Development and evaluation of the Cantonese matrix sentence test

References

• Akeroyd, M. A., S. Arlinger, R. A. Bentler, A. Boothroyd, N. Dillier, W. A. Dreschler, J.-P. Gagné, M. Lutman, J. Wouters, L. Wong, et al. 2015. “International Collegium of Rehabilitative Audiology (ICRA) recommendations for the construction of multilingual speech tests.” International Journal of Audiology 54 (sup2): 17–22. doi:10.3109/14992027.2015.1030513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bo Nielsen, J., T. Dau, and T. Neher. 2014. “A Danish open-set speech corpus for competing-speech studies.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 135 (1): 407–420. doi:10.1121/1.4835935.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma, P, and D. Weenink. 2013. “Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer. Version 6.0.10.” Retrieved 1 January 2016 from http://www.praat.org/.In.
   Google Scholar
• Bolia, R. S., W. T. Nelson, M. A. Ericson, and B. D. Simpson. 2000. “A speech corpus for multitalker communications research.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 107 (2): 1065–1066. doi:10.1121/1.428288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand, T., and B. Kollmeier. 2002. “Efficient adaptive procedures for threshold and concurrent slope estimates for psychophysics and speech intelligibility tests.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 111 (6):2801–2810. doi:10.1121/1.1479152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, Z. G., M. J. Pickering, H. Yan, and H. P. Branigan. 2011. “Lexical and Syntactic Representations in Closely Related Languages: Evidence from Cantonese–Mandarin Bilinguals.” Journal of Memory and Language 65 (4): 431–445. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2011.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, A. S., M.-K. Choi, and D. P. Salmon. 2001. “The Effects of Age, Education, and Gender on the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale Performance of Elderly Chinese and American Individuals.” The Journals of Gerontology 56 (6): P356–P363. doi:10.1093/geronb/56.6.p356.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, F., L. L. N. Wong, and Y. Hu. 2014. “Effects of Lexical Tone Contour on Mandarin Sentence Intelligibility.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 57 (1): 338–345. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2013/12-0324).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz, A., M. Buschermöhle, A. A. Aarnisalo, A. Vanhanen, T. Hyyrynen, O. Aaltonen, H. Löppönen, M. A. Zokoll, and B. Kollmeier. 2014. “The Development and Evaluation of the Finnish Matrix Sentence Test for Speech Intelligibility Assessment.” Acta Oto-Laryngologica 134 (7): 728–737. doi:10.3109/00016489.2014.898185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberhard, D. M., G. F. Simons, and C. D. Fennig. 2021. Ethnologue: Languages of the World. Twenty-fourth edition. Dallas, Texas: SIL International (http://www.ethnologue.com).
   Google Scholar
• Hagerman, B. 1982. “Sentences for Testing Speech Intelligibility in Noise.” Scandinavian Audiology 11 (2): 79–87. doi:10.3109/01050398209076203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harianawala, J., J. Galster, and B. Hornsby. 2019. “Psychometric Comparison of the Hearing in Noise Test and the American English Matrix Test.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 30 (4): 315–326. doi:10.3766/jaaa.17112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochmuth, S., T. Brand, M. A. Zokoll, F. Z. Castro, N. Wardenga, and B. Kollmeier. 2012. “A Spanish Matrix Sentence Test for Assessing Speech Reception Thresholds in Noise.” International Journal of Audiology 51 (7): 536–544. doi:10.3109/14992027.2012.670731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochmuth, S., T. Jürgens, T. Brand, and B. Kollmeier. 2015. “Talker- and Language-Specific Effects on Speech Intelligibility in Noise Assessed with Bilingual Talkers: Which Language is More Robust Against Noise and Reverberation?” International Journal of Audiology 54 (sup2): 23–34. doi:10.3109/14992027.2015.1088174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houben, R., J. Koopman, H. Luts, K. C. Wagener, A. van Wieringen, H. Verschuure, and W. A. Dreschler. 2014. “Development of a Dutch matrix Sentence Test to Assess Speech Intelligibility in Noise.” International Journal of Audiology 53 (10): 760–763. doi:10.3109/14992027.2014.920111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, H., X. Xi, L. L. N. Wong, S. Hochmuth, A. Warzybok, and B. Kollmeier. 2018. “Construction and Evaluation of the Mandarin Chinese Matrix (CMNmatrix) Sentence Test for the Assessment of Speech Recognition in Noise.” International Journal of Audiology 57 (11): 838–850. doi:10.1080/14992027.2018.1483083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ISO389-8. 2004. Acoustics – Reference Zero for the Calibration of Audiometric Equipment – Part 8: Reference Equivalent Threshold Sound Pressure Levels for Pure Tones and Circumaural Earphones. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• Jansen, S., H. Luts, K. C. Wagener, B. Kollmeier, M. Del Rio, R. Dauman, C. James, B. Fraysse, E. Vormès, B. Frachet, et al. 2012. “Comparison of Three Types of French Speech-in-Noise Tests: A Multi-Center Study.” International Journal of Audiology 51 (3): 164–173. doi:10.3109/14992027.2011.633568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, H., G. Lin, N. Sankaran, J. Xia, S. Kalluri, and S. Carlile. 2017. “Development and Evaluation of a Mixed Gender, Multi-Talker Matrix Sentence Test in Australian English.” International Journal of Audiology 56 (2): 85–91. doi:10.1080/14992027.2016.1236415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollmeier, B. 1990. Messmethodik, Modellierung und Verbesserung der Verständlichkeit von Sprache (in German) [Methodology, Modeling, and Improvement of Speech Intelligibility Measurements]. Göttingen: Universität of Göttingen.
