Validity and reliability of integrated pressure level real-ear-to-coupler difference measurements

References

• American National Standards Institute (ANSI). 2013. Methods of Measurement of Real-Ear Performance Characteristics of Hearing Aids. ANSI S3.46-2013. New York, NY: Acoustical Society of America.
   Google Scholar
• American Academy of Audiology (AAA). 2013. Clinical Practice Guidelines Pediatric Amplification. Accessed October 15, 2020. https://www.audiology.org/wpcontent/uploads/legacy/publications/PediatricAmplificationGuidelines.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Audiology Practice Standards Organization (APSO). 2021. Hearing Aid Fitting for Adult & Geriatric Patients. S2.1[2021]. New Brighton, MN: APSO.
   Google Scholar
• Bagatto, M., S. Moodie, S. Scollie, R. Seewald, S. Moodie, J. Pumford, and K. P. R. Liu. 2005. “Clinical Protocols for Hearing Instrument Fitting in the Desired Sensation Level Method.” Trends in Amplification 9 (4):199–226. doi:10.1177/108471380500900404.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bates, D., M. Mächler, B. Bolker, and S. Walker. 2015. “Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4.” Journal of Statistical Software 67 (1):1–48. doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, M. A., R. McCreery, J. Kopun, B. Hoover, J. Alexander, D. Lewis, and P. G. Stelmachowicz. 2014. “Paired Comparisons of Nonlinear Frequency Compression, Extended Bandwidth, and Restricted Bandwidth Hearing Aid Processing for Children and Adults with Hearing Loss.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 25 (10):983–998. doi:10.3766/jaaa.25.10.7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, J. C. K., and C. D. Geisler. 1990. “Estimation of Eardrum Acoustic Pressure and of Ear Canal Length from Remote Points in the Canal.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 87 (3):1237–1247. doi:10.1121/1.398799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jonge, R. 1996. “Real-Ear Measures: Individual Variation and Measurement Error.” In Hearing Aids: Standards, Options, and Limitations, edited by M. Valente, 72–125. New York: Thieme Medical Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Dirks, D., and G. Kincaid. 1987. “Basic Acoustic Considerations of Ear Canal Probe Measurements.” Ear and Hearing 8 (Suppl 5):60S. doi:10.1097/00003446-198710001-00002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabry, D. 2003. “Nonlinear Hearing Aids and Verification of Fitting Targets.” Trends in Amplification 7 (3):99–115. doi:10.1177/108471380300700303.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Feigin, J. A., J. Kopun, P. Stelmachowicz, and M. Gorga. 1989. “Probe-Tube Microphone Measures of Ear-Canal Sound Pressure Levels in Infants and Children.” Ear and Hearing 10 (4):254–258. doi:10.1097/00003446-198908000-00008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folkeard, P., J. Pumford, J. Pietrobon, and S. Scollie. 2019. “Evaluation of Probe Guide: Software-Assisted Probe Tube Placement in Hearing Aid Fittings.” Hearing Review 26 (11):22–25.
   Google Scholar
• Füllgrabe, C., T. Baer, M. A. Stone, and B. C. J. Moore. 2010. “Preliminary evaluation of a method for fitting hearing aids with extended bandwidth.” International Journal of Audiology 49 (10):741–753. doi:10.3109/14992027.2010.495084.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groon, K. A., D. M. Rasetshwane, J. G. Kopun, M. P. Gorga, and S. T. Neely. 2015. “Air-Leak Effects on Ear-Canal Acoustic Absorbance.” Ear and Hearing 36 (1):155–163. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000077.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafson, S., A. Pittman, and R. Fanning. 2013. “Effects of Tubing Length and Coupling Method on Hearing Threshold and Real-Ear to Coupler Difference Measures.” American Journal of Audiology 22 (1):190–199. doi:10.1044/1059-0889(2012/12-0046).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornsby, B. W. Y., E. E. Johnson, and E. Picou. 2011. “Effects of Degree and Configuration of Hearing Loss on the Contribution of High- and Low-Frequency Speech Information to Bilateral Speech Understanding.” Ear and Hearing 32 (5):543–555. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e31820e5028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). 2016. Electroacoustics - Hearing aids - Method for measuring electroacoustic performance up to 16 kHz. IEC Technical Specification 62886. Geneva, Switzerland: IEC.
   Google Scholar
• Keefe, D. H., J. C. Bulen, K. H. Arehart, and E. M. Burns. 1993. “Ear‐canal impedance and reflection coefficient in human infants and adults.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 94 (5):2617–2638. doi:10.1121/1.407347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo, T. K, and M. Y. Li. 2016. “A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research.” Journal of Chiropractic Medicine 15 (2):155–163. doi:10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapsley Miller, J. A., C. M. Reed, S. R. Robinson, and Z. D. Perez. 2018. “Pure-Tone Audiometry With Forward Pressure Level Calibration Leads to Clinically-Relevant Improvements in Test–Retest Reliability.” Ear and Hearing 39 (5):946–957. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, S. C., D. J. Freed, M. Nilsson, B. C. J. Moore, and S. Puria. 2015. “Extended High-Frequency Bandwidth Improves Speech Reception in the Presence of Spatially Separated Masking Speech.” Ear and Hearing 36 (5):e214–e224. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. D., R. W. McCreery, S. T. Neely, and P. G. Stelmachowicz. 2009. “Comparison of in-situ calibration methods for quantifying input to the middle ear.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 126 (6):3114–3124. doi:10.1121/1.3243310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCreery, R. W., A. Pittman, J. Lewis, S. T. Neely, and P. G. Stelmachowicz. 2009. “Use of Forward Pressure Level to Minimize the Influence of Acoustic Standing Waves During Probe-Microphone Hearing-Aid Verification.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 126 (1):15–24. doi:10.1121/1.3143142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCreery, R. W., E. A. Walker, M. Spratford, R. Bentler, L. Holte, P. Roush, J. Oleson, J. Van Buren, and M. P. Moeller. 2015. “Longitudinal Predictors of Aided Speech Audibility in Infants and Children.” Ear and Hearing 36 (01):24S–37S. doi:10.1097/AUD.0000000000000211.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moodie, S., R. C. Seewald, and S. Sinclair. 1994. “Procedure for Predicting Real-Ear Hearing Aid Performance in Young Children.” American Journal of Audiology 3 (1):23–31. doi:10.1044/1059-0889.0301.23.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moodie, S., E. Rall, L. Eiten, G. Lindley, D. Gordey, L. Davidson, M. Bagatto, and S. Scollie. 2016. “Pediatric Audiology in North America: Current Clinical Practice and How It Relates to the American Academy of Audiology Pediatric Amplification Guideline.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 27 (3):166–187. doi:10.3766/jaaa.15064.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, B. C. J., B. R. Glasberg, and M. A. Stone. 2010. “Development of a New Method for Deriving Initial Fittings for Hearing Aids With Multi-Channel Compression: CAMEQ2-HF.” International Journal of Audiology 49 (3):216–227. doi:10.3109/14992020903296746.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, B. C. J., M. A. Stone, C. Füllgrabe, B. R. Glasberg, and S. Puria. 2008. “Spectro-Temporal Characteristics of Speech at High Frequencies, and the Potential for Restoration of Audibility to People with Mild-to-Moderate Hearing Loss.” Ear and Hearing 29 (6):907–922. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e31818246f6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller, H. G. 2001. “Probe-Microphone Measurements: 20 Years of Progress.” Trends in Amplification 5 (2):35–68. doi:10.1177/108471380100500202.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mueller, H. G., and J. W. Hall. 1998. Audiologists’ Desk Reference. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Munro, K. J., and N. Hatton. 2000. “Customized Acoustic Transform Functions and Their Accuracy at Predicting Real-Ear Hearing Aid Performance.” Ear and Hearing 21 (1):59–69. doi:10.1097/00003446-200002000-00009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro, K. J., and J. Davis. 2003. “Deriving the Real-Ear SPL of Audiometric Data Using the “Coupler to Dial Difference” and the “Real Ear to Coupler Difference.” Ear and Hearing 24 (2):100–110. doi:10.1097/01.AUD.0000058114.20741.4D.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nørgaard, K. R., E. Fernandez-Grande, and S. Laugesen. 2017. “Incorporating Evanescent Modes and Flow Losses into Reference Impedances in Acoustic Thévenin Calibration.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 142 (5):3013–3024. doi:10.1121/1.5010891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2020. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Rasetshwane, D. M., and S. T. Neely. 2011. “Inverse Solution of Ear-Canal Area Function from Reflectance.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 130 (6):3873–3881. doi:10.1121/1.3654019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravn, G., and D. Preves. 2015. “Hearing Aid-Related Standards and Test Systems.” Seminars in Hearing 36 (1):29–48. doi:10.1055/s-0034-1396925.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ricketts, T. A., A. B. Dittberner, and E. E. Johnson. 2008. “High-Frequency Amplification and Sound Quality in Listeners With Normal Through Moderate Hearing Loss.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 51 (1):160–172. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2008/012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosowski, J. J., S. Stenfelt, and D. Lilly. 2013. “An Overview of Wideband Immittance Measurements Techniques and Terminology: You Say Absorbance, I Say Reflectance.” Ear & Hearing 34 (Supplement 1):9S–16S. doi:10.1097/AUD.0b013e31829d5a14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saunders, G. H., D. E. Morgan. 2003. “Impact on Hearing Aid Targets of Measuring Thresholds in dB HL Versus dB SPL: El.” International Journal of Audiology 42 (6):319–326. doi:10.3109/14992020309101324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheperle, R. A., S. S. Goodman, and S. T. Neely. 2011. “Further Assessment of Forward Pressure Level for In Situ Calibration.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 130 (6):3882–3892. doi:10.1121/1.3655878.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheperle, R. A., S. T. Neely, J. G. Kopun, and M. P. Gorga. 2008. “Influence of In Situ, Sound-Level Calibration on Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emission Variability.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 124 (1):288–300. doi:10.1121/1.2931953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scollie, S., P. Folkeard, J. Pumford, P. Abbasalipour, and J. Pietrobon. 2022. “Venting Corrections Improve the Accuracy of Coupler-Based Simulated Real-Ear Verification for Use With Adult Hearing Aid Fittings.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 33 (05):277–284. doi:10.1055/a-1808-1275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scollie, S. D., R. C. Seewald, L. E. Cornelisse, and L. M. Jenstad. 1998. “Validity and Repeatability of Level-Independent HL to SPL Transforms.” Ear and Hearing 19 (5):407–413. doi:10.1097/00003446-199810000-00007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seewald, R. C., L. E. Cornelisse, F. M. Richert, and M. G. Block. 1997. “Acoustic Transforms for Fitting CIC Hearing Instruments. In CIC Handbook, edited by M. Chasin, 83–100. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Seewald, R., S. Moodie, S. Scollie, and M. Bagatto. 2005. “The DSL Method for Pediatric Hearing Instrument Fitting: Historical Perspective and Current Issues.” Trends in Amplification 9 (4):145–157. doi:10.1177/108471380500900402.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Souza, N. N., S. Dhar, S. T. Neely, and J. H. Siegel. 2014. “Comparison of Nine Methods To Estimate Ear-Canal Stimulus Levels.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 136 (4):1768–1787. doi:10.1121/1.4894787.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stinson, M., and B. W. Lawton. 1989. “Specification of the Geometry of the Human Ear Canal for the Prediction of Sound‐Pressure Level Distribution.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 85 (6):2492–2503. doi:10.1121/1.397744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tharpe, A. M., D. Sladen, H. M. Huta, and A. M. Rothpletz. 2001. “Practical Considerations of Real-Ear-to-Coupler Difference Measures in Infants.” American Journal of Audiology 10 (1):41–49. doi:10.1044/1059-0889(2000/006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vaisberg, J. M., P. Folkeard, J. Pumford, P. Narten, and S. Scollie. 2018. “Evaluation of the Repeatability and Accuracy of the Wideband Real-Ear-to-Coupler Difference.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 29 (6):520–532. doi:10.3766/jaaa.17007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaisberg, J. M., E. A. Macpherson, and S. Scollie. 2016. “Extended Bandwidth Real-Ear Measurement Accuracy and Repeatability to 10 kHz.” International Journal of Audiology 55 (10):580–586. doi:10.1080/14992027.2016.1197427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valente, M., L. G. Potts, M. Valente, W. Vass, and J. Goebel. 1994. “Intersubject Variability of Real-Ear Sound Pressure Level: Conventional and Insert Earphones.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 5 (6):9.
   Google Scholar
• Van Eeckhoutte, M., P. Folkeard, D. Glista, and S. Scollie. 2020a. “Speech Recognition, Loudness, and Preference With Extended Bandwidth Hearing Aids for Adult Hearing Aid Users.” International Journal of Audiology 59 (10):780–791. doi:10.1080/14992027.2020.1750718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Eeckhoutte, M., S. Scollie, R. O'Hagan, and D. Glista. 2020b. “Perceptual Benefits of Extended Bandwidth Hearing Aids With Children: A Within-Subject Design Using Clinically Available Hearing Aids.” Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 63 (11):3834–3846. doi:10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villadsen, L., and J. Harte. 2018. “Interacoustics Research Platform: A Fully User-Configurable Hearing Research Instrument Based on the Titan.” Poster presented at association for research in otolaryngology 41st annual midwinter meeting, San Diego, California, February 9–14, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Voss, S. E., and J. B. Allen. 1994. “Measurement of Acoustic Impedance and Reflectance in the Human Ear Canal.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 95 (1):372–384. doi:10.1121/1.408329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts, K. M., M. Bagatto, S. Clark-Lewis, S. Henderson, S. Scollie, and J. Blumsack. 2020. “Relationship of Head Circumference and Age in the Prediction of the Real-Ear-to-Coupler Difference (RECD).” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 31 (7):496–505. doi:10.3766/jaaa19017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Withnell, R. H., P. S. Jeng, P. Parent, and H. Levitt. 2014. “The Clinical Utility of Expressing Hearing Thresholds in Terms of the Forward-Going Sound Pressure Wave.” International Journal of Audiology 53 (8):522–530. doi:10.3109/14992027.2014.898122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Withnell, R. H., P. S. Jeng, K. Waldvogel, K. Morgenstein, and J. B. Allen. 2009. “An In Situ Calibration for Hearing Thresholds.” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 125 (3):1605–1611. doi:10.1121/1.3075551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar