170
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Psychometric properties of the Swedish version of the international outcome inventory – alternative interventions (IOI-AI) – ear surgery (IOI-AIop)

ORCID Icon, &
Received 19 Apr 2023, Accepted 11 Mar 2024, Published online: 08 Apr 2024

References

  • Arlinger, S. 2003. “Negative Consequences of Uncorrected Hearing Loss–A Review.” International Journal of Audiology 42 (sup2): 17–20. https://doi.org/10.3109/14992020309074639.
  • Arlinger, S., P. Nordqvist, and M. Öberg. 2017. “International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids: Data from a Large Swedish Quality Register Database.” American Journal of Audiology 26 (3S): 443–450. https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_AJA-16-0123.
  • Bowling, A. 2005. “Mode of Questionnaire Administration can have Serious Effects on Data Quality.” Journal of Public Health (Oxford, England) 27 (3): 281–291. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdi031.
  • Braekman, E., R. Charafeddine, S. Demarest, S. Drieskens, F. Berete, L. Gisle, J. Van der Heyden, and G. Van Hal. 2020. “Comparing Web-Based Versus Face-to-Face and Paper-and-Pencil Questionnaire Data Collected Through Two Belgian Health Surveys.” International Journal of Public Health 65 (1): 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-019-01327-9.
  • Brännström, K. J., and I. Wennerström. 2010. “Hearing Aid Fitting Outcome: Clinical Application and Psychometric Properties of a Swedish Translation of the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA).” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 21 (08): 512–521. https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.21.8.3.
  • Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 567. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.
  • Cox, R. M., and G. C. Alexander. 1995. “The Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit.” Ear and Hearing 16 (2): 176–186. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003446-199504000-00005.
  • Cox, R. M., and G. C. Alexander. 2002. “The International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA): Psychometric Properties of the English Version.” International Journal of Audiology 41 (1): 30–35. https://doi.org/10.3109/14992020209101309.
  • Cox, R. M., G. C. Alexander, and C. M. Beyer. 2003. “Norms for the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 14 (08): 403–413. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1715761.
  • Dahlin Redfors, Y., R. Jönsson, and C. Finizia. 2022. “A Validation Study of the Swedish Version of the Glasgow Hearing Aid Benefit Profile Evaluated in Otosclerosis Subjects.” Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology 7 (3): 807–815. https://doi.org/10.1002/lio2.787.
  • Fayers, P. M. D. 2007. Quality of Life: The Assessment, Analysis and Interpretation of Patient-Reported Outcomes. 2nd ed. West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Gandek, B., S. J. Sinclair, M. Kosinski, and J. E. Ware. Jr. 2004. “Psychometric Evaluation of the SF-36 Health Survey in Medicare Managed Care.” Health Care Financing Review 25 (4): 5–25.
  • Gatehouse, S. 1999. “Glasgow Hearing Aid Benefit Profile: Derivation and Validation of a Client-centered Outcome Measure for Hearing Aid Services.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 10 (02): 80–103. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1748460.
  • Gatehouse, S., and W. Noble. 2004. “The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ).” International Journal of Audiology 43 (2): 85–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/14992020400050014.
  • Granberg, S., J. Dahlström, C. Möller, K. Kähäri, and B. Danermark. 2014. “The ICF Core Sets for Hearing Loss–Researcher Perspective. Part I: Systematic Review of Outcome Measures Identified in Audiological Research.” International Journal of Audiology 53 (2): 65–76. https://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2013.851799.
  • Heggdal, P. O. L., M. H. Naess, J. Hess-Erga, K. S. Larsen, and H. J. Aarstad. 2021. “Psychometric Properties for the Norwegian Translations of Two Revised APHAB-Subscales and an Adapted IOI-HA (IOI-CI) in Patients with Cochlear Implants.” International Journal of Audiology 61: 1–8.
  • Heuermann, H., M. Kinkel, and J. Tchorz. 2005. “Comparison of Psychometric Properties of the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-hA) in Various Studies.” International Journal of Audiology 44 (2): 102–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/14992020500031223.
  • Hickson, L., L. Worrall, and N. Scarinci. 2006. “Measuring Outcomes of a Communication Program for Older People with Hearing Impairment Using the International Outcome Inventory.” International Journal of Audiology 45 (4): 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/14992020500429625.
  • Hill-Feltham, P. R., M. L. Johansson, W. E. Hodgetts, A. V. Ostevik, B. J. McKinnon, P. Monksfield, R. Sockalingam, T. Wright, and J. R. Tysome. 2021. “Hearing Outcome Measures for Conductive and Mixed Hearing Loss Treatment in Adults: A Scoping Review.” International Journal of Audiology 60 (4): 239–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2020.1820087.
  • Kramer, S. E., G. H. Allessie, A. W. Dondorp, A. A. Zekveld, and T. S. Kapteyn. 2005. “A Home Education Program for Older Adults with Hearing Impairment and their Significant Others: A Randomized Trial Evaluating Short- and Long-Term Effects.” International Journal of Audiology 44 (5): 255–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/14992020500060453.
  • Kramer, S. E., S. T. Goverts, W. A. Dreschler, M. Boymans, and J. M. Festen. 2002. “International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA): Results from The Netherlands.” International Journal of Audiology 41 (1): 36–41. https://doi.org/10.3109/14992020209101310.
  • Lisspers, J., A. Nygren, and E. Söderman. 1997. “Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD): Some Psychometric Data for a Swedish Sample.” Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 96 (4): 281–286. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.1997.tb10164.x.
  • Manchaiah V., S. Thammaiah, and Vinay. 2021. Psychometric Properties of the Kannada Version of the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA). International Journal of Audiology 60(12): 1039–1045. https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2021.1884910.
  • Noble, W. 2002. “Extending the IOI to Significant Others and to Non-Hearing-Aid-Based Interventions.” International Journal of Audiology 41 (1): 27–29. https://doi.org/10.3109/14992020209101308.
  • Öberg, M., T. Lunner, and O. Andersson. 2007. “Psychometric Evaluation of Hearing Specific Self-Report Measures and Their Associations with Psychosocial and Demographic Variables.” Audiological Medicine 5 (3): 188–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/16513860701560214.
  • Ostevik, A. V., P. Hill-Feltham, M. L. Johansson, B. J. McKinnon, P. Monksfield, R. Sockalingam, J. R. Tysome, T. Wright, and W. E. Hodgetts. 2021. “Psychosocial Outcome Measures for Conductive and Mixed Hearing Loss Treatment: An Overview of the Relevant Literature.” International Journal of Audiology 60 (9): 641–649. https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2021.1872805.
  • Pauli, N., K. Strömbäck, L. Lundman, and Y. Dahlin-Redfors. 2019. “Surgical Technique in Stapedotomy Hearing Outcome and Complications.” Laryngoscope 130 (3): 790–796. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.28072.
  • Redfors, Y. D., J. Hellgren, and C. Möller. 2013. “Hearing-Aid Use and Benefit: A Long-Term Follow-Up in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Otosclerosis.” International Journal of Audiology 52 (3): 194–199. https://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2012.754957.
  • Redfors, Y. D., R. Jönsson, B. Tideholm, and C. Finizia. 2019. “Psychometric Properties of the Swedish Version of the Glasgow Benefit Inventory in Otosclerosis Subjects.” Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology 4 (6): 673–677. https://doi.org/10.1002/lio2.320.
  • Robinson, K., S. Gatehouse, and G. G. Browning. 1996. “Measuring Patient Benefit from Otorhinolaryngological Surgery and Therapy.” Annals of Otology, Rhinology, and Laryngology 105 (6): 415–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348949610500601.
  • Smith, S. L., C. M. Noe, and G. C. Alexander. 2009. “Evaluation of the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids in a Veteran Sample.” Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 20 (6): 374–380. https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.20.6.5.
  • Stephens, D. 2002. “The International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA) and its Relationship to the Client-Oriented Scale of Improvement (COSI).” International Journal of Audiology 41 (1): 42–47. https://doi.org/10.3109/14992020209101311.
  • Stewart, A. W. J. 1992. Measuring Functioning and Well-Being: The Medical Outcomes Study Approach. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press.
  • Strömbäck, K., L. Lundman, A. Bjorsne, J. Grendin, A. Stjernquist-Desatnik, and Y. Dahlin-Redfors. 2017. “Stapes Surgery in Sweden: Evaluation of a National-Based Register.” European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology: official Journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS): Affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology – Head and Neck Surgery 274 (6): 2421–2427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-017-4510-2.
  • Sullivan, M., and J. Karlsson. 1998. “The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey III. Evaluation of Criterion-Based Validity: Results from Normative Population.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 51 (11): 1105–1113. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00102-4.
  • Sullivan, M., J. Karlsson, and J. E. Ware. Jr. 1995. “The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey–I. Evaluation of Data Quality, Scaling Assumptions, Reliability and Construct Validity Across General Populations in Sweden.” Social Science & Medicine (1982) 41 (10): 1349–1358. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00125-q.
  • Taft, C., J. Karlsson, and M. Sullivan. 2004. “Performance of the Swedish SF-36 Version 2.0.” Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation 13 (1): 251–256. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QURE.0000015290.76254.a5.
  • Terwee, C. B., S. D. M. Bot, M. R. de Boer, D. A. W. M. van der Windt, D. L. Knol, J. Dekker, L. M. Bouter, and H. C. W. de Vet. 2007. “Quality Criteria were Proposed for Measurement Properties of Health Status Questionnaires.” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 60 (1): 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012.
  • Wu, Y., B. Levis, Y. Sun, C. He, A. Krishnan, D. Neupane, P. M. Bhandari, Z. Negeri, A. Benedetti, and B. D. Thombs, DEPRESsion Screening Data (DEPRESSD) HADS Group. 2021. “Accuracy of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Depression Subscale (HADS-D) to Screen for Major Depression: Systematic Review and Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis.” BMJ (Clinical Research ed.) 373:n972. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n972.
  • Zahnert, T., H. Löwenheim, D. Beutner, R. Hagen, A. Ernst, H.-W. Pau, T. Zehlicke, H. Kühne, N. Friese, A. Tropitzsch, et al. 2016. “Multicenter Clinical Trial of Vibroplasty Couplers to Treat Mixed/Conductive Hearing Loss: First Results.” Audiology & Neuro-Otology 21 (4): 212–222. https://doi.org/10.1159/000444616.
  • Zigmond, A. S., and R. P. Snaith. 1983. “The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.” Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 67 (6): 361–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x.