   Google Scholar
• Kollmeier, B., A. Warzybok, S. Hochmuth, M. A. Zokoll, V. Uslar, T. Brand, and K. C. Wagener. 2015. “The Multilingual Matrix Test: Principles, Applications, and Comparison Across Languages: A Review.” International Journal of Audiology 54 (sup2): 3–16. doi:10.3109/14992027.2015.1020971.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollmeier, B, and M. Wesselkamp. 1997. “Development and Evaluation of a German Sentence Test for Objective and Subjective Speech Intelligibility Assessment.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 102 (4): 2412–2421. doi:10.1121/1.419624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung, M.-T, and S.-P. Law. 2001. “HKCAC: The Hong Kong Cantonese Adult Language Corpus.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 6 (2): 305–325. doi:10.1075/ijcl.6.2.06leu.
   Google Scholar
• Leung, M.-T., S.-P. Law, and S.-Y. Fung. 2004. “Type and Token Frequencies of Phonological Units in Hong Kong Cantonese.” Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 36 (3): 500–505. doi:10.3758/bf03195596.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Luts, H., E. Boon, J. Wable, and J. Wouters. 2008. “FIST: A French Sentence Test for Speech Intelligibility in Noise.” international journal of audiology 47 (6): 373–374. doi:10.1080/14992020801887786.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, X, and S. M. McGhee. 2013. “A Cross-Sectional Study on Socioeconomic Status and Health-Related Quality of Life Among Elderly Chinese.” BMJ Open 3 (2): e002418. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, X., B. McPherson, and L. Ma. 2013. “Chinese Speech Audiometry Material: Past, Present, Future.” Hearing, Balance and Communication 11 (2): 52–63. doi:10.3109/21695717.2013.794592.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, S, and V. Yip. 2011. Cantonese: A Comprehensive Grammar. 2nd edition. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mok, P. P. K., D. Zuo, and P. W. Y. Wong. 2013. “Production and Perception of a Sound Change in Progress: Tone Merging in Hong Kong Cantonese.” Language Variation and Change 25 (3): 341–370. doi:10.1017/S0954394513000161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. B, and T. Dau. 2011. “The Danish Hearing in Noise Test.” International Journal of Audiology 50 (3): 202–208. doi:10.3109/14992027.2010.524254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, M., S. D. Soli, and J. A. Sullivan. 1994. “Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the Measurement of Speech Reception Thresholds in Quiet and in Noise.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 95 (2): 1085–1099. doi:10.1121/1.408469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozimek, E., D. Kutzner, A. Sek, and A. Wicher. 2009. “Polish sentence tests for measuring the intelligibility of speech in interfering noise.” International Journal of Audiology 48 (7): 433–443. doi:10.1080/14992020902725521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozimek, E., A. Warzybok, and D. Kutzner. 2010. “Polish Sentence Matrix Test for Speech Intelligibility Measurement in Noise.” International Journal of Audiology 49 (6): 444–454. doi:10.3109/14992021003681030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plomp, R, and A. M. Mimpen. 1979. “Improving the Reliability of Testing the Speech Reception Threshold for Sentences.” Audiology 18 (1): 43–52. doi:10.3109/00206097909072618.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Primadita, F. 2017. “Development and Clinical Validation of the Indonesian Matrix Sentence Test.” Master-Thesis, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Puglisi, G. E., A. Warzybok, S. Hochmuth, C. Visentin, A. Astolfi, N. Prodi, and B. Kollmeier. 2015. “An Italian Matrix Sentence Test for the Evaluation of Speech Intelligibility in Noise.” International Journal of Audiology 54 (sup2): 44–50. doi:10.3109/14992027.2015.1061709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soli, S. D, and L. L. N. Wong. 2008. “Assessment of Speech Intelligibility in Noise with the Hearing in Noise Test.” International Journal of Audiology 47 (6): 356–361. doi:10.1080/14992020801895136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabor, W, and M. K. Tanenhaus. 1999. “Dynamical Models of Sentence Processing.” Cognitive Science 23 (4): 491–515. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2304_5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, C, and V. J. van Heuven. 2009. “Mutual Intelligibility of Chinese Dialects Experimentally Tested.” Lingua 119 (5): 709–732. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2008.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Rooij, J. C. G. M, and R. Plomp. 1991. “The Effect of Linguistic Entropy on Speech Perception in Noise in Young and Elderly Listeners.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 90 (6): 2985–2991. doi:10.1121/1.401772.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Wieringen, A, and J. Wouters. 2008. “LIST and LINT: Sentences and Numbers for Quantifying Speech Understanding in Severely Impaired Listeners for Flanders and the Netherlands.” International Journal of Audiology 47 (6): 348–355. doi:10.1080/14992020801895144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Versfeld, N. J., L. Daalder, J. M. Festen, and T. Houtgast. 2000. “Method for the Selection of Sentence Materials for Efficient Measurement of the Speech Reception Threshold.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 107 (3): 1671–1684. doi:10.1121/1.428451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagener, K., J. L. Josvassen, and R. Ardenkjaer. 2003. “Diseño, optimización y evaluación de la prueba Danesa de frases en ruido [Design, Optimization and Evaluation of a Danish Sentence Test in Noise].” International Journal of Audiology 42 (1): 10–17. doi:10.3109/14992020309056080.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagener, K. C., T. Brand, and B. Kollmeier. 1999a. “Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Satztests in deutscher Sprache I: Design des Oldenburger Satztests [Development and Evaluation of a German Sentence Test – Part I: Design of the Oldenburg Sentence Test].” Journal of Audiology 38: 4–15.(in German)
   Google Scholar
• Wagener, K. C., T. Brand, and B. Kollmeier. 1999b. “Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Satztests für die deutsche Sprache Teil III: Evaluation des Oldenburger Satztests [Development and Evaluation of a German Sentence Test – Part III: Evaluation of the Oldenburg Sentence Test].”Journal of Audiology 38: 86–95 (in German).
   Google Scholar
• Wagener, K. C., T. Brand, and B. Kollmeier. 1999c. “Entwicklung und Evaluation eines Satztests in deutscher Sprache - Teil II: Optimierung des Oldenburger Satztests [Development and Evaluation of a German Sentence Test – Part II: Optimization of the Oldenburg Sentence Tests].” Journal of Audiology 38: 44–56 (in German).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Warzybok, A., M. Zokoll, N. Wardenga, E. Ozimek, M. Boboshko, and B. Kollmeier. 2015. “Development of the Russian Matrix Sentence Test.” International Journal of Audiology 54 (sup2): 35–43. doi:10.3109/14992027.2015.1020969.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, L. L, and S. D. Soli. 2005. “Development of the Cantonese Hearing in Noise Test (CHINT).” Ear and Hearing 26 (3): 276–289. doi:10.1097/00003446-200506000-00004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, L. L. N., S. D. Soli, S. Liu, N. Han, and M.-W. Huang. 2007. “Development of the Mandarin Hearing in Noise Test (MHINT).” Ear and Hearing 28 (2 Suppl): 70S–74S. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e31803154d0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, P., S. T. Cheng, and F. Chen. 2018. “Cantonese Tone Identification in Three Temporal Cues in Quiet, Speech-Shaped Noise and Two-Talker Babble.” Frontiers in Psychology 9 (1604). doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.0160.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao, Y. 1935. The Researches on the Modern Wu Language. Beijing: Tsinghua University Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Zokoll, M. A., D. Fidan, D. Türkyılmaz, S. Hochmuth, İ. Ergenç, G. Sennaroğlu, and B. Kollmeier. 2015. “Development and Evaluation of the Turkish Matrix Sentence Test.” International Journal of Audiology 54 (Suppl 2): 51–61. doi:10.3109/14992027.2015.1074735.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar