise.” International Journal of Audiology 54 (sup2): 44–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2015.1061709.
- R Core Team. 2013. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/
- Steel, M. M., B. C. Papsin, and K. A. Gordon. 2015. “Binaural Fusion and Listening Effort in Children Who Use Bilateral Cochlear Implants: A Psychoacoustic and Pupillometric Study.” PLoS One 10 (2): e0117611. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117611.
- Strand, J. F., V. A. Brown, M. B. Merchant, H. E. Brown, and J. Smith. 2018. “Measuring Listening Effort: Convergent Validity, Sensitivity, and Links with Cognitive and Personality Measures.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research: JSLHR 61 (6): 1463–1486. doi:https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_JSLHR-H-17-0257.
- Uslar, V. N., R. Carroll, M. Hanke, C. Hamann, E. Ruigendijk, T. Brand, and B. Kollmeier. 2013. “Development and Evaluation of a Linguistically and Audiologically Controlled Sentence Intelligibility Test.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 134 (4): 3039–3056. doi:https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4818760.
- van den Tillaart-Haverkate, M., I. de Ronde-Brons, W. A. Dreschler, and R. Houben. 2017. “The Influence of Noise Reduction on Speech Intelligibility, Response Times to Speech, and Perceived Listening Effort in Normal-Hearing Listeners.” Trends in Hearing 21: 2331216517716844. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216517716844.
- van Rij, J., P. Hendriks, H. van Rijn, R. H. Baayen, and S. N. Wood. 2019. “Analyzing the Time Course of Pupillometric Data.” Trends in Hearing 23: 2331216519832483. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216519832483.
- Visentin, C., N. Prodi, F. Cappelletti, S. Torresin, and A. Gasparella. 2018. “Using Listening Effort Assessment in the Acoustical Design of Rooms for Speech.” Building and Environment 136: 38–53. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.03.020.
- Visentin, C., N. Prodi, F. Cappelletti, S. Torresin, and A. Gasparella. 2019. “Speech Intelligibility and Listening Effort in University Classrooms for Native and Non-Native Italian Listeners.” Building Acoustics 26 (4): 275–291. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1351010X19882314.
- Wagner, A. E., L. Nagels, P. Toffanin, J. M. Opie, and D. Başkent. 2019. “Individual Variations in Effort: Assessing Pupillometry for the Hearing Impaired.” Trends in Hearing 23: 2331216519845596. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216519845596.
- Wendt, D., T. Dau, and J. Hjortkjaer. 2016. “Impact of Background Noise and Sentence Complexity on Processing Demands during Sentence Comprehension.” Frontiers in Psychology 7: 345. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00345.
- Wendt, D., T. Koelewijn, P. Książek, S. E. Kramer, and T. Lunner. 2018. “Toward a More Comprehensive Understanding of the Impact of Masker Type and Signal-to-Noise Ratio on the Pupillary Response While Performing a Speech-In-Noise Test .” Hearing Research 369: 67–78. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2018.05.006.
- Whelan, R. 2008. “Effective Analysis of Reaction Time Data.” The Psychological Record 58 (3): 475–482. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395630.
- Winn, M. B. 2016. “Rapid Release from Listening Effort Resulting from Semantic Context, and Effects of Spectral Degradation and Cochlear Implants.” Trends in Hearing 20: 233121651666972. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216516669723.
- Winn, M. B., J. R. Edwards, and R. Y. Litovsky. 2015. “The Impact of Auditory Spectral Resolution on Listening Effort Revealed by Pupil Dilation.” Ear and Hearing 36 (4): e153–e165. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000145.
- Winn, M. B., D. Wendt, T. Koelewijn, and S. E. Kuchinsky. 2018. “Best Practices and Advice for Using Pupillometry to Measure Listening Effort: An Introduction for Those Who Want to Get Started.” Trends in Hearing 22: 2331216518800869. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216518800869.
- Zekveld, A. A., T. Koelewijn, and S. E. Kramer. 2018. “The Pupil Dilation Response to Auditory Stimuli: Current State of Knowledge.” Trends in Hearing 22: 2331216518777174. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216518777174.
- Zekveld, A. A., S. E. Kramer, and J. M. Festen. 2010. “Pupil Response as an Indication of Effortful Listening: The Influence of Sentence Intelligibility.” Ear and Hearing 31 (4): 480–490. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181d4f251.
- Zekveld, A. A., M. Rudner, S. E. Kramer, J. Lyzenga, and J. Rönnberg. 2014. “Cognitive Processing Load during Listening is Reduced More by Decreasing Voice Similarity than by Increasing Spatial Separation Between Target and Masker Speech.” Frontiers in Neuroscience 8: 88. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2014.00088.