References
- Aspöck, L., R. A. Viveros Munoz, and J. Fels. 2020. “Additional Data for Experiments on Spatial Release from Masking in Different Room Acoustic Conditions.” RWTH Aachen University. https://publications.rwth-aachen.de/record/789293/files/Documentation%20of%20additional%20data%20for%20experiments%20on%20spatial%20release%20from%20masking%20in%20different%20room%20acoustic%20conditions.pdf
- Boersma, P., and D. Weenink. 2020. “Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer.” Computer program Version 6.1.12. Praat. http://www.praat.org/. Accessed 15 April 2020.
- Bregman, A. S. 1990. Auditory Scene Analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Bronkhorst, A. 2000. “The Cocktail Party Phenomenon: A Review of Research on Speech Intelligibility in Multiple-Talker Conditions.” Acta Acustica United with Acustica 86 (1): 117–128.
- Carlyon, R. P., R. Cusack, J. M. Foxton, and I. H. Robertson. 2001. “Effects of Attention and Unilateral Neglect on Auditory Stream Segregation.” Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 27 (1): 115–127. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.27.1.115.
- Cherry, E. C. 1953. “Some Experiments on the Recognition of Speech, with One and with Two Ears.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 25 (5): 975–979. doi:https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1907229.
- Conway, A. R. A., N. Cowan, and M. F. Bunting. 2001. “The Cocktail Party Phenomenon Revisited: The Importance of Working Memory Capacity.” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 8 (2): 331–335. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03196169.
- Edwards, B. 2016. “A Model of Auditory-Cognitive Processing and Relevance to Clinical Applicability.” Ear & Hearing 37 (1): 85S–91S. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000308.
- Gagné, J.-P., J. Besser, and U. Lemke. 2017. “Behavioral Assessment of Listening Effort Using a Dual Task Paradigm: A Review.” Trends in Hearing 21: 233121651668728. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216516687287.
- Gallun, F. G., A. C. Diedesch, S. D. Kampel, and K. M. Jakien. 2013. “Independent Impacts of Age and Hearing Loss on Spatial Release in a Complex Auditory Environment.” Frontiers in Neuroscience 7: 252. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2013.00252.
- Hafter, E. R., J. Xia, S. Kalluri, R. Poggesi, C. Hansen, and K. Whiteford. 2013. “Attentional Switching When Listeners Respond to Semantic Meaning Expressed by Multiple Talkers.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 133 (5): 3381. doi:https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4805827.
- Hasher, L., and R. T. Zacks. 1979. “Automatic and Effortful Processes in Memory.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 108 (3): 356–388. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.108.3.356.
- Humes, L. E., J. H. Lee, and M. P. Coughlin. 2006. “Auditory Measures of Selective and Divided Attention in Young and Older Adults Using Single Talker Competition.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 120 (5): 2926–2937. doi:https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2354070.
- Ihlefeld, A., and B. Shinn-Cunningham. 2008. “Disentangling the Effects of Spatial Cues on Selection and Formation of Auditory Objects.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 124 (4): 2224–2235. doi:https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2973185.
- Imhof, M. 2010. “What is Going on in the Mind of a Listener? The Cognitive Psychology of Listening.” In Listening and Human Communication in the 21st Century, edited by A. D. Wolvin, 97–126. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
- Kahneman, D. 1973. Attention and Effort. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc.
- Koch, I., E. Poljac, H. Müller, and A. Kiesel. 2018. “Cognitive Structure, Flexibility, and Plasticity in Human multitasking-An integrative review of dual-task and task-switching research.” Psychological Bulletin 144 (6): 557–583. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000144.
- Leys, C., C. Ley, O. Klein, P. Bernard, and L. Licata. 2013. “Detecting Outliers: Do Not Use Standard Deviation around the Mean, Use Absolute Deviation around the Median.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 49 (4): 764–766. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.03.013.
- Masiero, B., and J. Fels. 2011. “Perceptually Robust Headphone Equalization for Binaural Reproduction.” Paper presented at the 130th Audio Engineering Society Convention, London, UK, May 13–16.
- McGarrigle, R., K. J. Munro, P. Dawes, A. J. Stewart, D. R. Moore, J. G. Barry, S. Amitay, et al. 2014. “Listening Effort and Fatigue: What Exactly Are we Measuring? A British Society of Audiology Cognition in Hearing Special Interest Group ‘white paper’.” International Journal of Audiology 53 (7): 433–440. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2014.890296.
- Oberem, J., V. Lawo, I. Koch, and J. Fels. 2014. “Intentional Switching in Auditory Selective Attention: Exploring Different Binaural Reproduction Methods in an Anechoic Chamber.” Acta Acustica United with Acustica 100 (6): 1139–1148. doi:https://doi.org/10.3813/AAA.918793.
- Picou, E. M., and T. A. Ricketts. 2014. “The Effect of Changing the Secondary Task in Dual-Task Paradigms for Measuring Listening Effort.” Ear and Hearing 35 (6): 611–622. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000055.
- Rogers, R. D., and S. Monsell. 1995. “Costs of a Predictible Switch between Simple Cognitive Tasks.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 124 (2): 207–231. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.124.2.207.
- Rönnberg, J., T. Lunner, A. Zekveld, P. Sörqvist, H. Danielsson, B. Lyxell, and Ö. Dahlström. 2013. “The Ease of Language Understanding (ELU) Model: Theoretical, Empirical, and Clinical Advances.” Frontiers in System Neuroscience 7: 31. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2013.00031.
- Rubinstein, J. S., D. E. Meyer, and J. E. Evans. 2001. “Executive Control of Cognitive Processes in Task Switching.” Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 27 (4): 763–797. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.27.4.763.
- Sarampalis, A., S. Kalluri, B. Edwards, and E. Hafter. 2009. “Objective Measures of Listening Effort: Effects of Background Noise and Noise Reduction.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 52 (5): 1230–1240. doi:https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2009/08-0111).
- Schmitz, A. 1995. “Ein Neues Digitales Kunstkopfmeßsystem.” Acta Acustica United with Acustica 81 (4): 416–420.
- Seeman, S., and R. Sims. 2015. “Comparison of Psychophysiological and Dual-Task Measures of Listening Effort.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 58 (6): 1781–1792. doi:https://doi.org/10.1044/2015_JSLHR-H-14-0180.
- Surprenant, A. M. 1999. “The Effect of Noise on Memory for Spoken Syllables.” International Journal of Psychology 34 (5–6): 328–333. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/002075999399648.
- Wingfield, A. 2016. “Evolution of Working Memory and Cognitive Resources.” Ear & Hearing 37 (1): 35S–43S. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000310.
- Xia, J., S. Kalluri, B. Edwards, and E. R. Hafter. 2014. “Cognitive Effort and Listening in Everyday Life.” ENT & Audiology News 23: 88–89.
- Xia, J., N. Nooraei, S. Kalluri, and B. Edwards. 2015. “Spatial Release of Cognitive Load Measured in a Dual-Task Paradigm in Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 137 (4): 1888–1898. doi:https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4916599.
- Zekveld, A. A., M. Rudner, S. E. Kramer, J. Lyzenga, and J. Rönnberg. 2014. “Cognitive Processing Load during Listening is Reduced More by Decreasing Voice Similarity than by Increasing Spatial Separation between Target and Masker Speech.” Frontiers in Neuroscience 8: 88. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2014.00088.